Video & Transcript : 'court filing fees' :

Page 175 of 500
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/03/2026 - House Education

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • For those without, the average fee was 0.954%.
  • They charge fees. We don't require—we don't permit the counties to charge fees.
  • We do permit ADE to charge fees.
  • we don't require we don't permit the counties to charge fees we do permit ADE to charge fees so the
  • They, TUSD, went to court.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Human Services - 02/24/25

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • There was through two Senate files that we were going to hear.
  • Senate File 1317, it's all yours.
  • </c><00:07:44.479><c> by</c> doing that uh or incurring fees by doing that uh or incurring fees by homeowners
  • </c><01:07:27.799><c> order</c> some kind of you know court order some kind of you know court order treatment
  • aren't safe, you're expected to build new safe courts.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Public Safety Committee Mar 24th, 2026

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • We have 26 items on file. I was... We have a very large agenda today. We have 26 items on file.
  • design files.”
  • “The printing of files that have been specifically identified as firearm design files.
  • and court costs.
  • , and court costs.
Committee: House Public Safety
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/03/2026 - House Floor Session

Arizona House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • SB 1139, family court. SB 1148, Supreme Court. SB 1171, HCCS.
  • House Bill 2946, relating to development fees. You've heard the third reading of House Bill 2946.
  • A small one-bedroom workforce unit could be charged the same fee as a much larger luxury unit.
  • This bill strengthens protections against sudden fee increases during long buildouts.
  • the East Valley, they're charging $30,000 for impact fees on a home, new construction.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Human Services Committee Apr 29th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • File Item 11, AB 798, Calderon. File Item 12, AB 896, Elhawary. File Item 15, AB 1099, Brian.
  • to court-appointed counsel in dependency court.
  • to court-appointed counsel in dependency court.
  • File item number 4. File item number 5, AB 495.
  • It is file item 21, AB 1318, Bonta. File item 22. It is file item 21, AB 1318, Bonta.
Summary: The committee heard a series of child care, social services, immigrant support, disability services, and language access bills, with many measures drawing strong support and no opposition. Early in the hearing, AB 450 proposed a Department of Aging task force to study and recommend policies for undocumented adults age 55 and older; AB 593 would let CDSS identify data-sharing opportunities to improve CalFresh administration and participation; and AB 904 would clarify child care subsidy eligibility so families do not lose care during pregnancy leave, family leave, caregiving, or job search periods. All three were presented as ways to reduce barriers and improve access to essential services, and AB 904 was moved out on a 1-0 call after support testimony from child care advocates and a member of the public. AB 617, which would expand and standardize respite care access for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities by requiring licensing and registry participation, drew both support and significant opposition from respite providers and disability service organizations concerned about added regulation, cost, and possible delays; the author said she would continue working with opponents, and the bill was moved out on a 2-0 call. The committee also heard AB 1220, which would require regional centers to document denials, notices of action, and appeals in individual program plans and include that data in annual reports to improve transparency and equity in developmental services. The bill drew extensive public support from parents, advocates, and disability organizations, with no opposition, and passed 5-0. AB 752 would make child care centers by right in certain residential zones when co-located with multifamily housing or institutional uses, and supporters argued it would reduce zoning barriers and help expand child care capacity; it also passed 5-0. AB 1242 would create a CalHHS language access director, require human review of machine translation, and improve language coverage determinations for state and local agencies; supporters emphasized health equity and the need for better access for limited-English communities, and the bill was moved out on a 4-0 call. Later, AB 548 would continue and expand the Asylee and Vulnerable Non-Citizen Program, which provides case management and integration services for asylees and certain visa holders; supporters said the program had been effective but had run out of funding, and the bill passed 4-0. AB 495, the Family Preparedness Plan Act, would strengthen family safety planning