Video & Transcript Research : 'removal process'

Page 22 of 500
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Capital Investment Committee 4/3/25

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • In 2018, MnDOT started a scoping process for the reconstruction of Trunk Highway 218 within the municipal
  • In 2018, MnDOT started a scoping process for the reconstruction of Trunk Highway 218 within the municipal
  • The facility is crucial for removing iron and manganese from our raw well water, ensuring our residents
  • The facility is crucial<00:58:21.280> for<00:58:21.520> removing<00:58:22.000> iron<
  • /c><00:58:22.400> and crucial for removing iron and crucial for removing iron and manganesees<
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Apr 23rd, 2026 at 09:30 am

Oklahoma Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Murrah Federal building was bombed, and they ran back to the ICU and began to remove patients and see
  • who they could remove from care so they could prepare for the influx of victims that were coming in.
  • This removes the earnings cap for those that return to the classroom and allows them to return after
  • Again, this removes the earnings cap for teachers who decide to return to the classroom.
  • We're gonna have an agency running a process to loan these funds out And they, by the way, are not a
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

House of Representatives Apr 23rd, 2026

Louisiana House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • So there is a several-step process.
  • But currently, that is the legal process we have in this state, and that is a process that we must all
  • ... ...process we have in this state, and that is a process that we must all abide by, that that's the
  • But currently, that is the legal process we have in this state, and that is a process that we must all
  • It's called due process. And this bill attempts to bypass that process.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Representative Kendrick moves to process the bill. Will there be debate?
  • We've come to a mitigation process there that will mitigate those costs.
  • So this is merely removing a reference to those rules that have been withdrawn. Move for adoption.
  • So that doesn't change this process. Thank you for the question, Representative Provenzano.
  • process that alt certs go through today.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • canceled meetings, and so I I just don't think it's functioning, and you know, this is part of a process
  • is as we When we're making changes to the courts, effectively relabeling things and changing their process
  • Current law requires foreign insurance companies to send their service a process to the insurance commissioner
  • keeps the insurance department from saving costs there for them having to intermediate these service process
  • It removes physician faculty members and physician staff at the university hospital Trust.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Could you explain why that part was removed from the introduced version of the bill?
  • you actually Explain why that was removed from the bill.
  • The audit process was being very punitive; it's supposed to be corrective.
  • There is a process for people to get books.
  • food dye provision and also we removed the 10 mg limit.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • But do we have any examples of any other state-funded or facilitated entities where we reduce or remove
  • does not appropriate any funds; the investment will still have to come through the regular budget process
  • The amendment removes pay payroll processors from the bill. Moved to adopt.
  • law governing first-party motor vehicle damages and claims by establishing a standardized appraisal process
  • We've been through that process before. Recognized for follow-up Follow-up, thank you, Mr.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Apr 14th, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 3587 improves the processes, procedures, and protections for the implementation of court-ordered
  • So this is, I misspoke earlier, this is someone who's going through the criminal justice process Senator
  • House Bill 4226 refines the process by which parties to litigation can seek disqualification of the judge
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate Finance and Taxation Education Committee Feb 25th, 2026

