Transcript Highlights:

• To provide medically advised treatment based not on the patient or medical science, but on the doctor's
• abortion with an outrageous penalty of $100,000.
• with abortion-related travel.
• on abortion.
• Deemed a medical emergency.

Bills: HCR35, SJR59, SJR84, SCR30, SB127, SB317, SB324, SB457, SB506, SB511, SB529, SB547, SB584, SB619, SB636, SB646, SB659, SB715, SB732, SB735, SB771, SB784, SB800, SB801, SB904, SB1026, SB1049, SB1065, SB1181, SB1224, SB1250, SB1383, SB1467, SB1524, SB1528, SB1531, SB1568, SB1585, SB1640, SB1681, SB1754, SB1757, SB1777, SB1972, SB1980, SB2007, SB2041, SB2046, SB2050, SB2055, SB2069, SB2080, SB2119, SB2138, SB2139, SB2154, SB2201, SB2225, SB2268, SB2306, SB2308, SB2310, SB2330, SB2366, SB2375, SB2392, SB2401, SB2422, SB2480, SB2514, SB2530, SB2533, SB2543, SB2544, SB2589, SB2610, SB2615, SB2623, SB2660, SB2662, SB2693, SB2695, SB2707, SB2722, SB2742, SB2753, SB2807, SB2843, SB2844, SB2858, SB2880, SB2885, SB2891, SB2925, SB2938, SB2986, SJR3, SJR18, SB5, SB914, SB963, SB1197, SB1415, SB1437, SB1786, SB326, SB767, SB769, SB783, SB1035, SB1271, SB1619, SB1637, SB1806, SB1, SB260, HB135, HB1109, HCR35, HCR64, SJR36, SJR50, SJR63, SJR84, SJR59, SCR12, SCR39, SCR48, SCR19, SCR30, SCR3, SB2023, SB619, SB2742, SB646, SB1026, SB2880, SB62, SB666, SB847, SB284, SB854, SB1073, SB810, SB1505, SB583, SB1502, SB507, SB1434, SB1376, SB1585, SB1772, SB2016, SB1163, SB1122, SB731, SB397, SB508, SB1436, SB287, SB261, SB1882, SB393, SB1791, SB529, SB209, SB2429, SB1999, SB511, SB2309, SB510, SB584, SB1085, SB2046, SB1975, SB2717, SB1262, SB1524, SB636, SB2056, SB884, SB517, SB1200, SB1845, SB1863, SB2681, SB2200, SB2199, SB1757, SB2050, SB2458, SB2201, SB2660, SB2662, SB1065, SB801, SB2533, SB3014, SB3013, SB758, SB1721, SB2366, SB1013, SB2797, SB2383, SB1754, SB2119, SB2448, SB1777, SB1283, SB2392, SB2076, SB2786, SB2876, SB2284, SB2225, SB1540, SB2929, SB1972, SB2540, SB2595, SB2217, SB715, SB2330, SB1383, SB500, SB1640, SB2001, SB2080, SB506, SB2514, SB2753, SB2398, SB1241, SB2927, SB2173, SB2538, SB898, SB1449, SB2529, SB1531, SB2846, SB2476, SB986, SB1181, SB2075, SB2154, SB2864, SB1359, SB2386, SB771, SB2844, SB2550, SB1351, SB1423, SB1931, SB2245, SB2589, SB2707, SB2807, SB410, SB659, SB2776, SB2693, SB2580, SB1980, SB1886, SB1234, SB739, SB456, SB127, SB1666, SB2843, SB2801, SB800, SB2055, SB784, SB2986, SB735, SB1012, SB324, SB2926, SB2938, SB2007, SB2138, SB1242, SB2615, SB1049, SB2310, SB1224, SB2972, SB1568, SB2841, SB2885, SB3016, SB2858, SB2610, SB2139, SB1856, SB2035, SB2308, SB2306, SB2041, SB1528, SB1681, SB1141, SB2401, SB2530, SB2375, SB547, SB1266, SB1373, SB1467, SB2069, SB2269, SB2480, SB2544, SB672, SB904, SB2695, SB2891, SB2422, SB2543, SB1854, SB317, SB2539, SB2532, SB2925, SB1250, SB2082, SB2203, SB457, SB2357, SB2721, SB243, SB1285, SB2568, SB1959, SB1442, SB1454, SB2520, SB2541, SB1708, SB1237, SB1844, SB1586, HB1392, HB22, SB1551, SB3039, SB2819, SB66, SB629, SB1015, SB2342, SB2903, SB2933, SB1965, SB2477, SB3029, SB2605, SB2419, SB1957, SB375, SB250, SB777, SB628, SB2523, SB2367, SB2703, SB2608, SB2778, SB3044, SB2965, SB2521, SB865

