COMMERCE: Requests the Louisiana State Law Institute to study the use and application of the term "foreign" with respect to juridical persons provided for in state law
Summary
House Concurrent Resolution 31 does not change substantive law directly. Instead, it authorizes and requests the Louisiana State Law Institute to study how the term “foreign” is used in Louisiana statutes and jurisprudence, with particular attention to banking institutions, pipeline operations, other critical infrastructure, and juridical persons generally. The study is to examine the historical origins of the term, how its meaning varies across legal contexts, the practical effects on regulated industries, and whether alternative terminology or standardized definitions would improve clarity.
The resolution also asks the Law Institute to consider whether entities from countries deemed “foreign adversaries” should be specifically defined or treated differently from other international entities. The Institute must report its findings and make legislative recommendations to the Legislature before the 2027 Regular Session, and submit the report to the legislative research library. Because it is a concurrent resolution, it serves as a directive for study and recommendations rather than an amendment to the Revised Statutes.
Impact
HCR 31 has no immediate effect on state law, regulatory requirements, or private rights. Its practical impact is to initiate a formal review of terminology used across Louisiana law, especially in commercial, financial, and infrastructure-related statutes, and to potentially set the stage for future legislation that could clarify, modernize, or standardize the use of “foreign” in legal definitions. Any legal change would depend on later bills introduced after the study is completed.
Sentiment
The bill appears to have been received favorably and with little opposition. It passed the House overwhelmingly and the Senate unanimously, indicating broad bipartisan support for a study resolution focused on legal clarity and terminology. The voting history suggests general agreement that the issue merits review rather than immediate policy conflict.
Contention
There was little recorded contention in the available materials, but the resolution itself identifies the main policy questions that could become controversial later: whether Louisiana should continue using the term “foreign” across different legal contexts, whether standardized terminology is preferable, and whether entities tied to countries considered foreign adversaries should be singled out for different treatment. Those issues could affect banks, pipeline operators, other critical infrastructure entities, and other juridical persons, but the resolution only asks for study and recommendations, not immediate changes.
Requests the Louisiana State Law Institute to study and make recommendations to the legislature on including digital products in the application of the Louisiana Products Liability Act.
Urges and requests the office of motor vehicles to study the necessity of Louisiana state identification cards for citizens with Alzheimer's and related dementia diseases
Requests the La. State Law Institute to study and make recommendations to the House of Representatives on including digital products in the application of the La. Products Liability Act
Commends and recognizes Film Louisiana for its contributions to economic development and designates April 15, 2026, as Film Louisiana Day at the Louisiana State Capitol
Requests the health profession licensing boards to work with the commissioner of administration to identify funds from their cash and cash equivalent year-end balances that can be transferred into the state general fund.