Transcript Highlights:

• They used her retirement to pay off bills, to get loans.
• He didn't pay into Social Security.
• This woman not only did they use her two retirements to pay off their debt, and he went and got them
• I don't think we pay as much attention to the potential upside.
• If you don't know how to properly prompt AI, you're not going to be able to use it properly.

Bills: HB2311, HB2371, HB2409, HB2410, HB2456, HB2457, HB4005

Keywords: artificial intelligence, disclosure requirements, data privacy, minor protection, online safety, HB2371, Arizona divorce, family law, dissolution of marriage, AI arbitration, AI-assisted arbitration, automated dispute resolution, online arbitration, binding determination, recommendation, superior court appeal, de novo review, marital dissolution, spousal consent, minor children

Transcript Highlights:

• They used her retirement to pay off bills, to get loans.
• He didn't pay into Social Security.
• This woman not only did they use her two retirements to pay off their debt, and he went and got them
• I don't think we pay as much attention to the potential upside.
• If you don't know how to properly prompt AI, you're not going to be able to use it properly.

Summary: The committee met in a special morning session and heard several bills related to artificial intelligence and energy. HB 2371 would allow consenting divorcing parties without minor children to use AI-assisted arbitration in simple divorce cases, with the judge retaining final authority; members raised concerns about binding language, privacy, asset division, and spousal support, but the sponsor said amendments were welcome. The bill passed 7-0 with a do pass recommendation. HB 2311 would require conversational AI systems to disclose to minors that they are interacting with AI, restrict sexual content, prohibit deceptive human impersonation, and require self-harm response protocols; Google testified in support, noting similar safeguards already exist in its products, while one public commenter opposed the bill as government overreach. The committee adopted an amendment and advanced the bill 7-0. The committee then heard HB 2409, which would create a statewide summer AI education program focused on digital hygiene, civic integrity, privacy, media literacy, critical thinking, and algorithmic bias. The sponsor argued Arizona needs to prepare students for AI-driven job disruption and teach practical use of the technology, but several members objected to the statewide curriculum and funding implications; the bill passed 4-3. HB 2410 would treat communications with AI as privileged in the same way as communications with human professionals, with the sponsor arguing courts should develop the doctrine through common law as AI use evolves. A criminal justice speaker supported the bill as a privacy and Fourth Amendment safeguard, and the measure passed 6-0 with one present. Finally, the committee considered HB 4005, requiring school districts and charter schools to provide instruction on the ethical, moral, and educational uses of AI. Supporters said students need basic AI literacy and prompt-writing skills, but opponents cited funding and staffing concerns and said districts are already struggling with existing mandates; the bill passed 4-2 with one present. The committee also advanced HB 2456 and HB 2457, both related to energy infrastructure and small modular reactors, after amendments replacing references to large industrial energy users with extra high-load factory customers. Supporters tied the bills to AI-driven data center growth and future energy demand, while opponents raised local zoning, environmental, and public participation concerns; both bills received do pass recommendations by 4-3 votes. The meeting then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• Thank you. pay $92.5 million pay $92.5 million for<01:08:36.680><c> improper</c><01:08:37.080><c> detention
• </c><01:36:17.560><c> sub-subcontractors</c> contractor to pay sub-subcontractors contractor to pay sub-subcontractors
• </c><01:44:19.120><c> payments</c> sets requirements for prompt payments sets requirements for prompt
• </c> follow the rules to ensure prompt follow the rules to ensure prompt payments<01:44:43.680><c> of
• Most contractors pay within the payment.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This legislation by Representative Kim Hicks is prompted by a lawsuit, Texas v.
• This legislation by Representative Kim Hicks is prompted by a lawsuit, Texas v.
• This legislation by Representative Kim Hicks is prompted by a lawsuit, Texas v.
• This legislation by Representative Kim Hicks is prompted by a lawsuit, Texas v.
• This legislation by Representative Kim Hicks is prompted by a lawsuit, Texas v.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• California has led the nation on equal pay, but our laws are only as strong as their enforcement.
• However, the Department is missing pay data for at least 400,000 workers.
• It is a critical step toward ending persistent wage disparities and delivering real pay equity.
• It is a critical step toward ending persistent wage disparities and delivering real pay equity.
• Be sure that non-demand consumers are not paying for costs they are not generating.

