Video & Transcript Research : 'data sales'

Page 17 of 500
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Apr 22nd, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • So how do you typically, how does the sales transaction work?
  • They keep track of all the data.
  • As a farmer, a huge portion—I know a lot of folks' sales do come from SNAP.
  • So we're issuing those nutrition incentives at the point of sale at our welcome tents.
  • You haven't done any of the demographic data or any of that stuff, have you?
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services, it would allow the proceeds of real property sales
  • No, this does not affect the tax ramifications of any of these sales. The queues are closed.
  • I'd be more interested if you could ensure some specific data that shows, let's say, for example, 125%
  • of home-based businesses for the last fiscal year had an increase in sales of X and that gives us X
  • And we don't have all the data on exactly what that will do because it's not currently allowed.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Apr 28th, 2026 at 09:00 am

Oklahoma Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • President, it requires a hyperlink to said data.
  • This is called the Data Center Ratepayer Protection Act.
  • And do you have any data that shows that this program will improve that?
  • And any data on? I think it's great if it works. You, Mr.
  • There is data that this is helping save lives.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill gives express statutory authority for OPUC to request and receive market data from the PUC,
  • I just think they need to have a little bit more data and information. So, this is a good bill.
  • By publishing a dedicated team with access to data, OPUC would gain the capacity to conduct a number
  • This bill ensures that any data team established by OPUC will have access to the information it needs
  • This team will be solely focused on specialized data analysis related to products. ...to protect and
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/17/2026 - House Commerce

Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • to four years, I'm not saying any names or places, that was held against this lady who was a huge sales
  • Costco under the theory that the power of eminent domain was appropriate in that case because the sales
  • Costco under the theory that the power of eminent domain was appropriate in that case because the sales
  • tax The power of eminent domain was appropriate in that case because the sales tax revenue generated
  • Sometimes the data lags behind.
Summary: The committee heard Senate Bill 1566, which would prohibit municipalities and counties from maliciously delaying licensing, permits, or approvals, authorize the Attorney General to enforce the prohibition, and provide expedited judicial review. The sponsor said the bill is intended to address affordability by preventing intentional government delays in housing and business approvals. County representatives supported the goal but opposed the bill as drafted, arguing the county language differed from the city/town language and could sweep in ordinary processing delays or incomplete applications; the sponsor said a floor amendment would fix the county language. Testimony from supporters described long permit and parcel-number delays and argued the bill would give applicants a remedy against intentional obstruction. The committee recommended the bill do pass by a 7-3 vote, with one present and one absent. The committee then heard Senate Bill 1787, which would require written notice for exactions imposed on development projects, allow individualized determinations, and create an appeal path including judicial review. The sponsor framed it as a takings and affordability measure to stop unrelated or excessive exactions from being imposed on housing projects. Cities and counties opposed the bill, saying existing law already requires nexus and proportionality, already provides an appeal process, and that the bill would create a duplicative Attorney General review and confusion, especially for mixed-use projects. Supporters, including Pacific Legal Foundation, the Home Builders Association, and a homeowner who described a costly infrastructure demand on her property, argued the bill would curb extortionate demands and make the process fairer. The committee passed the bill 7-2 with one present and one absent. Senate Bill 1478, a liquor-regulation cleanup bill, was also heard and received broad support. The measure makes technical changes to liquor statutes, including clarifying interim permits, repealing a federal food-safety preemption provision, and updating definitions such as cider and production terminology. Industry stakeholders said the bill was the product of months of consensus work and mostly technical corrections. It passed unanimously, 10-0. Finally, the committee heard Senate Bill 1431, which would limit municipal control over home design features and prohibit certain required shared amenities that would necessitate HOA maintenance. The sponsor and supporters argued the bill would reduce housing costs by preventing subjective aesthetic mandates and unnecessary HOA-driven requirements, while opponents from cities and neighborhood groups warned it would undermine local control, crime-prevention design standards, neighborhood character, and quality. Home builders and property-rights advocates said the bill would expand consumer choice and reduce costs, while critics argued it could lead to lower-quality housing and remove local recourse. The bill was not reported out in the portion provided, and testimony continued with no final vote shown.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Licensing & Administrative Procedures Apr 22nd, 2025

Licensing & Administrative Procedures

AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Judiciary Committee Apr 9th, 2025

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • This would mandate some data collection.
  • As the program, if passed, gets instilled or installed, we have the ability to be privy to some data
  • That has since changed, and I suspect, although I don't have the data, that there may be individuals
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate County and Municipal Government Committee Apr 2nd, 2025

