Wisconsin Senate Bill SJR5

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/27/23
• Refer: 1/27/23
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

The appropriation authority of the legislature and the allocation of moneys Wisconsin receives from the federal government (second consideration).

Impact

If ratified, the changes proposed in SJR5 would have a far-reaching impact on state laws regarding fiscal management, particularly in how federal funds are handled. Currently, under existing statutes, the governor has the unilateral authority to accept and allocate federal funds, which has led to criticism over accountability and oversight. By restricting this authority and mandating legislative approval for allocations, the amendment aims to enhance the legislature's control over fiscal decisions, thus increasing legislative scrutiny of how federal resources are utilized within the state.

Summary

SJR5 is a proposed constitutional amendment that seeks to modify the appropriation authority of the Wisconsin state legislature regarding funds received from the federal government. The specific constitutional amendment would stipulate that the legislature cannot delegate its power to determine how these federal funds should be appropriated. Furthermore, it establishes that the governor would be prohibited from allocating any federal moneys accepted on behalf of the state without the legislature's approval through a joint resolution or as designated by legislative rule. This amendment is particularly significant as it represents a shift in the balance of power between the legislative and executive branches in the state.

Contention

The proposal has sparked debate among legislators and stakeholders. Proponents argue that the amendment is essential for ensuring that the legislature maintains control over state finances and that there is greater transparency and accountability in how federal funds are spent. Critics, however, contend that this change could slow down the allocation of much-needed federal assistance, particularly in times of crisis, as it may lead to bureaucratic delays due to the need for legislative approval. This contention highlights the ongoing struggle for power and control between the legislative and executive branches, and points to the broader implications of such a shift in authority.