Summary: The Senate convened with a quorum, approved prior journals, and moved through confirmations and floor items. Doreen DiAmico was confirmed to the State Water Resources Control Board by a 34-1 vote, Dr. Anne Maria de Mars was confirmed to the State Athletic Commission by 36-0, and Ronald Fiore was confirmed to the State Athletic Commission by 36-0. The body then took up SB 73 on election security, with supporters arguing it would protect ballot chain of custody and prevent intimidation or unauthorized access to voting materials, while opponents raised concerns about transparency, federal preemption, and the bill’s impact on investigations. SB 73 passed on concurrence and urgency with 29 ayes and 8 noes on both the urgency clause and the measure. The Senate also approved SB 929 on annual Energy Commission oversight (37-0), SB 1370 on wildfire-related testimony/oversight (28-5), SB 983 authorizing Port of San Diego job order contracting (28-8), SB 1367 restricting local approval of new or converted private detention facilities (28-8), SB 1257 requiring annual reporting on immigration enforcement incidents (28-8), and SB 1103 requiring large home improvement retailers to report immigration enforcement activity and related records (23-8). SB 1399, which removes the sunset on DOJ reviews of immigration detention facilities, passed 28-7, and SB 873, “ICE Out of Courts,” passed 28-7 to limit arrests near courthouses without a judicial warrant. Later, the Senate passed SB 1292 creating a pilot for camera- or sensor-based curb management with human review and privacy safeguards, despite opposition over privacy and automation concerns, by 28-7. SB 878 strengthened prompt-payment insurance penalties for delayed claims after disasters and passed 29-6. SB 958, a CEQA clarification related to housing and building height impacts, passed unanimously 37-0. SB 924 modernized low-income energy assistance services and passed 35-1. SB 1057 on certification for nurse assistants and home health aides passed, as did SB 1092 giving mobile home residents a chance to bid on park sales (29-7), SB 1123 requiring agencies to consider consumer and other benefits in rulemaking (26-8), SB 1233 increasing utility rate transparency (29-8), SB 1237 strengthening pay data reporting enforcement (28-6), SB 886 shifting data center infrastructure costs away from existing ratepayers (28-6), SB 905 reforming utility incentives and performance metrics (28-8), and SB 909 strengthening public works wage enforcement (28-7). The final item shown, SB 925 on fusion energy roadmap development, passed unanimously 37-0, while SB 954 on CEQA and advanced manufacturing drew extensive debate over environmental guardrails versus economic competitiveness; the transcript cuts off during closing remarks before the vote is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• He later found that he did not need to pay taxes ...to the state.
• He later found that he did not need to pay taxes to the state. So he got a refund for the state.
• You don't have to pay to do that work twice.
• Do we need to include in there sort of model AI prompts?
• Like, hey, if you’re using AI, Do we need to include in there sort of model AI prompts?

Keywords: Freedom of Information Advisory Council, 976, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Well, we now have the COLAs and the AIs, which are going to be hitting the June 12 pay date.
• June 12 pay date. Could you repeat that? I'm sorry, you're going too fast. I'm sorry.
• Yes, we've had an additional retirement pay... Need $2.1 million. Is that correct?
• helping with your overtime, or what contracts are helping with your overtime, and how much we're paying
• they're doing the work correctly because we are bound by federal mandates in terms of standards of promptness

Keywords: 962, all

Summary: The Finance Advisory Committee approved the minutes from its May 14, 2026 meeting and then considered four fiscal transfers. FAC 2026-9 for the Office of the State Controller transferred $4.345 million among fringe benefit accounts in the General Fund and Special Transportation Fund. Members questioned several employee benefit accounts, including active and retiree health care, Social Security, higher education alternative retirement, and OPEB; agency staff explained the transfers were based on updated year-end projections, with some accounts showing surpluses and others needing additional funds. The item was approved, with two no votes noted. FAC 2026-10 for the Military Department transferred $150,000 from the Honor Guards account to personal services and Governor’s Guard accounts to cover operational needs, and it was approved without opposition. FAC 2026-11 for the Department of Social Services transferred $3.3 million among accounts. Most of the discussion focused on a surplus in the substance use disorder waiver/reinvestment account, lower-than-expected TANF/TFA caseloads, federal family planning backfill requirements, and staffing challenges in eligibility operations. DSS said some funds remained unused because a residential care vendor did not enter into a contract, some reserves were intended for future multi-year investments, and eligibility staff require 12 to 18 months of training; the item was approved. FAC 2026-12 for the Department of Children and Families transferred $3.05 million among accounts for year-end operational needs. Members asked about closures of day treatment and community-based prevention programs, and DCF said children were transitioned to other providers without service interruption, with closures driven by provider decisions and financial viability. DCF also explained that some prior funding had been used as gap funding and that ongoing support had been built into the budget. The committee approved the transfer and then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• what Entergy pays, no more, no less.
• So we continue to pay for that.
• This continued uncertainty as prompted creditors to consider other jurisdictions.
• We pay our own litigation expenses. My clients pay for their own attorneys.
• We also pay for the city's attorneys and the utilities' attorneys.

