Video & Transcript Research : 'judicial determination'

Page 83 of 500
MD

Maryland 2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session, 4/7/2026 #1

Maryland Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Let's go to Judicial Proceedings. Uh, this is Report Number 22.
  • <02:08:10.239> proceedings reading let's go to judicial proceedings reading let's go to judicial
  • The Speaker, judicial and quasi-judicial employees compensation.
  • Uh, judicial proceedings. Thank you very much, Mr. President.
  • The judicial proceedings committee will meet today at 2 p.m. for a voting session. 2 p.m.
Summary: The Senate convened with an invocation by Rabbi Ari Goldstein, whose remarks were journalized at the request of the senator from District 33. The chamber then recognized the doctor of the day, Dr. Maryann Lamont, for her 50 years in medicine and her work in neurology and stroke care, and also thanked a legislative aide, Samantha Briggs, who is leaving for law school. The presiding officer noted a quorum was present and moved into the day’s floor work. The Senate handled several messages and committee reports, including a conference committee appointment on Senate Bill 18, which concerns provisional social work licensure. In Finance, the chamber advanced Senate Bill 246 on Health Services Cost Review Commission member terms, Senate Bill 370 on acupuncture board revisions, Senate Bill 564 creating a Division of Data Protection in the Attorney General’s office and a related work group, Senate Bill 782 on telecommunications infrastructure protections, Senate Bill 808 on health insurance provider panel requirements, Senate Bill 849 on agricultural equipment warranties, Senate Bill 867 on the Maryland Aerospace and Technology Commission, and Senate Bill 982 on mutual insurance holding companies converting back to mutual insurers. Most of these bills were reported favorably with technical or conforming amendments, which were adopted without objection, and each was ordered printed for third reading. The committee also considered several House bills with Senate cross-files or identical measures. These included House Bill 118 on money transmitter licensing, House Bills 339 and 512 on Anne Arundel County Board of License Commissioners compensation, House Bill 1100 on telecommunications infrastructure protections, House Bill 1395 on agricultural equipment warranties, House Bill 1473 creating Maryland’s Future Board, House Bill 226 on Department of Disabilities housing programs, House Bill 278 codifying the Longevity Ready Maryland plan, and House Bill 746 on collaborative care model coverage and cost-sharing limits. In each case, the committee reports were adopted, amendments were approved where offered, and the bills were advanced to third reading or passed for third reading, with no recorded opposition on the floor.
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

