Video & Transcript Research : 'reasonable accommodation'

Page 6 of 500
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • So while the caseworker thought that was reasonable, the judge did not.
  • One of the reasons why troponin would be elevated is myocarditis.
  • Are there not other reasons that troponin can be elevated, Doctor?
  • But there are a lot of reasons that troponin can be elevated. Thank you.
  • And for that reason, we strongly support the bill.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • And so I think that's the reason why we have to be system-...
  • There's no reason for young people to stay or come back. You lose your youth.
  • They really need to bring down the removal of children, and I understand the reasons for that.
  • This bill requires a burden shift to be on a reasonable...
  • Two things: the beyond reasonable doubt standard and then active efforts.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session Mar 11th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • unanimous, it was unanimous. outside of the House, but it got vetoed by the governor for unreasonable reasons
Bills: SJR36, SJR34, SJR18, SCR9, SB616, SB565, SB384, SB140, SB262, SB370, SB372, SB495, SB627, SB764, SB842, SB971, SB767, SB480, SB1066, SB929, SB765, SB523, SB62, SB19, SB18, SB666, SB688, SB707, SB888, SB687, SB706, SB847, SB869, SB890, SB992, SB1145, SB494, SB290, SB766, SB11, SB10, SB13, SB263, SB412, SB20, SB441, SB442, SB1621, SCR13, SB569, SB314, SB25, SB293, SB914, SB260, SB1248, SB740, SB14, SJR34, SCR9, SB10, SB11, SB19, SB20, SB25, SB62, SB140, SB260, SB262, SB290, SB293, SB314, SB370, SB384, SB412, SB441, SB442, SB480, SB494, SB495, SB616, SB627, SB706, SB707, SB764, SB767, SB869, SB890, SB929, SB992, SB1145, SB1621, SJR34, SB140, SB262, SB370, SB480, SB627, SB764, SB767, SR224, SB1626, SB1627, SB1628, SB1629, SB1630, SB1631, SB1632, SB1633, SB1634, SB1635, SB1636, SB1637, SB1638, SB1639, SB1640, SB1641, SB1642, SB1643, SB1644, SB1645, SB1646, SB1647, SB1648, SB1649, SB1650, SB1651, SB1652, SB1653, SB1654, SB1656, SB1657, SB1658, SB1659, SB1660, SB1661, SB1662, SB1663, SB1664, SB1665, SB1666, SB1667, SB1668, SB1669, SB1670, SB1671, SB1672, SB1673, SB1674, SB1675, SB1676, SB1677, SB1678, SB1679, SB1680, SB1681, SB1682, SB1683, SB1684, SB1685, SB1686, SB1687, SB1688, SB1689, SB1690, SB1691, SB1692, SB1693, SB1694, SB1695, SB1696, SB1697, SB1698, SB1699, SB1700, SB1626, SB1627, SB1628, SB1629, SB1630, SB1631, SB1632, SB1633, SB1634, SB1635, SB1636, SB1637, SB1638, SB1639, SB1640, SB1641, SB1642, SB1643, SB1644, SB1645, SB1646, SB1647, SB1648, SB1649, SB1650, SB1651, SB1652, SB1653, SB1654, SB1656, SB1657, SB1658, SB1659, SB1660, SB1661, SB1662, SB1663, SB1664, SB1665, SB1666, SB1667, SB1668, SB1669, SB1670, SB1671, SB1672, SB1673, SB1674, SB1675, SB1676, SB1677, SB1678, SB1679, SB1680, SB1681, SB1682, SB1683, SB1684, SB1685, SB1686, SB1687, SB1688, SB1689, SB1690, SB1691, SB1692, SB1693, SB1694, SB1695, SB1696, SB1697, SB1698, SB1699, SB1700
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Health and Welfare May 19th, 2026