Keywords: spaceports, tax-exempt bonds, aerospace investment, Texas space economy, Federal legislation, education funding, Texas State Technical College System, capital projects, infrastructure, higher education, tax exemption, property tax, homestead, fire damage, constitutional amendment, Birding Capital, Matagorda County, wildlife, conservation, Texas Legislature

Transcript Highlights:

• It strips New Jersey's medical licensing boards of the authority to discipline abortion providers for
• You're going to promote medical facilities, so-called medical facilities.
• This bill is not about abortions. This bill is about protecting medical records.
• Protecting medical providers that provide that medical care.
• or seek abortions?

Keywords: 1146, all

Transcript Highlights:

• abortion outside of Texas.
• Senate Bill 2880 builds on that strategy with specific sweeping provisions that target medication abortion
• on abortion."
• not deemed a medical emergency.
• They exist to make abortion drugs.

Transcript Highlights:

• of the medication abortion pill.
• So, as such, the prohibitions relating to the abortion-inducing drugs do not apply to medical emergencies
• abortion.
• Because HB7 uses a definition of an An abortion-inducing drug that excludes medications prescribed, dispensed
• , or administered for non-abortion medical reasons.

Bills: SB 8, HB7, HB15, HB 265, HCR 13, SB 8, HB 7, HB 15, HB 265, HCR 13

Keywords: sex designation, restroom access, civil penalties, private civil right of action, women's privacy, abortion, healthcare, jurisdiction, civil action, qui tam, prohibition, state law, youth camp, safety regulations, advisory committee, child welfare, health standards, summer camp, camp safety, child abuse reporting

Transcript Highlights:

• President, the HCA and its analysis on this bill said there is no medical reason to report induced abortion
• President, the HCA and its analysis on this bill said there is no medical reason to report induced abortion
• Somehow, had an abortion, paid for an abortion. You loved somebody that had an abortion.
• It just erased all abortion laws.
• Abortion affects men and women.

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• safe medication abortion drug first approved by the FDA in 2000.
• Medication abortion... Medication abortion is safe and effective.
• Restricting access to medication abortion and specifically mifepristone is a priority for the anti-abortion
• Though medication abortion has been used by millions of people for a quarter of a century,...
• , infections, and incomplete abortion, alone, miles away from emergency and medical care.

Summary: The Assembly Business and Professions Committee heard a full agenda of bills focused on reproductive health, professional licensing and sunset reviews, consumer protection, and business regulation. Early testimony centered on AB 260, which would protect access to medication abortion, mifepristone, and telehealth reproductive care in California; supporters emphasized state protections against federal restrictions, while an opponent argued the bill removed safety safeguards. The committee also heard AB 714 on closing a loophole in regulation of low-cost commercial driving schools, AB 968 on allowing pharmacists to prescribe non-hormonal contraception, AB 671 on streamlining restaurant permitting, AB 1027 on strengthening cannabis product testing oversight, AB 1271 on broadband pricing and speed transparency, and AB 1332 on narrowly allowing medicinal cannabis shipments for seriously ill patients. Several sunset bills were also taken up, including AB 1482 on animal shelter and breeder transparency, AB 1501 on the Podiatric Medical Board and Physician Assistant Board, AB 1502 on the Veterinary Medical Board, AB 1503 on the Board of Pharmacy, and AB 1504 on the Massage Therapy Council. Testimony was largely in support of the measures, with many bills drawing co-sponsors or support from industry, consumer, or professional groups. AB 1503 generated the most sustained opposition, with nurses, physicians, and drug industry representatives objecting to expanded pharmacy technician ratios, standard-of-care language, and therapeutic interchange authority; supporters argued the bill would modernize pharmacy practice and expand access. AB 1504 also drew mixed testimony, with massage therapy groups supporting continuation of the council but raising concerns about proposed public records and governance provisions. AB 1271 drew a policy dispute over whether broadband reporting requirements duplicated federal FCC processes, while supporters argued California needed its own consumer-facing data and complaint system. After quorum was established later in the hearing, the committee began taking roll-call votes. AB 1271, AB 1332, AB 1482, AB 1501, and AB 1502 were all reported out on due-pass motions, with AB 1271 amended and the others generally amended or as introduced as noted. Earlier bills including AB 260, AB 671, AB 714, AB 968, and AB 1027 also received motions and were approved once the quorum was present. The chair repeatedly noted the lack of quorum during the hearing, but once one was secured, the committee completed votes on the agenda items and advanced the measures to Appropriations.