House in Session May 2nd, 2025

Florida House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • read the details: it requires the Department of Commerce to conduct a baseline modeling scenario to determine
  • Magistrate, a commissioner appointed a special magistrate to hold hearings to determine facts related
  • What do you determine a charter school's eligibility to receive these shares or tax funds? **Rep.
Bills: HJR 138, HB 42, HB 104, HB 129, HB 677, HB 426, HB 668, HB 1699, HB 2017, HB 2128, HB 2038, HB 3783, HB 3717, HB 2316, HB 3686, HB 2563, HB 3883, HB 4021, HB 2788, HB 2663, HB 3305, HB 3173, HB 3474, HB 1105, HB 3531, HB 3490, HB 3597, HB 1295, HB 3512, HB 3010, HB 3112, HB 4215, HB 3223, HB 3464, HB 3120, HB 4214, HB 4511, HB 3704, HB 4081, HB 4783, HB 4063, HB 2783, HB 4937, HB 5085, HB 2510, HB 3426, HB 4361, HB 1169, HB 2516, HB 2347, HB 4034, HB 4700, HB 3560, HB 5150, HB 3860, HB 3146, HB 3924, HCR 98, HCR 92, HB 1520, HB 1545, HB 5265, HB 1887, HB 1914, HB 2402, HB 2306, HB 2350, HB 3000, HB 3237, HB 3326, HB 3211, HB 1056, HB 2081, HB 2187, HB 3092, HB 3308, HB 3526, HB 3750, HB 4219, HB 4230, HB 4290, HB 5238, HB 4804, HB 4749, HB 245, HB 1465, HB 294, HB 793, HB 809, HB 3928, HB 334, HB 2037, HB 1973, HB 285, HB 4341, HB 1043, HB 1234, HB 1193, HB 1729, HB 2498, HB 1314, HB 1353, HB 3960, HB 3923, HB 2221, HB 2517, HB 2518, HB 2213, HB 5092, HB 3748, HB 5246, HB 4344, HB 1482, HB 4044, HB 2702, HB 4264, HB 2807, HB 2898, HB 3181, HB 3250, HB 2091, HB 2115, HB 2542, HB 2768, HB 3349, HB 4406, HB 1593, HB 1899, HB 3133, HB 3133, HB 4960, HB 3214, HB 2145, HB 1201, HB 5061, SB 29, SB 879, SB 65, SB 1745, SB 412, SB 412, SB 1746, SB 1238, SB 1341, SB 522, SB 1532, SB 1378, SB 1062, SB 2066, SB 1963, SB 2204, SB 1366, SB 2077, SB 1967, SB 1151, HB 1618, HB 2156, HB 2615, HB 2615, HB 2349, HB 1926, HB 569, HB 1762, HB 38, HJR 138, HB 42, HB 104, HB 104, HB 129, HB 677, HB 426, HB 668, HB 1699, HB 2017, HB 2128, HB 2038, HB 3783, HB 3717, HB 2316, HB 3686, HB 2563, HB 3883, HB 4021, HB 2788, HB 2663, HB 2663, HB 3305, HB 3173, HB 3474, HB 1105, HB 3531, HB 3531, HB 3490, HB 3490, HB 3597, HB 1295, HB 3512, HB 3010, HB 3112, HB 4215, HB 3223, HB 3223, HB 3464, HB 3120, HB 4214, HB 4511, HB 3704, HB 4081, HB 4783, HB 4063, HB 2783, HB 4937, HB 5085, HB 2510, HB 3426, HB 4361, HB 1169, HB 2516, HB 2347, HB 4034, HB 4700, HB 3560, HB 5150, HB 3860, HB 3146, HB 3924, HCR 98, HCR 92
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • absolutely are We are united more than before that day, stronger, more compassionate, and more determined
  • These dogs served with incredible determination, searching tirelessly.
  • Justice Taylor served as Chief Judge of the 18th Judicial District, where over more than 20 years, he
  • That is the hallmark of our judicial system.
  • to find in here where it does allow for, yeah, so it's page 4, line 5, and less law enforcement determines
Bills: HR1046, SB1733, SB1439
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health May 22nd, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • . obsolete provisional license for out-of-state speech-language pathologists waiting to take the judicial
  • eliminating the obsolete provisional license for out-of-state podiatrists waiting to take the Podiatry Judicious
  • The bill conflicts with federal law by changing who does what. determines donor eligibility and requires
  • The "shall comply" mandate could place a physician in a scenario of trying to determine whether to violate
  • It reinforces the 1990s Patient Self-Determination Act. It's a protection bill.
Keywords: 1184, house, all
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Trade, Workforce & Economic Development Apr 9th, 2025

Trade, Workforce & Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • To determine which entities may serve as a trustee or a substitute trustee.
  • We've worked closely with TWC to determine the resources they need to put, uh, to put this bill in effect
  • The combination of growth with our financial industry in Texas and our strong judicial system creates
  • It will also state that if a security is determined to be invalid under the law of the issuer's jurisdiction
  • claims associated with it and precludes prior holders from asserting a claim, thereby promoting judicial
Bills: HB74, HB175
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session Mar 5th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • error to be used by a comptroller or a public accounts connection with the property value study to determine
  • on State Affairs HB 797 by Leach relating to the Discipline of Judges by the State Commission on Judicial
  • Conduct in the Notice to the Legislature of Certain Reprimands refer to the Committee on Judicial and
  • . of the Committee on Licensing and Administrative Procedures, HB 817 by Cain, relating to the determination
  • HB 851 by Schofield relating to the determination or reporting of the number of residence homesteads
Keywords: 1184, house, all
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • A third element is to streamline judicial review, and that is really modeled off the site's proposal
  • that this body approved, I believe it was two years ago, and also modeled off of streamlined judicial
  • One of the things that this trailer bill language does not do is it does not determine the decisions
  • We need to be working with folks in the Delta to determine their water supply needs in that scenario,
  • In terms of funding levels for specific programs to be determined in future years. Thank you.
Summary: The hearing opened with budget framing from the chair and the LAO, who said the May Revision addresses roughly a $14 billion budget problem and that the environment and transportation subcommittee’s proposals account for about $1.9 billion of the solution. The LAO urged members to focus on solutions that do not worsen out-year deficits, to preserve reserves, and to defer major policy changes that are not necessary to pass the budget, including the newly introduced water-related trailer bills. Members also raised concern about a late-dropped Olympic-related trailer bill, which the LAO likewise suggested should be deferred for fuller review. The first major item was the Delta Conveyance Project and related water quality control plan trailer bills. The administration argued the proposals would streamline permitting, water rights proceedings, judicial review, and land acquisition, and would clarify DWR’s bond authority for the project. DWR said the project is needed to protect water supply reliability against drought, earthquakes, sea level rise, and other climate-related disruptions, and that the tunnel would help move water when conditions are wet and safer for the environment. Committee members from both parties questioned the timing, the use of budget trailer bills for major policy changes, the scope of the CEQA and water-rights changes, the lack of a bond cap, cost growth, and eminent domain protections. The LAO recommended deferring both water trailer bills without prejudice. Public comment was sharply divided, with labor, water agencies, and some business groups supporting the project as climate adaptation and reliability infrastructure, while environmental, tribal, fishing, county, and community groups opposed it as an attempt to bypass public process and weaken protections. The committee then briefly heard the DMV’s Digital Experience Platform fee trailer bill, which would reinstate a $1 system improvement fee to help fund the vehicle-registration phase of the project. DMV said the fee would raise about $7 million annually and offset roughly $59 million to $60 million of project costs, while the LAO noted it would help but would not solve the Motor Vehicle Account’s broader structural gap. The hearing then moved to California High-Speed Rail, where the new CEO presented an updated plan and said the project remains a major climate and infrastructure investment. He reported a revised Merced-to-Bakersfield cost range of $34.9 billion to $38.5 billion, said the agency is trying to reduce risk through direct procurement of materials, and argued that stable annual funding is needed to avoid higher costs from delays.
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

