Transcript Highlights:

• We've offered the amendments to the author.
• So would you be willing to work with the author?
• So I've talked to the author and have made that...
• Twice in Congressional District 5. Where is that? Dallas and East Texas.
• It is a variation of procedure that's not authorized by the law.

Bills: HB569 , HB766 , HB1638 , HB2316 , HB2773 , HB2785 , HB3113 , HB3709 , HB3775 , HB4275

Committee: House Elections

Keywords: early voting, ballot correction, voting rights, election integrity, mail-in voting, voter notification, HB 766, precinct chair, precinct chair candidate, ballot application, Texas Election Code, Section 172.021, election administration, candidate filing, party precinct chair, county party, political party office, email address, telephone number, confidential candidate information

Summary: The committee heard House Bill 3709, which would change the partial manual audit process so early voting could be audited by voting location rather than by randomly selected precincts. The author and several supporters said the current precinct-based process is antiquated, labor-intensive, and especially difficult in countywide voting systems and large counties. Opponents and some neutral witnesses raised concerns about whether the change would still allow an apples-to-apples audit against official precinct results, whether random selection procedures should be more clearly defined, and how ballot secrecy and mail ballots would be handled. The Secretary of State’s office said counties already use random selection methods and that the bill would largely standardize early voting audits with election-day procedures, while also noting ballot privacy issues can arise in public records requests. After testimony, the bill was left pending. The committee then took up House Bill 766, as substituted, which would require precinct chair applicants to provide an email address, phone number, or both, while making that contact information confidential. Supporters said the change would help parties and local officials contact applicants more efficiently. Opponents argued it could expose personal contact information to public records requests and harassment, and some suggested the information should instead be handled through party rules. The bill was left pending after the committee substitute was withdrawn. House Bill 3775 followed and would set clearer timelines for when early voting ballot boards may begin opening carrier envelopes, with different start times based on county size. Supporters said the bill would address counties opening ballots too early and improve ballot security, while opponents warned it could delay defect notices and cure opportunities for mail voters and create problems in large counties that process high volumes of ballots. Testimony also focused on whether the bill referred to carrier envelopes or secrecy envelopes and on how counties like Harris County currently image and secure ballot materials. The bill was left pending. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 4275, which would require countywide polling systems to have polling places in each election precinct, intended to address uneven distribution of polling locations across county commissioner precincts. Supporters said the bill would make polling place distribution fairer and more consistent, especially in Harris County, while opponents said it would undermine countywide voting, increase costs, require more equipment and staff, and reduce local flexibility. Several witnesses also raised concerns about ballot secrecy and the practical burden on large and rural counties. The bill remained under discussion as testimony continued.

Transcript Highlights:

• She cut the department's workforce in half so they don't have the necessary staff to pursue… …congressionally
• authorized funding on time or to investigate civil rights violations.
• Times, will segregate special education… …from the larger education system in direct defiance of congressional
• And then we, as a Congress, need to use our authority to prevent This President and any President from
• Speaker, I have Introduced an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act addressing the massive

Bills: HB2478

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:13:26.320><c> directed</c> through a congressionally directed through a congressionally directed
• </c><00:21:18.039><c> the</c> Safety and um item 25 012 authorizes the Safety and um item 25 012 authorizes
• </c><00:28:06.640><c> to</c> Department requests authorization to Department requests authorization to
• </c> Hampshire Housing Finance Authority Hampshire Housing Finance Authority pursu<00:36:11.440><c> to
• </c><00:40:52.480><c> to</c><00:40:52.599><c> sell</c> requests authorization to sell requests authorization

Summary: The Long Range Capital Planning and Utilization Committee met in organizational session and first elected Representative John Cluder as clerk. A nomination of Senator Mark Makoni as vice chair was made but not voted on because he was absent; it was carried over to the next meeting. The committee also reviewed its guidelines and procedures, including how it handles property-disposal requests, late items, and informational materials, and then approved the November 12, 2024 minutes with one abstention from a member who had been absent. The committee then considered several state property and lease requests. It approved a 50-year, $1-per-year ground lease for about 5.66 acres at Berlin Regional Airport in Milan for a New Hampshire Army National Guard hangar/support facility, after hearing that the project is federally funded, intended for training and search-and-rescue support, and would have no permanent full-time staffing. The committee also approved a 30-year lease for the Department of Justice to move the chief medical examiner’s offices, morgue, and autopsy suite to 279 Pleasant Street in Concord, with testimony that the current Concord Hospital space is inadequate and that the new site would double body-storage capacity. Several Department of Safety and Department of Transportation property items were approved as well. Safety received approval for a 10-year lease, with renewal options, for the State Police aircraft hangar at 91 Airport Road in Concord. Transportation was authorized to continue disposal efforts for remnant parcels in Concord, Conway, Lisbon, Effingham, and Mount Vernon, with testimony explaining market conditions, appraisals, access limits, and easements; members asked questions about access and buildability, but each item was approved. During the Berlin lease item, the committee was told the FAA objects to any lease longer than 50 years at that airport, so the request was revised from 55 years to 50 years on the record before approval.

