Transcript Highlights:

• Senate Bill 1012 does not create a new regulatory scheme for every new technology.
• Senate Bill 1012 does not create a new regulatory scheme for every new technology.
• Elon Musk said, 'I'm in favor of AI regulation and that we should have some sort of regulatory oversight
• I’ve said it dozens of times to the members of this committee: regulatory clarity, regulatory consistency
• Regulatory clarity, regulatory consistency is of the utmost importance for Missouri's business community

Summary: The committee met without a quorum at first and held public hearings on two Senate bills. Senate Bill 944, sponsored by Sen. Carla May, would update the statutory salary range for the City of St. Louis sheriff’s attorney, which she said has been unchanged since 1990 and no longer reflects inflation, modern legal complexity, or comparable compensation in other jurisdictions. There was brief supportive comment from Rep. Fuchs, and no witnesses appeared in opposition or for information. The hearing on SB 944 then concluded without further action. The committee next heard Senate Bill 1012, sponsored by Sen. Nicola, which would clarify that existing law applies to artificial intelligence and that humans remain responsible for AI use. The bill also addressed AI in licensed professions, companion chatbots, and political ads using generative AI. Rep. Fuchs raised a question about liability for sharing an AI-generated image, and the sponsor said the bill excludes end users from liability and is intended to create basic guardrails while preserving innovation. Testimony in opposition came from Americans for Prosperity and the Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry. Both argued the bill was overly broad and contained drafting problems, including unused definitions, cross-reference errors, and unclear metadata and liability provisions. The Chamber also said the bill would create regulatory uncertainty for industry and should be perfected before advancing. After public testimony, the committee moved into executive session on SB 1012 and voted the bill do pass, but the vote was 0 ayes and 11 noes after a member changed to the prevailing side, so the bill failed. The meeting then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• conflicting</c> in a large fiscal impact and conflicting in a large fiscal impact and conflicting regulatory
• </c> regulatory overlap. regulatory overlap.
• And so, that's kind of the regulatory overlap that I mentioned that we want to help revise the language
• </c><00:07:32.560><c> overlap</c><00:07:33.680><c> uh</c> that's kind of the regulatory overlap uh that's
• kind of the regulatory overlap uh that<00:07:33.880><c> I</c><00:07:33.920><c> mentioned</c><00:07:34.280

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• persons and the environment from radiation exposure via risk assessment, safety protocols, and regulatory
• Members, this is our Transparency, Accountability, and Efficiency bill for our Texas Judiciary.
• Senate Bill 1335 makes adjustments to the Estates Code to improve estate administration efficiency, and
• Members, this is a cleanup bill that will increase efficiency in the Comptroller's Office by allowing
• amendment to SB 2900 makes technical adjustments requested by the Comptroller to streamline the efficiency

