Texas 2025 - 89th 2nd C.S.

Texas House Bill HB27

Filed
9/3/25  
Out of House Committee
8/23/25  
Voted on by House
8/25/25  
Out of Senate Committee
9/2/25  
Bill Becomes Law
 

Summary

HB27 requires the Texas Water Development Board to conduct a groundwater study focused on aquifers underlying the territory of the Neches and Trinity Valleys Groundwater Conservation District. The study must estimate the maximum amount of groundwater that can be produced in perpetuity without preventing the district from meeting its adopted desired future conditions, compare that estimate with the district’s modeled available groundwater, and evaluate the hydrological effects of proposed groundwater production and transfers out of the district. The analysis must include impacts on recharge, inflows, discharges, spring flows, capture, and groundwater-surface water interaction. The board must submit a report to state leaders and legislative committees by January 12, 2027. Until 270 days after that report deadline, the district is prohibited from issuing new permits or permit amendments for groundwater production and transfer out of the district. The moratorium does not apply to permits or amendments issued before the bill’s effective date, and the section expires November 1, 2027.

Impact

The bill temporarily amends the Special District Local Laws Code by adding Section 8863.106 to govern permitting in the Neches and Trinity Valleys Groundwater Conservation District. It creates a state-directed scientific review before additional groundwater export permits or permit amendments may be issued, effectively pausing certain district permitting activity while the Texas Water Development Board completes its study and reports its findings. The measure affects the district, permit applicants seeking groundwater production and transfer authority, and state water planners responsible for groundwater management and desired future conditions.

Sentiment

The available voting history suggests the bill had generally strong support, with passage on third reading by wide margins in the House and Senate-related votes showing more support than opposition, though not unanimous. The absence of committee transcript material limits insight into detailed debate, but the recorded votes indicate the bill was viewed favorably overall as a groundwater management and planning measure. The narrower votes on some procedural motions suggest some members had reservations about timing or process, even if the underlying policy drew broad approval.

Contention

The main point of contention is the temporary moratorium on new permits and permit amendments for groundwater production and out-of-district transfer, which could delay development or water supply projects for applicants in the district. Supporters likely view the pause as necessary to ensure permitting aligns with long-term aquifer sustainability and desired future conditions, while opponents may see it as an unnecessary restriction on local groundwater rights and economic activity. Another possible area of concern is that the bill relies on a state study and a time-limited freeze, which may be criticized either as too restrictive or not restrictive enough depending on stakeholders’ views of aquifer conditions.

Companion Bills

TX SB 55

Similar To Relating to a groundwater study of certain aquifers underlying the territory of the Neches and Trinity Valleys Groundwater Conservation District by the Texas Water Development Board before the issuance of permits or permit amendments by the district.

TX SB 50

Similar Relating to a groundwater study of certain aquifers underlying the territory of the Neches and Trinity Valleys Groundwater Conservation District by the Texas Water Development Board before the issuance of permits or permit amendments by the district.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.