Bills: SB483, SB522, SB783, SB1239, SB1254, SB1255, SB1259, SB1341, SB1664, SB1762, SB1856, SB1877, SB1977

Keywords: utility, proprietary information, customer data, data protection, electric service, customer information, emergency communication, electric utility, privacy, certification, public accountants, interstate licensing, accounting, regulatory amendment, energy efficiency, construction regulations, building codes, Texas, sustainability, cost-effectiveness

Summary: The Senate Business and Commerce Committee met with a quorum and first took up pending business, voting out several bills. Senate Bills 1697, 1569, 1202 as substituted, 1029, 1364, 1185, 924, 1008 as substituted, 264, 1376, and 1358 as substituted were reported favorably, with some sent to the local and uncontested calendar. The committee also adopted a substitute for SB 1202 and later corrected votes on several measures. SB 924 and SB 1376 drew some opposition, while the rest of the pending bills were reported without dissent or with limited nays. The committee then heard testimony on SB 1856, which would create an annual capacity-cost recovery rider for Entergy Texas customers in the MISO region. The author and Entergy argued the bill would better match rates to actual capacity costs and improve transparency, while the Texas Association of Manufacturers and the Public Utility Commission raised concerns about the short 10-day review period, rider proliferation, and the preference for full rate cases over piecemeal adjustments. The bill was left pending. The committee also heard and left pending SB 522 on CPA reciprocity, SB 1664 requiring TDUs to provide clearer, standalone rate-change disclosures, SB 1877 expanding OPUC’s access to market data, SB 1254 and SB 1255 as TDLR cleanup bills on professional employer organizations and mold assessors, SB 1341 updating manufactured housing rules, SB 1239 on sovereign debt and Texas governing law, and SB 1259 streamlining the surveyor-in-training licensing process. Additional bills discussed included SB 1977, which would cap recoverable legal expenses in electric, water, and sewer rate cases; OPUC and some consumer advocates supported the idea as a way to reduce ratepayer costs, while utility representatives warned it could discourage participation and increase rate shock. The committee also heard SB 1762 clarifying that geothermal energy conservation wells are not battery resources, and SB 783 allowing SECO to proceed with future energy-code rulemaking for state-funded buildings. Both drew supportive testimony from industry and environmental groups. All remaining bills heard during the meeting were left pending, and the committee recessed subject to the call of the chair.

Transcript Highlights:

• They're designed specifically to prompt you to think.
• AI tools want to give answers and will not admit or give an answer when prompted.
• When we had our summer institutes this past summer, we did pay them a stipend to be in there, which of
• When we had our summer institutes this past summer, we did pay them a stipend to be in there, which of
• So we utilize a different funding source there, but that would be something to be able to pay stipends

Summary: The Senate Committee on Education Pre-K through 12 met to hear a panel discussion on artificial intelligence in K-12 education. Dr. Maya Israel of the University of Florida gave an overview of AI literacy, the benefits of AI for personalized learning and teacher support, and the risks involving data privacy, overreliance, hallucinations, and misuse. She described the Florida K-12 AI Task Force, which published statewide guidance in March and is now providing professional development, case studies, surveys, and resources for teachers and families. She also noted that teacher preparation programs and microcredentials are being developed, but there is not yet a statewide baseline standard for teacher AI training. Superintendents Van Ayers of Hillsborough County and Kevin Hendrick of Pinellas County described district policies and implementation efforts. Hillsborough adopted an AI governance policy, created an implementation guide, and set rules barring generative AI use for students in pre-K through 7th grade while allowing limited, teacher-approved use for older students with district-vetted tools. Pinellas emphasized digital responsibility, parent transparency, data-use agreements, and a governance process for approving tools. Both districts said AI is being used for lesson planning, tutoring, reading-level adjustments, scheduling, and other administrative tasks, but they do not yet have reliable evidence that AI is improving academic performance. They also discussed teacher training, stipends, and certification efforts, including partnerships with universities and vendors such as Microsoft, Google, Magic School, and Gemini. Drew Allen of FSU Inspire offered an industry-focused perspective, arguing that AI is not new but that education must adapt more quickly to industry needs. He described Inspire’s workforce and research mission, its AI and robotics training for teachers, and the need to build teacher comfort and confidence through incentives and applied training. Committee members raised concerns about student dependence on AI, academic integrity, mental health, moral decision-making, data privacy, and whether schools should return to more paper-based testing. The panel generally agreed that AI should be used with strong guardrails, human oversight, and a balance between technology use and traditional learning. No legislation was considered, and the meeting ended with a motion to adjourn, which was adopted without objection.

Transcript Highlights:

• suit against the owner of Bikini Barista stands, who sexually harassed his employees and failed to pay
• A couple examples of that is a subcontractor in the waste and recycling industry was paying workers a
• In the waste and recycling industry, a subcontractor was paying workers a subminimum wage, and so hundreds
• Before you begin, Giovanni, I just want to say: Cindy, when you’re online, you have to accept the prompt
• So please go ahead and accept the prompt. Go ahead, Giovanni.