Bills: SB15, SB35, SB290, SB1365, SB2568, SB18, SB427, SB1860, SB1864, SB2675, SB596, SB2858, SB3058, SB816, SB1163, SB1484, SB1898, SB1777, SB1802, SB2692, SB315, SB1585, SB1626, SB2058, SB2050, SB2105, SB2245, SB2764, SB2611, SB2497, SB2452, SB2243, SB1705, SB1244, SB1361, SB438, SB578, SB584, SB2690, SB2521, SB2487, SB2342, SB2063, SB125, SB2041, SB1962, SB1413, SB6, SB2878, SB13, SB30, SJR87, SB7, SB127, SB293, SB441, SB3059, SB57, SB512, SB1718, SB140, SB2055, SB2075, SB2018, SB1534, SB1567, SB785, SB1233, SB1580, SB1663, SB413, SB447, SB519, SB467, SB1579, SB1191, SB1021, SB1838, SB2807, SB2835, SB546, SB2121, SB2167, SB2024, SB1032, SB1049, SB1266, SB1400, SB1302, SB401, SB1596, SB1281, SB1242, SB1343, SB1346, SB2753, SB2221, SB1719, SB2177, SB552, SB646, SJR1, SB15, SB800, SB790, SB748, SB571, SB1957, SB1923, SB1896, SB1760, SB1335, SB2368, SB2477, SB2587, SB2972, SB2986, SB2965, SB1563, SB1467, SB1164, SB1137, SB614, SB705, SB961, SB918, SB955, SB869, SB850, SB863, SB1610, SB1055, SB2206, SB457, SB2337, SB1362, SB926, SB1494, SB251, SB456, SB500, SB1307, SB2615, SB2995, SB2321, SB973, SB974, SB865, SB506, SB781, SB1522, SB1558, SB510, SB667, SB763, SB2073, SB1858, SB1660, SB505, SB2900, SB1433, SB1540, SB1964, SB1300, SB1644, SB2217, SB2373, SB2431, SB1758, SB2480, SB3039, SB3047, SB3073, SB2920, SB2781, SB826, SB766, SB2460, SB527, SB1946, SB2885, SB1243, SB2610, SB2595, SB857, SB2501, SB66, SB268, SB331, SB618, SB414, SB1394, SB2425, SB898, SB993, SB442, SB735, SB784, SB2538, SB1919, SB1013, SB2215, SB2322, SB626, SB570, SB747, SB2183, SB673, SB1015, SB1447, SB1370, SB1784, SB1897, SB2873, SB2891, SB2933, SB2540, SB2681, SB2695, SB1965, SB2203, SB872, SB875, SB1030, SB1277, SB1730, SB1681, SB1152, SB2969, SB2747, SB2705, SB2541, SB1708, SB2080, SB2721, SB1986, SB2392, SB2539, SB2857, SB2799, SB2785, SB2782, SB1531, SB1927, SB1263, SB1098, SB35, SB290, SB1365, SB2568, SB18, SB427, SB1860, SB1864, SB2675, SB596, SB2858, SB3058, SB816, SB1163, SB1484, SB1898, SB1777, SB1802, SB2692, SB315, SB1585, SB1626, SB2058, SB2050, SB2105, SB2245, SB2764, SB2611, SB2497, SB2452, SB2243, SB1705, SB1244, SB1361, SB438, SB578, SB584, SB2690, SB2521, SB2487, SB2342, SB2063, SB125, SB2041, SB1962, SB1413, SCR9, SB21, SB1198, SB1405, SB2601, SB2778, HB5560, HB762, HB1584, HB 107, HB 114, HB138, HB4386, HB2495, HB581, HB3348, HB5323, HB4341, HB6, HB171, HB143, HB449, HB3486, HB4263, HB5246, HB2, HB2011, SB17

Keywords: SB 15, Texas Local Government Code, zoning preemption, housing affordability, small lots, lot size, lot density, single-family zoning, residential subdivision, municipal land use, local control, state preemption, parking requirements, setbacks, infill development, missing middle housing, lot width, lot depth, homebuilders, housing supply

Transcript Highlights:

• ...utilization, setting approval timelines, utilization, setting approval timelines, and other regulatory
• customized living services in single-family assisted living facilities and struggling through a regulatory
• has some direct enroll with DHS options in other contexts for housing supports that might be more efficient
• I mean, what Senator F is bringing up, you know, what are the other efficiencies?
• I know we got people other efficiencies I know we got people working<01:21:34.760><c> on</c><01:21:34.960

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It's not efficiency. It's about power—the power to govern. Thank you.
• Efficiency.
• We keep talking about efficiency and being more efficient, and we can do more with less, not when it
• How is that efficient? How is that in furtherance of the rule of law?
• The bill does address a regulatory issue and accountability.

Bills: HCR11, HB153, HB278, HB424, HB454, HB455, HB687, HB816, HB833, HB942, HB1053, HB1097, HB1147, HB1148, HB1190, SB75, SB85, SB197, SB200, SB217

Keywords: Camp Beauregard, Louisiana National Guard, Youth Challenge Program, military affairs, Pineville, National Guard training, emergency response, youth development, alternative education, high school equivalency, GED, at-risk youth, leadership training, job skills, citizenship, veterans, state military operations, mobilization, logistics staging area, public service

