Requesting The Hawaii Civil Rights Commission To Examine The Applicability Of Existing State Anti-discrimination Laws To Algorithmic And Automated Decision Systems.
Summary
HCR 192 is a concurrent resolution requesting the Hawaiʻi Civil Rights Commission (HCRC) to study how existing state anti-discrimination laws apply to algorithmic and automated decision systems, including artificial intelligence tools. The resolution focuses on uses of these systems in employment screening, housing and tenant selection, credit decisions, public accommodations, and eligibility for state benefits and services.
The resolution asks HCRC to assess whether current law is sufficient to investigate and remedy algorithmic discrimination, identify jurisdictional and evidentiary challenges, consider whether guidance or rulemaking would help regulated entities and the public, evaluate the feasibility of a complaint or intake pathway, and recommend any needed legislation. It also directs HCRC to report findings and any proposed legislation to the Legislature before the 2027 regular session.
Impact
Because HCR 192 is a concurrent resolution rather than a bill, it does not itself change state law or create new rights, duties, or enforcement powers. Its practical effect is to initiate an agency review of whether Hawaii’s existing civil rights and anti-discrimination statutes already cover harms caused by automated decision-making, and whether administrative clarification or future legislation is needed. The resolution specifically implicates the state’s anti-discrimination framework as enforced by the Hawaiʻi Civil Rights Commission, with potential relevance to employment, housing, credit, public accommodations, and access to government services.
Sentiment
The resolution appears broadly supportive and precautionary in tone, reflecting concern that emerging AI and automated systems may reproduce or conceal discrimination. The framing emphasizes fairness, equal protection, and maintaining public confidence in government, suggesting a generally favorable view of examining the issue before harms become more entrenched. No committee transcript or vote record is provided, so there is no recorded opposition or formal debate to indicate divided sentiment.
Contention
The main points of concern are not about whether discrimination should be prohibited, but about how existing law applies to algorithmic systems in practice. The resolution highlights possible jurisdictional questions, evidentiary difficulties in proving discrimination when decisions are made by opaque models, and uncertainty about whether HCRC has enough authority under current statutes to investigate and remedy these claims. Another likely area of contention is whether the state should rely on existing law and administrative guidance or move toward new legislation and complaint procedures specifically addressing AI-driven decision-making.
Same As
Requesting The Hawaii Civil Rights Commission To Examine The Applicability Of Existing State Anti-discrimination Laws To Algorithmic And Automated Decision Systems.
Same As
Requesting The Hawaii Civil Rights Commission To Examine The Applicability Of Existing State Anti-discrimination Laws To Algorithmic And Automated Decision Systems.
Requesting The Office Of Hawaiian Affairs To Convene A Working Group To Examine And Consider The Transfer Of Native Hawaiian Burial Site Management Under Chapter 6e, Hawaii Revised Statutes, From The State Historic Preservation Division To The Office Of Hawaiian Affairs.
Requesting The Office Of Hawaiian Affairs To Convene A Working Group To Examine And Consider The Transfer Of Native Hawaiian Burial Site Management Under Chapter 6e, Hawaii Revised Statutes, From The State Historic Preservation Division To The Office Of Hawaiian Affairs.
Requesting The Office Of Hawaiian Affairs To Convene A Working Group To Examine And Consider The Transfer Of Native Hawaiian Burial Site Management Under Chapter 6e, Hawaii Revised Statutes, From The State Historic Preservation Division To The Office Of Hawaiian Affairs.
Requesting The Office Of Hawaiian Affairs To Convene A Working Group To Examine And Consider The Transfer Of Native Hawaiian Burial Site Management Under Chapter 6e, Hawaii Revised Statutes, From The State Historic Preservation Division To The Office Of Hawaiian Affairs.
Requesting The Hawaii State Lgbtq+ Commission And Hawaii State Commission On The Status Of Women To Collaborate And Conduct A Comprehensive Review Of The Hawaii Revised Statutes And Recommend Amendments To Incorporate Gender-neutral Terminology.
Requesting The State Of Hawaii To Require That Any Individual Or Group That Administers The Mandatory Harassment And Discrimination Training To Employees Demonstrate Adequate Competency In Lgbtq+ (lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, And More Identities) Identity And Culturally Specific Gender Identity Relevant To Hawaii.
Requesting The Hawaii Civil Rights Commission To Examine The Applicability Of Existing State Anti-discrimination Laws To Algorithmic And Automated Decision Systems.
Requesting The Hawaii Civil Rights Commission To Examine The Applicability Of Existing State Anti-discrimination Laws To Algorithmic And Automated Decision Systems.
Requesting The Hawaii Civil Rights Commission To Examine The Applicability Of Existing State Anti-discrimination Laws To Algorithmic And Automated Decision Systems.