Transcript Highlights:

• AB 2540 will expand equitable access to medication abortion services for students attending community
• This bill would allow students to receive medication abortion through their community college health
• The campuses combined provided over 1,000 medication abortions a year for the past two years.
• Their student health services presents medication abortion on their website and in literature as part
• Medication abortion can be handled through telemedicine.

Summary: The Assembly Health Committee heard a long agenda of health-related bills, beginning with AB 2651 by Bonta, which would require schools to notify parents when school vaccination rates fall below herd immunity thresholds. Supporters, including family physicians, PTA representatives, and medical groups, said the bill would improve transparency and help parents protect children and vulnerable family members. Opponents argued the data could be misleading, could identify medically exempt or conditional students, and might lead to stigma or discrimination. The bill was later moved out of committee on a due-pass-as-amended motion, with one no vote recorded on the roll call. The committee also heard AB 2123 by Aguirre-Curry on medical debt relief, AB 1570 by Wilson to eliminate out-of-pocket costs for medically necessary breast diagnostic and supplemental imaging, AB 2201 by Berner to restore Medi-Cal eligibility and renewal flexibilities, AB 2448 by Berman to strengthen privacy protections for reproductive and gender-affirming care records, AB 2034 by Addis on food additive safety and transparency, and AB 2598 by Krell to require better notification of next of kin when a patient dies in a hospital. Each bill drew strong support from authors, advocates, and affected individuals, while some drew opposition from insurers, industry groups, or transparency critics who raised concerns about cost, duplication, implementation, or unintended harm. Several bills were moved forward on due-pass-as-amended motions, including AB 2123, AB 2201, AB 2448, AB 2034, and AB 2598. The committee also heard AB 2551 by Elhawary, which would require health plans to collect and publish data on how often enrollees must go out of network for behavioral health care and why. Supporters said the measure would expose access barriers and high out-of-pocket costs, especially for communities of color and people with language access needs; opponents said it would add another reporting mandate and might not solve provider shortage problems. Members generally expressed support for the bill’s goals and several described personal or district-level experiences with behavioral health access problems. The bill was then moved out of committee on a due-pass motion. The committee also took up consent items and other procedural motions, with multiple bills reported out and some placed on call.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> abortion policy in our state. abortion policy in our state.
• </c> schedule an abortion? schedule an abortion?
• </c> abortion up to birth. abortion up to birth.
• </c> Abortion up to birth. Abortion up to birth.
• </c> plus abortions plus abortions every<01:26:15.520><c> year.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• abortions.
• abortion or procedural abortion, so that would be something to remove.
• With patients managing medication abortions at home, would they be identifiable if we had to report their
• </c> medication abortions at home be medication abortions at home be identifiable<02:34:22.319><c> if
• Thank you for letting me read. abortion data or more detailed abortion abortion data or more detailed

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Substitute Senate Bill 5917 relates to abortion medications possessed by the Department of Corrections
• Abortion medications are defined for these purposes as substances used in the course of medical treatment
• This medication abortion plays a critical role in ensuring timely access to care for people with high
• As you know, CLW is opposed to abortion. We don't view abortion medications as health care.
• Studies have shown that there are serious risks with abortion medications.

Bills: SB5915, SB5988, SB6025, SJM8002

Keywords: SB 5915, health technology assessment, HTA, clinical committee, medical technology review, coverage determination, state-purchased health care, Washington health care, RCW, evidence-based medicine, cost-effectiveness, safety and efficacy, Medicare coverage, national coverage determination, clinical guidelines, patient advocacy, public comment, medical necessity, rare disease, life-threatening disease