County and Municipal Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • I have a simple little two-page bill that provides that sales and use tax levied by local law for specific
  • But Jefferson County has a 1-cent sales tax, so I want to make sure... because what you all talked about
  • I see your point, sir, but again, it says, "Senator sales tax"...
  • the bills, as it is written, specifically talks about county... specifically it talks about county sales
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part II) Mar 17th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • And with slowing sales that we come to expect in our industry every January, their usual incentive to
  • In that subsection B, it has a part where it does not limit the amount of direct-to-consumer sales that
  • these 2G permits can make, allowing them to make up to 70,000 gallons of wine sales direct to consumer
  • problem occurs with what I think is being overlooked here is that wineries can direct-to-consumer sale
  • You have an S permit, you are not allowed to direct-to-consumer sale in Texas.
Summary: The Senate Committee on State Affairs resumed consideration of several pending bills, first taking up Senate Bills 667, 1349, 1585, and 2312. After inviting testimony had already been heard, no members of the public came forward to testify on any of those measures, and the committee closed public testimony and left all four bills pending. The committee then heard Senate Bill 1355, which Senator Parker explained as a committee substitute aimed at helping Texas distillers recover unpaid invoices from wholesalers. The substitute would require distillers to invoice at the time of purchase, send a demand letter if payment terms are violated, and allow complaints to be filed with the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission, which could determine an appropriate penalty based on the facts. Natasha Dehart of Bent Distilling Company testified in support, describing serious cash-flow problems and unpaid invoices from a Texas wholesaler that had forced layoffs, late vendor payments, and operational strain. No one testified against the bill, and it was left pending. The committee also heard Senate Bill 1378, a narrowly tailored local bill for a Carrollton facility recently acquired by Sazerac that employs more than 1,000 Texans. Senator Parker said the bill would create a limited exemption to avoid forcing the company to shut down or move because of current permit restrictions, while preserving the three-tier system and preventing the company from selling wine to itself. A Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission resource witness said the bill was drafted so it would not open the door to broader industry changes. Mason Moreland testified against the bill as filed, arguing it gave special treatment to one company and failed to address broader problems in the wine industry, including direct-to-consumer sales and permit issues. After questions from senators, public testimony closed and SB 1378 was left pending. The committee then recessed subject to the call of the chair.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Business and Commerce May 20th, 2025

Business & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • One million individual data profiles were reported as compromised last year alone.
  • of Data on a number of floors, and then NSCC is on maybe the top.
  • It's actually the School of Data Sciences. ...with NSCC inside of it. Correct.
  • These laws, however, did not contemplate internet sales or certain sales, such as the sale of insurance
  • fraudulent sales, and state licensees were implicated.
Summary: The committee took up several pending business items and reported a series of House bills out of committee, including HB 2467, HB 2468, HB 2518, HB 4310, HB 4386, HB 4490, HB 5323, and HB 149. Most of these were advanced on committee substitute motions and sent to the local and uncontested calendar or reported favorably to the full Senate. HB 2467 drew one nay vote, while the others were approved without opposition. HB 4310 and HB 4386 were described as committee-substitute versions with changes narrowing disclosure requirements and preserving attorney-client privilege in certain circumstances. A major portion of the meeting focused on HB 149, an AI governance bill. The substitute was explained as addressing biometric identifier capture and storage, exempting certain AI uses for security and fraud prevention, clarifying definitions, restricting AI systems that simulate explicit child sexual content, adjusting Attorney General investigative authority, refining sandbox program waivers, reducing Texas AI Council powers and membership, and adding DIR coordination provisions. The committee adopted the substitute and reported the bill favorably. The committee then heard extensive testimony on HB 1500, the DIR sunset bill. The author said the bill would continue DIR for 12 years, restructure its board, update advisory committees, require regular cybersecurity assessments and penetration testing for state agencies, improve IT procurement training, and transfer the e-grants program to the Comptroller. A Texas 2036 witness supported the bill as a way to strengthen governance, procurement, and cybersecurity. Members asked detailed questions about the bill’s structure and then left HB 1500 pending. The committee also heard a lengthy presentation on HB 150, which would create the Texas Cyber Command as a component of the University of Texas System, administratively attached to UTSA and located in San Antonio. The author argued the command would centralize cyber threat intelligence, incident response, and digital forensics, and would be able to support state and local entities, with optional services for local governments. Members raised concerns about university mission drift, governance, security, chain of command, procurement authority, gifts and donations, and civil liberties implications of proactive cyber monitoring. Witnesses from UTSA/NSCC and SecurityScorecard testified in support, emphasizing the security of the downtown San Antonio facility, the existing cyber ecosystem there, and the need for a dedicated cyber capability. The bill remained under discussion with no final committee action announced in the excerpt.