AN ACT relating to administration of the government; prohibiting government entities from using artificial intelligence to calculate and assign social scores; prohibiting government entities from using artificial intelligence to identify persons using biometric data or gathering of images; providing exceptions; providing definitions; and providing for an effective date.
Impact
If enacted, HB0091 would specifically affect statutes governing privacy and civil rights by safeguarding individual freedoms from invasive government assessments based on AI-generated classifications. This inclusion of restrictions on the use of AI not only reflects contemporary concerns regarding digital privacy but also places Wyoming among the few states actively legislating against social scoring practices that have emerged elsewhere. The intent of the bill is to prevent potential harm that could arise from unchecked AI technologies, such as discriminatory treatment that disregards individuals' rights, which are guaranteed by state and federal laws.
Summary
House Bill 0091 aims to prohibit government entities in Wyoming from utilizing artificial intelligence systems for calculating and assigning social scores. The bill seeks to address concerns regarding the implications of AI technologies that could adversely affect individuals based on their social behaviors or characteristics. By defining clear terms related to artificial intelligence, biometric data, and governmental entities, the bill establishes a framework for governance that limits the extent to which AI-driven evaluations can influence public decision-making and treatment of citizens within the state.
Contention
One of the notable points of contention surrounding HB0091 lies in its scope and the definitions of AI and biometric data. Lawmakers and stakeholders might debate the implications of excluding certain organizations from the definitions set forth in the bill, which could open avenues for misinterpretation of what constitutes a governmental entity. Additionally, concerns about the balance between technological advancement and ethical governance will be pivotal in discussions, as supporters highlight the need to protect personal freedoms while critics may argue about potential hindrances to innovation in public policy applications. Such debates are expected to shape the bill's journey through the legislative process.