Bills: SB5925, SB5906, SB6070, SB6002

Keywords: Attorney General, civil investigative demand, CID, subpoena-like demand, investigative authority, consumer protection, civil enforcement, pre-suit investigation, document production, interrogatories, deposition, oral testimony, confidentiality, trade secrets, judicial review, enforcement action, Washington RCW, law enforcement powers, government transparency, due process

Summary: The committee heard testimony on Senate Bill 5925, which would expand the Attorney General’s authority to issue civil investigative demands in investigations involving constitutional violations, law enforcement use of force and tactics, the Keep Washington Working Act, wage laws, discrimination, and jail-related issues. The prime sponsor and Attorney General’s office said the bill would give the AGO more effective investigative tools without creating new enforcement authority, while labor and civil rights supporters said it would speed investigations into wage theft and discrimination. Opponents from law enforcement, cities, counties, and retail groups argued the bill was too broad, lacked sufficient guardrails, could burden public agencies and businesses, and raised constitutional concerns, especially around speech restrictions and the scope of the Attorney General’s power. Public testimony on SB 5925 then closed, and the committee moved on to the next bill. The committee then heard Senate Bill 5906, which would codify and expand protections against immigration enforcement in non-public areas of schools, child care facilities, health care facilities, higher education institutions, and county auditor spaces where ballots are handled. Supporters, including immigrant-rights, faith, student, and parent advocates, said the bill would reduce fear, protect privacy, and keep families engaged in education, health care, and civic life. Health care and early learning groups generally supported the goal but asked for clearer definitions, model policies, training, and more workable implementation language. The bill drew substantial public support and opposition testimony was not presented in the excerpt; the committee later noted 3,725 pro, 2,147 con, and 22 other sign-ins before moving on. The committee also heard Senate Bill 6070, which would expand missing-person response tools by allowing certain investigative technologies in missing-endangered-person cases, creating new alerts for missing Black people and people with disabilities, and broadening the definition of missing endangered person. The sponsor and supporters, including prosecutors, law enforcement, families, disability advocates, and students, said the bill would help recover missing people faster and address racial and disability-related disparities in alert systems. Testifiers described personal experiences with delayed responses and the need for an Ebony Alert and Purple Alert. Law enforcement supported the bill and requested a related administrative change to transfer the missing persons website to the State Patrol. The committee then moved to Senate Bill 6002, a bill to regulate automated license plate readers, with staff explaining it would set registration, use, retention, and privacy rules, including limits on immigration-related use and restrictions near sensitive locations; the sponsor and ranking member framed it as a privacy and civil liberties measure, and the committee began hearing questions and testimony on that bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• Funding to pay for principal and interest of those bonds are appropriated from the state general fund
• Funding to pay for principal and interest of those bonds are appropriated from the state general fund
• This bill has emerged out of a growing crisis in our country, prompted by dangerous and politicized attacks
• This bill has emerged out of a growing crisis in our country, prompted by dangerous and politicized attacks

Summary: The Senate Higher Education and Workforce Development Committee held its final meeting of the 2026 session, opening a public hearing on Senate Bill 6321, which would authorize up to $6 billion in state general obligation bonds over six years and create the Washington Institute for Scientific Advancement within the Department of Commerce. Staff explained that the institute would oversee grants for scientific research and facilities, with the proposal requiring voter approval for the debt and institute creation. Senator Slatter, the prime sponsor, said the bill was intended to stabilize research funding in Washington in response to federal cuts and uncertainty, and noted it was modeled in part on similar efforts in California and Texas. Testimony was overwhelmingly in support. Representatives from Washington State University and the University of Washington described the state’s research enterprise as an economic engine and emphasized the importance of stable funding for jobs, innovation, and competitiveness. University of Washington witnesses said federal funding disruptions had reduced new NIH awards, cut student support, and threatened research programs in medicine, mental health, clean energy, forest resilience, and climate adaptation. Several early-career researchers and union members testified about personal impacts from grant terminations, furloughs, and delayed career transitions, arguing that the bill would help protect scientific work, workforce development, and public health outcomes in Washington. After closing the hearing on SB 6321, the committee moved into executive session. It voted do pass on Substitute House Bill 2525 and sent it to the Rules Committee. The committee also approved a slate of gubernatorial appointments for confirmation recommendation, and then adjourned after thanking staff and members for their work during the session.