for immigrant families, standardize acceptance of caregiver authorization affidavits, and create a joint guardianship process for temporary separations; testimony focused on fear of family separation and the need for clear school and medical procedures, and the bill passed 4-0. AB 1357 would exclude guaranteed income payments from being counted as income for state public assistance eligibility, with supporters arguing it would prevent recipients from falling off the “benefits cliff”; it passed 4-1. Finally, AB 1201, the Reunity Act, was introduced to require individualized court assessments before denying reunification services to parents with certain violent felony convictions after a five-year period, with the author and a witness describing the bill as a trauma-informed approach to family reunification.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Our late fees were $1,500. And we did, in fact, file a request for reconsideration.
  • The trial court said our housing element did comply with state law, and the appeals court determined
  • It's actually determined and deferred to the courts.
  • It was approved by HCD and then subsequently overturned by the court.
  • If a court throws out their housing element, let them fix the problem.
Summary: The committee heard a long housing agenda with several bills presented before quorum was established. AB 1725, as amended, would require disclosure of nearby oil wells and methane monitoring issues in a specific district; the author and community witnesses described serious health and safety risks in Vista Hermosa Heights, while the California Apartment Association, California Building Industry Association, and California Chamber of Commerce opposed, arguing the bill targeted the wrong industry and that the state should instead fix abandoned wells directly. AB 2110, a local finance tool to create tax increment districts for workforce housing for education, health care, manufacturing, and public safety workers, drew no witnesses in support or opposition and was presented as a way to help workers live closer to jobs. AB 1732 would expand CEQA streamlining for public university and college housing projects; UC and several housing and labor groups supported it, while housing advocates raised concerns about amendments affecting existing 100% affordable housing exemptions. AB 1771, amended into a study bill, would direct HCD to report on the long-standing resident manager requirement for apartment buildings with 16 or more units; the rental housing industry supported studying the issue, while the chair emphasized the need to consider tenant protections and the impact on current resident managers before changing the law. The committee also heard AB 2185, which would direct state affordable housing programs to update guidelines to better support factory-built housing; it drew broad support from housing, labor, technology, and local government groups, with no opposition. AB 2748 would delay new EV-readiness requirements for 100% affordable housing developments, keeping the prior 40% standard through 2035; supporters said the higher standard would add significant costs and threaten project feasibility, while clean air and transportation advocates argued the code changes are modest, important for equity, and should not be rolled back. Members split along those lines, with some emphasizing housing production and others urging more public subsidy for EV infrastructure rather than delaying the code. SB 417, a proposed $10 billion affordable housing bond for the November ballot, received extensive support from housing organizations, local governments, labor, and business groups, but Habitat for Humanity and the Los Angeles mayor’s office asked for specific allocations for CalHome and interim housing; the bill was ultimately moved to Appropriations on an 8-0 vote, with members noting ongoing negotiations over funding priorities. Finally, AB 1740 would create an urban multimodal community designation for Santa Monica, allowing local approval of certain low-impact coastal-zone activities—such as some housing, bike and bus lanes, outdoor dining, and building changes—without Coastal Commission review. The author and Santa Monica officials said the bill would reduce delays and uncertainty for infill housing and local economic recovery while preserving protections for sensitive coastal resources; supporters included housing, business, and city groups. The Coastal Commission and environmental organizations opposed, saying the bill would carve out broad exemptions, weaken public access and appeal rights, and bypass the local coastal program process that Santa Monica has not completed. Committee members debated the Commission’s role, with some criticizing it for opposing legislation and others arguing the bill was a common-sense way to modernize coastal permitting. A motion and second were made on AB 1740, and the bill was left pending with the committee’s action to be taken when appropriate.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Utilities and Energy Committee Jun 25th, 2025

