Transcript Highlights:

• The House is now in position to introduce bills and resolutions. >> Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
• I move to suspend the rules for a time-sensitive resolution. >> Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
• I move to suspend the rules for a time-sensitive resolution. >> Any objections?
• Speaker, this resolution designates the new state house currently under construction as the Alabama State
• Resolution adopted. The chair recognizes the gentleman from Mobile for a motion. >> Thank you, Mr.

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I also would like to announce that I do have a resolution bill in support, expressing support for the
• House Concurrent Resolution 2001. House Concurrent Resolution 2001.
• Members, you've heard the third reading of House Concurrent Resolution 2001.
• Members, I'd take the opportunity to explain my vote on this House concurrent resolution.
• Members, by votes of 32 ayes, 27 nays, 1 not voting, you have passed House Concurrent Resolution 2001

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• What I'm hearing are not objections necessarily to the resolution, possibly potential objections to how
• But this resolution, this H.J.R. does not actually say we're not going to participate in any optional
• In talking to our national policy experts, this particular resolution, they are very concerned that if
• The Committee on Legislative Review on House Joint Resolution 154 is now closed.
• The committee on legislative review on House Joint Resolution 154 is now closed.

Keywords: 959, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Next order of business is introduction of new bills and resolutions. Mr.
• on it, a calm this with a resolution on it, a calm discussion. discussion. discussion.
• <01:19:11.480> Clerk,<01:19:11.800> please bills and resolutions. Mr.
• Clerk, please bills and resolutions. Mr.
• New bills and resolutions, report.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The Senate convened with prayer, the pledge, roll call, and approval of the February 5, 2026 journal. The House clerk then delivered messages that the House had passed House Bills 103, 188, 189, 258, 276, and 419 and requested concurrence. The chamber also received second-reading reports for Senate Bills 2, 4, 71, 136, and 183, which were sent to the Rules Committee, and later committee reports that posted SB 2, SB 4, and SB 71 for Monday, February 9, and SB 136 and SB 183 for Tuesday, February 10. The Committee on Committees also referred several bills to standing committees, including SB 155, 118, 153, 158, 160, 72, 98, and 145. The main floor action was passage of Senate Bill 132, relating to massage therapy. The sponsor said the bill was intended to help local governments investigate businesses posing as massage parlors and to strengthen enforcement against unlicensed practice, including raising the penalty for certain violations from a class B to a class A misdemeanor and treating each unlicensed session as a separate offense. Supporters said it would aid efforts to combat human trafficking and preserve local zoning and licensing authority. Several senators voiced concerns that the bill could be too broad and might unintentionally affect trafficking victims or impose harsh penalties for unlicensed massage without injury or fraud, but they still voted yes. SB 132 passed 32-0. The Senate also adopted Senate Committee Substitute 1 for Senate Bill 18 and then passed the bill 32-0. SB 18 updates Kentucky’s podiatry laws, formally recognizes podiatric assistants and residents, gives the Board of Podiatry authority to license and regulate them, allows podiatrists to supervise physician assistants with board approval, limits supervision to four assistants, and requires new podiatrists starting in 2027 to complete at least two years of residency training. The sponsor said the measure modernizes oversight and improves access to foot and ankle care, especially for patients with diabetes. After the floor work, the Senate recessed for meetings of the Rules Committee and Committee on Committees, and later received the committee reports noted above.

Transcript Highlights:

• DLI is mandated to achieve an informal resolution.
• within a period of achieve a resolution within a period of 10<00:47:45.520> days.
• period. um in former resolution period. um in former resolution continued<00:48:05.200> to
• Uh educating employers about resolution.
• They detail the form and resolution.

Bills: HF3707, HF3732, HF2581, HF3731

Keywords: unemployment insurance, judicial officials, paid leave, economic development, worker protections, workforce development, unemployment benefits, youth training, grants, job creation, grant funding, revolving loan, underserved communities, disadvantaged groups, electrical licensing, installation, Class A installer, regulations, labor and industry, 1183