Finance and Taxation Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • I also see this bill as being part of helping that process because I know that there are many schools
  • <00:16:14.399> because<00:16:14.720> I part of helping that process because I part
  • of helping that process because I know<00:16:15.040> that<00:16:15.199> there<00:16:15.360
  • 25:36.880> appropriations decisions through appropriations decisions through appropriations process
  • . process. process.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm still thinking, processing, and studying the bill, and I appreciate your responses.
  • Torts have been removed from the bill, and by the way, that's great progress.
  • The intentional tort is one subject, and that's been removed.
  • Evidence and procedures within Chapter 41, the deliberative process.
  • People processing trauma or not processing their trauma.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • in turn has caused people to lose trust in our election process.
  • I do agree that this could simplify the process.
  • Nothing in Senate Bill 2487 changes the civil commitment process in any way.
  • Not only that, they had subsidized rental at the end of that process.
  • This bill will protect archers by ensuring due process of law.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part II) Apr 14th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • So it simplifies the process. Yes, sir.
  • So it simplifies the process. Yes, sir.
  • We’re not removing equipment. We’re not... ...locations. We’re not removing equipment.
  • And I do agree that this could simplify the process.
  • No judge, no hearing, no due process.
Summary: The committee first adopted a committee substitute for Senate Bill 30 and then voted to report the substituted bill favorably to the full Senate; the roll call showed six ayes and one nay, with later unanimous-consent corrections noted for additional aye votes. The committee also reported Senate Bill 801 favorably to the full Senate by an eight-to-one vote. Both bills were left with no further action in the meeting after the votes. The committee then heard Senate Bill 2595 by Senator Middleton and Senate Bill 2876 by Chairman Hughes, both aimed at addressing masked harassment and riot-related conduct. Supporters said the bills would deter intimidation, protect public order, and respond to recent protests and anti-Semitic incidents, while opponents from civil rights, disability, and advocacy groups argued the measures were overly broad, could chill peaceful protest, and would burden people who wear masks for religious, medical, or disability-related reasons. Public testimony was taken on both bills, and both were left pending after testimony closed. Senate Bill 2753, by Senator Hall, proposed consolidating early voting and election day into a single continuous in-person voting period with common procedures and equipment, while preserving countywide voting and mail voting. The Secretary of State’s office said the bill could improve ballot secrecy and simplify administration, though witnesses raised concerns about ballot privacy, logistics, and access for disabled voters; some county election officials were neutral or supportive of the concept, while others opposed it as confusing or potentially burdensome. The bill was left pending after extensive testimony. The committee also heard Senate Bill 2225 on allowing spirit-based ready-to-drink beverages to be sold in grocery and convenience stores, with supporters arguing the law should focus on alcohol content rather than the source of the alcohol and that the bill would modernize an outdated code. Later, Senate Bill 1540, which would add election officials and related workers to confidentiality protections, drew support from county election officials who described threats and harassment, though one witness suggested the bill’s language may need technical adjustment to better match its intent. Finally, Senate Bill 2382, concerning statewide voter registration systems and offline counties, drew opposition from county election administrators and vendors who warned about capacity, cybersecurity, and single-point-of-failure risks, while others suggested a phased approach or API-based integration; the transcript ends with testimony still open on that bill.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part I) Apr 14th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Again, first intentional torts have been removed from the bill.
  • That's been removed.
  • Intentional torts have been removed from the bill.
  • The deliberative process does not have any caps or thresholds.
  • People processing trauma or not processing their trauma, that may not be visible, and that concerns me
Summary: The Senate Committee on State Affairs heard Senate Bill 3031, which would expand aggravated assault to cover certain road-rage shootings involving a person in or traveling to or from a motor vehicle, when a firearm is discharged and causes injury, property damage, or fear of serious bodily injury. Senator Schwertner laid out the bill for the author, described it as closing a gap in the law, and there was no public testimony; the bill was left pending. The committee then heard Senate Bill 2514, a measure by Chairman Hughes aimed at creating a DPS unit to identify, investigate, and monitor hostile foreign influence operations and to require ethics training for state employees. Supportive invited testimony from Dr. Jacqueline Deal, Ambassador Kelly Curry, and Michael Lucci emphasized threats from the Chinese Communist Party, transnational repression, cyber intrusion, and state-level influence efforts, and argued Texas should take a leading role. Public testimony included opposition from speakers who raised concerns about free speech, privacy, and potential overbreadth. The bill was left pending after testimony closed. Finally, the committee took up Senate Bill 30 as pending business and discussed a committee substitute. Senator Schwertner explained that the substitute would limit admissible medical expense evidence to amounts paid or up to 300% of Medicare, clarify treatment of provider testimony and attorney-referred providers, remove a requirement that plaintiffs use available health insurance to mitigate damages, strike a unanimous-verdict requirement for non-economic damages, and delete a remittitur provision. Senators questioned the impact on sexual assault and child abuse survivors, the use of Medicare as a benchmark, and whether the bill would still allow fair compensation. After discussion, SB 30 was left pending and the committee recessed subject to the call of the chair.