To create section 27 of article I of the constitution; Relating to: prohibiting governmental entity discrimination (second consideration).
Impact
If passed, AJR102 would create significant changes in how state laws regulate interactions between citizens and governmental entities. It enforces a standard prohibiting any form of discrimination within government operations. This could lead to the implementation of new policies and training programs designed to educate government employees about civil rights issues and the importance of treating all individuals fairly, affecting hiring, service provision, and overall operational protocols within state agencies.
Summary
AJR102 is a legislative measure aimed at prohibiting discrimination by governmental entities. The bill emphasizes the importance of equal treatment for all individuals when interacting with government services and programs. By seeking to institutionalize this principle, AJR102 reflects a proactive commitment to civil rights and aims to eliminate any instances where discrimination may impede access to governmental services or benefits. Supporters argue that this bill is necessary to ensure fairness and promote equality across all societal sectors.
Contention
Discussions surrounding AJR102 indicate some contention, particularly regarding how broadly or narrowly discrimination is defined within the bill. Critics raise concerns that overly broad interpretations could lead to unintended consequences or administrative burdens for governmental entities. Additionally, there is debate over whether existing measures are sufficient to address discrimination, with opponents of the bill arguing that current laws already provide adequate protections, making this bill unnecessary. Hence, balancing the need for protection against potential bureaucratic overreach is a key point of contention.
Relating to the implementation of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives and certain prohibited considerations in contracting by governmental entities.
Proposing An Amendment To Article Vi, Section 3, Of The Hawaii State Constitution To Increase The Mandatory Retirement Age For State Justices And Judges.
A concurrent resolution to amend and reenact section 9 of article III and section 16 of article IV of the Constitution of North Dakota, relating to the threshold for approving a constitutional amendment.
Applying to the Congress of the United States to call a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for the limited purpose of proposing one or more amendments to the constitution to impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and to limit the terms of office of federal officials and members of Congress.
Applying to the Congress of the United States to call a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for the limited purpose of proposing one or more amendments to the constitution to impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and to limit the terms of office of federal officials and members of Congress.
Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.
Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.
Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii State Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.