Appropriations Feb 12th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • So when they go through that process, that can be determined. But it is believed.
  • You're recognized. >> And who makes that determination?
  • Chairman in the bill creates a process for the attorney general to initiate a judicial proceedings of
  • That's an determined senators.
  • now with an hour remaining on the schedule already determined.
Keywords: 999, senate, all
IN

Indiana 2026 Regular Session

Friday, Feb. 27 part 1

Indiana Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members of the Senate, that conference committee removed the language in the bill concerning judicial
  • If there's not a way, then they won't be affected to determine what their billion dollars.
  • That's ultimately to be able to determine what their annual revenues are.
  • Technology and data available to determine the age of the Indiana account holder.
  • There's multiple things that they've determined where this individual is at.
Keywords: 964, all
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Day 32 (2-23-26)

Kentucky Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • And the bill guarantees a meaningful and impartial appeal process, including judicial review independent
  • opposing this bill. impartial appeal process, including a impartial appeal process, including a judicial
  • review independent of the judicial review independent of the permitting<00:31:12.799> authority
  • And since we don't take that position in our judicial system, we should not take that position in our
  • It took until 2020 before I got the final determination. can talk about the agencies not being can talk
Keywords: 958, all
Summary: The Senate convened with a prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, then established a quorum, excused absent members, and approved the journal from Friday, February 20, 2026. The chamber also announced caucus meetings during recess and received notice that the House had passed House Bills 111, 527, and 555. New Senate bills were introduced, including SB 220 on small farm wineries, SB 221 on abuse of a corpse, and SB 222 on environmental covenants and an emergency declaration. The main floor debate centered on Senate Bill 52, which concerns fair permitting and licensing practices. The sponsor described the bill as a response to delays and subjectivity in agency permitting, saying it would require clear standards, set deadlines, and provide meaningful appeals without eliminating existing requirements. Opponents argued that a fixed deadline could be too short for complex environmental and public-safety reviews and could pressure agencies with limited staffing; one senator also warned it could benefit large businesses at the expense of workers and communities. Supporters countered that the bill would improve accountability and help businesses, child care providers, and other applicants get timely decisions. After floor amendments were withdrawn, SB 52 passed as amended by a vote of 30 yeas to 5 nays. Before that vote, the Senate also returned SB 50 from the Appropriations and Revenue Committee to the Rules Committee under suspension of the rules. After SB 52, the chamber took up Senate Bill 124, relating to sick leave for school district personnel, and heard the sponsor’s explanation that it was intended to address classroom absences in a cost-effective way that would benefit students and taxpayers. The transcript cuts off during the discussion of SB 124, before any final vote on that bill is shown.
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Children and Family Law (09/30/2025)

