Video & Transcript Research : 'aggregate bond limitation'

Page 31 of 500
VA

Virginia 2026 Regular Session

March 12, 2026 - Regular Session

Virginia House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Exception to limitation on the application of parole statutes, legislation passed the House, pass Senate
  • House Bill 1111 relates to civil litigation, suspension bonds, and irrevocable letters of credit upon
  • This bill makes changes to the appeal bond cap in Virginia, which is a friendly reminder that it has
  • relates to health insurance cost-sharing payments for insulin and diabetes equipment and supplies limit
  • House Bill 1426 was going to limit the statute of limitations on general district court judgments to
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • information on climate-related risks to the financial system, you instituted a hiring freeze that will limit
  • It's really related more to long-term bond rates, particularly the...
  • The number of additional bonds that we're going to have to issue, particularly with so many of these
  • We came together During a really tough economic time at the end of this, during a pandemic, it limited
  • Monetary aggregates have not been a great predictor of really anything else.
Bills: SB257
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • We do not have independent bonding authority like a local district, OK?
  • Again, we do not have independent bonding authority or any advilarm tax adjustments.
  • And then, they talk about the recommendations in aggregate.
  • All the information we release is an aggregate.
  • All of our recommendations are based on aggregate information.
Keywords: 914, all
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • That's the bonding bill.
  • That's the bonding bill.
  • That's the bonding bill.
  • , hopefully in the bonding bill, if we get a bonding bill passed, we should put some unless otherwise
  • </c><00:27:19.840><c> bill</c> effect if we do get a bonding bill effect if we do get a bonding bill
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • So I don't think that's a limiting factor for you.
  • The aggregate amount right now, I'll have to get back to you on that.
  • The second thing we need is support on bond measures.
  • All the various climate bonds were combined in one bond package, so our $6.1 billion that we had for
  • Is it that it includes things that are outside the city limits?
Summary: The committee held an informational hearing on flood risk and flood management in California, with opening remarks emphasizing that flooding is a statewide and growing threat due to climate change, including the possibility of extreme losses in a worst-case event. Members noted recent flooding in places such as San Diego, the Tulare Basin, and Pajaro, and framed the hearing as a way to better understand prevention, response, and how to capture excess water for later use. Jeffrey Mount of PPIC gave the main overview, describing California’s high flood exposure, the different flood types the state faces, and the mix of structural and non-structural tools used to manage them. He stressed that levees, dams, bypasses, land-use planning, flood insurance, and emergency response all matter, but that risk is rising because current standards are based on past hydrology rather than future climate conditions. He also warned that flood management is underfunded, that the National Flood Insurance Program is weak, and that federal support is increasingly uncertain. Members asked about groundwater recharge, permitting, NOAA and federal cuts, and which communities are most at risk; Mount said recharge can help but does not eliminate flood risk, and that small Central Valley communities and heavily developed floodplains are especially concerning. State officials Laura Hollander of the Department of Water Resources and Jane Dolan of the Central Valley Flood Protection Board described the state’s role in forecasting, emergency response, grants, planning, and the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan. They highlighted aging infrastructure, the need for better coordination, and the state’s special liability in the Central Valley after the Paterno decision. Dolan reviewed the history of major floods and said the plan calls for about $1 billion per year over 30 years to meet current needs, while Hollander said the state works with local and federal partners on preparedness, response, and subventions projects. Both emphasized that floodplain planning, regional coordination, and faster permitting are important, but that more consistent funding is needed. A later panel from local flood agencies and districts reinforced those points, arguing that the state’s annual flood funding is below identified needs and that a proposed statewide flood and dam safety bond was reduced substantially in the broader climate bond package. Witnesses urged more routine maintenance funding, support for regional flood planning, and continued federal-state-local partnerships to reduce risk and maintain eligibility for federal assistance. No formal votes or legislative actions were taken during the informational hearing.
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Community Development and Small Businesses Jun 21st, 2026 at 10:00 am

