Video & Transcript Research : 'district composition'

Page 78 of 500
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Feb 25th, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Oklahoma Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • I have a Lincoln County resident, District 28. He has given service to this country as well.
  • Some of them are from my district and Senator Woods's district. And we're welcoming them today.
  • So if you'd like to notify your pastors or groups in your districts, they'd like to come up.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Children, Youth and Family Services REVISED: HB3637 - Added Feb 18th, 2026 at 03:00 pm

Children, Youth and Family Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • This was an issue that we had experienced with some constituents and some facilities in my district and
  • as well as in my neighboring district in Norman.
  • I mean, all of my districts in the city, right?
  • about this board might be reviewing something or looking at something over a local area, town, or a district
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House Ways and Means General Fund Committee Feb 18th, 2026

Ways and Means General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • of the stuff that has been in the news and whatever, because they are well-educated people in my district
  • of the stuff that has been in the news and whatever, because they are well-educated people in my district
  • the insurance has paid its required amount, then they can't come back against the people in your district
  • Retired state employees work as law enforcement officers or assistant district attorneys authorized.
  • The same thing with district attorneys. And then the bus drivers are a little bit different.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WAL Public Hearing - Thu Feb 12, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST

Water & Land

Transcript Highlights:
  • And with that said, we are moving on to first up we have HB 1846 relating to shoreline mitigation districts
  • /c><00:17:53.440> HB1<00:17:54.320> 1846 HB 1846, relating to shoreline mitigation districts
  • Um, for instance,<02:14:31.840> in<02:14:32.000> my<02:14:32.239> district,<02:14
  • :32.960> there's<02:14:33.280> been<02:14:33.440> a instance, in my district, there's
  • been a instance, in my district, there's been a lot<02:14:33.760> of<02:14:33.840> buildings
Summary: The committee heard testimony on HB 1846, relating to shoreline mitigation districts. DLNR and the Office of Planning opposed the bill, arguing it would improperly shift regulatory roles between the agencies and prioritize private land interests over public trust and natural and historic resources. Supporters, including the Shoreline Preservation Coalition, Kahana Bay residents, and Hawaii Realtors, said regional planning is needed to address severe erosion, especially in Kahana, and that better coordination between state and county agencies could help move stalled projects forward. Testifiers emphasized that shoreline conditions vary by area and that science-based, region-specific solutions are needed. Members asked questions about whether existing law already allows regional planning and emergency shoreline responses. DLNR said it already has authority to process regional projects and cited an existing draft EIS for Kahana Bay that would proceed through normal permitting and public hearing channels. Supporters responded that the bill would provide a clearer regional planning framework and help communities facing urgent erosion impacts. No vote was taken on HB 1846 in the portion provided. The committee then took up HB 2205, relating to emergency erosion mitigation. DLNR opposed the bill, saying it already has authority to issue emergency permits and had recently done so quickly for a collapsed sidewalk at Queen Surf Beach, and warning that the bill’s language could weaken Act 16 by changing a prohibition on shoreline hardening to a requirement to merely minimize it. Kahana Bay representatives and other supporters argued the bill would create a limited, regulated short-term pathway for emergency shoreline solutions while long-term plans are developed, and said current permits have expired or stalled, leaving dangerous sandbags and no practical relief. Additional testimony from a private homeowner stressed that erosion is threatening homes and that private owners are often bearing the cost of protecting public shoreline access. The discussion remained focused on balancing emergency protection, public access, and long-term shoreline management, and no final action was taken in the excerpt provided.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

TRS-LBT, TRS-EDT, TRS Public Hearings 02-10-2026

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • . >> Can I ask, because knowing my district where the airport is as well, how much acreage would you
  • > my >> Can I ask because knowing my uh my >> Can I ask because knowing my uh my district
  • 30.639> airport<00:14:31.040> is<00:14:31.360> as<00:14:31.600> well, district
  • where the airport is as well, district where the airport is as well, what<00:14:32.800> t<00:
Summary: The joint committees on Transportation, Labor and Technology, and later Transportation and Economic Development and Tourism, heard several bills. SB 2573 would allow administrative driver’s license revocation hearings to be held by interactive conference technology such as Zoom and permit electronic exchange of evidence. The chief adjudicator for the ADLRO supported it as a non-mandatory option that has worked well since 2021, improving attendance and saving time and money; DOT also supported it. The committees voted to pass SB 2573 with technical, non-substantive amendments. SB 3215 would make permanent the requirement that securing mooring lines at commercial docks be performed by labor subject to collective bargaining by repealing the sunset date in existing harbor safety law. DOT did not submit testimony, and the chair noted support from longshore labor. The committees voted to pass SB 3215 unamended. The committees also heard SB 2693, which authorizes $15 million in general obligation bonds for planning, design, and construction of a 50,000-square-foot aerospace hangar and related facilities at Hilo International Airport. A Phoenix Space executive testified in support, saying Hawaii and Hilo have geographic advantages and that the project could support aerospace investment and jobs; several other organizations and individuals submitted supportive testimony. Committee members questioned whether federal matching funds or airport capacity existed, and DOT said it had no assurance of federal participation and would need to check on capacity and potential users. The hearing then moved to SB 2698, which would create a cruise ship special fund and impose a per-passenger head fee on cruise ships docking in state commercial harbors while repealing the existing cruise ship TAT framework effective January 1, 2026. DOT supported the bill but requested amendments to clarify that the new fee is in addition to existing passenger, port entry, and dockage fees and to raise the fee from $6.50 to $10; DOT said the higher amount would better fund harbor improvements such as shore power. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings testified in support but said the added fee would significantly increase costs, while a local ship supply business supported the cruise industry and opposed the TAT approach, saying cruise activity benefits local farmers and jobs. No final vote on SB 2698 was taken in the excerpt provided.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Business and Commerce (Part II) May 1st, 2025

