Video & Transcript : 'filing fees' :

Page 25 of 500
AL

Alabama 2026 Regular Session

Alabama Senate County and Municipal Government Committee Jan 20th, 2026

County and Municipal Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • I know in rental fees at airports.
  • All it simply says is if a city is going to do a new tax or a fee or renew a tax or a fee, they're going
  • All it simply says is if a city is going to do a new tax or a fee or renew a tax or a fee, they're going
  • All it simply says is if a city is going to do a new tax or a fee or renew a tax or a fee, they're going
  • </c><00:51:39.599><c> or</c> is going to do a new tax or a fee or is going to do a new tax or a fee or
Bills: SB23 , SB71 , SB105 , SB109 , SB115 , SB131 , SB148 , SB165 , SB23 , SB71 , SB105 , SB109 , SB115 , SB131 , SB148 , SB165
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session May 5th, 2026 at 09:30 am

Oklahoma Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • You guys might have seen that I had a floor amendment filed at one point, and that was to put some of
  • This updates the fee schedule for oversize and overweight permit fees.
  • The increase in revenue from these fees will go directly to the roads fund to help our road infrastructure
  • And the fees that are going to be charged now, where did you say those monies would go?
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

JHA Info Briefing - Tue Feb 17, 2026 @ 2:00 PM HST

Hawaii House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Regents would still file full disclosures, fully subject to review and enforcement.
  • This bill does not eliminate filing,<00:22:33.039><c> does</c><00:22:33.200><c> not</c><00:22:33.360>
  • <c> weaken</c><00:22:33.679><c> the</c><00:22:33.840><c> authority</c><00:22:34.080><c> of</c> filing
  • , does not weaken the authority of filing, does not weaken the authority of the<00:22:34.320><c> Hawaii
  • Regents would still file enforcement.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight Feb 24th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight

Transcript Highlights:
  • Yes, as I say, this is a request from Sheriff Tommy Johnson, Oklahoma County, to change the warrant fees
  • Then the judge decides whether that fee should be paid or not.
  • You know, that's a good question because I did have a visit from DPS as soon as I filed it.
  • From DPS as soon as I filed it.
  • It requires that VPO petitions be filed of record even when denied at intake, because when petitions
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Ways and Means Mar 17th, 2026

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 287 by Representative Bowie extends authority for imposition of certain fees levied by the
  • That fee is set to expire in June of this year, and so this is an attempt to renew that fee or renew
  • And so this is an attempt to renew that fee or renew its imposition of that fee until 2030.
  • It's not new fees. It's currently their operating budget.
  • So this is a self-supporting fee for their organization.
Bills: HB287 , HB340 , HB412 , HB440 , HB514 , HB515 , HB521 , HB543 , HB553 , HB570 , HB961
Committee: House Ways & Means
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/28/2026 - House Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • I've heard something about the intake of files, organizing files, right? Is that all it's doing?
  • It's organizing files for human review? It's organizing files for human review? Mr.
  • This program captures that because they go into their 201 file, their DD-214 file, and they go into their
  • You think I have built-in files like this? Well, no, I know you—not military files.
  • I know, not the military file.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/28/2026 - House Judiciary

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • However, we do not currently receive notice when these applications are filed, so this bill would require
  • declaratory and injunctive relief, at least $100,000 in financial damages, and reasonable attorney's fees
  • declaratory and injunctive relief, at least $100,000 in financial damages, and reasonable attorney's fees
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • I am speaking on behalf of the City of Austin in opposition to House Bill 1523 as filed.
  • And partners in Bastrop County as filed House Bill 1523 would prohibit the of Austin from pursuing an
  • and time again over the last three weeks where a haphazard meeting was called after this bill was filed
  • only way that we got to the table to even get a little bit of color on this project was for me to file
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • We have just filed our initially prepared plan with the State Water Development Board.
  • Lastly, the committee substitute prohibits a groundwater conservation district from collecting export fees
  • And then lastly, the second part is about removing export fees for districts.
Summary: The Committee on Natural Resources heard House Bill 2109, which would remove certain long-proposed reservoir projects from the state water plan after 50 years without progress. Chairman Van Deaver and many landowners, local officials, timber interests, and conservation advocates testified in support, arguing that the Marvin Nichols Reservoir has burdened Northeast Texas landowners for decades with the threat of eminent domain, depressed property values, and uncertainty over homes, farms, ranches, schools, churches, and cemeteries. Supporters also said the project would flood tens of thousands of acres, require extensive mitigation, harm timber and agriculture, and that Texas now has better alternatives such as conservation, reuse, aquifer storage and recovery, and desalination. Several members expressed sympathy for the affected families and questioned whether a project could remain in the plan indefinitely without progress. Opposition came from North Texas water interests, including the North Texas Commission, Tarrant Regional Water District, and the Texas Water Association, who argued that the bill would interfere with the state’s long-term water planning process and remove needed future supply options for a fast-growing region. They said Region C faces major projected shortages by 2070, that conservation and reuse have already delayed the need for new supplies, and that reservoirs remain one tool in the state’s water-planning toolbox. TWDB staff explained the existing inter-regional conflict process and noted that the substitute would affect several unique reservoir sites, not just Marvin Nichols. After testimony, Chairman Van Deaver closed by urging passage of the bill, but the committee withdrew the substitute and left HB 2109 pending. The committee then took up House Bill 5188, a brackish groundwater bill. The author said the bill would reduce permitting burdens for wells in designated brackish groundwater production zones, and the committee substitute added requirements on monitoring, groundwater-rights ownership, and allocation of pumpage limits while removing some exclusions and export-fee provisions. Texas Wildlife Association testified against the bill, warning that the exemptions could weaken groundwater conservation districts’ ability to protect freshwater resources and surface-owner rights. San Antonio Water System testified in favor, saying brackish groundwater is a key future supply and that the substitute would help speed development of desalination and brackish projects. The Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts testified neutrally but raised concerns about reduced district oversight, especially around injection-well exclusions and the loss of export fees, and said discussions on the bill were ongoing.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 3rd, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • 1322 and recognize that Representative Hopper took time to explain the differences between the bill filed
  • All the paperwork was not properly filed with the city, and our city hall was burned down by our former
  • Now, we have a situation where somebody claimed that they filed the paperwork, and now they're trying
  • developing this critical infrastructure in return for the district being able... ...to levy certain fees
  • require very, very significant amounts of capital investment that will affect utility, tax, and impact fee