Joint Committee on Community Development and Small Businesses

Transcript Highlights:
  • We understand what it means to build something from the ground up, often with limited resources, but
  • With that being said, I would like to remind everyone of the three-minute limit for testimony.
  • The definition that got changed as it relates to the economic development bond bill meant that you had
  • While we are thankful for the funding that was included in the economic development bond bill that the
  • legislature passed last session to potentially help seed the downtown vitality fund, bond dollars are
Keywords: 995, all
Summary: The Joint Committee on Community Development and Small Business held its second hearing of the session, with Chairs Gómez and Vargas opening by emphasizing the committee’s focus on equity, small business growth, and support for communities that have historically been overlooked. Several members noted the historic nature of having two Latino chairs. The hearing covered a package of bills centered on access to capital, transparency in state assistance, commercial tenant protections, downtown revitalization, and business improvement district administration. Testimony was largely supportive of bills aimed at helping micro-businesses, small businesses, and disadvantaged entrepreneurs. Beckma, the Asian Business Empowerment Council, a minority- and woman-owned business owner, and a worker-owned Springfield business all backed measures including S. 179 and H. 312/S. 184, which would prioritize capital assistance and require reporting on where state business aid goes. Witnesses said transparency, upfront payments on state contracts, and better data collection could help businesses that struggle with delayed reimbursements, limited reserves, and difficulty accessing traditional financing. The Metropolitan Area Planning Council supported S. 173, which would dedicate a portion of sales tax revenue to a downtown vitality fund for district management, cultural districts, and downtown infrastructure, and said the bill could help sustain downtowns and prevent cultural displacement. There was also testimony on H. 306, a commercial tenant first right of refusal bill, with Beckma supporting it as a way to help small tenants stay in their locations, while the Greater Boston Real Estate Board opposed it, arguing it would add cost, delay, uncertainty, and could reduce property values and the commercial tax base. The board supported H. 305, a housing bill that would expand by-right multifamily and open-space residential development while preserving local zoning protections. Andre Leroux of MassINC also supported S. 173 and H. 299, the latter proposing longer BID renewal periods and audit requirements aligned with nonprofit standards. No votes were taken; the hearing concluded after public testimony and questions, with the chair closing testimony.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Environment, Climate and Legacy - 03/13/25

Environment, Climate, and Legacy

Transcript Highlights:
  • this is a cubic foot we pay of aggregate this is a cubic foot we pay for<00:57:52.839><c> aggregate<
  • </c> resources to map their aggregate resources to map their aggregate which<00:59:26.839><c> again</
  • </c><01:01:26.160><c> although</c> construction aggregates although construction aggregates although
  • facts on Aggregates 400 tons of<01:03:02.680><c> Aggregates</c><01:03:03.680><c> uh</c><01:03:04.119
  • </c><01:04:49.319><c> site</c> highways and aggregate site highways and aggregate site Reclamation<01
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Apr 22nd, 2025

Alabama House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • can come up with good amendments on the floor, but when we... amendments on the floor, but when we limit
  • debate and we limit the opportunity for people to present amendments and we close the process, it takes
  • I mean, you ought to say definitely yes, because what your word is, your bond.
  • Adequate, relevant, and limited to what is necessary in relation to the specified purposes listed in
  • Now, it limits the distilled can. Now, it limits the volume, the amount of alcohol in it.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Floor Session Jan 22nd, 2026