Transcript Highlights:
  • appropriately addressed through the existing appeals process, which allows for review of family division determinations
  • legislative<00:30:00.880> branch<00:30:01.120> and<00:30:01.279> the<00:30:01.520> judicial
  • legislative branch and the judicial legislative branch and the judicial branch. branch. branch.
  • 56% of the people who called there were claiming violations of their civil liberties within our judicial
  • And I don't know if this bill is the way to do it or not, but people don't trust our judicial system.
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The committee took up House Bill 518 and House Bill 652FN, both related to the family court system and child/family matters. HB 518 drew extended discussion about DCYF/DCYF’s role and whether the bill should be retained, amended, or studied further. Representative Love argued the agency is deeply troubled, citing abuse cases, lack of training, and fear among constituents, and said he would vote against ITL while preferring interim study so the bill could still be used as a future amendment vehicle. Other members emphasized that the family division has ongoing reform work underway and that abolishing or moving cases to superior court would not solve the underlying problems. On HB 652FN, the subcommittee chair and Representative Pearson gave a detailed defense of the family division, explaining its history, statewide structure, caseload, and the rationale for specialized family courts. Pearson said the bill would reverse progress by shifting jurisdiction back to superior court, overload dockets, and deprive families of judges with specialized expertise. He pointed to reforms already underway, including simplified forms, more mediation, and review of possible judicial bias patterns. Several members and public comments supported keeping the bill as a tool for reform rather than killing it, while critics argued the family court system suffers from due process, oversight, and rule-of-law problems. The committee also heard broader testimony on family court concerns, including allegations of systemic bias, discovery limits, unsworn witnesses, and lack of oversight, as well as support for mediation as a less adversarial and more effective option. Some members said the judiciary needs more judges and mediators, but that budget constraints limit those improvements. The discussion ended with no final vote recorded in the excerpt; instead, members continued debating whether the bills should be ITL’d or retained for interim study and further reform work.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • polling locations; House File 1840, Vice Chair Altondorf's bill dealing with creating a standard for determining
  • Vice Chair Altondorf's bill deals with creating a standard for determining the residence of an individual
  • <00:04:33.840> or parties involved without a court or parties involved without a court or judicial
  • 35.039> will<00:04:35.240> help<00:04:35.639> make<00:04:35.880> that judicial
  • setting will help make that judicial setting will help make that process<00:04:36.400> more<00
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The committee took up House File 1378, an elections administration bill, and first adopted the DE5 amendment. The author described DE5 as a negotiated package combining provisions from several bills on election administration, including notice of temporary polling locations, residence standards for people under civil commitment orders, polling place closure/change notices, absentee voting provisions, special election filing periods, and timelines for filing statements of economic interest. The committee then adopted two additional amendments, A6 and A8, both presented as technical or corrective changes; A8 restored language on off-reservation temporary polling that had been inadvertently left out. Testimony from county election officials and the Secretary of State’s office was generally supportive of the bill’s election-administration changes. Blue Earth County’s Michael Stalberger said the bill would streamline election-day work, improve absentee ballot deadlines, clarify ballot correction procedures, formalize chain-of-custody plans, and speed out-of-court remedies for ballot errors. He also raised concerns about implementation details, including the timing for first chain-of-custody plans, applying candidate filing changes to townships and school districts as well as cities, the short turnaround for college student housing lists, and whether the statewide system could handle new absentee-ballot data fields. Nicole Freeman of the Secretary of State’s office echoed support for the technical cleanup and several policy changes, including removing the permanent absentee application box from voter registration forms, clarifying ballot-board procedures, chain-of-custody planning, and the out-of-court remedy, while also flagging concerns about the absentee application cutoff, city opt-outs from absentee voting, and staffing requirements for absentee locations. Later in the hearing, members discussed a separate proposed amendment, A4/A3, dealing with prohibitions on inducements to vote or register, including lotteries or other chances to win money or goods. The author explained it was intended to clarify existing law and respond to recent examples of large-money election-related giveaways, but after discussion the chair declined to offer the amendment in committee, saying it would likely not have enough support and could be taken up later on the floor. The hearing ended with the technical amendments adopted and the bill advanced with the committee continuing broader discussions on the remaining issues.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 1st, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • It says failure to comply with the requirements of Section 351.257 may be used to determine eligibility
  • So the people that are going to be Deciding determining a verdict, they're gonna know what it is.
  • Restoring faith in our judicial system means ensuring that every survivor's voice matters.
  • Help or assist in determining whether that person gets released or not.
  • In the judicial system. Each system brings its own burden, stereotypes, and wounds.
Bills: HB47
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 1st, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Failure to comply with the requirements of section 351.257 may be used to determine. and eligibility
  • So the people that are going to be deciding or determining a verdict, they're going to know what it is
  • Our judicial system means ensuring that every survivor's voice matters.
  • two determine the best way to empower prosecutors to be able to successfully... prosecute these types
  • Or assist in determining whether that person gets released or not.
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Municipal and County Government (02/04/2025)