Summary: The House Health Care and Wellness Committee held public hearings on several Senate bills and one joint memorial. SB 5915 would update the Health Technology Assessment Program by adding Medicare-recommended or guideline-recommended technologies to the review priority list, requiring broader evidence review for rare or life-threatening diseases, and setting posting and decision deadlines; supporters from rare disease families and clinicians said the current process is outdated and too rigid, while the sponsor said the bill reflects needed modernization. SJM 8002 urges the federal government to oppose Medicare privatization and make changes to original Medicare and Medicare Advantage, including eliminating the 20% coinsurance in original Medicare, adding dental/vision/hearing benefits, reducing Medicare Advantage overpayments, and recouping fraud and abuse funds; labor, senior, and retiree advocates supported it as a way to protect beneficiaries and the Medicare trust fund. The committee also heard SB 5395 on prior authorization, which would require more transparency in denial notices, limit denial decisions to licensed clinicians, restrict AI from being the sole basis for denials or delays, and address retrospective denials; providers, hospitals, and patient advocates supported the bill as a compromise to reduce delays and inappropriate denials, while insurers were generally neutral but sought a narrow amendment. SB 5845 would tighten payment timelines for clean claims, require faster notice and information requests for non-clean claims, and authorize penalties for chronic noncompliance; hospitals and physicians said predictable payment is essential for financial stability, while insurers were neutral and requested a limited amendment. SB 6025 would change the fetal death definition to use the best clinically accurate gestational age rather than the last menstrual period; OB-GYNs, nurses, and medical groups supported it as a medically accurate update, while one opponent objected on moral grounds. The committee also heard SB 5988, which would authorize the Department of Health to continue accrediting opioid treatment programs and set fees to cover the program’s costs; the sponsor and DOH said it is needed to maintain a patient-centered accreditation option after budget cuts, and the bill was described as a companion to House legislation. Finally, SB 5917 would change how the Department of Corrections coordinates distribution of state-purchased abortion medications, remove the current cost-plus-fee requirement, and broaden the definition of abortion medication; supporters said it would allow the stockpiled medication to be distributed to providers and patients, while opponents argued it promotes abortion and misuses public funds. The transcript ends with the committee closing public testimony and adjourning, with no votes taken in the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• medical findings.
• However, these medical findings are being altered or deleted by administrative staff who lack any medical
• I'm trained in both medication and procedural abortion care, and I'm really passionate about providing
• By lowering medical standards, this bill allows a two-fold outcome: increasing the number of abortions
• You're not preventing abortion.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It protects access to medication abortion here in California.
• Medication abortion is safe and effective. It's at least invasive.
• Here today in strong support and as a co-sponsor of AB 260, restricting access to medication abortion
• Though medication abortion has been used by millions of people for a quarter of a century and decades
• infections and incomplete abortion, alone, often miles away from emergency medical care.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Isn't the definition, isn't lawful kind of a little vague because the medical exemptions for abortion
• So if a doctor gives a woman an emergency abortion in a medical emergency, could the father then sue
• Because she, let's say, thought it was the right thing to have this medical emergency abortion and the
• or spontaneously abort in the... ...of all pregnancies self-abort or spontaneously abort in the first
• been working on trying to clarify the medical exemptions for abortions to make doctors feel comfortable

Summary: The committee first took up SB 1272 on guardianship, which would limit a guardian’s ability to isolate an adult ward from family and require notice to family or other named persons about major events such as a ward’s death or medical relocation. Senator Jones said the bill was intended to curb abuse by bad actors while not affecting good-faith guardians. Fortuna Smuggler and Phyllis Smith spoke in support, describing the need for family notification and closure. The bill passed unanimously, 8-0, and was reported favorably. The committee then considered CS/SB 1284 on wrongful death for an unborn child. Senator Graal explained that the bill would expand Florida’s Wrongful Death Act to allow parents to recover economic and non-economic damages for the death of an unborn child. An amendment was adopted to define “unborn child” as a member of the species Homo sapiens carried in the womb and to state that the act does not authorize a wrongful death action against the mother or a health care provider acting within the applicable standard of care. The amendment drew questions about abortion, medical emergencies, and whether fathers could sue; the sponsor said the bill was not intended to create claims against mothers or lawful medical care. Public testimony was sharply divided, with supporters arguing it gives families parity and accountability, and opponents warning it could be used to target abortion care, increase malpractice pressure, and worsen physician shortages. The committee approved the bill as amended by a 6-4 vote. Finally, the committee heard a strike-all amendment to SB 1288 on parental rights. The amendment would strengthen parental consent requirements for minors’ medical care, with exceptions for emergencies, court orders, certain legal categories of minors, and other existing statutory exceptions. It also would require parental consent for treatment related to STD screening, give parents more control over school or health surveys, and address use of biofeedback devices. Supporters said the measure restores parents’ authority and protects children from inappropriate questioning or treatment, while opponents argued it could block needed care for minors in unsafe homes, reduce access to STI treatment and mental health services, and create unintended consequences. The amendment was adopted, and the committee continued hearing testimony on the bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• The typical medical protocol, as you've heard from Ava's story and others, is to offer families abortion
• program exclude any abortion-related services or groups with affiliations to abortion-related providers
• abortion travel.
• drugs or abortions in other states.
• We've broadened our medical testing to address the gaps left by the abortion industry, and we utilize