Transcript Highlights:

• Under its authorizing statute, the task force is required to submit three reports.
• of health care benefits. ...including the process for prior authorization of health care benefits.
• If enacted, this bill would usurp the state's authority to protect its residents from potential AI harms
• We’re working with the governor’s D.C. team to stay connected with congressional members.
• Do you have a sense as to how we can support our congressional, I guess, delegation in making sure that

Committee: House Technology, Economic Development, & Veterans

Summary: The committee held a work session focused on technology use in government, AI policy and oversight, and federal broadband funding. The first panel featured Seattle CTO Rob Lloyd, who described the city’s AI approach as centered on public trust, responsible use, privacy, security, and community partnership. He said Seattle is using small pilots and a data strategy to test AI for tasks such as public records processing, infrastructure inspection, and housing/permitting improvements, while keeping human decision-makers responsible. Members asked about permit review, training on best practices, labor engagement, and public records risks; Lloyd emphasized that AI should assist rather than replace human judgment and that the city is still testing solutions for records redaction and search. Washington Technology Solutions CTO Nick Stow and Deputy Director Mark Quimby then outlined the state’s AI policy work, noting that the state’s guidance now covers more than generative AI and is built into existing privacy and security review processes. They described a statewide AI community of practice, a sandbox used by more than 15 agencies, and use cases including a resident portal with opt-in consent features, cybersecurity screening, and wildfire detection. Committee members raised questions about labor, data privacy, and the status and effectiveness of wildfire detection tools. The AI Task Force update from the Attorney General’s office reported progress through eight subcommittees on topics including governance, consumer protection, labor, health care, public safety, education, government efficiency, and climate/energy, with an interim report due December 1 and a final report due July 1, 2026. The presenter also warned that a pending federal budget reconciliation provision could bar state AI regulation for 10 years, and a member noted ongoing work on prior AI bills for the 2026 session. The broadband portion of the meeting began with Commerce’s Dave Pringle, who said the BEAD broadband program is being reshaped by new NTIA guidance issued June 6. He explained that Washington’s original multi-round application process has been compressed into an expedited roughly 30-day application window, with a September 4 state submission deadline, and that earlier rounds are effectively being replaced under the new federal rules. He noted that no projects have been built yet, that four counties did not receive round-two applications, and that the state is working with applicants, the Governor’s Office, and the Attorney General’s Office while also managing a leadership transition in the broadband office. The Office of Equity then reported on the Digital Equity Forum’s growth, membership expansion, outreach, and draft recommendations, including better interagency coordination, improved data for underserved communities, and elevating digital equity as a statewide priority; members discussed the loss of federal digital equity operating funds and the forum’s transition back to Commerce. The final presenter, Lumen’s Rob Thoms, discussed private-sector broadband deployment, saying the company continues investing in fiber overbuilds and working with local governments, but faces permitting, regulatory, and geography challenges. He said Washington has strong backbone fiber and is well positioned for enterprise and AI-related demand, but that rural and legacy telecom transitions remain difficult and that satellite and wireless options may play a larger role over time.

Transcript Highlights:

• Now we have the bill in the shape the author would like the bill to be.
• </c> year is the year where congressionally year is the year where congressionally chartered<01:03:30.640
• There are two different classifications for congressionally chartered veterans organizations.
• </c> classifications for um congressionally classifications for um congressionally chartered<01:07:58.760
• eight congressionally chartered veteran service<01:33:26.880><c> organizations</c><01:33:27.880><c>

Bills: HF169 , HF195 , HF194 , HF1756 , HF2133

Committee: House Taxes

Transcript Highlights:

• The recommended budget for fiscal year 27 is $128.6 million, with 367 authorized positions.
• The year 27 budget is $128.6 million, with 367 authorized positions.
• Our total authorized positions remain unchanged from fiscal year 26 at 367.
• But the local governing authorities determine where polling locations are.
• So there will be no congressional general in December.