Utilities and Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • But on the legal fees, I think that could be a concern. I also have a concern about...
  • Moving to file item number three. SB 283, Senator Laird. Welcome, Senator.
  • Wallace, aye, aye, Zabur, this is the consent file. Aye. Aye. I'm here and I'm here.
  • Consent file? Item number, consent file. Burner, aye. 17. All right. And we will...
  • Consent file? Aye. Chen aye. That's 18-0.
Summary: The Assembly Committee on Utilities and Energy met without a quorum at first and began as a subcommittee, hearing SB 24 by Senator McNerny. The bill would prohibit investor-owned utilities from using ratepayer funds for political advertising, lobbying, and efforts against municipal utility formation, while also tightening related accounting and consultant-fee rules. Supporters argued ratepayer money should not subsidize utility advocacy or branding during an affordability crisis; opponents said the bill was too broad, could affect legal and regulatory communications, and raised concerns about First Amendment and unintended consequences. After amendments were accepted, the committee later voted the bill out on a 10-1 vote, with one member not voting, and the roll was held open for additional members to add on. The committee then heard SB 283 by Senator Laird, the Clean Energy Safety Act of 2025, which responds to the Moss Landing battery storage fire. The bill would establish stronger safety standards for battery energy storage systems, including fire authority consultation and inspections, compliance with NFPA and building/fire code standards, and a prohibition on locating battery storage in indoor combustible facilities. The author and supporters, including firefighters, local governments, utilities, and industry groups, said the measure would improve safety and coordination as battery storage expands; there was no opposition testimony. The committee approved SB 283 unanimously, 16-0, and later the roll was reopened and the measure ultimately advanced 18-0. The consent calendar included SB 80, SB 491, SB 593, SB 804, and SCR 25, all of which were approved together without opposition. The committee also held the roll open for absent members to add on after the votes, then adjourned after all business was completed.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Transportation - 01/27/25

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • So for transactions that either don’t have a filing fee or where we have specifically waived the filing
  • The estimated revenue here is that our filing fees associated with an online renewal would increase the
  • </c><01:08:23.359><c> fees</c><01:08:23.560><c> is</c> Revenue here is that our filing fees is Revenue
  • here is that our filing fees is associated<01:08:24.440><c> with</c><01:08:24.679><c> an</c><01:08:24.839
  • </c><01:24:53.040><c> um</c> a a a plate fee and a a title fee um a a a plate fee and a a title fee um
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Appropriations May 5th, 2026

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Institutions are competing nationally for talent, and policies are evolving in real time through the courts
  • In a lot of jurisdictions, this is the pay that the ADA, the prosecutor, the rank-and-file lawyer that
  • So you all actually, with this, will give us the base of $60,000, but also I've had to file a lawsuit
  • If you have a well that's been inactive for five years or more, you have to pay an assessment fee.
  • I filed the bill to do it.
Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 513 by Representative Young, which would regulate name, image, and likeness activity for intercollegiate and interscholastic athletes, especially high school athletes. Young said the bill reflects recommendations from a task force and sets guardrails such as parental consent and prohibited NIL categories. The committee adopted a technical amendment and then reported the bill favorably as amended. Members then heard several Senate bills from Senator Mizell and Senator Cloud. Senate Bill 233 would create a statewide data exchange compact to allow state agencies to share information more efficiently; it was reported favorably. Senate Bill 300 would make various changes to the Procurement Code, including auction techniques, sole sourcing for consulting services in limited cases, and procurement process clarifications; it was reported favorably. Senate Bill 303 would allow executive branch agencies to buy or share technology solutions with other states and use the federal GSA schedule, and it was reported favorably as amended. Senate Bill 411, removing a 20-year lease limitation for certain Orleans Parish state property, was also reported favorably. The committee spent substantial time on House Bill 660 and House Bill 719, both dealing with district attorney funding and staffing. HB 660 would raise the state warrant amount for assistant district attorney salaries from $50,000 to $60,000, with supporters arguing it is needed to recruit and retain prosecutors; an opposition witness argued the state should fund both prosecutors and public defenders more equitably. The committee adopted an amendment making the bill effective only upon appropriation and reported it favorably as amended. HB 719 would increase the number of assistant district attorney warrants statewide, with most of the new warrants directed to Baton Rouge, St. Tammany, and Caddo; it too was amended to be subject to appropriation and reported favorably as amended. House Bill 596, which would have created an inactive well-feet assessment credit for oil and gas operators, was voluntarily deferred after concerns that it could reduce funding for the oil field site restoration fund. Later, the committee reported favorably as amended House Bill 802, which redirects existing revenue to watershed and flood restoration work in the Amite River Basin, and House Bill 940, which creates a task force and rules framework for law enforcement responses to unlawful drone activity. It also reported favorably House Bill 76 on coverage for orally administered anti-cancer medications, House Bill 950 on consumer protection materials for seniors, and began discussion of House Bill 1028, which would require higher Medicaid reimbursement rates for non-emergency medical transportation providers.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Environment, Climate and Legacy - 04/03/25

