Video & Transcript Research : 'payroll'

Page 6 of 74
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Financial Services Jun 21st, 2026 at 11:00 am

Joint Committee on Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • timing of payroll has an outsized role in all other financial decisions.
  • But payroll has been largely unchanged in over a century. Currently payroll is in batches.
  • A generation ago, most things In two- to four-week batches, because running payroll is complicated.
  • Batch payroll is bad for a worker living paycheck to paycheck because they may only have a few dollars
  • We are trying to build a more worker-friendly payroll system, which we believe is every worker getting
Keywords: 995, all
Summary: The committee held an informational opening hearing for the Financial Services Committee, with Chair Murphy and Senator Feeney introducing new and returning members and explaining that no bills were being heard that day beyond brief introductory testimony. Commissioner of Banks Mary Gallagher thanked the committee for last session’s money transmission modernization law, and several members echoed appreciation for her office’s work. The hearing then featured a long series of stakeholder introductions and overviews of their priorities for the session. Testimony covered a wide range of financial, insurance, housing, health care, and consumer issues. Banking and mortgage groups discussed housing affordability, foreclosure delinquencies, flood insurance, regulatory changes, and the impact of federal policy shifts. Insurance representatives raised concerns about auto and homeowners market pressures, labor rates, tariffs, rebates, e-titling, third-party litigation funding, and public adjuster restrictions. Consumer and advocacy groups highlighted debt collection reform, earned wage access, retirement savings access, public banking, and consumer protections in financial services. Several speakers also emphasized the need for committee expertise and offered themselves as resources for future bills. Health-related organizations focused on insurance mandates, prior authorization, behavioral health access, pharmacy benefit manager reform, community health center funding, maternal health and midwifery reimbursement, and anesthesia reimbursement parity. Other groups, including credit unions, retailers, auto dealers, dental and medical associations, and behavioral health providers, described their roles in the Commonwealth and previewed legislation or policy areas they expect to follow this session. No votes were taken; the meeting was informational and ended after testimony from the sign-up list and a few late additions.
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