Bills: SB397, SB481, SB596, SB760, SB855, SB1195, SB1196, SB1233, SB1257, SB1318, SB1368, SB1388, SB1398, SB1524, SB1558, SB1589, SB1677, SB1792, SB2034

Keywords: SB 397, telemedicine, telehealth, teledentistry, remote care, virtual care, consent documentation, patient consent, data collection, data sharing, audio-only telehealth, in-person examination, irreversible medical procedure, health professional regulation, Occupations Code, Texas Health and Human Services, medical records, provider compliance, data privacy, consumer rights

Transcript Highlights:

• The one in my district, they provide medication.
• never been on medication.
• are lost every year due to abortion pills and out-of-state abortions.
• and abortions in other states.
• These are administered through the Texas Medical Board, so we're keeping it within the medical community

Bills: SB670, SB1388, SB627, SB912, SB269, SB528, HB2711, HB4819, HB5248, HB4175

Keywords: SB 670, investigational sun protection products, sun protection, sunscreen, FDA approval, clinical trial, phase one trial, patient access, informed consent, physician prescription, Texas Health and Safety Code, Texas Medical Board, compassionate use, experimental treatment, medical freedom, patient autonomy, healthcare regulation, dietitian, dietitians, licensed dietitian

Transcript Highlights:

• The one in my district, they provide, uh, medication.
• they've never been on medication.
• The abortion, I mean, the alternatives to abortion funding had gone.
• killed every year due to abortion pills and out of state abortions.
• and abortion in other states.

Transcript Highlights:

• medical findings.
• However, these medical findings are being altered or deleted by administrative staff who lack any medical
• I'm trained in both medication and procedural abortion care, and I'm really passionate about providing
• By lowering medical standards, this bill allows a two-fold outcome: increasing the number of abortions
• You're not preventing abortion.

Summary: The Assembly Business and Professions Committee heard a full agenda of bills covering travel consumer protections, cannabis commerce with tribes, medical record integrity, pest control licensing, pawn and gold-buying regulation, pharmacy discipline, land surveying, and expedited licensing for veterans separated under a federal transgender military policy. Members also later heard AB 1973, which would expand the ability of advanced practice clinicians to provide abortion care, with supporters arguing it would improve access and opponents warning about safety and scope-of-practice concerns. Several bills were presented before quorum was reached, and the chair repeatedly urged absent members to arrive so the committee could vote. Testimony on the bills was largely in support. Authors and witnesses said AB 1758 would raise the seller-of-travel assessment cap to keep the Travel Consumer Restitution Fund solvent; AB 2506 would allow state cannabis licensees to sell products from tribal licensees while respecting tribal sovereignty; AB 1637 would prevent non-physicians from altering physician-authored medical notes; AB 2477 would create a short provisional period for pest control workers awaiting licensure; AB 2633 would close a loophole involving remote gold-buying events and stolen property reporting; AB 2141 would let the Board of Pharmacy resolve some cases through stipulated settlements before formal accusations; and AB 1933 would make technical clarifications to land surveying law. AB 1775 drew emotional testimony from transgender service members and advocates describing the impact of federal separation policies and the need for California licensing and support. Once quorum was established, the committee voted out the consent calendar and each of the heard bills, generally on party-line or near-unanimous votes. AB 1637, AB 1758, AB 1775, AB 1933, AB 2141, AB 2477, AB 2506, and AB 2633 all passed out of committee, most to Appropriations or another policy committee as noted. AB 1973 also passed, despite a no vote from some members and an opposition witness from the California Family Council. The committee later took vote changes and additional roll calls for absent members before adjourning.