Summary: The committee first adopted the minutes from February 26 and then heard House File 2581, authored by Representative Frazier, which sought $1 million for Fortis Capital, a nonprofit economic development lender. Frazier and Fortis CEO Brian Smith described Fortis as a gap-financing lender that helps underserved entrepreneurs who cannot meet traditional bank underwriting standards. They said the organization has made 37 loans totaling more than $4 million since 2021, leveraged another $29.5 million, and created 314 jobs. Smith said Fortis typically charges around 6.5% interest, has had two defaults, and uses a revolving loan fund model that recycles repayments; members discussed how the proposal fits with other state economic development programs and whether Fortis should instead be part of a competitive grant process. The chair laid HF 2581 over for possible inclusion in a budget bill. The committee then heard House File 3707, brought by Representative Berg, which would extend confidentiality protections to unemployment insurance and paid leave judges and related staff by adding them to the definition of judges for purposes of protecting personal information. Berg and testifiers from the Department of Economic Development and MAPE said the bill responds to harassment and safety concerns, including threats, doxxing, and an attack near an office, and is intended to protect people making sensitive determinations. MAPE supported the bill as an update to existing protections for similar workers. Members raised concerns that the bill’s language was too broad, especially the reference to the paid leave division, and questioned whether it should cover only judges or also call-center and other staff. Department and committee members agreed the language likely needed narrowing and discussed possible amendments and whether to move the bill to Judiciary and then revisit it. No final vote was taken on HF 3707 during the discussion, and the bill remained under consideration for further language work.

Transcript Highlights:

• resolution will be um that budget resolution will be um Targets<00:12:26.560> in<00:12:26.680
• So, as I referred to earlier, within a budget resolution or resolution between the legislature regarding
• <00:36:00.040> or earlier within a budget resolution or earlier within a budget resolution
• resolution between the legislature resolution between the legislature regarding<00:36:03.680> budget
• <00:38:21.400> representative resolution representative resolution representative Allen<00:38:

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: The Higher Ed Finance and Policy Committee met to begin a budget overview for higher education. The chair noted quorum, committee member introductions, and that Democratic members were absent. The chair also said the Office of Higher Education would not be appearing for the planned budget deep dive, so nonpartisan fiscal staff would present instead. Ken Savory, the committee’s nonpartisan fiscal analyst, introduced a presentation on the higher education finance structure and timeline. Savory explained the state budget cycle, the difference between direct appropriations, statutory appropriations, open appropriations, base funding, tails, and one-time appropriations, and how those concepts apply to higher education. He described the committee’s usual budget areas: the Office of Higher Education, Minnesota State, the University of Minnesota, and the Mayo Foundation. He also reviewed historical spending charts showing higher education’s share of the general fund over time, the 2/3-1/3 funding policy in statute, and how tuition and general fund support have shifted. He noted that the FY 26-27 base for the Office of Higher Education area is about $725 million, including roughly $450 million for the State Grant program and about $99 million for North Star Promise. Members asked about comparing the current budget to earlier biennia, and staff responded that they would need to calculate the percentage difference. The chair then summarized prior budget growth, saying the previous budget was about $650 million over base and the current budget/tail was about $450 million over base. Staff also reviewed the 2024 omnibus higher education bill, including a roughly $5 million reduction to North Star Promise that was redirected to the Fostering Independence Grant program and a $500,000 appropriation for Minnesota State’s Kids on Campus program. The committee did not take any formal votes or actions during this portion of the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• I know she's looking at it, but I don't know what the resolution is.
• How fast we sent out resolution letters for our cases is another measure.
• The resolution letters is 33.33%. And the percent of notice letters is 33.3%.
• The next one, resolution letters, that's specific to our board operations department and whether they
• The next one, resolution letters, that's specific to our board operations department and whether they

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Many faculty have been involved from the initial Senate resolutions to the system-wide committees to
• requesting the Chancellor's Office The statewide Academic Senate created a resolution requesting the
• The 2024 Academic Senate resolution specifically praised the quality of this training and encouraged
• Furthermore, in 2024, they passed a resolution requesting more representation on the AI committee.
• Furthermore, in 2024, they passed a resolution requesting more representation on the AI committee.