February 5, 2025 - 09:00 AM

Transcript Highlights:
  • And legislative use FLAIR today and will use PALM tomorrow to pay its bills and meet its payroll.
  • So the payroll obviously affects state employees, to include legislative employees and judicial branch
  • The remaining modules—the accounting part, the payroll part, and the data warehouse—would be scheduled
  • We expanded the scope of how payroll was going to be handled within Florida PALM.
  • And I'm going to say 'ish' because our financials and payroll is truly a waterfall approach, whereas
Summary: The subcommittee heard updates on several major technology modernization efforts, beginning with the Department of Financial Services’ Florida PALM project, which is replacing the state’s decades-old FLAIR accounting system. DFS described PALM as a statewide effort affecting all three branches of government, with cash management already live and the remaining financial management, payroll, and data warehouse components still in development. Officials said the project began in 2014, was restructured after a 2022 legislative pause, and is now being recommended for a go-live delay from January 2026 to July 2026. Members asked about governance, staffing, contract structure, cost growth, and maintenance costs; DFS said the contract is deliverable-based, the current amendment would add a net $2.2 million, and post-go-live maintenance is expected to be about $13 million annually under the current contract through July 2027. The Agency for Health Care Administration then updated the committee on the FX Medicaid enterprise modernization program. AHCA explained that federal CMS directed states to move from monolithic Medicaid systems to a modular approach, leading Florida to procure separate vendors for integration services, data warehouse, unified operations, provider services, and claims processing, with pharmacy benefits still to be procured. Officials said the project has spent about $334 million to date, with most costs federally matched, and requested $189.95 million for the upcoming year. They also highlighted a 2024 special assessment that produced 81 recommendations, most tied to staffing shortages, and said the Legislature added 47 FTEs, with 17 currently filled or being filled. Members asked about governance changes, production status, data access, and future technology maintenance; AHCA said some components are operational, the data warehouse is nearing certification, and the agency is working to keep the system adaptable and nonproprietary. The Department of Children and Families presented its Access modernization project, which is replacing a mainframe-based eligibility system used for SNAP, TANF, Medicaid assistance, and related programs. DCF said the six-year, $205 million project is in its third year and has already delivered a new customer portal with mobile access, multi-factor authentication, and fraud protections, while also building a worker portal, document management, community partner tools, and workload management functions. The agency said it is requesting $36.625 million for the next fiscal year, the same as last year, and emphasized that the project has remained on schedule and on budget by breaking work into smaller modules and using strong vendor and staff support. Members praised the project’s progress and asked about cybersecurity testing and the long delay before modernization began; DCF said security requirements were built in from the outset and that the remaining work will focus on moving staff off the legacy mainframe and modernizing notices and back-end processes.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • all types of earnings and expenses, including costs drivers usually have to cover themselves like payroll
  • Filing compliance paperwork, maintaining certified payroll records, and more.
  • a public works project, they must provide access to documents associated with that project, like payroll
  • They already know that there is something wrong, and the certified payroll would eventually substantiate
  • Second, the request for certified payroll cannot slow down or stop the construction of projects.
Summary: The committee heard several labor-related bills, with AB 1424, AB 1340, AB 288, and AB 746 all advancing on due-pass motions to Appropriations after testimony and roll calls. AB 1424 would require climate resiliency and extreme-heat protections in CDCR facilities; supporters described dangerous heat conditions for incarcerated workers and staff, while no opposition testified. AB 1340 would allow rideshare drivers to unionize and collectively bargain; drivers, labor groups, and researchers testified that app-based work is low-paid and unstable, while TechNet, Uber, Lyft, and other business groups argued the bill conflicts with Proposition 22 and could raise costs. AB 288 would let PERB step in when federal labor remedies are unavailable; supporters said it is needed because of NLRB dysfunction, while the Chamber of Commerce raised preemption and enforcement concerns. AB 746 would create an inmate cooperative program and a green reentry reserve; supporters framed it as a recidivism-reduction and reentry strategy, and there was no opposition testimony. The committee also heard AB 858, which would extend hotel and hospitality worker recall rights after declared emergencies and extend existing COVID-era protections. Hospitality workers and unions supported the bill as a way to protect jobs after pandemics, wildfires, and other disasters, while hotel, chamber, retail, restaurant, trucking, travel, and attractions groups opposed it, saying the current recall rules were meant to sunset and that the bill would create broad liabilities and hiring complications. The bill was moved to Appropriations but remained on call after the roll. AB 291, creating a credentialed educator apprenticeship program to address teacher shortages and improve diversity, drew support from education groups and stakeholders who said apprenticeships could lower preparation costs and provide better support; it was also moved to Appropriations and placed on call. Later, the committee took up AB 1104, a solar-energy bill intended to clarify that private solar customers are not “awarding bodies” and to ease certain business-to-business solar transactions while preserving prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements for contractors. Supporters said the current interpretation has chilled commercial solar adoption and harmed jobs, while opponents from electrical workers, PG&E, and others warned about expanded “over-the-fence” power sales and the need for clearer limits. Members questioned the lack of a definition of “small,” and the bill was held without a second. The committee also heard AB 338, which seeks $50 million for Los Angeles and Ventura wildfire workforce recovery; the author and county officials described major job loss and business destruction and said the funds would support displaced workers and rebuilding, with the testimony continuing beyond the excerpt provided.
VA

Virginia 2026 1st Special Session

March 11, 2026 - Regular Session

Virginia House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • But our people in their payroll gets deducted.
  • And that's a dangerous precedent, letting a bureaucrat, 400 of them at the VEC, tax their payroll.
  • I think they could probably try and spin this vote as somehow a vote in favor of this really high payroll
  • But our people in their payroll gets deducted.
  • And that's a dangerous precedent letting a bureaucrat, 400 of them at the VEC, tax their payroll.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Floor Session 3/12/25

