Video & Transcript Research : 'regulatory amendment'

Page 5 of 500
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate Education Policy Committee Feb 11th, 2026

Education Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • "I have an amendment I'd like to offer on this bill.
  • "This is the amendment.
  • So we've adopted the amendment. Now let's get on to the bill.
  • >> Amendment<00:08:01.919> pass. >> Amendment pass. >> Amendment pass.
  • Now, let's get on to the amendment.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Natural Resources Mar 26th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's not designed to apply to amendments.
  • This is known as the regulatory compact.
  • The existing regulatory framework that the PUC has adopted and the legislature has mandated provides
  • of these instances in these smaller systems, just the lack of regulatory knowledge.
  • And so there is not a, what I would call regulatory vacuum or advocacy vacuum on that front.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Mar 26th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • The chair moves that House Bill 1089, without amendment, be reported favorably to the full House with
  • The chair moves that House Bill 1238, without amendment, be reported favorably to the full House with
  • The chair moves that House Bill 1318, without amendment, be reported favorably to the full House with
  • To prevent a conflict of interest, the section requires a director with... ...a regulatory interest in
  • So this just amends the water code to allow a district to consider the impact on these wells.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Mar 26th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Next Tuesday night, our City Council will approve an amendment that's going to bring in an additional
  • This is known as the regulatory compact.
  • Right as the regulatory compact stands right now, is there any...
  • Given our system of regulatory oversight, it should be in receivership if it was dilapidated.
  • That’s why we have the regulatory system we do to ensure that.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Justice May 14th, 2025

Criminal Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • This is another constitutional amendment that addresses the critical bail issue that we have throughout
  • So what this joint resolution does, if approved by Texas voters, it amends the Constitution to require
  • the denial of bail If approved by Texas voters, it amends the Constitution to require the denial of
  • This constitutional amendment adds insult to injury, and with that, we oppose this SJR. Thank you.
  • I forgot we had a floor amendment, but it actually makes it clearer to your concern.
Bills: SB3073, SJR87
Summary: The Senate Committee on Criminal Justice met with a quorum present and took up three bills tied to bail reform and law enforcement records. Senator Huffman presented SJR 87, a proposed constitutional amendment that would require denial of bail for people accused of certain serious felony offenses if they have a prior conviction for, or are already on bond for, one of those offenses and there is probable cause to believe they committed another listed offense. Supporters said it would give judges a needed tool to detain repeat violent offenders; opponents from the ACLU of Texas and Texas Civil Rights Project argued it would mandate detention without individualized due process and weaken the presumption of innocence. The committee voted 7-1 to report SJR 87 favorably, with Senator Miles voting no. The committee then heard SB 3073, which would require magistrates who find no probable cause after an arrest to enter written findings supporting that determination. Senator Huffman said the bill was a narrow cleanup measure to improve transparency and provide guidance to law enforcement and prosecutors without limiting judicial discretion. With no invited or public testimony, the committee voted 6-1 to report SB 3073 favorably, again with Senator Miles dissenting. Finally, the committee considered SB 781, a committee substitute dealing with law enforcement file management and personnel records. Senator King explained that the bill would standardize policies already used in many Texas cities and under civil service rules, separating public and sealed personnel information while preserving access for criminal defense discovery. Senator Miles raised concerns that sealing exonerated allegations could hide patterns of misconduct and allow problematic officers to move between agencies. The committee adopted the committee substitute and voted 6-1 to report SB 781 favorably, with Senator Miles voting no. The committee then recessed subject to the chair’s call.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • So I encourage you to add an amendment.
  • So, notwithstanding the POP amendment, or you called it the court... amendment, I don't know.
  • Be in court amendment. This seems to be...
  • Yeah, that sounds like an amendment. Okay, go next.
  • It was before it was amended, in committee.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Committee, February 16, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Discussion on the bill or amendments. Start with amendments.
  • discussion on the bill or amendments. discussion on the bill or amendments.
  • Further amendments.
  • Further amendments.
  • to<01:43:01.920> the further amendment or an amendment to the further amendment or an amendment
Bills: HB0103, HB0070, HB0091
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Judiciary Committee, February 16, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Landon Amendment. >> The Landon amendment. >> Is there a second?
  • >> Any other amendments?
  • Is there a second to that amendment? amendment? amendment? >> Second. >> Second.
  • propose that amendment. propose that amendment.
  • That amendment has been adopted. >> Any additional amendments to this bill?
Bills: HB0103, HB0070, HB0091
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Conservation Jan 31st, 2026 at 09:07 am

Senate Conservation

Transcript Highlights:
  • We are in full support of the bill and the amendment, the purpose of this work.
  • And it amends the tax code. And we're not getting that kind of review.
  • And it amends the tax code, and we're not getting that kind of review.
  • Would the sponsor consider an amendment to have this apply only the classic case?
  • Would the sponsor consider an amendment to have this apply only the classic case?
Bills: SB47, SB110, SB122, SB143, SB168