Transcript Highlights:

• They didn't pay. ...pay for the tickets they were supposedly going to sell until after they had won.
• from using emails or documents. ...document tracking software that automatically deletes, without a prompt
• prohibited from using emails or document tracking software that automatically deletes documents without a prompt

Bills: HB11, HB12, HB21, HB26, HB30, HB33, HB37, HB45, HB210, HB303, HB630, HB879, HB1041, HB1188, HB1261, HB1318, HB1465, HB1535, HB1593, HB1778, HB2559, HB2596, HB2692, HB2703, HB2712, HB2742, HB2809, HB2890, HB3012, HB3526, HB5061, HB5092, HB5238, HCR92, SB203, SB317, SB393, SB397, SB644, SB731, SB801, SB867, SB913, SB1071, SB1073, SB1086, SB1087, SB1250, SB1310, SB1359, SB1444, SB1483, SB1705, SB1782, SB1861, SB1897, SB1944, SB2023, SB2043, SB2082, SB2133, SB2215, SB2309, SB2497, SB2532, SB2549, SB2566, SB2617, SB2639, SB2696, SB2717, SB2747, SB2751, SB2790, SB2797, SB2799, SB2841, SB2850, SB2857, SB2891, SB2919, SB2928, SB2994, SB3051, SJR34, SB529, SB541, SB693, SB963, SB1968, SB2308, SB2544, SB1173, SB1646, SB1734, SB1833, SB1, SB17, SB260, SB509, SB1506, SB1637, HB1393, HB2559, HB26, HB3012, HB1593, HB2607, HB3526, HB3810, HB388, HB879, HB12, HB2703, HB30, HB2712, HB2692, HB1633, HB1318, HB685, HB630, HB4753, HB2742, HB303, HB198, HB1535, HB762, HB148, HB1520, HB5061, HB2286, HB1606, HB1041, HB132, HB11, HB45, HB48, HB1261, HB1465, HB1778, HB2596, HB5238, HB33, HB1188, HB210, HB1022, HB1458, HB5560, HB1240, HB1950, HB2027, HB2768, HB2788, HB2791, HB3146, HB3698, HB3699, HB1893, HB3700, HB4850, HB4187, HB1397, HB4885, HB4804, HB3751, HB3611, HB2775, HB2061, HB2003, HB1729, HB1242, HB791, HB2029, HB647, HB2522, HB4738, HB3033, HB3594, HB3474, HB2563, HB2802, HCR90, SJR36, SJR50, SJR63, SCR12, SCR39, SB2023, SB128, SB2043, SB62, SB666, SB847, SB284, SB854, SB810, SB1505, SB583, SB507, SB1434, SB1772, SB2016, SB1122, SB731, SB397, SB508, SB1436, SB287, SB1882, SB393, SB1791, SB209, SB2429, SB511, SB2309, SB1085, SB1975, SB2717, SB1262, SB636, SB2056, SB884, SB1200, SB1845, SB2458, SB801, SB3014, SB3013, SB758, SB2797, SB2076, SB2876, SB1640, SB1449, SB1181, SB1234, SB2926, SB2841, SB1528, SB2891, SB1854, SB317, SB1250, SB2082, SB1237, SB2819, SB629, SB2608, SB1602, SB2009, SB867, SB640, SB1698, SB2680, SB2994, SB913, SB1071, SB1086, SB1087, SB1483, SB1444, SB1553, SB1556, SB1703, SB2133, SB2297, SB2298, SB2622, SB2955, SB2334, SB1861, SB1367, SB2044, SB2363, SB2565, SB1888, SB3036, SB3057, SB3043, SB3063, SB3035, SB203, SB2799, SB2688, SB2522, SB2639, SB2459, SB2655, SB2251, SB1884, SB2617, SB2928, SB2566, SB1897, SB1749, SB2549, SB2553, SB2919, SB1782, SB1705, SB2696, SB1944, SB2215, SB1232, SB2850, SB2969, SB2497, SB1798, SB2603, SB2607, SB781, HB34, HB128, HB130, HB581, HB668, HB677, HB766, HB2259, HB2960, HB2358, HB2894, HB4384, HB2663, HB748, HB793, HB1193, HB1734, HB2340, HB2350, HB3104, HB5180, HB4739, HB1584, HB4344, HB4238, HB4219, HB3806, HB3805, HB3804, HB3803, HB3229, HB3228, HB1922, HB1522, HB431, HB3597, HB1612, HB4224, HB754, HB1314, HB2254, HB2789, HB3560, HB4643, HB1237, HCR98, SB3070, SB835, SB524, SB2233, SB2683

Keywords: licensing, reciprocity, regulation, Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, interstate agreements, housing finance, multifamily residential, low income, tax exemption, audit requirements, affordable housing, local government, development bonds, Medicaid, nutrition support, maternal health, chronic conditions, pilot program, disaster relief, tax rates

Transcript Highlights:

• The potential side effects include abuse, dependency, and risk of fatality, which have prompted federal
• The potential side effects include abuse, dependency, and risk of fatality, which have prompted federal
• synthetic kratom found in products on the market often exceeds the amount found naturally in the plant, prompting
• we start looking at the kind of the two pathways that people are guiding us down, that we do have to pay