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • MDE currently has 475 employees, a $49 million payroll, but the fiscal note says MDE would need 13 more
  • MDE currently has 475 employees, a $49 million payroll, but the fiscal note says MDE would need 13 more
  • Representative Bennett continued: “MDE currently has 475 employees, a $49 million payroll, but the fiscal
  • currently has 475 employees a $49 mde currently has 475 employees a $49 million<00:16:06.720> payroll
  • but the fiscal note says million payroll but the fiscal note says mde<00:16:09.560> would<00:
Keywords: 1183, house
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

Conference Committee on HF2432 5/8/25

Transcript Highlights:
  • subject of the investigation has payroll subject of the investigation has payroll through<00:53:
  • Because then they don't pay in payroll taxes and things like that.
  • Because then they don't pay in payroll taxes and things like that.
  • You're going to need more than bank records, more than payroll records.
  • bank records, more than payroll records. bank records, more than payroll records.
Keywords: 1183, house
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • This then escalates to a ticket to human resources, which is then directed via a ticket to payroll, a
  • personal visit to the payroll department, and several ...emails later, you were given an explanation
  • The way that the payroll calendar works is usually you have, let's say, July 1 to July 26.
  • You then cut off the 26th so the Amazing payroll team can process everything and make sure paid leave
  • One is on payroll, the other is on time leave.
Summary: The Assembly Committee on Public Employment and Retirement met for its first hearing of the session, adopted committee rules, and heard several labor-related bills. The chair reviewed hearing procedures, including limits on testimony and expectations for orderly conduct. Members then took up measures affecting public employee bargaining, contracting, confidentiality, school employee benefits, pay stub information, and state correctional health staffing. AB 672 would require public employers to notify PERB when filing court actions involving statutes PERB administers and allow PERB to intervene; it drew support from SEIU, AFSCME, school employees, labor groups, and no opposition, and was passed out of committee. AB 283 would move IHSS bargaining from the county to the state level; providers and recipients testified about low wages, long delays in bargaining, and care access concerns, while counties and public authorities raised cost, scope, and implementation issues. The bill passed 7-0 after members discussed family care worker concerns and the author said he would continue working on the issue. AB 339 would require local governments to give unions 120 days’ notice before contracting out bargaining-unit work. Labor supporters said the bill would make existing meet-and-confer rights meaningful and protect jobs, while counties, cities, special districts, chambers of commerce, and staffing groups argued it would burden local agencies and interfere with existing MMBA procedures. The committee also heard AB 340, which would make communications between employees and union representatives confidential for PERB purposes; supporters said it codified existing case law, while school administrators, special districts, counties, and business groups warned it could hinder investigations. AB 378 would extend the classified school employees summer assistance program to JPA employees, and AB 374 would require more detailed pay stubs for classified school employees; both had labor support and some education-sector opposition over implementation and cost concerns, and both advanced. AB 393 would require cost analyses before contracting out physician work at CDCR and the Department of State Hospitals; supporters argued the state was overpaying contractors amid high vacancy rates, and the bill also advanced. At the end of the hearing, the committee recorded final votes showing AB 283, AB 340, AB 374, AB 378, AB 393, and AB 672 all passing out of committee, while AB 339 remained on hold with a 4-0 vote and some members not voting.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • some funding available to be able to bridge sort of the transition from ATF lag over to predicted payroll
  • Okay, so in terms of impact to budget, you note that one payroll period was 172 million for the state
  • system and how many hours it's payroll system and how many hours it's going<00:04:54.039> to<
  • as well so lag over to predicted payroll as well so okay<00:05:08.600> so<00:05:08.720> in
  • period was 172 note that one payroll period was 172 million<00:05:13.639> for<00:05:13.800>
Keywords: 910, house, all
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 1/16/25

Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:09:54.079> taxes<00:09:54.920> operational<00:09:55.519> and as payroll
  • taxes operational and as payroll taxes operational and Staffing<00:09:56.120> challenges<00:09
  • and 88% of a payroll tax could be<00:20:01.679> hundreds<00:20:01.960> of<00:20:02.120
  • They do when it comes to payroll taxes.
  • They do when it comes to payroll taxes.
Keywords: 1183, house
Summary: The committee’s first official meeting was framed as an informational session, with the chair saying no legislation would be acted on and that testimony would focus on what is working and not working for businesses and workers in Minnesota. The stated topics included earned sick and safe time, paid family and medical leave, labor shortages, and broader business climate concerns. The chair also noted the absence of DFL members and invited questions to be held until the end so testifiers could present fully. Lauren Shodor of the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce argued that Minnesota’s business climate has worsened because of high taxes, rising costs, regulation, and new workplace mandates. She cited chamber survey and research findings saying more businesses are considering leaving the state, that Minnesota companies are investing more in other states than vice versa, and that the state lags national growth rates. She said employers are especially concerned about earned sick and safe time and the upcoming paid family and medical leave program, which the chamber believes add compliance burdens and costs, particularly for small and medium-sized businesses. Matt Hilgart of the Association of Minnesota Counties said the new leave laws affect county budgets and operations because labor is the main county cost and services are often state-mandated. He said the programs were imposed outside the collective bargaining process and can duplicate existing county benefits, increase costs, and create staffing and service challenges. He asked for changes including clearer premium-sharing language, exclusion of elected officials and short-term election workers from paid leave requirements, better exemption and private-plan rules, coordination requirements for intermittent leave, and more clarity for essential employees during weather emergencies. Owen Worth of the League of Minnesota Cities said cities are facing similar implementation problems, with overlapping leave policies and concerns about stacking state and federal leave rules, and he indicated the league would support changes to reduce administrative and budget pressures on cities.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on State and Local Government - 02/18/25

State and Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • of a certification program for payroll specialists across the enterprise to ensure that all payroll
  • specialists are consistently trained in statewide payroll processes.
  • do compliance reviews of agency payroll do compliance reviews of agency payroll practices<00:10:
  • certification program for payroll certification program for payroll Specialists<00:10:14.240>
  • payroll payroll processes<00:10:23.600> the<00:10:23.760> recommendation<00:10:24.480>
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MS

Mississippi 2026 Regular Session

MS Senate Floor - 7 January, 2026; 10:00 AM

Mississippi Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • paying 15% of payroll forever into this. paying 15% of payroll forever into this.
  • the payroll. the payroll.
  • assessing payroll goes down. assessing payroll goes down.
  • payroll assessment. payroll assessment.
  • Gross payroll is the issue. We have about a $7 billion gross payroll.
Summary: The Senate convened with a quorum present, heard an invocation from Reverend Chip Stevens of First Baptist Church in Jackson, and recited the pledge of allegiance. The body then dispensed with the reading of the journal, committee reports, and bill titles, and received several guest introductions, including the president of Mississippi University for Women, the physician of the day, and the session’s pages. The main item of business was Senate Bill 2004, the Mississippi PERS Stability Act. Senator Sparks explained that the bill would provide a $500 million infusion to the PERS accumulated employers account on July 1, 2026, followed by $50 million annually for 10 years, with backup funding from unobligated general funds if needed. He said the measure was intended to help address the system’s roughly $26 billion liability and to support both state employees and local government employers, noting that the state had already taken other steps to strengthen PERS. The bill was advanced to engrossed status, read for the third time, and placed on the calendar for final passage. Senator Norwood asked whether the funding would help local governments, and Senator Sparks said it would, because the liability is shared by all employers in the system and affects local balance sheets and bond ratings. Senator Bryan then spoke at length in opposition to the broader direction of retirement policy, criticizing the committee process, the fragmentation of retirement legislation, and what he described as incentives for privatization and unfair treatment of new hires. He said he would still vote for the bill because it sends money into the system, but argued that the state should focus retirement benefits on older retirees and avoid further benefit expansions. Senator Sparks responded that the bill was a necessary cash infusion to honor commitments to employees, stabilize the system, and avoid insolvency, and said more PERS legislation would follow.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • So if any of you... ...are business owners, you're familiar with paying payroll taxes.
  • And then finally, my last point is the payroll expenses.
  • The state directly pays for the payroll taxes. That's right, yeah.
  • It's an 8.25% state payroll contribution rate.
  • We've heard LBB's assumption of a 5% payroll increase.
Bills: SB1, SB 1
MO

