Louisiana House Bill HB287

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/24/26
• Refer: 2/24/26
• Refer: 3/9/26
• Report Pass: 3/17/26
• Engrossed: 3/24/26
• Refer: 3/25/26
• Report Pass: 4/27/26
• Enrolled: 5/18/26
• Chaptered: 5/22/26
• Passed: 5/22/26

Caption

TAX COMMISSION, STATE: Extends authority for imposition of certain fees levied by the Louisiana Tax Commission for the assessment of certain properties (EN +$3,000,000 SG RV See Note)

Summary

HB 287 extends the Louisiana Tax Commission’s authority to levy and collect certain assessment-related fees for an additional four years, moving the sunset date from June 30, 2026 to June 30, 2030. The bill does not create new fee categories or change the fee rates; it simply continues existing authority for fees tied to the commission’s work assessing certain property types. Under current law, the commission may charge fees in connection with assessments of public service properties, insurance company properties, and financial institution properties. The bill keeps those fees in place through the new expiration date, preserving the commission’s funding mechanism for these specialized assessment functions. The act becomes effective upon gubernatorial action or otherwise as provided by the Louisiana Constitution.

Impact

HB 287 amends R.S. 47:1838 to extend the Louisiana Tax Commission’s temporary authority to impose assessment fees through June 30, 2030. The practical effect is to continue the commission’s ability to collect fees from public service property owners, insurance companies, and financial institutions for assessment services, supporting the commission’s operations and related property tax administration. The bill does not alter the fee amounts or expand the classes of property subject to the fees; it only extends the existing statutory authorization.

Sentiment

The bill appears to have been broadly noncontroversial. It passed the House unanimously, 96-0, indicating strong support and little to no opposition in recorded voting. The absence of committee transcript discussion also suggests the measure was treated as a routine extension of existing authority rather than a contested policy change.

Contention

There is little visible contention in the available record. The only likely point of policy interest is the continued imposition of fees on public service companies, insurers, and financial institutions, which are the entities directly affected by the extension. However, the unanimous vote and lack of recorded debate indicate that any concerns about cost or continued fee authority did not generate organized opposition in the legislative process.