Summary: The committee first adopted a three-minute rule for the rest of the meeting by a 9-3 vote. It then took up SB 217, which would reorganize Orleans Parish courts by reducing judgeships in criminal, juvenile, traffic, and municipal courts and, through an adopted amendment, creating one civil district court with 13 judges and allowing hearing officers. Senator Morris argued the changes were based on caseload comparisons and population data; opponents from the Urban League and ACLU said the bill was driven by power rather than efficiency, relied on incomplete or inconsistent data, would strain the courts, and would reduce minority representation on the bench. The committee reported the bill favorably as amended by an 11-4 vote. The committee next considered SB 197, which would reduce the number of judges on the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal by two. Senator Morris again cited filings and caseload comparisons, while opponents argued the bill ignored the intensity and complexity of appellate work, could increase backlog and costs, and would disproportionately affect Black women judges. The bill was reported favorably by an 11-4 vote. The committee also adopted HCR 11, expressing support for the Louisiana National Guard at Camp Beauregard and the Youth Challenge Program, and reported favorably SB 85, creating an insurance fund for retired St. Charles Parish sheriff’s employees. Several other measures were advanced with little or no opposition. HB 833 created the Sexual Assault Survivor Empowerment Task Force and was amended to add representatives from the coroners’ association, a survivor appointed by STAR, and a licensed clinical social worker; it was reported favorably. HB 816, with a technical correction, prohibited foreign adversaries from acquiring property near military installations and was reported favorably. HB 1053, dealing with definitions for dealers and retail dealers and allowing certain businesses to serve complimentary alcoholic beverages under agreed-upon floor amendments, was reported favorably. HB 153, as amended, removed the Office of Debt Recovery from the bill and limited it to prohibiting reporting certain criminal fines and fees to credit bureaus; it was reported favorably. SB 75, on cybersecurity reimbursement and baseline standards for local governments after cyber incidents, was reported favorably after testimony from GOSEP and others. SB 200, allowing expropriation of land near military bases owned by foreign adversaries when a court finds a threat to public health and safety, was also reported favorably after extensive testimony and discussion. Finally, HB 454, the Gracie Claire Rushing Act on chain of custody for human remains and internal organs, was converted into a substitute bill, adopted, and then introduced for further discussion, with the sponsor describing it as a transparency and accountability measure for grieving families.

Transcript Highlights:

• integrate technology into their farming operations<01:04:16.119><c> improving</c><01:04:16.599><c> efficiency
• </c><01:04:17.039><c> and</c> operations improving efficiency and operations improving efficiency and
• 41:50.679><c> the</c> Echo um our our sister Agency on the Echo um our our sister Agency on the regulatory
• 51.760><c> for</c><01:41:52.199><c> uh</c><01:41:52.320><c> manure</c><01:41:52.840><c> and</c> regulatory
• Authority for uh manure and regulatory Authority for uh manure and bio<01:41:53.520><c> solids</c><01

Bills: HF44, HF2102, HF2279, HF2280, HF2281

Keywords: HF44, Casey Jones State Trail, Pipestone Trailhead, Currie Loop, Minnesota bonding bill, capital investment, state bonds, bond proceeds fund, Department of Natural Resources, DNR, trail rehabilitation, trail reconstruction, recreational trail, bike trail, hiking trail, infrastructure, state trail, Pipestone, Currie, bonding authorization

Transcript Highlights:

• First, the size of the illicit market presents unique regulatory and enforcement challenges, and the
• These products exist outside of the regulatory system.
• So I'm a little confused because it sounds to me like, you know, you do have the regulatory authority
• The opportunity now is to enhance regulatory precision.
• So you talked, both of you mentioned a lot, regulatory enforcement and precision.