Missouri 2026 Regular Session

Budget Jan 20th, 2026 at 01:00 pm

Budget

Transcript Highlights:
  • But when we're talking about a $50 billion budget and, you know, state payroll, Medicaid payroll, you
  • The Division of Accounting provides central payroll processing functions.
  • The Division of Accounting provides central payroll processing functions.
  • The Division of Accounting provides central payroll processing functions.
  • And so, per statute, we have level percent of payroll contributions.
Keywords: 959, house, all
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

WAM Informational Briefing 02-11-2025

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • team uh and testing uh<00:14:41.800> around<00:14:42.160> Baseline<00:14:42.560> payroll
  • <00:14:43.360> reporting uh around Baseline payroll reporting uh around Baseline payroll reporting
  • It's the amount of money you need by each quarter and the amount of money that you need for payroll and
  • It's the amount of money you need by each quarter and the amount of money that you need for payroll and
  • It's the amount of money you need by each quarter and the amount of money that you need for payroll and
Keywords: 912, senate, all
MS

Mississippi 2026 Regular Session

Finance - Room 216, 2 February, 2026; 3:00 PM

Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • And the actuaries assume a 2.65% payroll growth annually.
  • And I would also be giving up 2.65% annually in payroll increases based on the actuarial assumptions.
  • And the actuaries assume a 2.65% payroll growth annually.
  • So if if I uh payroll growth annually.
  • <00:25:38.480> increases 2.65% annually in payroll increases 2.65% annually in payroll increases
Summary: The committee first heard a bill concerning tax increment financing (TIFs). The sponsor explained that the measure would not change the existing financing structure, but would add an optional arrangement cities could negotiate with developers: a revenue bond guaranteed by taxes generated from the development. The goal was to let developers guarantee the bond and access funds sooner on the front end of a project rather than waiting to see whether tax revenues meet projections. After no questions, the committee adopted a motion that the title was sufficient and reported the bill out do pass as a committee substitute. The next bill, Senate Bill 2873, came from the Department of Revenue and dealt with enforcement of the state’s vape registry law. The sponsor said the bill fills a gap left by prior legislation by creating a statutory forfeiture process for seized products valued at $20,000 or less, including notice, a right to contest, and rules for disposition of forfeited property. The committee then moved the bill title sufficient and do pass, and it was reported out. Senate Bill 2894 addressed local improvement projects funded in 2021 through 2024 that had not been executed or had unspent money remaining. The bill would require return of certain funds after a memorandum of understanding was not signed or after three years with unspent balances, require remittance of unspent interest, allow withholding of some city diversion or state aid road funds for noncompliance, and require periodic status reports to the Legislative Budget Office. The sponsor also offered an amendment giving entities 60 days from the bill’s effective date to request a one-time six-month extension; the amendment and the bill both received favorable votes and were reported out. Senate Bill 2910 would require employers in the PERS system to settle the books if a unit of government or other employer terminates participation. Senate Bill 2911 proposed a new return-to-work option for PERS retirees, shortening the separation period from 90 days to 30 days and allowing certain retirees to return to public employment at up to 80% of the stated salary, with employer-paid retirement contributions and possible health insurance support. The sponsor said the bill would exclude elected officials, K-12 superintendents, and IHL/community college administrators, and he discussed the bill’s expected effect on PERS funding with questions from members about actuarial impact and whether the proposal would affect existing retirement rules. Both bills were discussed but the transcript excerpt does not show final committee action on Senate Bill 2911.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part I) Apr 30th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • ruling, concerns remain about whether Texas is fully complying with Janus and the Administration of Payroll