Committee: House Appropriations

Summary: The committee heard a budget presentation for the Department of State. House Fiscal Division said the FY27 recommended budget is $128.6 million and 367 positions, with elections making up the largest share. Secretary of State Nancy Landry said the office is implementing Louisiana’s first closed party primary, continuing voter education efforts, and moving toward procurement of a new voting system that would produce a voter-verifiable paper ballot and support risk-limiting audits. Members asked about polling place confusion, machine replacement costs, election commissioner pay, and the cost of educating voters about the new primary system. Landry said polling places are not changing because of the new primary law, the new system is expected to cost about $100 million total, and a bill this session would raise election commissioner pay by $100 per day. Fiscal staff also estimated the closed primary law will add about $31.5 million in costs over five years, mostly from converting local elections to statewide elections and voter outreach. The committee then reviewed the Department of Veterans Affairs budget, which was presented at about $105.2 million with a mix of federal, state, self-generated, and interagency funds. The department said most costs are tied to personnel and veterans’ homes, and that the homes are funded largely by federal dollars plus self-generated revenue. Members focused heavily on delays in processing National Guard disability claims and payments to veterans. Representatives said constituents had waited about a year for claims to be resolved, while the department said it had increased staffing and was processing a backlog of more than 400 claims, but still had about $950,000 in approved claims awaiting funding. The department said the payout program is governed by statute and that additional supplemental funding has been requested. Members also discussed veterans’ home care, including how service-connected disability status affects eligibility and costs, and whether chronic wound care and related complications could increase long-term costs. The department said veterans with higher service-connected ratings receive care with federal support, while others pay fees. Several members urged the department to provide clearer timelines and better communication to claimants, and one member suggested a separate oversight hearing to address the disability claim process and any needed statutory changes. The committee adjourned after the presentations and questions.

Transcript Highlights:

• The arts are in every zip code, every congressional district. The arts transcend party lines.
• The arts are in every zip code, every congressional district. The arts transcend party lines.
• From the congressional conversation as it goes to NEH and state programs, and any progress on that front
• They have the authority to appoint. And, I mean, I, in my...
• Which forms of community development capital emerging community authored narratives?

Summary: The joint informational hearing focused on how federal actions are affecting arts, culture, humanities, libraries, museums, and creative industries in California. Chair Ben Allen, Vice Chair Chris Ward, and other members described the moment as a crisis, citing proposed or implemented cuts to the NEA, NEH, and IMLS, grant terminations, leadership removals, and budget proposals to zero out major cultural agencies. Members emphasized that arts and humanities are both culturally essential and economically significant, and they framed the hearing as a chance to hear impacts on the ground and consider state and federal responses. Testimony from Aaron Harky of Americans for the Arts and Jolie Fisher of SAG-AFTRA highlighted the scale of the problem. Harky said federal rescissions and policy changes are causing immediate financial harm, forcing hiring freezes, program cancellations, and emergency fundraising, while disproportionately hurting rural, immigrant, elder, and small community organizations. She noted California’s creative economy generates hundreds of billions of dollars and urged support for restoring state arts funding, museum grants, and legislation such as SB 456 and AB 3149, along with federal measures like the Charitable Act and Performing Arts Tax Parity Act. Fisher focused on film and television production, saying runaway production, outdated tax rules, and weak federal IP protections are harming workers and local businesses; she urged federal production incentives, tax parity for performers, and stronger protections against AI misuse of artists’ voices and likenesses. State agency leaders Rick Noguchi of California Humanities, Greg Lucas of the State Library, and Danielle Purcell of the California Arts Council described direct impacts from federal funding disruptions. Noguchi said California Humanities lost NEH support immediately, putting grants and documentary projects at risk and prompting possible litigation and appeals. Lucas said the State Library initially faced a major IMLS funding loss but has since had part of the money restored, though still with a reduced amount that will limit local assistance. Purcell said the California Arts Council is assessing terminated grants and fielding urgent calls from grantees, while continuing to distribute state arts funds and track the damage. Members asked about bipartisan support, business coalition-building, economic measurement, AI threats to creative work, and the implications of federal leadership changes; no votes were taken, but the hearing ended with calls for continued advocacy, legal action, and possible state investment to stabilize the sector.

Transcript Highlights:

• pray that all unfair, wicked, and crooked leaders be exposed and rooted out from their positions of authority
• , and raise up in their place people of authority and raise up in their place people of integrity, truth
• Well, it was the last year under the original congressional resolution to pass the ERA.
• Well, it was the last year under the original congressional resolution to pass the ERA.