Health and Welfare

Transcript Highlights:
  • And then last, it reforms Medicaid's reasonable opportunity periods.
  • And so when we say a single reasonable opportunity period, so basically does that mean if for any reason
  • Finley mentioned that she thinks if there was a reason that we could maybe go more than a reasonable
  • And the reason I can't ask you questions, the reason I bring up these questions is for the committee
  • I think that's a reasonable approach.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session May 29th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • For that reason, we will limit the number of resolutions and recognitions at the beginning of each day
  • So for those reasons, I...
  • The reason that the third reading amendment was not adopted word for word is because a single family
  • It is for this reason that I move the adoption of the Conference Committee Report.
  • There are no substantive changes and for that reason I move, Mr.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Debate to add SF3210 to the Calendar for the Day for Tue., May 12 5/11/26

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • accommodation section, which says, among other things, “Reasonable accommodation means steps must be
  • accommodation section, which says, among other things, “Reasonable accommodation means steps must be
  • This language is about the process of reasonable accommodations.
  • reasonable accommodation, appropriate reasonable accommodation, the<00:10:18.600> employer<00
  • <00:31:31.240> accommodation clear reasonable accommodation clear reasonable accommodation
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The House debated Representative Hicks’ motion to place Senate File 3210 first on the calendar for the next day. Hicks said the bill, which concerns disability accommodations, had been on the general register since March 9 and had passed the Senate 46-18. Supporters argued it would strengthen the process for requesting accommodations and should be heard on the floor without further delay. Representative Niska opposed the motion, arguing the bill was poorly drafted, had not received enough committee work, and could create ambiguity in the Minnesota Human Rights Act. He focused on the bill’s use of “may” in describing failure to engage in the accommodation process and questioned how the proposal would affect existing law in employment, housing, public accommodations, and education. Hicks responded that the bill addresses the process for reasonable accommodations, not the underlying accommodation standards, and said disability advocates and the Department of Human Rights supported the language. Several members spoke in favor of calendaring the bill, emphasizing that it was bipartisan, had already moved through committee, and was important to people with disabilities. Some supporters described the accommodation process as difficult and said the bill would help ensure good-faith engagement between employers and individuals seeking accommodations. The exchange ended with the motion still under debate, with members indicating the bill would likely be taken up on the floor the following day.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • > to reasonable accommodations will need to reasonable accommodations will need to be<00:08:22.400
  • reasonable accommodations for people reasonable accommodations for people with<00:14:42.400>
  • or to provide a reasonable accommodation.
  • or to provide a reasonable accommodation.
  • or to provide a reasonable accommodation.
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The House took Senate File 3210 off the table and then adopted an amendment from Representative Nadeau that added the word “reasonable” and a statutory reference clarifying who qualifies as a person with a disability. The bill, as amended, was then given third reading. The measure is described as relating to human rights and disability accommodations as protection from discrimination. Representative Hicks, the bill’s author, said the proposal is intended to send a clear message that discrimination against people with disabilities is unlawful and that entities must engage in a good-faith process to identify reasonable accommodations. Supporters, including Representatives Finke, Feist, and Luetkemeyer, argued the bill reinforces existing law, reflects the interactive process already used in practice, and helps protect access in employment, public accommodations, schools, and other settings. Hicks also responded to questions from Representative Joy by describing the process as a simple conversation to meet a person’s needs. Representative Niska opposed the bill, arguing that it is unclear whether it changes the meaning of other provisions in the Minnesota Human Rights Act beyond employment and that it could create ambiguity and more litigation for businesses, schools, and public entities. He said the legislature should be explicit if it intends to change those provisions and warned the bill could invite lawsuits rather than provide clarity. Representative Loegering-Nicolai responded that the bill would change the practice of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights and that referencing the interactive process in public policy would provide a lens for assessing whether accommodations were handled in good faith. No final vote on passage was taken in the portion provided.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Is there a reason why the title's still off? Is there a reason why the title's still off? No.
  • And if they don't, within some reasonable amount of time, there is a series of escalating fines attached
  • And if they don't, within some reasonable amount of time, there is a series of escalating fines attached
  • He said that the reason they are raising concerns is that all the pharmacy prescriptions are going up
  • many years, and it has been derailed at various points every single time it has been tried for one reason