Municipal and County Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • by their own census and that's determine by their own census and that's a<00:40:59.880> census
  • or selectmen to determine, cost-wise.
  • Aerials are making those determinations Aerials are making those determinations and<02:25:10.479
  • We’re being held accountable by the judicial system to follow the law.
  • being held accountable by the judicial being held accountable by the judicial system<04:43:55.480
Keywords: 1189, house, all
CO

Colorado 2026 Regular Session

Colorado House 2026 Legislative Day 094 Apr 18th, 2026

Colorado House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • That individual determine their fate.
  • And I'm determine his or her fate.
  • also determine anothers as well. also determine anothers as well.
  • <01:51:58.400> that either DHS or the court determined that either DHS or the court determined
  • will help determine my vote for here. will help determine my vote for here.
Keywords: 981, all
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

HSH Public Hearing - Tue Mar 11, 2025 @ 10:00 AM HST

Human Services & Homelessness

Transcript Highlights:
  • In our state, we have two different types of jail terms: determinate and indeterminate jail terms.
  • In our state, we have two different types of jail terms: determinate and indeterminate jail terms.
  • This bill will improve survivors' faith in the judicial process and protect them.
  • This bill will improve survivors' faith in the judicial process and protect them.
  • ensure a smooth and expeditious judicial ensure a smooth and expeditious judicial process.<00:49
Keywords: 910, house, all
Summary: The committee heard testimony on SB 281 SD1, which would define and prohibit torture as a Class A felony. The Honolulu Prosecutor’s Office, HPD investigators, and other supporters said the bill is needed because existing laws do not adequately capture torture, especially cases involving children and vulnerable persons. Several testifiers emphasized that starvation is a common method of torture that often leaves little visible evidence, and they urged the committee to restore the original starvation language removed from the measure. The Office of the Public Defender said it did not oppose the bill’s purpose but raised concerns that the language was too broad and could create trial issues, particularly around minors and vulnerable people, and suggested narrowing amendments. The chair indicated the testimony had made a strong impression and said the committee would try to move the bill forward. The committee then heard SB 292 SD1, relating to sexual exploitation and safe harbor protections for survivors seeking medical or law enforcement help. The Honolulu Prosecutor’s Office supported the measure, noting that a prior version raised equal protection concerns that were no longer present, and said survivors should be able to seek help without fear of prosecution. Written support was also noted from several advocacy and state groups. Testimony in support focused on retaliation fears, trafficking, and the need for manpower and resources to address exploitation and related crimes. Finally, the committee took up SB 295 SD1, which would increase penalties for violating temporary restraining orders and orders for protection and treat a violation of one as a second offense for the other. The Public Defender’s Office objected to the mandatory jail component, arguing judges should retain discretion and that there was no clear evidence mandatory jail deters violations. The transcript cuts off before any final committee action or vote on SB 295 was recorded.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part I) Apr 30th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • To determine a drought contingency plan consistent with other public water suppliers with that I move
  • future elections, provide easier public interaction and understanding of ballot language created non-judicial
  • avenue for citizens to use before. being required to file a judicial challenge, when the judicial remedies
  • Local law enforcement determined that when the superintendent learned of the teacher's misconduct.