Summary: The working group met for a legislative-only discussion on kratom ahead of a special session, with members first hearing a staff memo summarizing federal and state regulation, kratom’s psychoactive effects, reported health risks, and North Dakota’s recent executive action and special session call. The chair explained that legislators in the room would speak first, then online participants, with comments limited to about five to seven minutes, and noted a public open house and later expert testimony would follow. Several legislators argued the issue had already been extensively debated in the 2025 session, citing House Bill 1101, which would have scheduled kratom as a Schedule I substance and was defeated, and House Bill 1566, which evolved into a study. They urged the group to consider both prohibition and regulation, and some suggested a temporary measure until the 2027 session. Others emphasized testimony from people who say natural kratom helps with chronic pain or PTSD and warned against banning a product that some use to function, while still supporting tighter controls on adulterated or synthetic products. Other members focused on public health and enforcement concerns. Some said the executive order created confusion for users, retailers, and law enforcement, and raised concerns about withdrawal, access to treatment such as Suboxone, and whether the state could regulate the product effectively in the short time available. A pharmacology-focused discussion distinguished natural kratom leaf from synthetic 7-OH products, with several members saying the synthetic forms pose the greatest overdose risk and should be tightly restricted or scheduled, while any legal natural product would need strict limits, labeling, and penalties. The meeting ended without a vote, with the chair saying the group would continue gathering testimony and return for further hearings next week and during the special session.

Transcript Highlights:

• And these are questions that actually sunset provisions are designed to prompt.
• And these are questions that actually sunset provisions are designed to prompt.
• And the agency intends. ...are designed to prompt.
• could just challenge that licensing authority and challenge that fee and say, hey, we're not going to pay

Summary: The Joint Administrative Procedures Committee reviewed several agency rules and objections under Chapter 120. First, the committee revisited prior objections to Agency for Health Care Administration rules containing sunset provisions. AHCA’s general counsel said the agency amended 26 of the objected rules but declined to amend five others, arguing sunset provisions are lawful, are not themselves rules, and were consistent with a 2019 gubernatorial directive. Committee members questioned that position, especially for licensing and certificate-of-need rules, and urged the agency to consider legislative changes; no formal action was taken on that item during the discussion. The committee then considered an objection to Department of Management Services Rule 60G-1.001 defining the Governor’s Mansion grounds. Committee staff argued the rule is vague and improperly refers to future land acquisitions without updating the rule since 1998. DMS defended the rule as a general definition tied to publicly recorded property and a master lease, but said it would not object if the Legislature chose to codify the definition in statute. After discussion, the committee voted to file the objection. Members also received informational updates from the Department of Environmental Protection on the Solaris state lands inventory system, and from the Florida Gaming Control Commission on its response to the Tampa Bay Downs unadopted-rule litigation, in which the commission said it has stopped relying on the prior tax interpretation and will not promulgate a rule on that issue. The Department of Business and Professional Regulation said it would remove an unsupported cigar wholesale dealer permit reference, repeal an obsolete excise-tax deduction rule, and amend penalty guidelines and an affirmation in its alcohol, beverage, and tobacco rules. Finally, the Division of Administrative Hearings’ interim director discussed case-processing times, possible changes to ALJ status, and whether the Florida Rules of Evidence should apply in administrative proceedings, emphasizing the need to weigh costs, independence, and impacts on pro se litigants. The chair noted this was likely the committee’s final meeting of the year.

Transcript Highlights:

• Nor should taxpayers be forced to pay for medically unnecessary drugs to which many have a strong moral
• Paying for and facilitating abortion is not within the legitimate mission of a college.
• The WEA account continues to grow, and funds do exist to pay for this bill.
• Maybe staff can send a prompt. Can send a prompt.
• Can send a prompt.

Bills: SB5826, SB5828, SB5909, SB5954

Keywords: medication abortion, public education, access, healthcare rights, postsecondary institutions, college grant, scholarships, higher education, private institutions, Washington State, undergraduate programs, enrollment, program review, public institutions, veterans, tuition waiver, education, survivors, eligibility, 904