California House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • And this allows even small-dollar scams to be aggregated and shared across law enforcement jurisdictions
  • Aggregated and shared across law enforcement jurisdictions, really strengthening the efforts to combat
  • I know the pride that comes with wearing the uniform, and I know the deep bond that exists between Marines
  • That bond is why I felt it was important to speak today. I also stand before you as a father.
Keywords: 988, house, all
Summary: The Assembly convened with an initial quorum call, then proceeded with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, and routine procedural actions. Members approved several unanimous-consent requests, including suspending rules for adjournment-in-memory remarks and guest introductions, striking a large number of file items at the authors’ request, and moving AB 739 out of Appropriations to second reading. The chamber also recognized several guests, including law enforcement personnel, a student musician, and a Glendale councilmember. On the floor, AB 1184 by Assembly Member Patterson, the Homeowner Association Accountability and Transparency Act of 2026, was presented as a transparency measure for HOAs and passed 56-0. AB 871 by Assembly Member Stephanie, addressing financial elder abuse and scam reporting/training requirements for financial institutions, also passed 56-0. SB 25 by Senator Umberg, presented by the Majority Leader, would give the California Attorney General earlier access to federal merger filings to streamline merger review; it was taken up for vote after debate. The remainder of the session was devoted largely to adjournments in memory, including tributes to Paul R. Ignatius, Oxnard Police Commander Scott Aaron, Marine PFC Tanner Furman Rubio, and former Yolo County Supervisor Betsy Marchand. Members highlighted their public service, military service, and community leadership, and the Assembly observed a moment of silence for Rubio. The session concluded with announcements about upcoming deadlines and committee meetings, and the Assembly adjourned until Monday, January 26 at 1 p.m.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part I) May 15th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • had a Category One storm in Southeast Texas that one taxing unit used to raise approximately an aggregate
  • That's to do with GEO, Transparency for Bonds issued by local government.
  • Proposed or issued bond by local governmental entities.
  • House Bill 3526, relating to fiscal transparency for bonds issued by local governmental entities.
  • There is no age limit on this bill. Yeah, no, there's a long and dark history in this country.
Bills: HB11, HB12, HB21, HB26, HB30, HB33, HB37, HB45, HB210, HB303, HB630, HB879, HB1041, HB1188, HB1261, HB1318, HB1465, HB1535, HB1593, HB1778, HB2559, HB2596, HB2692, HB2703, HB2712, HB2742, HB2809, HB2890, HB3012, HB3526, HB5061, HB5092, HB5238, HCR92, SB203, SB317, SB393, SB397, SB644, SB731, SB801, SB867, SB913, SB1071, SB1073, SB1086, SB1087, SB1250, SB1310, SB1359, SB1444, SB1483, SB1705, SB1782, SB1861, SB1897, SB1944, SB2023, SB2043, SB2082, SB2133, SB2215, SB2309, SB2497, SB2532, SB2549, SB2566, SB2617, SB2639, SB2696, SB2717, SB2747, SB2751, SB2790, SB2797, SB2799, SB2841, SB2850, SB2857, SB2891, SB2919, SB2928, SB2994, SB3051, SJR34, SB529, SB541, SB693, SB963, SB1968, SB2308, SB2544, SB1173, SB1646, SB1734, SB1833, SB1, SB17, SB260, SB509, SB1506, SB1637, HB1393, HB2559, HB26, HB3012, HB1593, HB2607, HB3526, HB3810, HB388, HB879, HB12, HB2703, HB30, HB2712, HB2692, HB1633, HB1318, HB685, HB630, HB4753, HB2742, HB303, HB198, HB1535, HB762, HB148, HB1520, HB5061, HB2286, HB1606, HB1041, HB132, HB11, HB45, HB48, HB1261, HB1465, HB1778, HB2596, HB5238, HB33, HB1188, HB210, HB1022, HB1458, HB5560, HB1240, HB1950, HB2027, HB2768, HB2788, HB2791, HB3146, HB3698, HB3699, HB1893, HB3700, HB4850, HB4187, HB1397, HB4885, HB4804, HB3751, HB3611, HB2775, HB2061, HB2003, HB1729, HB1242, HB791, HB2029, HB647, HB2522, HB4738, HB3033, HB3594, HB3474, HB2563, HB2802, HCR90, SJR36, SJR50, SJR63, SCR12, SCR39, SB2023, SB128, SB2043, SB62, SB666, SB847, SB284, SB854, SB810, SB1505, SB583, SB507, SB1434, SB1772, SB2016, SB1122, SB731, SB397, SB508, SB1436, SB287, SB1882, SB393, SB1791, SB209, SB2429, SB511, SB2309, SB1085, SB1975, SB2717, SB1262, SB636, SB2056, SB884, SB1200, SB1845, SB2458, SB801, SB3014, SB3013, SB758, SB2797, SB2076, SB2876, SB1640, SB1449, SB1181, SB1234, SB2926, SB2841, SB1528, SB2891, SB1854, SB317, SB1250, SB2082, SB1237, SB2819, SB629, SB2608, SB1602, SB2009, SB867, SB640, SB1698, SB2680, SB2994, SB913, SB1071, SB1086, SB1087, SB1483, SB1444, SB1553, SB1556, SB1703, SB2133, SB2297, SB2298, SB2622, SB2955, SB2334, SB1861, SB1367, SB2044, SB2363, SB2565, SB1888, SB3036, SB3057, SB3043, SB3063, SB3035, SB203, SB2799, SB2688, SB2522, SB2639, SB2459, SB2655, SB2251, SB1884, SB2617, SB2928, SB2566, SB1897, SB1749, SB2549, SB2553, SB2919, SB1782, SB1705, SB2696, SB1944, SB2215, SB1232, SB2850, SB2969, SB2497, SB1798, SB2603, SB2607, SB781, HB34, HB128, HB130, HB581, HB668, HB677, HB766, HB2259, HB2960, HB2358, HB2894, HB4384, HB2663, HB748, HB793, HB1193, HB1734, HB2340, HB2350, HB3104, HB5180, HB4739, HB1584, HB4344, HB4238, HB4219, HB3806, HB3805, HB3804, HB3803, HB3229, HB3228, HB1922, HB1522, HB431, HB3597, HB1612, HB4224, HB754, HB1314, HB2254, HB2789, HB3560, HB4643, HB1237, HCR98, SB3070, SB835, SB524, SB2233, SB2683
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Fiscal Policy Jan 14th, 2026