  • Rule making authority to determine which battery types are safe for normal disposal in waste or recycling
Bills: HCR35, SJR59, SJR84, SCR30, SB127, SB317, SB324, SB457, SB506, SB511, SB529, SB547, SB584, SB619, SB636, SB646, SB659, SB715, SB732, SB735, SB771, SB784, SB800, SB801, SB904, SB1026, SB1049, SB1065, SB1181, SB1224, SB1250, SB1383, SB1467, SB1524, SB1528, SB1531, SB1568, SB1585, SB1640, SB1681, SB1754, SB1757, SB1777, SB1972, SB1980, SB2007, SB2041, SB2046, SB2050, SB2055, SB2069, SB2080, SB2119, SB2138, SB2139, SB2154, SB2201, SB2225, SB2268, SB2306, SB2308, SB2310, SB2330, SB2366, SB2375, SB2392, SB2401, SB2422, SB2480, SB2514, SB2530, SB2533, SB2543, SB2544, SB2589, SB2610, SB2615, SB2623, SB2660, SB2662, SB2693, SB2695, SB2707, SB2722, SB2742, SB2753, SB2807, SB2843, SB2844, SB2858, SB2880, SB2885, SB2891, SB2925, SB2938, SB2986, SJR3, SJR18, SB5, SB914, SB963, SB1197, SB1415, SB1437, SB1786, SB326, SB767, SB769, SB783, SB1035, SB1271, SB1619, SB1637, SB1806, SB1, SB260, HB135, HB1109, HCR35, HCR64, SJR36, SJR50, SJR63, SJR84, SJR59, SCR12, SCR39, SCR48, SCR19, SCR30, SCR3, SB2023, SB619, SB2742, SB646, SB1026, SB2880, SB62, SB666, SB847, SB284, SB854, SB1073, SB810, SB1505, SB583, SB1502, SB507, SB1434, SB1376, SB1585, SB1772, SB2016, SB1163, SB1122, SB731, SB397, SB508, SB1436, SB287, SB261, SB1882, SB393, SB1791, SB529, SB209, SB2429, SB1999, SB511, SB2309, SB510, SB584, SB1085, SB2046, SB1975, SB2717, SB1262, SB1524, SB636, SB2056, SB884, SB517, SB1200, SB1845, SB1863, SB2681, SB2200, SB2199, SB1757, SB2050, SB2458, SB2201, SB2660, SB2662, SB1065, SB801, SB2533, SB3014, SB3013, SB758, SB1721, SB2366, SB1013, SB2797, SB2383, SB1754, SB2119, SB2448, SB1777, SB1283, SB2392, SB2076, SB2786, SB2876, SB2284, SB2225, SB1540, SB2929, SB1972, SB2540, SB2595, SB2217, SB715, SB2330, SB1383, SB500, SB1640, SB2001, SB2080, SB506, SB2514, SB2753, SB2398, SB1241, SB2927, SB2173, SB2538, SB898, SB1449, SB2529, SB1531, SB2846, SB2476, SB986, SB1181, SB2075, SB2154, SB2864, SB1359, SB2386, SB771, SB2844, SB2550, SB1351, SB1423, SB1931, SB2245, SB2589, SB2707, SB2807, SB410, SB659, SB2776, SB2693, SB2580, SB1980, SB1886, SB1234, SB739, SB456, SB127, SB1666, SB2843, SB2801, SB800, SB2055, SB784, SB2986, SB735, SB1012, SB324, SB2926, SB2938, SB2007, SB2138, SB1242, SB2615, SB1049, SB2310, SB1224, SB2972, SB1568, SB2841, SB2885, SB3016, SB2858, SB2610, SB2139, SB1856, SB2035, SB2308, SB2306, SB2041, SB1528, SB1681, SB1141, SB2401, SB2530, SB2375, SB547, SB1266, SB1373, SB1467, SB2069, SB2269, SB2480, SB2544, SB672, SB904, SB2695, SB2891, SB2422, SB2543, SB1854, SB317, SB2539, SB2532, SB2925, SB1250, SB2082, SB2203, SB457, SB2357, SB2721, SB243, SB1285, SB2568, SB1959, SB1442, SB1454, SB2520, SB2541, SB1708, SB1237, SB1844, SB1586, HB1392, HB22, SB1551, SB3039, SB2819, SB66, SB629, SB1015, SB2342, SB2903, SB2933, SB1965, SB2477, SB3029, SB2605, SB2419, SB1957, SB375, SB250, SB777, SB628, SB2523, SB2367, SB2703, SB2608, SB2778, SB3044, SB2965, SB2521, SB865
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Criminal Justice and Public Safety (02/05/2025)

Criminal Justice and Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • testify as a witness the non-judicial testify as a witness the non-judicial nature<00:30:06.880>
  • They divided us into three branches: executive, judicial, and legislative.
  • This bill simplifies the process and reduces the burden on the judicial system.
  • the burden on the judici the burden on the judici system<04:32:43.760> uh<04:32:43.840>
  • Thank you very much. businesses to determine who's a businesses to determine who's a fraudster<04:44:
Keywords: 1189, house, all
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/24/2026 - Senate Floor Session

Arizona Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • HB 3212, property tax exemption; disability determination. Finance.
  • just, on the last few bills ago, talked about how harmful mandatory minimums are when we remove judicial
  • discretion entirely from a judge and instead... ...when we remove judicial discretion entirely from
  • A few days ago we voted on a different bill to return judicial discretion to judges in some cases because
  • to be ...essentially adding mandatory minimums if the cause of death is determined to be because of
Keywords: 1182, all