Business & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm the district... Bill 1749. Vice Chairman King, I am Lisa David.
  • I'm the district clerk for Williamson County, and I'm testifying on behalf of myself, as well as the
  • County and District Clerk Association.
  • I have been a district clerk. I was sworn in in 2007.
  • They say they live and that they live in the district that they're running from, the registrar has to
Summary: The Senate Committee on Business and Commerce heard testimony on HB 149, the Artificial Intelligence Governance Act. Senator Schwertner described the bill as an outcomes-based AI framework that would require disclosure when people interact with AI, prohibit manipulative or social-scoring systems, address biometric capture, discrimination, and deepfake child exploitation, and give the Attorney General enforcement authority. It would also create an AI Sandbox and AI Council. Witnesses from the Texas Public Policy Foundation, a Houston attorney, TechNet, and the Texas Association of Business strongly supported the bill, praising its stakeholder process and pro-innovation approach, while Texas Appleseed suggested regulators should have more examination authority over sandbox participants. The bill was left pending. The committee then heard SB 229, which would prohibit motor vehicle dealers from conditioning a sale on dealer-offered financing or charging more because a buyer uses outside financing or cash. Senator West said the bill is meant to stop forced financing and bait-and-switch pricing, and he noted the bill passed the committee and Senate in the prior session. The Texas Automobile Dealers Association opposed the bill, arguing it would force dealers to accept any third-party lender or cash transaction on terms they cannot control. The Texas Credit Union Association supported the bill, saying consumers should be able to choose outside financing without hidden fees or pressure. After questions about cash purchases and dealer practices, the bill was left pending. The committee also took up SB 2566, which would clarify legislators’ access to information from executive agencies, including confidential information, by setting response deadlines, limiting confidentiality agreements to statutory terms, requiring a standard AG form, and creating a complaint and penalty process for noncompliance. No witnesses testified, and the bill was left pending. Finally, SB 1749, as substituted, would let certain court-related employees and judicial conduct commission personnel keep personal information such as home addresses and phone numbers confidential, with work addresses used in place of home addresses for certain purposes. District clerk and judicial conduct commission witnesses described threats and harassment as the reason for the bill, and a court administration witness answered questions about how the address protections would work with voter registration and precinct records. That bill was also left pending, and the committee recessed without further business.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 29th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Even if a district attorney recommends expungement and expungement is granted, if the defendant is not
  • We are really not looking, in this case, to race the local District Attorney to the courthouse.
  • When a person wants to petition for their record to be expunged, the district clerk must send notices
  • On behalf of the Dallas Criminal District Attorney... You are for the bill, correct? Yes, sir.
  • I'm here representing Dallas County District Attorney John Cruse.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 29th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Our registered witness is Amy Waddell, Assistant District Attorney.
  • You're here on behalf of the Montgomery County District Attorney's office, testifying in favor of the
  • You're here on behalf of the office. the District Attorney's Office and yourself, and you're for the
  • I am a chief prosecutor at the Montgomery County District Attorney's Office, and I have recently been
  • County Judge, the District Attorney, the District Clerk, and the County Treasurer.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships Apr 7th, 2025

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • TCFE is a statewide membership agency across the state and in your districts, and I'm here to speak in
  • into that and to understand the nexus between alienation and reunification before we stop state district
  • I am also the former associate judge of the 247th District Court in Harris County, and one of the things
  • the committee: I wonder how many of... ...of you would be okay with a law that allows the Texas District
  • And so, while I understand and I hear the pain here, it causes me no pause to have that same district
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Mar 26th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • I've got you here on behalf of yourself and the County District Clerks Association of Texas, registered
  • My main concern is from the work that I've done in the district and the people that I've dealt with,
  • We have a difficult time getting summary judgment in many district courts.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Mar 26th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • But when you've got class actions and multi-district litigations, you have probably...
  • I know of two: there's one in my district, and there's one in Freestone County.
  • And the one that's in my district, the cemetery is not adjacent to the house, but you have to cross over
  • County, but I have one called Henderson Cemetery in my district.
  • So we're not talking about making municipal courts into quasi district courts. No, no, not at all.