  • House for Payroll Deduction for an employee of a municipality's police department in a municipality whose
  • If you want to sign up to have your payroll deducted, deduct for your dues.
  • But that doesn't justify why we just can't do it when we fill out our payroll information either.
  • This should be, Texas should be out of the business. of doing payroll deduction.
Bills: HCR35, SJR59, SJR84, SCR30, SB127, SB317, SB324, SB457, SB506, SB511, SB529, SB547, SB584, SB619, SB636, SB646, SB659, SB715, SB732, SB735, SB771, SB784, SB800, SB801, SB904, SB1026, SB1049, SB1065, SB1181, SB1224, SB1250, SB1383, SB1467, SB1524, SB1528, SB1531, SB1568, SB1585, SB1640, SB1681, SB1754, SB1757, SB1777, SB1972, SB1980, SB2007, SB2041, SB2046, SB2050, SB2055, SB2069, SB2080, SB2119, SB2138, SB2139, SB2154, SB2201, SB2225, SB2268, SB2306, SB2308, SB2310, SB2330, SB2366, SB2375, SB2392, SB2401, SB2422, SB2480, SB2514, SB2530, SB2533, SB2543, SB2544, SB2589, SB2610, SB2615, SB2623, SB2660, SB2662, SB2693, SB2695, SB2707, SB2722, SB2742, SB2753, SB2807, SB2843, SB2844, SB2858, SB2880, SB2885, SB2891, SB2925, SB2938, SB2986, SJR3, SJR18, SB5, SB914, SB963, SB1197, SB1415, SB1437, SB1786, SB326, SB767, SB769, SB783, SB1035, SB1271, SB1619, SB1637, SB1806, SB1, SB260, HB135, HB1109, HCR35, HCR64, SJR36, SJR50, SJR63, SJR84, SJR59, SCR12, SCR39, SCR48, SCR19, SCR30, SCR3, SB2023, SB619, SB2742, SB646, SB1026, SB2880, SB62, SB666, SB847, SB284, SB854, SB1073, SB810, SB1505, SB583, SB1502, SB507, SB1434, SB1376, SB1585, SB1772, SB2016, SB1163, SB1122, SB731, SB397, SB508, SB1436, SB287, SB261, SB1882, SB393, SB1791, SB529, SB209, SB2429, SB1999, SB511, SB2309, SB510, SB584, SB1085, SB2046, SB1975, SB2717, SB1262, SB1524, SB636, SB2056, SB884, SB517, SB1200, SB1845, SB1863, SB2681, SB2200, SB2199, SB1757, SB2050, SB2458, SB2201, SB2660, SB2662, SB1065, SB801, SB2533, SB3014, SB3013, SB758, SB1721, SB2366, SB1013, SB2797, SB2383, SB1754, SB2119, SB2448, SB1777, SB1283, SB2392, SB2076, SB2786, SB2876, SB2284, SB2225, SB1540, SB2929, SB1972, SB2540, SB2595, SB2217, SB715, SB2330, SB1383, SB500, SB1640, SB2001, SB2080, SB506, SB2514, SB2753, SB2398, SB1241, SB2927, SB2173, SB2538, SB898, SB1449, SB2529, SB1531, SB2846, SB2476, SB986, SB1181, SB2075, SB2154, SB2864, SB1359, SB2386, SB771, SB2844, SB2550, SB1351, SB1423, SB1931, SB2245, SB2589, SB2707, SB2807, SB410, SB659, SB2776, SB2693, SB2580, SB1980, SB1886, SB1234, SB739, SB456, SB127, SB1666, SB2843, SB2801, SB800, SB2055, SB784, SB2986, SB735, SB1012, SB324, SB2926, SB2938, SB2007, SB2138, SB1242, SB2615, SB1049, SB2310, SB1224, SB2972, SB1568, SB2841, SB2885, SB3016, SB2858, SB2610, SB2139, SB1856, SB2035, SB2308, SB2306, SB2041, SB1528, SB1681, SB1141, SB2401, SB2530, SB2375, SB547, SB1266, SB1373, SB1467, SB2069, SB2269, SB2480, SB2544, SB672, SB904, SB2695, SB2891, SB2422, SB2543, SB1854, SB317, SB2539, SB2532, SB2925, SB1250, SB2082, SB2203, SB457, SB2357, SB2721, SB243, SB1285, SB2568, SB1959, SB1442, SB1454, SB2520, SB2541, SB1708, SB1237, SB1844, SB1586, HB1392, HB22, SB1551, SB3039, SB2819, SB66, SB629, SB1015, SB2342, SB2903, SB2933, SB1965, SB2477, SB3029, SB2605, SB2419, SB1957, SB375, SB250, SB777, SB628, SB2523, SB2367, SB2703, SB2608, SB2778, SB3044, SB2965, SB2521, SB865
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services Mar 24th, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • After we sign contracts with any new client, we integrate with their payroll and time and attendance
  • For those who do, we pull their net earnings four times a day from our partnership with these payroll
  • This frees workers from employers' arbitrary payroll cycles. EWA is not alone.
  • Some of these integrate directly with employers' payroll systems to track hours.
  • It's hard for employers to pay their workers more often because payroll is complicated.
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