Summary: The Workforce Development Committee heard public testimony on several higher education bills. SB 5954 would align Washington’s veteran survivor tuition waiver rules with federal survivor education benefit eligibility, extending age and time limits for children, spouses, and domestic partners in certain cases. Senator Wagner said the bill would help families who lost state eligibility while waiting for federal certification, and veteran advocates supported it as a way to expand educational opportunity for military families. The committee then heard SB 5826, which would require public colleges and universities to provide access to medication abortion through student health centers or referrals and online information by the 2027-28 academic year. Supporters, including students and reproductive health advocates, said the bill would reduce travel, wait times, stigma, and barriers to care for students. Opponents, including religious and anti-abortion witnesses, argued the bill would promote abortion, impose costs on campuses and taxpayers, and expose students to medical and moral harms. No vote was taken. Members also heard SB 5828, which would restore and adjust Washington College Grant and College Bound Scholarship awards for students attending private, not-for-profit four-year institutions so the amounts are tied to public four-year averages. Senator Nobles and supporters said the bill would preserve student choice and prevent aid cuts from disrupting students mid-degree, while public university faculty opposed shifting more aid to private schools during a tight budget year. The committee also heard SB 5909, which would require public baccalaureate institutions to review and report low-enrollment undergraduate programs and potentially discontinue them after repeated low enrollment, with teach-out plans and exceptions for workforce, equity, and accreditation needs. Supporters framed it as a transparency and efficiency measure; faculty and campus representatives opposed it as too blunt and likely to harm small, specialized, and underrepresented-student-serving programs. The hearing concluded without recorded votes or final action on the bills.

Transcript Highlights:

• There's no pause for prompt pay for fraud, waste and abuse. So those are all that prepayment side.
• The reason we have a prompt pay conversation is the industry would hold up payments for the entire encounter
• I just say I hear it, but I can tell you the damage on a prompt pay Perry prompt pay statute was immeasurable
• pay thing.
• The PBM can pay X to their pharmacy but then pay less than X to everybody The PBM can pay X to their

Summary: The Senate Committee on Health and Human Services convened to discuss interim charges regarding fraud, waste, and abuse in Texas human services, particularly focusing on Medicaid and childcare programs. The meeting highlighted the importance of preventing misuse of taxpayer funds, with testimony from various stakeholders emphasizing the need for increased oversight and accountability in these programs. Key points included the alarming rise in healthcare fraud in other states, the necessity for Texas to enhance its fraud prevention measures, and the potential financial repercussions of failing to meet federal compliance standards. Several committee members expressed concerns about the impact of fraud on vulnerable populations, particularly those relying on Medicaid services. Testimonies from experts underscored the effectiveness of Texas's Office of Inspector General (OIG) in combating fraud, yet pointed out existing vulnerabilities, such as inconsistent enforcement and the need for better data sharing among agencies. The discussion also touched on the challenges faced by hospice care providers, with a significant increase in the number of hospices in Texas raising concerns about quality and oversight. The committee heard from various witnesses, including representatives from health plans and advocacy organizations, who provided insights into the complexities of managing Medicaid and the importance of maintaining program integrity. The meeting concluded with a commitment to further explore legislative solutions to enhance oversight and ensure that resources are directed to those in genuine need.

Transcript Highlights:

• urging the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association to reconsider its opposition to the rapid prompting
• urging the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association to reconsider its opposition to the rapid prompting
• </c><00:02:35.840><c> method</c><00:02:36.240><c> of</c> to the rapid prompting method of to the rapid
• prompting method of communication<00:02:37.240><c> instruction</c><00:02:37.960><c> for</c><00:02:38.120
• for any water or tenant to pay for any water or electricity<00:14:47.480><c> use,</c><00:14:48.360><

Keywords: 926, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We have to pay for services to counter these activities, as well as paying for a lot of staff time.
• And if somebody's willing to pay that, they would pay it. If they wouldn't, I'd be out of luck.
• And if somebody's willing to pay that, they would pay it. If they wouldn't, I'd be out of luck.
• I mean, it is happening in that sense of what I think I'm paying and what you're paying and someone paying
• over here... ...sense of what I think I'm paying, what you're paying, and someone paying over here,

Bills: SB6149, SB6175, SB6230, SB6248, SB6312, SB6061, SB6137

Keywords: rural county, frontier county, public facilities funding, economic development, local option sales tax, sales and use tax, workforce housing, affordable housing, county tax authority, RCW, Washington state, community economic revitalization board, CED, infrastructure funding, public works, job creation, job retention, job expansion, county planning, state auditor reporting