Summary: The Assembly Committee on Higher Education and the Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee held an oversight hearing on the California State University’s AI-empowered initiative, including the systemwide rollout of ChatGPT EDU and broader AI integration across CSU campuses. Opening remarks emphasized both the promise of AI for student success, workforce preparation, and access, and the need to address risks such as bias, privacy, misinformation, environmental impacts, and mental health harms. CSU representatives said the initiative grew out of Academic Senate recommendations and a systemwide generative AI committee, and that the goal was to provide equitable access, training, governance, and workforce alignment across the 23-campus system. CSU officials described systemwide contracts for AI tools, the AI Commons training hub, and faculty grant programs supporting AI-related curriculum innovation. They said more than 93,000 ChatGPT EDU accounts had been activated, over 4,300 faculty had taken voluntary training, and $3 million had been awarded to 63 faculty-led projects from more than 400 submissions. San Jose State University highlighted its own AI-focused programs, courses, orientation training, faculty fellows, student ambassadors, and interdisciplinary efforts to build AI literacy and responsible use into instruction and co-curricular programs. CSU also said it was tracking metrics on adoption, academic outcomes, workforce outcomes, and environmental impacts. Faculty, staff, and student representatives welcomed the educational potential of AI but raised concerns about the rollout, saying it had moved quickly and without enough consultation or consistent systemwide policy. They urged stronger protections for academic freedom, intellectual property, privacy, equity, and worker input, and warned about bias, surveillance, job displacement, and the environmental cost of AI. Legislators pressed CSU and OpenAI representatives on training requirements, data privacy, bias reporting, discipline for misuse, liability, sycophancy, and safeguards against harmful uses such as non-consensual imagery or self-harm-related interactions. CSU said interactions in the licensed tool are private, data are not used to train models, and campuses retain their own conduct processes; members also asked CSU to follow up on systemwide training, policy consistency, and additional safeguards.

Transcript Highlights:

• The Committee on Rules reports recommending the resolutions filed by Representative Hogan and others,
• observance of LGBTQ Plus Health Awareness Week, March 17th through 21st, 2025, reports that the resolutions
• Question is on adoption of the resolution. All those in favor say aye; all those opposed, nay.
• The resolution is adopted. The House will be in brief recess. I don't know.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The House first took up a resolution reported by the Committee on Rules congratulating the National Coalition for LGBTQ Health on LGBTQ+ Health Awareness Week, March 17–21, 2025. The House suspended the rules and adopted the resolution by voice vote. The House then considered House No. 62, "An Act Relative to Extending Certain COVID-19 Measures Adopted During the State of Emergency." The Committee on Ways and Means reported the bill ought to pass, and the House suspended the rules, ordered the bill to a third reading, and then passed it to be engrossed by voice vote. Finally, the House adopted an order to adjourn when it finished for the day and to meet again Thursday at 11 a.m. The chamber then adjourned to that time in an informal session.

Transcript Highlights:

• Item number six, introduction of resolutions. Mr.
• Clerk, are there any further resolutions for action? Madam Speaker.
• Clerk, are there any further resolutions for action?
• Madam Speaker, there are no resolutions for action. May all others be referred to print.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• assist with unit owners and associations to understand their rights under the law and to facilitate resolution
• assist with unit owners and associations to understand their rights under the law and to facilitate resolution
• c> facilitate rights under the law and to facilitate rights under the law and to facilitate resolution
• 49.280> largest<00:01:49.680> change<00:01:50.079> item<00:01:50.399> is resolution
• The largest change item is resolution.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• We're in receipt of communications returning the noted House concurrent resolutions, all having been
• the Senate has disagreed to the amendments proposed by the House to the noted Senate concurrent resolutions
• returning the noted<00:10:15.839> House<00:10:16.079> concurrent<00:10:16.480> resolutions
• ,<00:10:17.040> all noted House concurrent resolutions, all noted House concurrent resolutions

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <03:21:58.800> because I have this resolution because I have this resolution because a<03:
• . resolution. resolution.
• > life<03:30:49.359> and resolution honoring the life and resolution honoring the life
• <03:43:27.760> uh respect to uh various resolutions uh respect to uh various resolutions uh
• I was a co-sponsor of that resolution I was a co-sponsor of that resolution actually<03:43:56.640

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Thursday, February 12, 2026, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The chair lays before the Senate the following Senate resolutions, entitled, numbered, and referred as
• Monday, June 15: Senate Resolution No. 343 referred to Rules and Executive Nominations.
• Senate Resolution No. 344 referred to Rules and Executive Nominations.
• Thursday, June 18: Senate Resolution No. 338 referred to Rules and Executive Nominations, and Senate
• Resolution No. 339 referred to Rules and Executive Nominations.

