To amend section 10 (1) (c) of article V of the constitution; Relating to: prohibiting the governor from using the partial veto to create or increase any tax or fee (second consideration).
Impact
If enacted, SJR116 would significantly impact the legislative landscape by requiring that tax increases or new taxes can only be approved through a full legislative process rather than allowing the governor to selectively veto portions of budget bills. This means that lawmakers would retain more control over taxation, potentially leading to more thorough deliberation and debate over fiscal policies. The resolution may also foster a greater sense of accountability in governance, as legislators would be directly responsible for any tax changes rather than allowing a single executive to influence such decisions unilaterally.
Summary
SJR116 is a proposed joint resolution that aims to prohibit the governor from utilizing the partial veto power to create or increase any tax or fee. This resolution addresses a critical aspect of state governance and fiscal policy, redefining the extent of executive power in relation to state taxation and revenue generation. By limiting the governor's ability to affect taxes through a partial veto, SJR116 seeks to ensure that any tax changes must go through the legislative process, thereby enhancing checks and balances in state fiscal matters.
Contention
There are notable points of contention regarding SJR116, particularly among those who view it as either a necessary reform or an unnecessary restriction on executive powers. Supporters argue that it fortifies the legislative authority and prevents any misuse of the partial veto that may lead to unfavorable tax policies driven by executive preference. Conversely, opponents might contend that it limits the flexibility of the governor in fiscal matters, especially in times of urgent financial needs. The debate surrounding this resolution encapsulates larger discussions about the balance of power between branches of government and the implications for future fiscal governance.
Crossfiled
To amend section 10 (1) (c) of article V of the constitution; Relating to: prohibiting the governor from using the partial veto to create or increase any tax or fee (second consideration).
A concurrent resolution to amend and reenact section 9 of article III and section 16 of article IV of the Constitution of North Dakota, relating to the threshold for approving a constitutional amendment.
Requiring each resolution adopted by the legislative assembly proposing a constitutional amendment and each initiative petition and measure proposing a constitutional amendment to be comprised of a single subject.
Applying to the Congress of the United States to call a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for the limited purpose of proposing one or more amendments to the constitution to impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and to limit the terms of office of federal officials and members of Congress.
Applying to the Congress of the United States to call a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for the limited purpose of proposing one or more amendments to the constitution to impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and to limit the terms of office of federal officials and members of Congress.
Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.
Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.
Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii State Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.