Transcript Highlights:

• In May 2024, authorities arrested a 20-year-old illegal alien for allegedly snatching an 11-year-old
• </c><02:12:55.280><c> but</c> giving themselves up to authorities but giving themselves up to authorities
• </c><02:24:33.720><c> district</c> to Ohio's 13th congressional district to Ohio's 13th congressional
• </c> elected two times over 200 congressional elected two times over 200 congressional districts<02:30
• </c> Foreign actors of AU authorized Foreign actors of AU authorized unauthorized<02:45:20.359><c> access

Bills: HR30

Keywords: honor, legacy, Jimmy Carter, human rights, presidential achievements, diplomacy, Georgia, Nobel Peace Prize, James Earl Carter Jr., President Carter, Rosalynn Carter, Plains Georgia, Georgia politics, House resolution, memorial resolution, tribute, condolences, bipartisan, Carter Center, democracy

Transcript Highlights:

• I ask you to support the passage or, in the consideration of H. 4262 and 4619 authorizing ranked choice
• It simply asks for the authority to use a voting method that ensures municipal leaders are elected with
• This home rule petition would authorize Boston voters to decide whether to adopt ranked-choice voting
• That I worked on was the first ever ranked-choice voting election in Maine in the congressional district
• All required local approvals under Boston's home rule authority.

Committee: Joint Joint Committee on Election Laws

Summary: The Joint Committee on Election Laws held a hearing on ranked choice voting, focusing primarily on Boston’s home rule petition (H. 4262) and Bedford’s petition (H. 4916). Committee chairs Dan Hunt and Senator Keenan opened the hearing, explained the three-minute testimony limit, and noted that written testimony would also be accepted. The hearing featured testimony from a wide range of supporters, including advocacy organizations, community leaders, Boston City Council members, and Bedford residents. Witnesses generally argued that ranked choice voting would produce majority-supported winners, reduce vote-splitting and negative campaigning, encourage coalition-building, and give voters more freedom to rank candidates without fear of wasting their vote. Several speakers emphasized local control and said Boston and Bedford should be allowed to decide for themselves whether to adopt the system. Others highlighted potential benefits for women, historically marginalized communities, and voter participation more broadly. Boston councilors and supporters also described the city’s local approval process and said the proposal would still require voter ratification if enacted by the legislature. No opposition testimony was presented in the excerpt. The committee took no substantive vote on the bills during the hearing; after testimony concluded, the chairs thanked participants and the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• To implement these schemes, the Department dramatically increased the scope and authority of the Student
• also like to thank President Trump for his confidence in me to lead a department whose mission and authority
• with that would have a better functioning Department of Education, but certainly does require congressional
• I think there's a constitutional problem with the Department of Education delegating that authority to
• agenda, a policy-driven agenda, and people that are willing to implement it whether they have the authority

Committee: Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee

Keywords: educational reform, federal grants, bureaucracy, wealth disparity, public testimony

Summary: The committee meeting engaged in discussions focused primarily on educational reform, the influence of federal grants on local education systems, and the growing disparities in wealth and access to quality education. Members expressed concerns about the bureaucracy surrounding federal funding that hampers schools' ability to obtain necessary resources for improvement. Several members highlighted personal anecdotes from constituents, emphasizing the urgent need for reform to help students succeed in both K-12 and higher education environments. The meeting included public testimonies that provided insights into various community perspectives on these pressing issues.

Transcript Highlights:

• Father, we have no authority outside of what you've given us.
• I don't claim to have that authority to make that decision.
• So we got elected from the congressional districts. Okay. All right. Number B.
• . authorized.
• Congress person... person congressional district.