Summary: The Joint Legislative Audit Committee heard an audit on the Department of Cannabis Control’s oversight of cannabis packaging and labeling, focused on products that may be attractive to children. The auditor said the department’s rules are often vague or subjective, leading to inconsistent enforcement, and that the state relies heavily on complaints rather than pre-market review. The audit found disagreements with DCC’s conclusions in 13 of 80 packaging reviews, and noted weaknesses in tracking repeat violators and escalating penalties. The auditor recommended clearer statutory standards, better internal review tools, stronger repeat-offender policies, and consideration of options such as plain packaging or pre-approval systems. Committee members and the audit requester emphasized rising cannabis poison-control calls involving children under five and cited examples of legal products with cartoon imagery, bright colors, candy-like names, and beverage packaging that resembled ordinary drinks. DCC representatives said they had already begun reforms, including a centralized review team, improved databases, enhanced technology tools, and new procedures to track compliance history and apply progressive discipline. They also stressed that illicit cannabis and intoxicating hemp remain major sources of youth exposure and argued that some issues require both regulatory refinement and more legislative clarity. Public health witnesses argued that California has not done enough to protect children and urged plain packaging, limits on flavors and child-appealing design, and a pre-market review process. Industry representatives agreed that cannabis should not be marketed to children but said the current rules are too subjective and inconsistent, and asked for objective, bright-line standards rather than broader bans. Several members said the examples shown were plainly child-appealing and called for stronger statutory guardrails, while also acknowledging the need to keep pressure on the illicit market. No formal vote or action was taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><03:48:00.560><c> there</c> I think there is an efficiency there I think there is an efficiency there
• I do believe we need efficiencies to scale.
• Chair, and take any questions. efficiencies to scale in place I do efficiencies to scale in place I do
• need to be efficient, too.
• I think our schools need to be efficient I think our schools need to be efficient<04:03:31.720><c> too

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on House Bill 362, which would give the Department of Education rulemaking authority over educator licensing and testing requirements, including professional education assessments. Representative Ladd argued the bill is meant to preserve New Hampshire’s higher standards for teacher preparation and to avoid lowering requirements for licensed educators, while also allowing flexibility for career and technical education (CTE) instructors who may have strong industry experience but not traditional classroom credentials. Members discussed whether the bill should preserve industry-recognized credentials and basic academic skills testing while exempting CTE teachers from content exams; DOE Director Steven Appy said an amendment would clarify that the bill applies to initial licenses, exempt CTE teachers from the content-testing requirement, and keep current administrative practice on basic skills and industry credentials in statute. The committee also noted that an executive session would be scheduled later, likely the following week, to act on the bills and amendment. The committee then took up House Bill 90, dealing with the definition of part-time teachers. Representative Ladd explained that the bill is intended to let university and community college faculty teach limited hours in high school concurrent enrollment settings, especially in subjects like math and STEM where some schools cannot find locally certified teachers with a master’s degree. He said the measure is designed to expand student access to college-level courses, not to replace fully certified teachers or reduce standards, and emphasized that the bill is limited to faculty employed or contracted by the University System of New Hampshire or the Community College System of New Hampshire, with criminal background checks and ethics/conduct rules still applying. No votes were taken during the hearing, and the discussion ended with the understanding that further action would come in executive session.

Transcript Highlights:

• The opportunity now is to enhance regulatory precision.
• So you talked, both of you mentioned a lot, regulatory enforcement and precision.
• So you talked, both of you mentioned a lot, regulatory enforcement and precision.
• So you talked, both of you mentioned a lot, regulatory enforcement and precision.
• So you talked, both of you mentioned a lot, regulatory enforcement and precision.

Summary: The Joint Legislative Audit Committee heard an audit on the Department of Cannabis Control’s oversight of cannabis packaging and labeling, focused on whether products are attractive to children. The auditor said the department’s rules are often vague, enforcement is inconsistent, and licensees are left to interpret standards without prior review. In a review of 80 packaging cases, the audit team disagreed with the department’s conclusions in 13 instances, and the report highlighted examples involving cartoon imagery, colorful fonts, candy-like references, flavor names, and cannabis beverages that resembled ordinary drinks. The auditor recommended clearer statutory definitions, possible consideration of plain packaging or pre-approval models like Oregon’s, better internal guidance, and stronger tracking and escalation for repeat violators. Committee members and Assembly Member Irwin emphasized the rise in poison control calls involving children under five since legalization and argued that legal-market packaging can contribute to accidental ingestion, especially when products resemble candy or drinks. Several members pressed the department on why items such as root beer, strawberry lemonade, and cherry pie strain names should be allowed if they may appeal to children. The Department of Cannabis Control responded that it has already centralized label review, added staff and technology tools, improved compliance-history tracking, and is using progressive discipline tools such as notices to comply, citations, embargoes, abatements, and license actions. The department also argued that the illicit cannabis and intoxicating hemp markets are major drivers of youth exposure and that enforcement resources must be balanced across those markets. Public health witness Dr. Lynn Silver urged stronger restrictions, including plain packaging, bans on added flavors and child-appealing imagery, lower THC limits for edibles and beverages, and a dedicated pre-market review process. Industry representatives from the California Cannabis Industry Association and the California Cannabis Operators Association agreed that youth protections are essential, but argued that clearer, objective standards are needed so compliant businesses can know the rules and enforcement can be consistent. They said most licensed products are already compliant, that the most blatant youth-targeted packaging is concentrated in the illicit market, and that the Legislature should refine definitions and guidance rather than rely on subjective case-by-case judgments. No formal vote or bill action was taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> as part of their their regulatory as part of their their regulatory framework<00:31:49.039><c> for
• Right, and when I said to you what they will help provide the regulatory framework for this, and what
• Right, and when I said to you what they will help provide the regulatory framework for this, and what
• Right, and when I said to you what they will help provide the regulatory framework for this, and what
• Right, and when I said to you what they will help provide the regulatory framework for this, and what