Environment, Climate, and Legacy

Transcript Highlights:
  • There are some fees in the bill raising our AIS fees, with the small portion of general fund going back
  • There are some fees in the bill raising our AIS fees, with the small portion of general fund going back
  • Uh there are fees that are part fee.
  • Um the water use fees pay.
  • And we'll now lay over Senate file file file 305<01:02:47.839><c> for</c><01:02:48.160><c> possible</
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Court Manski is the committee director.
  • Supreme Court rejected that challenge.
  • The Texas Supreme Court has held that decades ago.
  • And the Supreme Court took up Carson v.
  • There's not 11,000 bills filed. Thank you. 2,283.
Committee: Senate Education
Summary: The Senate Committee on Education K-16 convened with a quorum, adopted its committee rules, and heard opening remarks from members introducing staff and outlining priorities for the session. Members from both parties emphasized education as a major issue, while several Republicans framed the committee’s work around school choice and parent empowerment. Senator West and other Democrats stressed protecting public schools, listening to Texans, and considering the effects of vouchers or education savings accounts on school districts and communities. Chairman Creighton laid out Senate Bill 2, the Texas Education Freedom Act, describing it as a universal education savings account program modeled on similar programs in other states. He said the bill would provide about $200 million for a universal eligibility pool and additional funding for students with disabilities and lower-income families, with priority weighting for former public school students. He also highlighted anti-fraud measures, vendor pre-approval, criminal background checks, cybersecurity protections, annual testing requirements for participating students, and the use of the Comptroller rather than TEA to administer the program. Creighton repeatedly said the bill is not a voucher and argued it would not take money from public schools, which he said would receive separate historic funding increases. Members questioned Creighton about the 500% of federal poverty line definition, the adequacy of the $10,000 ESA amount, whether the program would favor students already in private school, how microschools and homeschool pods would fit, and whether the bill protects religious liberty and private-school autonomy. Democrats raised concerns about disability protections, 504 students, foster children, public-school funding, open records, and the historical context of vouchers. Republicans generally supported the bill as a way to expand options for parents and students, while also asking about administration, fraud prevention, and data security. After member questions, the committee began invited testimony, with EdChoice President Robert Inlow presenting in support of SB 2 and citing the growth and reported success of school choice programs nationwide.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Insurance Committee Apr 22nd, 2026

Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • We will take those first: file item number 1, SB 1209, Senator Allen, followed by file item 3, SB 1301
  • We'll go back to the file. We will take file item number 7, SB 982, Senator Wiener.
  • We'll go back to the file. We will take file item number 7, SB 982, Senator Wiener.
  • File item 2, SB 1026, Gonzales. Senators Jones, Menjavar: aye. File item 3, SB 1301, Allen.
  • File item 4, SB 877. Senators... File item four, SB 877. Senators Jones, Rubio.
Committee: Senate Insurance
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • That it's up to us to pass policy, not to the courts. You're recognized.
  • Just so I get this right, there is no fee increase for dairy farmers in the state of Oklahoma.
  • Representative, under the current structure of the fees.
  • Right now, they're paying $5 fee on that.
  • You know, we've got to collect this fee so we can cover the price of milk.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Ways and Means Committee 4/24/25