Bills: HJR 98 , HB 142 , HB 912 , HB 2525 , SCR 19 , SB 66 , SB 128 , SB 209 , SB 250 , SB 317 , SB 383 , SB 393 , SB 397 , SB 517 , SB 571 , SB 612 , SB 614 , SB 715 , SB 731 , SB 801 , SB 865 , SB 867 , SB 872 , SB 905 , SB 913 , SB 945 , SB 946 , SB 986 , SB 1013 , SB 1015 , SB 1071 , SB 1086 , SB 1087 , SB 1113 , SB 1117 , SB 1181 , SB 1212 , SB 1241 , SB 1250 , SB 1263 , SB 1278 , SB 1285 , SB 1444 , SB 1483 , SB 1525 , SB 1528 , SB 1553 , SB 1556 , SB 1588 , SB 1660 , SB 1708 , SB 1802 , SB 1833 , SB 1844 , SB 1854 , SB 1957 , SB 1965 , SB 1999 , SB 2056 , SB 2082 , SB 2119 , SB 2133 , SB 2138 , SB 2203 , SB 2221 , SB 2337 , SB 2340 , SB 2373 , SB 2419 , SB 2422 , SB 2452 , SB 2477 , SB 2487 , SB 2501 , SB 2533 , SB 2586 , SB 2587 , SB 2615 , SB 2622 , SB 2633 , SB 2675 , SB 2681 , SB 2690 , SB 2713 , SB 2717 , SB 2753 , SB 2781 , SB 2782 , SB 2835 , SB 2841 , SB 2857 , SB 2891 , SB 2929 , SB 2933 , SB 2994 , SB 3016 , SJR 3 , SB 5 , SB 29 , SB 72 , SB 326 , SB 494 , SB 509 , SB 530 , SB 616 , SB 769 , SB 783 , SB 963 , SB 985 , SB 1143 , SB 1172 , SB 1238 , SB 1267 , SB 1271 , SB 1273 , SB 1506 , SB 1759 , SB 1786 , SB 1967 , SB 2312 , SB 2361 , SB 1 , SB 260 , SB 1506 , SB 1637 , HJR 98 , HJR 99 , HJR 2 , HJR 1 , HB 1109 , HB 1392 , HB 22 , HB 2525 , HB 3093 , HB 517 , HB 912 , HB 1130 , HB 142 , HB 1689 , HB 2018 , HB 136 , HB 2884 , HB 1393 , HB 2730 , HB 1399 , HB 1244 , HB 467 , HB 331 , HB 2559 , HB 29 , HB 26 , HB 166 , HB 353 , HB 2000 , HB 2756 , HB 3248 , HB 3513 , HB 3204 , HB 3135 , HB 3012 , HB 2763 , HB 2523 , HB 2457 , HB 2415 , HB 2198 , HB 2143 , HB 1708 , HB 1672 , HB 767 , HB 1327 , HB 2723 , HB 451 , HB 140 , HB 109 , HB 3096 , HCR 6 , HCR 12 , HCR 29 , HCR 50 , HCR 55 , HCR 56 , HCR 58 , HCR 70 , HCR 71 , HCR 74 , HCR 78 , HCR 80 , HCR 107 , HCR 116 , HCR 117 , SJR 36 , SJR 50 , SJR 63 , SJR 59 , SCR 12 , SCR 39 , SCR 48 , SCR 19 , SB 2023 , SB 1844 , SB 2533 , SB 62 , SB 666 , SB 847 , SB 284 , SB 854 , SB 1073 , SB 810 , SB 1505 , SB 583 , SB 507 , SB 1434 , SB 1772 , SB 2016 , SB 1163 , SB 1122 , SB 731 , SB 397 , SB 508 , SB 1436 , SB 287 , SB 261 , SB 1882 , SB 393 , SB 1791 , SB 209 , SB 2429 , SB 1999 , SB 511 , SB 2309 , SB 510 , SB 1085 , SB 1975 , SB 2717 , SB 1262 , SB 636 , SB 2056 , SB 884 , SB 517 , SB 1200 , SB 1845 , SB 2681 , SB 2458 , SB 801 , SB 3014 , SB 3013 , SB 758 , SB 1013 , SB 2797 , SB 2076 , SB 2876 , SB 2929 , SB 715 , SB 1640 , SB 2538 , SB 1449 , SB 986 , SB 1181 , SB 1359 , SB 410 , SB 1234 , SB 2926 , SB 2138 , SB 2615 , SB 2972 , SB 2841 , SB 3016 , SB 1856 , SB 1528 , SB 1373 , SB 672 , SB 2891 , SB 1854 , SB 317 , SB 2539 , SB 2532 , SB 1250 , SB 2082 , SB 2203 , SB 1285 , SB 1454 , SB 2520 , SB 1237 , SB 1586 , SB 2819 , SB 629 , SB 2342 , SB 2903 , SB 2477 , SB 3029 , SB 1957 , SB 375 , SB 250 , SB 777 , SB 2367 , SB 2703 , SB 2608 , SB 2965 , SB 2521 , SB 865 , SB 2165 , SB 2501 , SB 2675 , SB 2452 , SB 