Fiscal Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • per person, $2 million per occurrence bodily injury and property damage policy, or a combined single-limit
  • coverage of $2 million in the aggregate.
  • provision, how do these provisions correlate with procurement statutes for public projects and also bond
  • provision, how do these provisions correlate with procurement statutes for public projects and also bond
Keywords: 999, senate, all
Summary: The Committee on Fiscal Policy heard CS/CS/SB 290, a broad Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services bill, and CS/SB 320, an education deregulation bill. For SB 290, the committee adopted a strike-all amendment that, among other things, set density requirements for certain small municipalities, delayed biosolids changes from July 1, 2026 to July 1, 2028, increased insurance requirements and penalties for fumigation businesses, extended the time for contractors to pay subcontractors and suppliers, restricted county regulation of agritourism venues, and renamed the Bonifay Forestry Station. Members raised concerns about local preemption, the contractor-payment felony penalty, and the biosolids provisions. Audubon Florida testified in opposition to the state lands and biosolids sections, saying the bill reduced transparency and left regulatory gaps, while several industry and agriculture groups waved in support. After debate, CS/CS/SB 290 was reported favorably by a roll call vote, with Senator Bracey Davis voting no and most other members voting yes or not present. The committee then heard SB 320, which would reduce district-level administrative requirements in public schools, expand teacher apprenticeship and multi-year contracts, streamline salary supplements and testing calendars, increase flexibility in Title I and capital funding use, update facility planning rules, and shift oversight of district-run VPK programs to school districts. Supporters said the bill would cut bureaucracy and give districts more flexibility, while Senator Bracey Davis asked about remedies if charter schools fail to respond directly to Department of Education expenditure questions. SB 320 was also reported favorably by roll call vote. The committee then adjourned.
WA
Transcript Highlights:
  • And this would limit the new nondisclosure requirements relating to a person's sex designation or sex
  • We have very limited time here in this legislature, and we need to be prioritizing that on things that
  • From a compliance standpoint, these reports increase workload and cost at a time when there is limited
  • There's other places where they have a $750 limit.
  • There's other places where they have 750 limit.
Summary: The committee first met in executive session on several bills. On Second Substitute Senate Bill 6035, dealing with voting services for military, overseas, Native American, and disabled voters, members considered amendments affecting tribal meeting requirements and an electronic ballot portal; one amendment to study the portal rather than authorize it was adopted, while the tribal-meeting amendment was not. The bill was then reported out with a due pass as amended recommendation. Substitute Senate Bill 6081, concerning nondisclosure of sex designation records, saw an amendment adopted to limit the privacy protections to survivors of domestic violence or sexual assault, but the amendment was later rejected on final passage and the bill was reported out due pass. Substitute Senate Bill 6034, codifying the Governor’s Office of Indian Affairs, was amended to require Senate confirmation of the executive director and was reported out due pass as amended. Senate Bill 6084 on repeat voting was reported out due pass without amendment. Second Substitute Senate Bill 5968, implementing Executive Order 25-03 on agency credentials, had one amendment adopted on annual ORIA reporting and another rejected; it was reported out due pass as amended. Senate Bill 6137 on sports wagering was amended to restrict certain prop bets and to make threats tied to wagers a gross misdemeanor, then reported out due pass as amended. The committee then opened public hearings on a number of bills. The most extensive testimony was on Gross Substitute Senate Joint Memorial 8014, which calls for a U.S. investigation into the death of Aishanur Ezgi Eygi; family members, University of Washington students and staff, advocates, and others testified in