Summary: The committee heard public testimony on Senate Bill 6175, the WAVE Act, which would regulate ticket resale and ticketing practices. The bill would create licensing and bonding requirements for resellers, require all-in pricing and guaranteed refunds, cap resale prices at 110% of the original total price, prohibit speculative ticket sales and certain deceptive practices, and direct the Department of Licensing to enforce the law. Supporters from arts venues, nonprofit theaters, artists’ groups, consumer advocates, and labor said the bill would protect fans, artists, and venues from bots, fake websites, and extreme markups. Opponents from StubHub, Live Nation, the Ticket Policy Forum, and Chamber of Progress argued that price caps and other restrictions would reduce legitimate resale options, push activity into unregulated markets, and interfere with consumers’ ability to transfer or resell tickets. Committee members asked about transferability, sports-ticket exemptions, and how the bill would affect season tickets and property rights. Public testimony was then closed on SB 6175. The committee also heard Senate Bill 6230, which would require cash transactions to be rounded to the nearest five-cent increment in light of the federal decision to stop minting new pennies. Staff explained that rounding would apply after taxes and fees, and the Department of Revenue could adopt rules for mixed cash and non-cash payments. The sponsor said the bill would give businesses a clear framework. Retail and grocery groups supported the bill but asked for amendments to protect against audit and consumer-protection liability, to make acceptance of pennies permissive, and to address local ordinances and SNAP equal-treatment concerns. No one testified in opposition, and public testimony on SB 6230 was closed. The committee then took testimony on Senate Bill 6312, which would prohibit surveillance-based pricing, surge pricing, and the use of electronic shelf label systems in large grocery stores until 2030. Supporters, including privacy advocates, grocery workers, and labor representatives, said the bill would prevent AI-driven price discrimination and protect workers and consumers from opaque, unfair pricing. Opponents from grocery and retail associations and a Vusion Group representative said the bill was drafted too broadly, could unintentionally affect loyalty programs, discounts, inventory-based pricing, and existing electronic shelf label technology, and should be narrowed. After testimony, the committee waived the five-day notice rule for SB 6312 by motion and vote so it could take further action. The committee also heard Senate Bill 6149, which would expand the definition of a rural county for certain funding purposes. The sponsor, Senator Jeff Wilson, said the change was needed to preserve rural-designation benefits for Cowlitz County and other counties nearing population thresholds. Staff noted a discrepancy between data sources about which counties would qualify, and the sponsor said he would offer an amendment. Finally, the committee heard Senate Bill 6248 on travel insurance, which would codify a model act and standardize licensing, disclosures, and consumer protections. The travel insurance industry supported the bill, while the Office of the Insurance Commissioner and the Attorney General’s Office raised concerns about unresolved issues, including unlicensed claims adjusters and possible conflicts of law.

Transcript Highlights:

• It's important that we pay attention to each of these building blocks.
• </c> at at the university, we have to pay at at the university, we have to pay really<00:18:08.960><c
• So, pre-operative planning... prompts so that they can learn how to prompts so that they can learn how
• </c> everything in between that and prompt everything in between that and prompt engineering.<00:48:20.800
• They're just willing to pay for deed. They're just willing to pay for it. it. it.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Do they pay you for that? Yes, they do. Okay, that's all I need to know. Thank you. Okay.
• So once we're in it, we have that obligation every single year to pay that vendor to keep our systems
• Like I referenced, if they have a federated IT, they're paying for multiple data centers.
• Referenced, if they have a federated IT, they're paying for multiple data centers.
• You know, prompt libraries and, you know, gem libraries or project...

Summary: The subcommittee held an informational hearing on the Information Technology Services Division (ITSD) within the Office of Administration, with no quorum present and no formal action taken. Chair Voss said the purpose was to review ITSD’s programs, budget needs, and future plans, and members emphasized the value of an informed appropriator. Representative Riggs cautioned that the state should avoid jeopardizing federal broadband funding and asked that AI-related work remain consistent with federal expectations. ITSD leadership, including CIO John Loren and Deputy CIO Tara Damp, outlined the division’s scope and recent modernization efforts. They said ITSD supports 15 executive agencies plus the governor and lieutenant governor, manages about 1,200 production software solutions, handles roughly 35,000 help desk requests per month, and defends against billions of cyberattacks monthly. They highlighted investments in layered security, data center and network redundancy, a unified Microsoft 365 environment, modern development tools, and portal platforms. Damp reviewed the history of IT consolidation, noting budget reductions after 2007, then increased investment beginning in 2020 and especially with ARPA funds in fiscal 2023. Members asked about spending projections, subscription-based licensing, procurement modernization, and the role of non-consolidated agencies such as MoDOT and Conservation. The committee also discussed future funding needs and benchmarking. ITSD said its current spending is about $287 million, with a projected ongoing need of about $345 million to maintain and modernize services, while Gartner comparisons suggested Missouri spends less per employee and as a share of operating budget than peer states. Members asked for more detailed fiscal-year spending profiles for major initiatives and for clarification on what is and is not included in the projections, including Social Services and HR1-related work. ITSD said it would provide additional detail. A major portion of the hearing focused on AI strategy and governance. Tim Marsheski, ITSD’s director of AI and innovation, described a cautious, pilot-based approach centered on secure use, human oversight, and data governance. He cited examples such as an internal HR chatbot that reduced average response time from about 45 minutes to two minutes, pilots with DESE data transformation, and efforts to use AI for code assistance, document scanning, and workflow support. Members asked about workforce impacts, training, closed versus open models, and whether AI could help with auditing and fiscal analysis. ITSD said it is still early on workforce forecasting, but it is building governance, acceptable-use policies, and feedback loops to test tools, measure results, and scale only when they provide value and remain secure.