IC - Investments and Pensions Oversight Jul 18th, 2025

Investments & Pensions Oversight Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • I believe our June payroll had about 48,000 retirees on payroll. And so it's getting close.
  • We were taking too much out of the trust fund to subsidize retiree payroll.
  • Now, 61% of our payroll is being funded by contributions.
  • We had to have that liquidity to subsidize retiree payroll.
  • The payroll contributions for comprehensive benefits started at the time the program began, and what
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • How much are we putting in in the form of higher taxes, the payroll tax? tax to that payment.
  • Total for... the total tax increase is what for the payroll? $63 per employee per year.
  • So by next year we'll be above a billion dollars in payroll taxes for trying to retire.
  • can hire in this other state or I can hire in California, but here would be better. the cost for payroll
  • And it's supported by a small federal payroll tax that employers pay along.
Keywords: 988, house, all
LA
Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill says at the most opportune time or the nearest possible payroll period where you can get that
  • This bill says at the most opportune time or the nearest possible payroll period where you can get that
  • So I go in the system, type in Jim Patterson, press enter, stop the payroll deduction.
  • of the union anymore, and then that company—man, my employee had to take about an hour to fix the payroll
  • You are not opposed to them going and walking into their employer's payroll office and saying, please
Summary: The House Committee on Labor and Industrial Relations met for its final meeting of the session and took up SB 312 by Senator Talbot, a bill concerning labor organizations, employee dues and fees, withdrawal from unions, collective bargaining agreements, and related notice and reporting requirements. The author explained the bill would require annual notice to employees of their right to join or refrain from joining a labor organization, allow dues deductions to be authorized and revoked electronically, and require stoppage of deductions at the nearest possible payroll period after notice. The committee first adopted a technical amendment set, then considered a larger amendment set that shifted the withdrawal request to the employer, required the employer to notify the labor organization, placed the burden of proving notice compliance on the labor organization, and made the labor organization responsible for certain administrative costs. Supporters said the bill protected employee choice and could reduce taxpayer-funded administrative burdens; opponents argued the amendments created confusion, unnecessary bureaucracy, and unclear invoicing and cost-shifting procedures. Testimony came from business and labor representatives on both sides. Jim Patterson of the Louisiana Association of Business and Industry supported the cost-shifting language as a way to protect taxpayers and public employers. Matt Wood, Peter Robbins-Brown, and Larry Carter, representing labor groups, said they had worked for months to reach a simpler opt-in/opt-out framework and objected to the new amendments as adding complexity and uncertainty. Several members questioned why police, firefighters, and later mass transit employees were exempted; the author and others said those exclusions were tied to federal law or because those groups had not requested inclusion. After debate, the committee adopted the large amendment set and then adopted a separate technical amendment adding mass transit employees to the exemption list. On the bill itself, members continued debating whether the measure was necessary if unions already allow members to opt out and whether the bill should apply only to public employees such as teachers and school workers. The committee ultimately voted to report SB 312 with amendments. The motion passed on a roll call vote, with several members voting no, and the meeting adjourned afterward.