Bills: HB300, HB40, SB19, HB283, HB179, HB296, HB300, HB40, SB19, HB283, HB179, HB296

Keywords: HB300, Choctaw County, probate court, probate judge, recording fee, filing fee, deed tax, mortgage tax, deeds, mortgages, property records, recordation, county local act, local legislation, technology upgrades, digitalization of records, recordkeeping, county treasury, special fund, court administration

Transcript Highlights:

• I have personally been on regulatory calls with other states where policymakers are lifting sections
• </c> consideration for the strong regulatory consideration for the strong regulatory framework<00:10:
• It's going to have a much more chaotic regulatory environment.
• So, let's look to our alcohol regulatory system as a model for the hemp industry.
• </c> office of cannabis management regulatory office of cannabis management regulatory guideline.<00:

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, and the idea is that it is more efficient, um, a save of time because as you approach the gate there
• Um and the idea is that it<00:10:46.480><c> is</c><00:10:46.880><c> more</c><00:10:47.279><c> efficient
• <c> a</c><00:10:48.640><c> save</c><00:10:49.120><c> of</c><00:10:49.440><c> time</c> it is more efficient
• um a save of time it is more efficient um a save of time because<00:10:50.800><c> as</c><00:10:51.120
• agency and a criminal a regulatory agency and a criminal enforcement<01:51:01.199><c> agency.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Some of you know that, and we were so efficient with HB 220, which is quite rare, so now we have a little
• with hb220 which is quite rare efficient with hb220 which is quite rare so<00:08:53.959><c> now</c><
• Again, a very efficient and unusual hearing process this morning, so we'll wait just a little bit and
• Again, a very efficient and unusual hearing process this morning, so we'll wait just a little bit and
• one simply because the person efficient one simply because the person has<00:38:55.160><c> that</c><

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:07:06.680><c> but</c><00:07:06.919><c> build</c><00:07:07.199><c> them</c><00:07:07.759><c> efficiently
• </c><00:07:08.759><c> in</c> more homes but build them efficiently in more homes but build them efficiently
• prescriptive mandates have kept home ownership out of reach for far too many people, and by removing these regulatory
• prescriptive mandates have kept home ownership out of reach for far too many people, and by removing these regulatory
• Kept home ownership out of reach for far too many people, and by removing these regulatory barriers,

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• That means they can face extra taxes and regulatory burdens that were never designed with such tools
• That means they can face extra taxes and regulatory burdens that were never designed with such tools
• burdens that never that that regulatory burdens that never that that were<00:53:03.440><c> never</c>
• </c><01:16:25.040><c> And</c><01:16:26.400><c> look,</c> and more efficient and less.
• And look, and more efficient and less.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Thursday, February 12, 2026, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It's a non-regulatory entity that supports local communities.
• CAF's aspiration is that a change like this could open the door to future streamlining and regulatory
• They're setting regulatory compliance standards for the water community.
• They're setting regulatory compliance standards for the water community.
• That’s what they’re doing with their regulatory authority, like thwarting abundance.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• What this bill does is move the regulatory functions of the commission to the ISDA.
• It just puts regulatory functions under the ISDA.
• is also some code cleanup language about expired language and other changes needed to move that regulatory
• the commission and ISDA on how the regulatory side has worked.
• So it moves that regulatory side over to the ISDA, which they've already been doing that under an MOU