support, emphasizing accountability and the need for an independent investigation, while one speaker opposed the memorial as a misuse of legislative time. The committee also heard testimony on Substitute Senate Bill 5840, which would change campaign finance reporting schedules and participation rules; Public Disclosure Commission staff supported the bill as a transparency and consistency measure, while campaign treasurers and compliance officers opposed it, arguing the added reporting would be burdensome and costly. Substitute Senate Bill 6049, expanding Public Records Act exemptions for certain survivors, anonymized demographic data, and Healthy Youth Survey responses, drew support from OFM and opposition from a public-records advocate who warned against adding more exemptions. Substitute Senate Bill 6160, reducing or changing the frequency of numerous agency reports, was supported by OFM as a way to right-size reporting requirements. The committee also heard brief testimony on Senate Bill 5000 designating “The Evergreen State” as the official state nickname, Senate Bill 5325 designating the state cactus, Senate Bill 6044 recognizing Diwali and Bandi Chhor Divas as a legislatively recognized day, Senate Bill 6313 creating a Capital Centennial Stewardship Account, and Substitute Senate Bill 5827 expanding veterans’ preference documentation to include pre-discharge certification. No votes were taken during the public hearing portion, and the meeting adjourned after closing testimony on the final bills.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Under the tax spending limit, $6.9 billion, and under the consolidated general revenue limit, $14.2 billion
  • So as the tax spending limit has the lowest capacity, it is the current controlling limit.
  • We need to be looking at the rollback limits because... ...exemption limits.
  • or have bonding authorization.
  • or have bonding authorization not they want to do a bond or have bonding authorization and they understand
Bills: SB 1
Summary: The Senate Finance Committee convened for its first hearing of the 89th regular session, confirmed a quorum, adopted committee rules by a 15-0 vote, and began review of Senate Bill 1, the state budget for fiscal years 2026-27. Chair Huffman outlined the committee’s organization, introduced staff, and described the budget as conservative and focused on one-time investments. She highlighted major SB 1 priorities including property tax relief, full funding for public education formulas, teacher pay, school safety, border security, Medicaid growth, dementia research, energy and water infrastructure, transportation, wildfire suppression, and other capital and public safety needs. Comptroller Glenn Hager presented the biennial revenue estimate, saying the state has $194.6 billion available for general-purpose spending in 2026-27, with a projected $23.8 billion ending balance from the current biennium. He cautioned that revenue growth is returning to more normal levels and that lawmakers should avoid committing short-term surpluses to ongoing expenses. He also explained that the Economic Stabilization Fund is projected to hit its constitutional cap, meaning an estimated $5.6 billion in severance tax and related revenue would remain in general revenue in the upcoming biennium rather than flow into the fund. Senators discussed whether to raise or rename the fund and the implications of keeping more severance-tax revenue in general revenue. The Legislative Budget Board then gave an overview of SB 1 and the budget’s major funding changes. LBB staff explained that the bill is essentially flat at $332.9 billion in all funds, but includes large method-of-finance shifts and major property tax relief. They detailed how prior property tax relief enacted in the 88th Legislature grew from an estimated $18 billion to $22.7 billion because of higher property values and hold-harmless provisions, and said SB 1 continues that relief with a total of $51 billion in ongoing and new property tax support. Members asked extensive questions about the automatic growth in school tax compression, the constitutional homestead exemption, COVID-era federal funding, Medicaid assumptions, and the sunset of the non-homestead circuit breaker. No additional votes or final budget actions were taken beyond adoption of the committee rules.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Capital Investment Committee 3/18/25

