Video & Transcript Research : 'rejected proposition'

Page 21 of 211
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Budget Committee Feb 10th, 2025

Budget

Transcript Highlights:
  • Lastly, I would like to reiterate the Governor's proposal for Proposition 2 reforms.
  • This is because of the interaction with Proposition 2's cap on mandatory deposits.
  • My biggest concern in this proposal is the lack of funding for Proposition 36.
  • I did want to just move on to some kind of question that was raised regarding Proposition 30 and Proposition
  • Proposition 47's savings in the out years, so effectively we will have fewer.
Keywords: 988, house, all
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • We urge you to amend this bill. ...exclude educational and organizational tools, or better yet, reject
  • Books helped me survive abuse, isolation, and rejection.
  • I urge you to reject HB3225 and instead focus on supporting our libraries.
  • I have begun receiving unwanted attention and propositions from strange men on the street.
  • I wholeheartedly reject that notion.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • I'll then. talk about a history of the state's reserve with a particular emphasis on Proposition 2 and
  • And then finally, I'll conclude with an overview of how the deposit rules under Proposition 2 work with
  • In 2014, when the voters passed Proposition 2, which changed the rules regarding the budget stabilization
  • Proposition 2 has three elements that are important for this discussion.
  • So I'm going to turn to the next page to talk about how the deposit rules in Proposition 2 work.
Keywords: 988, house, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety - 03/02/26

Judiciary and Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • It allows them to be signed electronically, and it reduces the chance that they're going to be rejected
  • <00:26:54.400> by<00:26:54.720> institutions, going to be rejected by institutions,
  • going to be rejected by institutions, banks,<00:26:56.320> hospitals<00:26:57.360> and
  • So, at its core, this bill affirms a simple proposition.
  • If a policy or simple proposition.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session May 26th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, that's wrong, and it's immoral, and we should reject it without a second thought.
  • Members, you must know that this is an important issue. ...insane proposition.
  • And what I would like them to do, if you're rejecting this amendment, in terms of this amendment, is
  • Thank you. is ordered the author of the proposition gets to close. Mr.
  • Just the author of the proposition. So, Mr.
Bills: SB6, SB30, SB13, SB2878, SB2501, SB66, SB268, SB331, SB618, SB414, SB1394, SB2425, SB898, SB993, SB442, SB735, SB784, SB2538, SB1919, SB1013, SB2215, SB2322, SB626, SB570, SB747, SB2183, SB673, SB1015, SB1447, SB1370, SB1784, SB1897, SB2873, SB2891, SB2933, SB2540, SB2681, SB2695, SB1965, SB2203, SB872, SB875, SB1030, SB1277, SB1730, SB1681, SB1152, SB2969, SB2747, SB2705, SB2541, SB1708, SB2080, SB2721, SB1986, SB2392, SB2539, SB2857, SB2799, SB2785, SB2782, SB1531, SB1927, SB1263, SB1098, SB835, SB3070, SB22, SJR27, SB25, SB7, SB552, SB1612, SJR87, SJR1, SB6, SB30, SB13, SB2878, SB57, SB127, SB293, SB441, SB3059, SB512, SB241, SB1718, SB140, SB2055, SB2075, SB2018, SB1534, SB1567, SB785, SB1233, SB1580, SB1663, SB413, SB447, SB519, SB467, SB1579, SB1191, SB1021, SB1838, SB2807, SB2835, SB546, SB2121, SB2167, SB2035, SB2024, SB1032, SB1049, SB1266, SB1400, SB1302, SB401, SB1596, SB1281, SB1242, SB1343, SB310, SB1346, SB2753, SB2703, SB2221, SB1719, SB2177, SB800, SB790, SB748, SB571, SB1957, SB1923, SB1896, SB1760, SB1335, SB2368, SB2477, SB2587, SB2972, SB2986, SB2965, SB1563, SB1467, SB1164, SB1137, SB614, SB705, SB961, SB918, SB955, SB869, SB850, SB863, SB1610, SB1055, SB2206, SB457, SB2337, SB1362, SB926, SB1494, SB251, SB456, SB500, SB1307, SB2615, SB2995, SB2321, SB973, SB974, SB865, SB506, SB781, SB1522, SB1558, SB510, SB667, SB763, SB2073, SB1858, SB1660, SB505, SB2900, SB1433, SB1540, SB1964, SB1300, SB1644, SB2217, SB2373, SB2431, SB1758, SB2480, SB3039, SB3047, SB3073, SB2920, SB2781, SB826, SB766, SB2460, SB527, SB1946, SB2885, SB1243, SB2610, SB2595, SB857, SB2501, SB66, SB268, SB331, SB618, SB414, SB1394, SB2425, SB898, SB993, SB442, SB735, SB784, SB2538, SB1919, SB1013, SB2215, SB2322, SB626, SB570, SB747, SB2183, SB673, SB1015, SB1447, SB1370, SB1784, SB1897, SB2873, SB2891, SB2933, SB2540, SB2681, SB2695, SB1965, SB2203, SB872, SB875, SB1030, SB1277, SB1730, SB1681, SB1152, SB2969, SB2747, SB2705, SB2541, SB1708, SB2080, SB2721, SB1986, SB2392, SB2539, SB2857, SB2799, SB2785, SB2782, SB1531, SB1927, SB1263, SB1098, SCR9, HB5560, HB762, HB 107, HB 114, HB138, HB4386, HB2495, HB581, HB3348, HB5323, HB1584, HB4341, HB6, HB171, HB143, HB449, HB3486, HB4263, HB5246, HB2, HB2011, SB17, SB21
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