Summary: The House Agricultural Committee approved the minutes from its March 10 meeting and then took up several bills. House Bill 826 would shift regulatory functions of the Honey Commission to the Idaho State Department of Agriculture while leaving marketing and publicity with the commission; the sponsor and Idaho Honey Industry Association said the change largely codifies an existing memorandum of understanding, and the committee advanced the bill on a do-pass recommendation after questions about the $10,000 penalty, consultation with producers, and whether a misdemeanor penalty remained in the code. The committee also heard and advanced Senate Bill 1242, a DOGE cleanup bill removing obsolete definitions and duplicative public records language, and Senate Bill 1243, which removes outdated Soil and Water Commission/Idaho One Plan language; both were described as code cleanup and passed without opposition. The committee then heard Senate Bill 1283 on direct-to-consumer sales for small producers. Representative Boyle said the bill is intended to help small Idaho producers sell directly to consumers, with labeling, recordkeeping, and food-safety requirements, while exempting them from rules aimed at large commercial operations. Testimony was largely supportive from producers, Fair Idaho, Farm Bureau, and livestock groups, who said the bill would expand local markets and help smaller operations, though Food Northwest opposed it over concerns about labeling, training, and foodborne-illness protections. Committee members raised questions about dairy, catfish, raw milk, animal shares, safety, and the bill’s revenue cap; supporters said the bill keeps existing protections for milk and dairy and includes recordkeeping and temperature standards. The committee then voted to send Senate Bill 1283 to the floor with a do-pass recommendation, with members noting potential conflicts and support from their districts.

Transcript Highlights:

• Sasha Latipova, an FDA regulatory expert, has exposed a significant legal loophole.
• These regulatory failures underscore why These regulatory failures underscore why we cannot rely solely
• Sasha Latipova, an FDA regulatory expert, has exposed a significant legal loophole.
• These regulatory failures underscore why branded and adulterated.
• These regulatory failures underscore why we cannot rely solely on federal agencies.

Summary: The Senate Health and Welfare Committee approved the February 10, 2026 minutes and then took up Senate Bill 1346, a measure proposing a two-year pause on mRNA-based COVID-19 products for pregnant women and children. Senator Shippey presented the bill as a targeted safety pause to allow more long-term review, saying it was not a blanket ban and that amendments were likely needed to clarify the bill’s language and the process for reviewing safety data. He also said the committee should send the bill to the 14th order for possible amendments. The committee heard extensive testimony both for and against the bill. Supporters, including Nicholas Holster, Christina Parks, James Thorpe, Laura Dembray, Xavier Figueroa, and several others, argued that mRNA products are unsafe, described them as gene therapy, and cited alleged harms to fertility, pregnancy, children, and broader health outcomes. Opponents, including physician Stephen Montemot, Primo Castro of the Biotechnology Innovation Organization, and parent Stephanie Neymour, argued that mRNA vaccines are not gene therapy, that the bill would restrict parental choice and access to medical care, and that decisions should remain with patients and doctors. Committee members also questioned the bill’s definitions, the legislature’s ability to review scientific data, the scope of the exemption for cancer and genetic disorder therapies, and whether the measure would affect other vaccines. After debate, members expressed mixed views: some supported further work on the bill, while others raised concerns about government overreach, the breadth of the definitions, and whether the legislature had the expertise or mechanism to evaluate safety data. Senator Lenny moved to send SB 1346 to the 14th order for possible amendments, and the motion passed by roll call vote, 5-4. The committee then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• ><00:16:15.120><c> legislative,</c> participating in legislative, participating in legislative, regulatory
• affairs regulatory, and public affairs initiatives.<00:16:18.480><c> At</c><00:16:18.720><c> PCCA,</
• To meet California's emission standards, car makers have built more fuel-efficient vehicles.
• Improving fuel efficiency is cheaper, smarter, and better for the environment and economy.
• Improving fuel efficiency is drill.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Tuesday, April 29, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• burdens than another with lower regulatory burdens.
• burdens than another with lower regulatory burdens.
• burdens than another with lower regulatory burdens.
• ><c> regulatory</c><00:42:38.680><c> burdens.
• There is with lower regulatory burdens.

Keywords: 00:00 Call to Order 02:45 Roll Call 05:25 Cosmetologists 13:48 Barbers 01:16:06 Adjournment, 958, all