Transcript Highlights:

• So far, ward legal and medical documents and failing to adhere to the medical wishes of a war in the
• That results from lawful medical care isn't the definition is unlawful a little vague because the medical
• exemptions for abortion or they get.
• So if >> a doctor gives a woman in emergency of abortion and a medical emergency would could the father
• As you know, I've been working on trying to clarify the medical exemptions for abortions to make doctors

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Isn't the definition, isn't lawful kind of a little vague because the medical exemptions for abortion
• So if a doctor gives a woman an emergency abortion in a medical emergency, could the father then sue
• Because she, let's say she thought it was the right thing to have this medical emergency abortion and
• or spontaneously abort in the... ...of all pregnancies self-abort or spontaneously abort in the first
• But as you know, I’ve been working on trying to clarify the medical exemptions for abortions to make

Summary: The Judiciary Committee heard Senate Bill 1272 on guardianship, which would limit a guardian’s ability to isolate an adult ward from family and require notice of major events such as a ward’s death or relocation to a more restrictive setting. Senator Jones and supportive speakers said the bill was intended to protect wards from abuse and isolation by bad actors, while still preserving good-faith guardianship. With no opposition testimony or debate, the committee voted 8-0 to report the bill favorably. The committee then considered CS for Senate Bill 1284, which would expand Florida’s Wrongful Death Act to allow civil claims for the death of an unborn child. An amendment was adopted to define “unborn child” as a member of the species Homo sapiens carried in the womb and to state that the act does not authorize claims against the mother or against health care providers acting within the lawful standard of care. The bill drew extensive debate and testimony. Supporters argued it would give parents parity and fuller damages, including economic losses and mental anguish, when negligence causes the death of an unborn child. Opponents, including the ACLU, medical professionals, and reproductive rights advocates, warned it could be used to target abortion care, increase malpractice exposure, worsen physician shortages, and create speculative damages. The committee approved the bill 6-4. Finally, the committee took up Senate Bill 1288 on parental rights, with a strike-all amendment that would strengthen parental control over minors’ medical decisions, surveys, and biofeedback devices, while adding exceptions for emergencies, court orders, certain legal statuses, and situations involving abuse or out-of-home placement. Supporters said the measure restores parents as primary decision-makers and protects children from inappropriate questioning or treatment without consent. Opponents argued it could block minors from confidential care for STIs, mental health, or abuse-related issues, and could chill school and medical screenings. The transcript ends during testimony and debate on this bill, before any final vote is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• doing is so incredible, but what about their medical needs?
• medication.
• This bill will not only limit abortion access, but access to This bill will not only limit abortion access
• abortion access is still illegal here after six weeks.
• I was heavily medicated. The trauma was so intense.

Bills: S0164, S0656, S0892

Keywords: wrongful death, unborn child, civil liability, medical provider, parental rights, habitual felony offenders, violent crimes, enhanced penalties, criminal justice, recidivism

Summary: The committee heard a lengthy presentation from Miami-Dade State Attorney Catherine Fernandez-Rundle on human trafficking, describing Florida’s high victim counts, the role of online recruitment, common victim and trafficker profiles, and several case examples involving sexual exploitation, labor trafficking, and interstate trafficking. She highlighted Miami-Dade’s task force model, partnerships with law enforcement, schools, businesses, and shelters such as Camillus House’s Project Phoenix and the Thrive Clinic, and said the office relies heavily on technology, training, and victim-centered prosecution. Members asked about school-based trafficking, warning signs, social media platforms, and information-sharing about offenders across states; Fernandez-Rundle said more training and better interstate communication are still needed. The committee then took up CS for SB 656, which would codify FDLE’s Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Funding Program and rename/expand the online sting operations grant program to better support investigations, training, technology, and personnel. The bill was supported as a timely tool to combat online child exploitation and was reported favorably on a unanimous roll call. The committee also passed SB 892, which streamlines sentencing procedures for habitual felony offenders and related violent offender designations by clarifying notice and clemency-related paperwork requirements; it too was reported favorably unanimously. The remainder of the meeting focused on SB 164, which expands Florida’s Wrongful Death Act to allow parents to recover civil damages for the death of an unborn child. The sponsor said the bill is intended to recognize unborn children in civil law and allow recovery when a pregnancy is lost due to another’s negligence. Opponents from the ACLU, reproductive rights groups, medical insurers, and domestic violence advocates argued the bill is overly broad, could function as fetal personhood legislation, and could expose doctors, friends, family members, businesses, and abusive partners to lawsuits while chilling medical care, IVF, and pregnancy-related treatment. Supporters from pro-life organizations urged broader language and stronger protections for unborn children. No vote on SB 164 was taken in the portion provided.