2835 , SB 872 , SB 1212 , SB 1278 , SB 1588 , SB 1602 , SB 1704 , SB 1723 , SB 1833 , SB 1858 , SB 1946 , SB 2009 , SB 2177 , SB 2460 , SB 2785 , SB 2373 , SB 1660 , SB 614 , SB 867 , SB 1608 , SB 1525 , SB 905 , SB 640 , SB 2487 , SB 1698 , SB 383 , SB 705 , SB 748 , SB 1113 , SB 1117 , SB 1802 , SB 2340 , SB 2586 , SB 2680 , SB 2690 , SB 2994 , SB 2747 , SB 1950 , SB 913 , SB 1071 , SB 1086 , SB 1087 , SB 1483 , SB 1444 , SB 1553 , SB 1556 , SB 1703 , SB 2133 , SB 2297 , SB 2298 , SB 2622 , SB 2955 , SB 3059 , SB 2782 , SB 2781 , SB 2637 , SB 2633 , SB 2337 , SB 2334 , SB 1861 , SB 2043 , SB 1367 , SB 946 , SB 945 , SB 2857 , SB 128 , SB 571 , SB 1263 , SB 3058 , SB 612 , SB 2221 , SB 2587 , SB 2044 , SB 2363 , SB 2713 , SB 2311 , SB 1986 , SB 2565 , SB 2943 , SB 1888 , SB 2417 , SB 3048 , SB 3052 , SB 3053 , SB 3036 , SB 3057 , SB 3056 , SB 3043 , SB 3037 , SB 3050 , SB 3063 , SB 3047 , SB 3035 , SB 2446 , SB 466 , SB 2611 , SB 2794 , SB 2105 , SB 2017 , SB 1790 , SB 1778 , SB 1730 , SB 2995 , SB 2847 , SB 205 , SB 2619 , SB 1903 , SB 203 , SB 3061 , SB 1581 , SB 2600 , SB 2799 , SB 2790 , SB 2688 , SB 2515 , SB 1230 , SB 876 , SB 2522 , SB 2639 , SB 2137 , SB 2519 , SB 2403 , SB 2459 , SB 3051 , SB 2655 , SB 2251 , SB 2764 , SB 2878 , SB 1884 , SB 111 , SB 582 , SB 2617 , SB 1835 , SB 2751 , SB 2959 , SB 250 , SB 614 , SB 865 , SB 872 , SB 905 , SB 986 , SB 1113 , SB 1212 , SB 1278 , SB 1525 , SB 1588 , SB 1660 , SB 1802 , SB 1833 , SB 2487 , SB 2586 , SB 2675 , SB 2690 , SB 2929 , HB 912 , HB 2525 , SB 1844 , SB 2533 , SB 1957 , SB 1999 , SB 2138 , SB 2615 , SB 3016 , SR 469 , SB 29 , SB 326 , SB 494 , SB 530 , SB 769 , SB 783 , SB 1238 , SB 1967 , SB 2312 , SB 1506 , HJR 34 , HB 42 , HB 198 , HB 247 , HB 367 , HB 449 , HB 632 , HB 668 , HB 677 , HB 766 , HB 1105 , HB 1160 , HB 1169 , HB 1592 , HB 1778 , HB 1781 , HB 1868 , HB 2017 , HB 2038 , HB 2128 , HB 2240 , HB 2316 , HB 2510 , HB 2516 , HB 2563 , HB 2582 , HB 2663 , HB 2712 , HB 2715 , HB 2760 , HB 2788 , HB 3010 , HB 3069 , HB 3112 , HB 3120 , HB 3146 , HB 3157 , HB 3305 , HB 3348 , HB 3464 , HB 3474 , HB 3505 , HB 3512 , HB 3560 , HB 3597 , HB 3686 , HB 3783 , HB 3860 , HB 4063 , HB 4081 , HB 4214 , HB 4215 , HB 4224 , HB 4273 , HB 4325 , HB 4361 , HB 4386 , HB 4395 , HB 4665 , HB 4783 , HB 5032 , HB 5180 , HJR 34 , HB 42 , HB 198 , HB 247 , HB 367 , HB 449 , HB 632 , HB 668 , HB 677 , HB 766 , HB 1105 , HB 1160 , HB 1169 , HB 1592 , HB 1778 , HB 1781 , HB 1868 , HB 2017 , HB 2038 , HB 2128 , HB 2240 , HB 2316 , HB 2510 , HB 2516 , HB 2563 , HB 2582 , HB 2663 , HB 2712 , HB 2715 , HB 2760 , HB 2788 , HB 3010 , HB 3069 , HB 3112 , HB 3120 , HB 3146 , HB 3157 , HB 3305 , HB 3348 , HB 3464 , HB 3474 , HB 3505 , HB 3512 , HB 3560 , HB 3597 , HB 3686 , HB 3783 , HB 3860 , HB 4063 , HB 4081 , HB 4214 , HB 4215 , HB 4224 , HB 4273 , HB 4325 , HB 4361 , HB 4386 , HB 4395 , HB 4665 , HB 4783 , HB 5032 , HB 5180

