Law enforcement, prohibits use of four-point restraint
Summary
SB16 would prohibit Alabama law enforcement officers from using a four-point restraint, commonly known as a hog-tie, on any individual. The bill defines four-point restraint as restraining a person face-down on the ground with the hands and legs fastened behind the back, and it also bars placing a person face down in a way that restricts oxygen or blood flow to the head or neck.
The bill requires every law enforcement agency to update its policies and procedures to include a prohibition on four-point restraint. It also creates a criminal penalty for violations, making use of the prohibited restraint a Class A misdemeanor. The act would take effect on October 1, 2025.
Impact
SB16 would amend the operational rules governing Alabama law enforcement agencies by adding a statewide ban on four-point restraint and related prone positioning that can impair breathing or circulation. It would require agencies to revise internal policies and procedures, and it would expose officers to criminal liability for noncompliance. The bill directly affects law enforcement officers, police departments, sheriffs' offices, and other agencies covered by the state definition of law enforcement agency.
Sentiment
Based on the bill text and the absence of recorded committee debate or votes in the provided materials, the measure appears to be presented as a public-safety and use-of-force reform bill. The sponsor’s framing suggests an intent to limit a restraint technique viewed as dangerous, and the bill’s structure reflects a strong regulatory approach. No contrary arguments, amendments, or recorded opposition are included in the available context.
Contention
The main point of contention is likely the balance between officer discretion in restraining and transporting individuals and the safety risks associated with prone restraint techniques. Supporters would emphasize preventing positional asphyxia and reducing injury or death during arrests, while opponents may argue the bill constrains tactical options in volatile situations and adds criminal exposure for officers. Because no committee transcript or vote record is provided, no specific legislators or stakeholder groups are identified as taking those positions in the available materials.