Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB 2747

Filed
3/13/25  
Out of Senate Committee
5/5/25  
Voted on by Senate
5/14/25  
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to limitations applicable to certain agreements providing for a rebate of municipal sales and use taxes or a grant or loan based on those taxes.

Summary

SB 2747 would add a new limitation in the Tax Code on certain municipal sales-tax incentive agreements. The bill targets arrangements in which a municipality, local government corporation, or similar city-created entity offers a retailer a rebate, grant, or loan tied to municipal sales and use tax revenue in exchange for relocating an existing business or opening a new location in that municipality. The bill applies when the effect of the deal is to shift sales tax revenue from one Texas municipality to another. Under the bill, these agreements would be prohibited unless they do more than provide a tax benefit: the agreement must change the retailer’s economic position in some other way, and the retailer must have a substantial non-tax purpose for entering into it. The bill is aimed at preventing municipalities from using tax rebates or tax-based subsidies as the primary inducement for business relocations or expansions that simply move sales tax collections around within the state.

Impact

The bill would amend Chapter 321 of the Tax Code by creating Section 321.006 and would give the comptroller enforcement authority over prohibited agreements. If the comptroller finds a violation, the comptroller must disregard the affected business location when determining where a taxable sale is consummated and must revoke any sales tax permit issued for that location. The practical effect is to restrict local economic development incentives tied to municipal sales tax revenue and to limit the ability of cities and city-created entities to use tax rebates, grants, or loans to attract retailers from other Texas municipalities.

Sentiment

The available legislative history suggests the bill moved forward without recorded opposition in the provided vote data, and there are no committee transcript excerpts showing debate. Its placement on the General State Calendar and passage through third reading indicate it received sufficient support to advance. Overall, the bill appears to have been treated as a policy measure to curb perceived abuse of local sales-tax incentive deals rather than as a broadly controversial proposal in the available record.

Contention

The main point of contention implied by the bill’s text is between local economic development flexibility and limits on tax-driven business relocation incentives. Supporters would likely view the bill as preventing municipalities from bidding against each other with sales-tax rebates that merely shift revenue rather than create new economic activity. Opponents, if any, would likely be municipalities, local development corporations, or retailers that rely on such incentives, because the bill narrows the circumstances under which they can structure relocation or expansion deals and gives the comptroller authority to invalidate noncompliant arrangements.

Companion Bills

TX HB 5169

Identical Relating to limitations applicable to certain agreements providing for a rebate of municipal sales and use taxes or a grant or loan based on those taxes.

Previously Filed As

TX HB5169

Relating to limitations applicable to certain agreements providing for a rebate of municipal sales and use taxes or a grant or loan based on those taxes.

TX SB265

Relating to the applicability of sales and use taxes to certain services provided by a marketplace provider.

TX HB1681

Relating to the applicability of sales and use taxes to certain services provided by a marketplace provider.

TX SB0290

Local taxes in certain municipalities.

TX SB2836

Relating to the location where certain sales are consummated for the purpose of municipal sales and use taxes.

TX SB3047

Relating to the creation of certain municipal management districts; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments, fees, and taxes; granting a limited power of eminent domain.

TX HB134

Relating to the location at which certain sales are consummated for purposes of local sales and use taxes.

TX HB05983

An Act Concerning The Sales And Use Taxes Rates Applicable To Peer-to-peer Car Sharing.

TX HB05983

An Act Concerning The Sales And Use Taxes Rates Applicable To Peer-to-peer Car Sharing.

TX SF0076

AN ACT relating to sales tax; specifying the distribution of taxes on sales of very large electrical loads; providing a definition; providing reporting requirements; specifying applicability; and providing for an effective date.

Similar Bills

CA AB2570

Elderly Parole Program.

MN SF1826

Payment rates establishment for certain substance use disorder treatment services

MN HF1994

Payment rates established for certain substance use disorder treatment services, and vendor eligibility recodified for payments from the behavioral health fund.

TX HB1080

Relating to the publication of required notice by a political subdivision by alternative media.

CA SB680

Sex offender registration: unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor.

CA AB387

An act to amend Section 219 of the Code of Civil Procedure, relating to juries.

CA SB689

Local jurisdictions: district-based elections.

US HB31

Cover Outstanding Vulnerable Expansion-eligible Residents Now Act or the COVER Now Act This bill establishes a demonstration program to allow local governments to provide health benefits to the Medicaid expansion population in states that have not expanded Medicaid. Under the program, local governments may provide coverage for individuals who are newly eligible for Medicaid under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (i.e., the Medicaid expansion population) for a maximum of 10 years, or until their respective states expand Medicaid. The bill provides a 100% federal matching rate for the first three years of program participation. The bill prohibits states from taking certain actions against participating localities, such as withholding funding, increasing taxes, or restricting provider participation. States that violate these requirements are subject to certain funding penalties.