Transcript Highlights:

• My question was whether it had to have congressional approval.
• My question was whether it had to have congressional approval.
• Congress has authorized states to go to permanent standard time, but has only authorized states to recognize
• Andrea DeVoe, on behalf of Cal Choice Energy Authority, in support.
• Financing authority. Thank you.

Committee: Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications

Transcript Highlights:

• , the VRA was widely regarded as, quote, among the most remarkable and consequential pieces of congressional
• , which is before the Supreme Court for the second time, and that's a challenge to Louisiana's congressional
• If we're talking about a state agency, you know, say it's one of the Health Care Authority, we of course
• In congressional and presidential-year elections, in those even-year elections, you get higher rates
• value to a voter in exchange for the voter's vote for or against any person or ballot measure, or authorizes

Committee: House State Government & Tribal Relations

Summary: The committee held a work session on voting rights, beginning with testimony from Marissa Wright of Campaign Legal Center and David Montes of the ACLU of Washington. They described the federal Voting Rights Act’s main protections—preclearance, vote suppression, and vote dilution—and argued that Supreme Court decisions such as Shelby County and Brnovich have weakened those protections. They said state-level action is increasingly important, pointing to the Washington Voting Rights Act as a tool to address discriminatory election systems, with examples from Yakima, Sunnyside, and other parts of the Yakima Valley. Members asked about Washington’s history of discrimination, voter roll purges, noncitizen registration, remedies under the WVRA, ranked-choice voting, and how statistical evidence is used in vote dilution cases. No votes were taken. The committee then heard a joint presentation from the Office of Equity and several commissions, including the Hispanic Affairs Commission, Asian Pacific American Affairs Commission, and LGBTQ Commission. The panel described their role in advising state government, working with communities, and helping agencies improve equity and service delivery. They focused on the new immigration sub-cabinet created under Executive Order 2509, saying it is intended to coordinate across agencies, the legislature, the courts, and community organizations on issues such as data privacy, language access, communications, and protections for immigrant communities. Members asked about accountability under the Keep Washington Working Act, the use of NGOs, and the sub-cabinet’s goals. The panel said the effort is meant to make Washington residents feel safe, protected, and included. Next, researchers from the University of Washington presented findings from the Elections Database Project on vote-by-mail outcomes from 2020 to 2024. They reported that about 1.5% of ballots are signature-challenged in most elections, about 60% of those ballots are cured, and overall rejection rates are around 1% in general elections and 1.5% in primaries. They said younger voters and voters of color are more likely to have ballots rejected, and that cure rates do not fully eliminate those disparities. Committee members asked about tribal reservation data, turnout patterns, and access to election data. The researchers said they use publicly available data and will follow up with additional turnout information. The final panel featured Maria Fernandez and Vicki Frausto of EIA, who described voter education and leadership development work in Yakima County and Sunnyside. They said their organization helps residents understand ballot mechanics, language barriers, and misinformation, and they described harassment and intimidation tied to their civic engagement work. They supported stronger Washington Voting Rights Act protections and said at-large election systems continue to dilute Latino voting power in some jurisdictions. They also said turnout in Yakima County has risen modestly, which they attributed in part to community education and candidate recruitment. The committee thanked the presenters and adjourned the work session without taking action.

Transcript Highlights:

• . >> Do you know if this board has any adjudicative authority? Do they actually vote?
• there were any... what the duties of the board were and generally if there was any adjudicatory authority
• where a tie would adjudicatory authority where a tie would be<00:06:40.639><c> an</c><00:06:40.800><
• </c> state law to our congressional state law to our congressional delegation<00:28:41.360><c> to</c>
• </c> no to grant authority to do something. no to grant authority to do something.

Committee: Senate Executive Departments and Administration

Transcript Highlights:

• The agency already has authority over some non-game species.
• What we're trying to do is clarify that authority and ensure the agency has the authority to engage in
• So, we're giving them authority and discretion.
• The state has no authority to add species to that list.
• They don't have that authority. We're not giving them that authority.