IC - Courts, Corrections and Justice Nov 6th, 2025

Courts, Corrections & Justice Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • No, I reject that.
  • through law school understand the history of why we don't, as a general matter, subscribe to that proposition
  • We didn't get a chance to go to UNM Law School to understand why we routinely reject that in the bills
  • to your page 17, when we're talking about how we've brought the charges forward, it's filed, it's rejected
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US House Floor Proceedings (Thursday, April 10, 2025)

US Federal House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Fortunately, those lawsuits are being rejected.
  • Fortunately, those lawsuits are being rejected.
  • Fortunately, those lawsuits are being rejected.
  • Fortunately, those lawsuits are being rejected.
  • But the state legislature then rejected.
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government Jun 21st, 2026 at 01:00 pm

Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • It feels like a rejection.' And over and over, 'I am being disenfranchised.'
  • We really have had no Proposition 2½ overrides.
  • We really have had no Proposition 2½ overrides.
Keywords: 995, all
Summary: The Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government held a hybrid hearing on bills related to land use, zoning, permitting, municipal governance, and homelessness. Early testimony focused on a home rule petition for Ipswich to remove a residency requirement for a town manager, with supporters saying it would broaden the applicant pool and help fill a vacant permanent manager position. Another panel backed legislation to change the Springfield Water and Sewer Commission’s governance so ratepayers in surrounding communities would have representation, arguing the current board structure leaves many users without a voice in rate-setting and capital decisions. Several housing and zoning bills drew testimony. Senator Keenan and the Home Builders and Remodelers Association supported a bill to toll the one-year period for acting on a variance while an appeal is pending, saying appeals should not consume the time needed to implement approved projects. Representative Murray and the Real Estate Bar Association also testified on broader zoning reforms, including changes to undersized lots, merger rules, hearing deadlines, appeals, and variance standards; they argued the proposals would reduce delay and uncertainty and help housing production. Committee members questioned whether shifting zoning appeals from de novo to closed-record review would limit new evidence, and the witnesses said the change would speed cases while preserving limited opportunities to supplement the record. The committee also heard testimony on bills to end the criminalization of homelessness. Representatives, advocates, and shelter organizations said local camping bans and fines are counterproductive, especially after the U.S. Supreme Court’s Grants Pass decision, and urged a statewide response centered on housing and public health rather than punishment. Other municipal bills included remote participation in open town meetings for Wayland and a statewide local option, Fairhaven and Mattapoisett charter changes, and Cambridge’s request to use automated parking enforcement and mail parking tickets. The hearing also included testimony supporting fairground zoning flexibility, a Shrewsbury solar siting bill, and an Inspector General bill clarifying county land disposition procedures by requiring written notice to DCAM and a defined response period. No votes were taken during the hearing.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee May 12th, 2026