Ways and Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • File 2445.
  • </c> now renew my motion that Senate File now renew my motion that Senate File 1959<00:01:30.400><c>
  • </c> the housing finance bill, House File the housing finance bill, House File 2445.<00:01:51.920><c>
  • </c> House File 2445, the first engrossment. House File 2445, the first engrossment.
  • Finally, uh we have Senate File File File 2216<00:02:32.239><c> which</c><00:02:32.480><c> is</c><00:
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session-Day 18, March 3, 2026-AM

Wyoming Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate File 45 concurrence: 30 no, 1 excused. >> By your vote, you have failed to concur on Senate File
  • Senate file 87, felony bill.
  • Hearing no objection, it is so ordered. ... and it goes to court, the court can award damages to those
  • </c><00:21:23.760><c> determines</c> frivolous and the court determines frivolous and the court determines
  • </c> number one Senate file or house bill 39. number one Senate file or house bill 39.
CO

Colorado 2026 Regular Session

Colorado House 2026 Legislative Day 055 Mar 9th, 2026

Colorado House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, there's $8 billion that we're in debt. a word in our filing fees because it has a word in our filing
  • Here again, we’re just going to balance this on fees, and we go back to a fee that was pre-TABOR like
  • I mean, fees are a legitimate idea. A fee for service is a legitimate idea.
  • And what is this fee going to be? Because it’s for printing documents. It’s for a document fee.
  • It’s for a document fee.
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Executive Departments and Administration (01/21/2026)