Summary: The Senate convened with prayer by Senator Anthony H. Williams and the Pledge of Allegiance, then received gubernatorial communications and a long list of newly referred Senate and House bills and resolutions. The chamber approved the April 22, 2026 journal by a 49-0 vote. Senators also introduced guests, including a high school senior advisory council visiting with Senator Malone and a young guest welcomed by Senator Costa. On the floor, several bills were taken up and either set aside or advanced. Senate Bill 1377 and Senate Bill 482 were re-referred to Appropriations, Senate Bill 906 was re-referred to Rules and Executive Nominations, and Senate Bills 1133, 1334, and 1368 were also sent to Appropriations. Senator Dush requested a conflict-of-interest ruling on an amendment to Senate Bill 469; the chair ruled no conflict existed and required him to vote, and the amendment was adopted. The Senate also took Senate Bill 127 from the table and placed it on the calendar. The Senate then considered Supplemental Calendar Number One. Senate Bill 362 received a technical amendment and was advanced; Senate Bill 1183 passed 50-0; Senate Bill 1352, which would allow qualifying substance use disorder treatment providers to receive two-year licenses, passed 45-5 after supportive remarks from Senators Brooks, Tartaglione, and Street; and House Bill 1877, codifying the Pennsylvania seal of biliteracy, passed 50-0 after Senator Lindsey Williams described its student-led origins. The session ended with committee announcements for the next day and Senator Tartaglione’s petition urging a floor vote on the House-passed minimum wage bill, House Bill 2189.

Transcript Highlights:

• the Senate has disagreed to the amendments proposed by the House to the noted Senate concurrent resolution
• concurrent the house to the noted Senate concurrent the house to the noted Senate concurrent resolution
• 45.920> in<00:12:46.040> further<00:12:46.320> receipt<00:12:46.600> of resolution
• We're in further receipt of resolution.
• 2224 through 2226 as listed on pages 14 through 17, and that the accompanied Senate Concurrent Resolutions

Bills: SCR21, SCR75, SCR50, SCR149, SCR47, SCR163, SCR169, SCR170

Keywords: healthcare, rural clinic, feasibility study, access to care, community health, Volcano community, Hawaiʻi Health Systems Corporation, emergency services, health assessment, Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders, health care, interdepartmental collaboration, public awareness, support services, education, health insurance, affordable healthcare, working group, Hawaii Health Plan, Medicaid expansion

Transcript Highlights:

• Business on the Speaker's desk: House Resolution 2001, Health Workforce Well-Being Day.
• House Resolution 2001, Health Workforce Well-Being Day.
• Without objection, the first and second reading of House Resolution 2001 will be waived, and the measure
• House Resolution 2001, a resolution recognizing health workforce well-being in Arizona. ...well-being
• Speaker, I move that House Resolution 2001 be unanimously adopted. Thank you.

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Motions and resolutions: There are copies of the non-controversial motions at the House desk and online
• policy<00:08:41.839> motions<00:08:42.440> and policy motions and policy motions and resolutions
• 44.399> are<00:08:44.680> copies<00:08:45.000> of<00:08:45.120> the resolutions
• there are copies of the resolutions there are copies of the non-controversial<00:08:46.080> Motions
• The motion prevails. resolutions Schultz moves that housef resolutions Schultz moves that housef number

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Introduction of resolutions. Mr. Clerk, are there any resolutions for action?
• Madam Speaker, there are no resolutions for action. May all others be referred to print.
• Madam Speaker, there are no resolutions for action. May all others be referred to print.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Joint Resolution 8, which has nothing to do with money.
• Texas has already passed this resolution.
• To this non-expiring resolution for several reasons.
• This resolution keeps Texas at the forefront.
• We obviously had witnesses on both sides of this resolution.

Bills: HB246, HB796, HB 1056, HB1544, HB1846, HB2001, HB2618, HB2625, HB2869, HB2898, HB3069, HB3114, HB3157, HB3228, HJR98, HB246

Keywords: federal directives, state authority, Tenth Amendment, government enforcement, local governance, gold standard, legal tender, currency, transactional currency, financial transactions, electronic payment systems, state finance, regulatory compliance, electric trucks, charging infrastructure, advisory council, transportation, sustainability, criminal penalties, official information

Transcript Highlights:

• The chair lays out the following resolutions. The secretary will read.
• The resolutions are Senate Resolution 595 by West and Senate Resolution 507 by Nichols.
• Senate Resolution 510 by Hughes, Senate Resolution 513 by Miles, Senate Resolution 514 by Kolkhorst,
• The resolutions are adopted. Members, we'll soon begin our calendar for the day.
• the bills and resolutions.