Energy, Utilities and Communications

Transcript Highlights:
  • A lot of money just went out a few months ago from Proposition 4 to assist with wildland management and
  • A lot of money just went out a few months ago from Proposition 4 to assist with wildland management and
  • Third, reject any proposal that strips protections from survivors.
Keywords: 987, senate, all
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • So Proposition 2, which was put to the voters actually by the Legislature originally in 2014, also is
  • Similar to Proposition 98, it's a formula. It's automatic; you need to set this aside.
  • And you can see here, there's a proposition, Proposition 72, where Paul Gann is one of the signatories
  • Gabriel mentioned Proposition 72 in 1988, which Paul Gann authored.
  • Gabriel mentioned Proposition 72 in 1988, which Paul GAN authored.
Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Accountability and Oversight heard ACA 20, the Safe for California Futures Act, a constitutional amendment to strengthen the state’s Budget Stabilization Account (rainy day fund). The authors, Assembly Members Gabriel and Valencia, said the measure would raise the reserve cap from 10% to 20% of General Fund revenues, change how reserve deposits are treated under the Gann limit so deposits would not count against the spending cap until withdrawn, and update eligible debt repayments to include items such as budget loans, Proposition 98 settle-up obligations, and unemployment insurance debt. They emphasized that the proposal was intended to protect schools and core public services and to help California better withstand revenue volatility and future downturns. Committee discussion focused heavily on the technical effects of the measure, especially its interaction with Proposition 98 and the Gann limit. LAO and Department of Finance staff explained that Prop. 98 funding would not be changed directly, that the reserve deposits would be treated as exclusions from the appropriations limit, and that withdrawals would count when spent. Members asked about current reserve levels, mandatory deposits, and whether the measure would create more room for discretionary spending; supporters argued it would simply allow the state to save more in good years, while one member expressed concern that it could function as a slush fund and expand spending opportunities. Several members cited recent budget volatility, record revenues, and the need for stronger reserves, while others stressed that the measure should be understood as a future-oriented savings reform rather than a response to this year’s budget choices. Public testimony was uniformly supportive. California Forward, Elevate California, and the California Chamber of Commerce all backed the proposal, with the Chamber noting support for the policy and highlighting the importance of addressing unemployment insurance debt for small businesses. The chair concluded by thanking the authors, staff, and witnesses, and said ACA 20 was expected to move to the Assembly floor the next day.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Education Mar 11th, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • Texas courts have rejected this idea and courts across the country have. done so as well.
  • It should also include the demographics of the students who are rejected and who are expelled.
  • Rowe's government creates a subsidy, doesn't match the proposition on the ballots, goes against the RPT
  • Reject this bill. Thank you for your time. Thank you for your testimony.
  • I urge you to reject the education savings account bill.
Bills: HB3, HB3
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Proposition 2, which was put to the voters actually by the Legislature originally in 2014, is also a
  • Just to your first question about Proposition 98 and making assurances to the education community...
  • Similar to Proposition 98, it's a formula. It's automatic; you need to set this aside.
  • And you can see here, there's a proposition, Proposition 72, where Paul Gann is one of the signatories
  • Gabriel mentioned Proposition 72 in 1988, which Paul Gann authored.
Keywords: 988, house, all
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Transportation Funding Mar 10th, 2025

S/C on Transportation Funding

Transcript Highlights:
  • But while federal funds make up 30% of TxDOT's funding, Proposition 1 and 7... electively make up 40%
  • Moving to slide four, we'll talk a little bit more. more about Proposition 1, showing the mechanisms
  • Moving to slide 5, we'll turn to Proposition 7.
  • Proposition 1 totaling $19.5 billion.
  • So we are thankful and grateful that the Proposition 1 and Proposition 7 have come in to help. diversify
Keywords: 1184, house, all
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Education Mar 18th, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • Supreme Court decision stands for the proposition that the IDEA and Section 504 and all the restrictions
  • As I said before, the parents rejected SPED testing and SPED services that could have potentially. help
  • We urge this committee to reject.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

04/29/2026 - House Floor Session

Arizona House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chair, I reject that. What's that? I reject that I'm not telling the truth.
  • only thing on there that wasn't self-imposed by the president in our current disastrous budget propositions
  • the tax bills that come through and we have tax cuts and we have elimination of this, there's no Proposition
  • the tax bills that come through and we have tax cuts and we have elimination of this, there's no Proposition
Summary: The House convened, approved the journal, and spent much of the opening portion recognizing guests and interns from both parties, along with former lawmakers and a newly seated member, Representative Sylvia Allen. The chamber then took up House Concurrent Resolution 2065 honoring the late Alfredo Gutierrez. Members from both parties gave extended remarks about his life as a civil rights advocate, student activist, legislator, and mentor, and the resolution was unanimously adopted and transmitted to the Senate. Family members of Gutierrez were recognized in the gallery during the memorial tribute. The House then moved into Committee of the Whole on the first budget-related measures. On House Bill 4138, the “feed bill”/budget operations measure, Democrats argued the budget favored corporations and data centers over seniors, health care, housing, universities, and vulnerable families, while Republicans defended it as a continuation of prior policy and said it preserved tax conformity and modest agency cuts. After debate and questions, the committee recommended the bill do pass and the House adopted that report, sending HB 4138 to engrossing. The chamber next considered House Bill 4139, the amusement/gaming-related budget bill. Members debated whether it was essentially unchanged from last year’s budget language, with Republicans saying it was a continuation bill and that gaming-related provisions would support rural economies and tourism, while Democrats questioned the broader budget context and its effects on working families. The committee recommended HB 4139 do pass, and the House adopted that recommendation. The House then began debate on House Bill 4140, the state budget implementation bill, focusing on the budget stabilization fund and a proposed government efficiency initiative; discussion was still underway at the end of the transcript.