Executive Departments and Administration

Transcript Highlights:
  • And it's a small fee. No one wants to pay fees; I've learned that in government. No one likes them.
  • It would be a fee for the establishment, but likely would see an increase of fees across the massage
  • So if someone files a complaint and tries to be anonymous, we say please file a complaint when you're
  • There is a very small fee.
  • Um... ...the courts will rule.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part I) May 15th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill removes the state-mandated unnecessary $3.00 fee.
  • The rule is suspended, relating to the fee for a driving safety course.
  • House Bill 3012, relating to the fee for a driving safety course.
  • For a motion, we'll file a passage of House Bill 3526 by Corporation Leon.
  • It brings the city to the table in a court.
Bills: HB 11 , HB 12 , HB21 , HB26 , HB30 , HB33 , HB37 , HB45 , HB210 , HB303 , HB630 , HB879 , HB 1041 , HB 1188 , HB 1261 , HB1318 , HB1465 , HB1535 , HB1593 , HB1778 , HB2559 , HB2596 , HB2692 , HB2703 , HB2712 , HB2742 , HB2809 , HB2890 , HB3012 , HB3526 , HB5061 , HB5092 , HB5238 , HCR92 , SB203 , SB317 , SB393 , SB397 , SB644 , SB731 , SB801 , SB867 , SB913 , SB1071 , SB1073 , SB1086 , SB1087 , SB1250 , SB1310 , SB1359 , SB1444 , SB1483 , SB1705 , SB1782 , SB1861 , SB1897 , SB1944 , SB2023 , SB2043 , SB2082 , SB2133 , SB2215 , SB2309 , SB2497 , SB2532 , SB2549 , SB2566 , SB2617 , SB2639 , SB2696 , SB2717 , SB2747 , SB2751 , SB2790 , SB2797 , SB2799 , SB2841 , SB2850 , SB2857 , SB2891 , SB2919 , SB2928 , SB2994 , SB3051 , SJR34 , SB529 , SB541 , SB693 , SB963 , SB1968 , SB2308 , SB2544 , SB1173 , SB1646 , SB1734 , SB1833 , SB1 , SB17 , SB260 , SB509 , SB1506 , SB1637 , HB1393 , HB2559 , HB26 , HB3012 , HB1593 , HB2607 , HB3526 , HB3810 , HB388 , HB879 , HB 12 , HB2703 , HB30 , HB2712 , HB2692 , HB1633 , HB1318 , HB685 , HB630 , HB4753 , HB2742 , HB303 , HB198 , HB1535 , HB762 , HB148 , HB1520 , HB5061 , HB2286 , HB1606 , HB 1041 , HB132 , HB 11 , HB45 , HB48 , HB 1261 , HB1465 , HB1778 , HB2596 , HB5238 , HB33 , HB 1188 , HB210 , HB 1022 , HB1458 , HB5560 , HB 1240 , HB1950 , HB2027 , HB2768 , HB2788 , HB2791 , HB3146 , HB3698 , HB3699 , HB1893 , HB3700 , HB4850 , HB4187 , HB1397 , HB4885 , HB4804 , HB3751 , HB3611 , HB2775 , HB2061 , HB2003 , HB1729 , HB 1242 , HB791 , HB2029 , HB647 , HB2522 , HB4738 , HB3033 , HB3594 , HB3474 , HB2563 , HB2802 , HCR90 , SJR36 , SJR50 , SJR63 , SCR12 , SCR39 , SB2023 , SB128 , SB2043 , SB62 , SB666 , SB847 , SB284 , SB854 , SB810 , SB1505 , SB583 , SB507 , SB1434 , SB1772 , SB2016 , SB1122 , SB731 , SB397 , SB508 , SB1436 , SB287 , SB1882 , SB393 , SB1791 , SB209 , SB2429 , SB511 , SB2309 , SB1085 , SB1975 , SB2717 , SB1262 , SB636 , SB2056 , SB884 , SB1200 , SB1845 , SB2458 , SB801 , SB3014 , SB3013 , SB758 , SB2797 , SB2076 , SB2876 , SB1640 , SB1449 , SB1181 , SB1234 , SB2926 , SB2841 , SB1528 , SB2891 , SB1854 , SB317 , SB1250 , SB2082 , SB1237 , SB2819 , SB629 , SB2608 , SB1602 , SB2009 , SB867 , SB640 , SB1698 , SB2680 , SB2994 , SB913 , SB1071 , SB1086 , SB1087 , SB1483 , SB1444 , SB1553 , SB1556 , SB1703 , SB2133 , SB2297 , SB2298 , SB2622 , SB2955 , SB2334 , SB1861 , SB1367 , SB2044 , SB2363 , SB2565 , SB1888 , SB3036 , SB3057 , SB3043 , SB3063 , SB3035 , SB203 , SB2799 , SB2688 , SB2522 , SB2639 , SB2459 , SB2655 , SB2251 , SB1884 , SB2617 , SB2928 , SB2566 , SB1897 , SB1749 , SB2549 , SB2553 , SB2919 , SB1782 , SB1705 , SB2696 , SB1944 , SB2215 , SB1232 , SB2850 , SB2969 , SB2497 , SB1798 , SB2603 , SB2607 , SB781 , HB34 , HB 128 , HB 130 , HB581 , HB668 , HB677 , HB766 , HB2259 , HB2960 , HB2358 , HB2894 , HB4384 , HB2663 , HB748 , HB793 , HB 1193 , HB1734 , HB2340 , HB2350 , HB3104 , HB5180 , HB4739 , HB1584 , HB4344 , HB4238 , HB4219 , HB3806 , HB3805 , HB3804 , HB3803 , HB3229 , HB3228 , HB1922 , HB1522 , HB431 , HB3597 , HB1612 , HB4224 , HB754 , HB1314 , HB2254 , HB2789 , HB3560 , HB4643 , HB 1237 , HCR98 , SB3070 , SB835 , SB524 , SB2233 , SB2683
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • specific budget augmentations not related to the departments before us, please refer to the daily file
  • at this point, has stopped our work there. and are unable to collect fees.
  • I think the courts are dramatically complicating our implementation of this.
  • With that, there is a recognition about fees that I think has been called out.
  • Other fund reversions, and we are concerned that those are coming from fee-based positions.