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • stance on bonds uh municipal bonds<00:03:24.440><c> as</c> bonds as bonds as well<00:03:26.159><c> again
  • , and then there are private activity bonds, or bonds that are taxable.
  • The blue line is for tax-exempt bonds, and the yellow line is for taxable bonds.
  • The bonds had a 20-year final maturity, so the bonds amortized, or were paid off, over 20 years.
  • bonds other agency bonds appropriation bonds other agency bonds that<01:23:23.000><c> are</c><01:23:23.120
Keywords: 1183, house
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Natural Resources Committee Jan 12th, 2026

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Assembly Bill 442 removes the requirement that a harvest area be limited to a single watershed, allowing
  • Diaz described, this bill simply resolves the timber harvest limitation that doesn't serve any meaningful
  • The bond was intentionally designed to...
  • The bond was intentionally designed to address urgent and ongoing climate impacts already affecting many
  • After the voters approved the bond and then the Legislature allocated the funds last fall, in September
Keywords: 988, house, all
Summary: The committee heard several natural resources bills focused on forestry, wildfire prevention, recycling, and organic waste management. AB 442 would remove a timber harvest planning limitation tied to a single watershed to make working forest management plans more feasible; supporters said the current permit structure has created barriers and that the bill would help nonindustrial landowners manage forests for resiliency, while no opposition testified. AB 623 would require state agencies to report on the effectiveness of the Governor’s emergency suspension of CEQA and the Coastal Act for fuel-reduction projects; the author said the bill would provide needed data on wildfire mitigation efforts, and it drew no opposition. AB 35 would create a targeted APA exemption for Proposition 4 bond programs so funds for wildfire prevention, water, flood protection, and related projects could be deployed faster; the author and a large coalition of local agencies, water districts, conservation groups, and environmental advocates supported it, citing delays in getting money to projects such as Tijuana River pollution cleanup, and the committee discussed the need for urgency and accountability. The committee also considered AB 3333, which would use a $5 million market development payment from the Beverage Container Recycling Fund to support end uses for non-container glass, such as ground glass pozzolan for cement. Supporters said the bill would divert hard-to-recycle glass from landfills, reduce emissions, and create a stronger market for recovered material, while opponents from the glass packaging and waste sectors argued the bill would divert program funds away from bottle-to-bottle recycling and could undermine existing recycling goals and infrastructure. Members raised questions about the fund’s finances and the relationship between the bill and existing recycled-content requirements; the author said the bill was intended to address glass that is already being landfilled and to support carbon reduction. The committee ultimately advanced the bill, with some members noting fiscal concerns and the need for further work. AB 643 would allow certain diverted organic materials processed into fertilizer to count toward SB 1383 recovered organic waste procurement targets. Supporters from wastewater and water agencies said the change would help jurisdictions meet procurement goals and expand beneficial use of biosolids and other organic residuals, while opponents, including Californians Against Waste and compost industry representatives, argued that procurement credit should remain focused on newly diverted food and green waste and should not undermine investments in composting infrastructure. Committee members discussed whether a compromise could limit the credit to historically landfilled materials and noted that CalRecycle technical assistance was still pending. Despite the unresolved concerns, the bill was moved forward. The committee also adopted the consent calendar item AB 946, and at the end of the hearing the recorded votes showed AB 35, AB 3333, AB 442, AB 623, and AB 643 all receiving enough support to pass out of committee and move to Appropriations, with AB 946 passing on consent.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Insurance Mar 26th, 2025

Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • They're essentially limited options and are monopolistic in many ways.
  • For insurance, if we tweak that and just say, hey, or you can get a bond for the project.
  • Bonding, generally in the past—and we've worked through bonds—is a very specific... ...project.
  • process because a bond, typically, you've got to have a lot of input data.
  • That has to be pushed back to Wednesday, and that generally doesn't work well with bonds.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Feb 17th, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • member, if the person can't get out unless they have this, why would be the process if they can't bond
  • or some way to be able to cover that cost for someone who otherwise might qualify, say, for an OR bond
  • or they have a bond reduction to where they might otherwise be released.
  • But we're hoping by it being a very limited number that it would not be a burden on folks.
  • There's still a limit in there.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Appropriations Feb 18th, 2026 at 04:00 pm

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • In the aggregate, however, that money collected makes a real difference in our ability to prosecute these
  • need about $11,000 to make changes to the data processing systems to increase this lump-sum payment limit
  • Families are traveling long distances, provider capacity is limited, and many communities simply do not
  • support administrative functions and essential operations of home care agencies, including but not limited
  • are required for certain purposes, such as the capital projects fund for major capital purposes and bond
Bills: SB5109, SB5835, SB6065
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Floor Session Jun 25th, 2026

California House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • That's why this bond is so critical. That's why this bond is so critical.
  • Not nearly adequate enough, and not contained in this bond, not linked to this bond.
  • limit in our state constitution.
  • Now, how do you get around the spending limit?
  • The spending limit is there so that when the politicians hit the spending limit, any revenue that's collected
Keywords: 988, house, all
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Transportation Jun 21st, 2026 at 11:00 am

Joint Committee on Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • We do ask that everyone try to limit their testimony to three minutes.
  • Our intent is to use them only on those high-speed roadways and, again, only in a limited fashion.
  • I mean, we have limitations. Correlation, in my view, between that and reduced police enforcement.
  • So the speed limit is already set, in my opinion, too high.
  • It will help enforce speed limits, protect workers, and save lives.
Keywords: 995, all
Summary: The hearing focused on a broad package of traffic and roadway safety bills, with repeated emphasis on work zone safety, the Move Over law, automated enforcement, and protections for pedestrians, cyclists, and roadside workers. MassDOT Highway Administrator Jonathan Gulliver strongly supported a bill allowing MassDOT vehicles to use blue flashing lights in limited work-zone settings, arguing that blue lights reliably slow drivers and could help address a rise in work-zone crashes and fatalities. District Attorney Marion Ryan, State Police representatives, and police association leaders supported a separate Move Over bill that would raise penalties for repeat violations and add an education component, citing officers and workers killed or injured roadside and saying the goal is deterrence and safer driver behavior rather than revenue. A major portion of the hearing was devoted to automated enforcement bills for speed and red-light violations, including proposals for school zones, work zones, and broader local options. Senator Brownsberger and Senator Jalen argued that automated enforcement is needed because speeding and red-light running remain common while police traffic enforcement has declined, and they described the bills as civil, opt-in tools that issue tickets to vehicles rather than drivers. Supporters from WalkMass, T4MA, Safe Roads Alliance, MassBike, Medford officials, and other advocates cited fatal pedestrian crashes, neighborhood speeding, and the need to protect vulnerable road users, while also pointing to privacy and equity safeguards in the bills such as limits on photographs, data retention rules, public reporting, and local approval processes. Several local and advocacy witnesses backed targeted camera programs. Senator Lovely and Representative Cruz supported a Salem school-zone camera bill, describing repeated violations around schools and buses. Medford officials and school-safety advocates supported a similar statewide camera bill, citing recent pedestrian deaths and dangerous cut-through traffic. AAA Northeast and the Massachusetts Aggregate and Asphalt Pavement Association also supported targeted enforcement in work zones and school zones, while urging public education and warning periods. Some witnesses raised concerns about the color of lights for highway workers, with State Police representatives preferring green over blue to avoid confusion with law enforcement, and committee members asked about constitutional issues, surchargeability, and possible targeting concerns. No votes were taken during the hearing.