Bills: SB111, SB128, SB203, SB205, SB261, SB317, SB393, SB397, SB466, SB510, SB582, SB705, SB731, SB748, SB801, SB867, SB876, SB913, SB1071, SB1086, SB1087, SB1250, SB1285, SB1310, SB1400, SB1444, SB1483, SB1553, SB1556, SB1581, SB1608, SB1698, SB1723, SB1730, SB1835, SB1858, SB1903, SB1946, SB1950, SB1986, SB2017, SB2043, SB2056, SB2058, SB2063, SB2082, SB2105, SB2133, SB2137, SB2177, SB2203, SB2260, SB2311, SB2334, SB2344, SB2403, SB2417, SB2446, SB2519, SB2522, SB2532, SB2600, SB2611, SB2619, SB2637, SB2688, SB2717, SB2764, SB2785, SB2790, SB2794, SB2841, SB2847, SB2857, SB2878, SB2891, SB2943, SB2955, SB2972, SB2995, SB3037, SB3057, SB3059, HJR2, HB26, HB206, HB334, HB451, HB517, HB554, HB1109, HB2081, HB2756, HB3204, HB3809, SJR3, SB5, SB72, SB509, SB616, SB963, SB985, SB1025, SB1080, SB1143, SB1172, SB1245, SB1267, SB1271, SB1273, SB1355, SB1422, SB1759, SB1786, SB2361, SB17, SB314, SB455, SB761, SB1023, SB1968, SB2122, SB2371, SB2420, SB2544, SB1, SB260, SB1506, SB1637, SJR36, SJR50, SJR63, SCR12, SCR39, SB2023, SB62, SB666, SB847, SB284, SB854, SB1073, SB810, SB1505, SB583, SB507, SB1434, SB1772, SB2016, SB1163, SB1122, SB731, SB397, SB508, SB1436, SB287, SB261, SB1882, SB393, SB1791, SB209, SB2429, SB511, SB2309, SB510, SB1085, SB1975, SB2717, SB1262, SB636, SB2056, SB884, SB1200, SB1845, SB2458, SB801, SB3014, SB3013, SB758, SB2797, SB2076, SB2876, SB1640, SB1449, SB1181, SB1359, SB1234, SB2926, SB2972, SB2841, SB1528, SB2891, SB1854, SB317, SB2532, SB1250, SB2082, SB2203, SB1285, SB1237, SB2819, SB629, SB2608, SB1602, SB1723, SB1858, SB1946, SB2009, SB2177, SB2460, SB2785, SB867, SB1608, SB640, SB1698, SB705, SB748, SB2680, SB2994, SB2747, SB1950, SB913, SB1071, SB1086, SB1087, SB1483, SB1444, SB1553, SB1556, SB1703, SB2133, SB2297, SB2298, SB2622, SB2955, SB3059, SB2637, SB2334, SB1861, SB2043, SB1367, SB2857, SB128, SB3058, SB2044, SB2363, SB2311, SB1986, SB2565, SB2943, SB1888, SB2417, SB3048, SB3052, SB3053, SB3036, SB3057, SB3056, SB3043, SB3037, SB3050, SB3063, SB3047, SB3035, SB2446, SB466, SB2611, SB2794, SB2105, SB2017, SB1790, SB1778, SB1730, SB2995, SB2847, SB205, SB2619, SB1903, SB203, SB3061, SB1581, SB2600, SB2799, SB2790, SB2688, SB2515, SB1230, SB876, SB2522, SB2639, SB2137, SB2519, SB2403, SB2459, SB3051, SB2655, SB2251, SB2764, SB2878, SB1884, SB111, SB582, SB2617, SB1835, SB2751, SB2063, SB1400, SB2058, SB2260, SB2928, SB1310, SB2566, SB2344, SB1897, SB1749, SB1361, SB2549, SB2553, HJR2, HJR1, HB1109, HB517, HB1130, HB1689, HB2884, HB1393, HB2559, HB26, HB2756, HB3204, HB3012, HB1327, HB451, HB109, HB206, HB1238, HB2890, HB9, HB2081, HB4215, HB2970, HB37, HB1899, HB3809, HB334, HB554, HB1593, HB2607, HB3526, HB3810, HB5092, HB388, HB2809, HB1151, HB913, SB2919, SB1782, SB1705, SB2696, SB1944, SB2215, SB644, HB3307, HB879, HB116, HB12, HB2703, HB1610, HB1615, HB1620, HB30, HB21, HCR7, HCR75, HCR86, HCR92, HCR93, HCR126

Keywords: special education, school districts, legal fees, reporting requirements, transparency, hospital reporting, child abuse, neglect, administrative penalty, medical ethics, child protection, student privacy, numerical class rank, education policy, academic programs, high school, fetal development, health curriculum, public schools, middle school health education