Committee: Senate Senate Rules

Transcript Highlights:

• Congressional delegation and the money has been able to keep flowing to the agencies.
• We have about 26 million left on that<00:29:52.640><c> 2023</c><00:29:53.600><c> authorization.
• </c><00:29:54.399><c> Loan</c><00:29:54.720><c> requests</c> that 2023 authorization.
• Loan requests that 2023 authorization.
• </c> happy to run maps by congressional happy to run maps by congressional districts<00:52:29.520><c>

Committee: Senate Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development

Transcript Highlights:

• debris contract, which each county independently controls—the state does not have that jurisdictional authority—we
• augmentation, our vast relations with our different multiple vendors, and just the relationships we have congressionally
• And just the relationships we have congressionally with the governor's office throughout the state with
• There's no authority that we have to say, hey, we're going to force you to go to this training.
• the place to go to help answer those questions at the local level without calling, you know, the congressional

Committee: Senate Appropriations Committee on Transportation, Tourism, and Economic Development

Summary: The committee received a program review from the Florida Division of Emergency Management on the 2024 hurricane season and FEMA reimbursement process. Deputy Director Keith Pruitt described the impacts of Hurricanes Debby, Helene, and Milton, including major storm surge, flooding, tornadoes, debris removal, power restoration, flood-control deployments, sheltering, and logistics missions. He emphasized that Florida’s approach is “federally funded, state managed, locally executed,” and said the division has already obligated large amounts of public assistance funding and mitigation dollars while continuing to work on remaining missions and reimbursements. A major focus of the discussion was how local governments can better document and vet debris-removal and other disaster costs so they are eligible for FEMA reimbursement. Chair DiCeglie and other senators raised concerns about local planning, commercial debris collection, and whether counties and municipalities that spend money up front will be reimbursed. Pruitt explained that eligibility depends on documentation, scope of work, insurance, and FEMA rules, and that the state’s FROC process is intended to help counties identify eligible work before costs are incurred. He also said commercial debris may be eligible in some cases but is not guaranteed, and that counties should coordinate early with FDEM and FEMA. Senators also asked about possible FEMA reforms, the age of outstanding reimbursement claims, and a proposed state fund to advance money to fiscally constrained counties while they wait for FEMA payments. Pruitt said Florida’s system is a national best practice, but that more county-level training and clearer coordination would help reduce de-obligations and audit problems. He said the reimbursement-advance idea is still being developed, and that the state continues to look at ways to streamline mitigation through programs like Elevate Florida. The committee took no formal action beyond hearing the presentation, and the meeting adjourned after closing comments from senators praising FDEM’s work.

Transcript Highlights:

• So you would talk to the author, I would support.
• authority to enforce?
• authority.
• Would the author lead witness like to respond? Sure.
• Would the author lead witness like to respond? Sure.

Committee: Senate Elections and Constitutional Amendments

Summary: The committee heard three bills. SB 73, by Senator Cervantes, would bar county registrars from allowing federal agents to inspect voting machines and was presented as a response to alleged federal interference in California elections. Supporters said it would help local governments defend election systems, while Senator Choi opposed it as unnecessary and beyond state authority, arguing federal law already governs access to voting equipment. The bill passed on a 4-1 vote to Appropriations after the call was lifted. SB 401, by Senator Hurtado and presented by Senator Allen, would authorize the Fair Political Practices Commission to extend Form 700 and other economic-interest filing deadlines during declared emergencies. Testimony and committee discussion focused on whether the bill gave the FPPC too much open-ended discretion, with members asking for clearer limits on how long extensions could last and when they would apply. The author and FPPC counsel said they would work on clarifying the language, and the bill passed 5-0 to Labor, Public Employment and Retirement. SB 46, by Senator Umberg, would give the Secretary of State authority to remove constitutionally ineligible presidential or vice presidential candidates from the California ballot, aimed at preventing a third presidential term. Supporters from CREW and a constitutional law professor argued the measure was constitutional and necessary to enforce the 22nd Amendment, while the Secretary of State’s office raised concerns about creating an investigative role and suggested alternative language or use of an independent special counsel. Members debated whether ballot eligibility determinations should be made at the state or federal level, and the bill passed 4-1 to Appropriations. The chair then thanked committee staff and adjourned the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• authorization.
• </c> a CBDC without direct congressional a CBDC without direct congressional authorization. authorization
• . authorization.
• authority.
• </c> with congressional Republicans policies. with congressional Republicans policies.

Bills: HB4016 , HR4 , HR590 , HB1919 , SB1582 , HB3633

Keywords: defense appropriations, military funding, national security, Department of Defense, fiscal year 2026, House of Representatives, election, Speaker, Clerk, Congress, budget authority, rescission, fiscal policy, government funding, impoundment, Federal Reserve, digital currency, monetary policy, financial services, privacy