Transcript Highlights:

• </c> wear body-worn cameras that both protect wear body-worn cameras that both protect the<00:28:36.920
• , and this is just going to protection, and this is just going to simply<00:36:06.960><c> help</c><00
• </c> non-concur non-concur and to protect non-concur non-concur and to protect local<01:05:40.800><c>
• </c> recommend mitigation measures to protect recommend mitigation measures to protect the<04:02:02.920
• </c> graves of both armies. graves of both armies.

Transcript Highlights:

• c> protect</c><00:30:45.919><c> children</c><00:30:46.320><c> from</c><00:30:46.559><c> motor</c> protect
• protect children from motor protect protect children from motor vehicle<00:30:47.279><c> accidents</
• The law didn't protect her, and it won't protect the next child unless we eliminate the hazard entirely
• The law didn't protect her and it<00:48:18.000><c> won't</c><00:48:18.160><c> protect</c><00:48:18.319
• </c> doing it for UV protection? doing it for UV protection?

Committee: House Transportation

Transcript Highlights:

• ON HIS GRAVE OF THE FLORIDA NATIONAL CEMETERY EVAN SAID BE THE CHANGE, SAY I WILL.
• OUR JOB IS TO PROTECT PEOPLE, TO PROTECT THOSE WE LOVE.
• BY SUPPORTING THE BILL WE TAKE A CRUCIAL STEP TOWARD ENDING HUMAN TRAFFICKING AND PROTECTING OUR MOST

Transcript Highlights:

• SB 99 would strengthen protections for military families.
• Military protective orders, also called MPOs, are similar to civil restraining orders and provide protection
• This bill does not create a new protected class.
• This bill adds nothing to those protections.
• AGSC seeks targeted amendments that preserve safety protections while protecting consumer choice and

Summary: The committee heard several bills focused on domestic violence protections, pay equity enforcement, Jewish demographic data collection, court transparency, auto glass insurance practices, pet policy disclosure for renters, and civil rights accountability for federal officers. SB 99 would require courts and law enforcement to better recognize military protective orders in domestic violence cases; supporters from the Department of Defense and military organizations said it would close jurisdictional gaps for military families, and the bill passed to Public Safety. SB 1237 would increase penalties for repeat noncompliance with California pay data reporting laws; supporters said stronger enforcement is needed to address persistent wage gaps, and the bill passed to Appropriations. SB 1387 would allow Jewish identity to be reported as an ethnic category in state demographic data; supporters said better data would improve policy and anti-discrimination efforts, while opponents argued the bill was unnecessary or divisive, and it passed to Privacy. SB 932 would require assignees filing civil actions to identify the original party in the case caption; supporters framed it as a transparency measure, and it passed to Judiciary/Appropriations on call. The committee also took up SB 98, which would regulate auto glass insurance claims by restricting assignment of benefits, requiring clearer estimates and invoices, and limiting inducements to consumers. The sponsor and NICB said the bill would curb fraud and unsafe repairs, while independent glass shops and industry groups argued it could reduce consumer choice and favor insurer-aligned networks; the bill passed to Appropriations. SB 1296 would require landlords to disclose pet policies before collecting application fees and provide refunds if nondisclosure materially affected an applicant’s decision; supporters said it would save renters time and money, while rental housing representatives objected to a provision limiting eviction based solely on failure to sign a pet addendum. The bill passed to Appropriations. Finally, SB 747, the No Kings Act, would create a California cause of action allowing people to sue federal officers for constitutional violations using standards similar to Section 1983. Senator Wiener and a witness who said he was unlawfully detained by Border Patrol argued the bill is needed because federal officers currently lack comparable accountability after the Supreme Court narrowed Bivens remedies. Law enforcement groups opposed the bill, warning that the qualified immunity language is unclear, could create a separate California standard, and might expose officers and governments to retroactive litigation; members discussed possible amendments on qualified immunity and retroactivity, and the bill was moved forward with an urgency amendment while negotiations continued.

Transcript Highlights:

• We commit ourselves to protecting precious lives that travel our roads every... what was lost.
• We commit ourselves to protecting precious lives that travel our roads every ...commit ourselves to protecting
• Your gavel can literally wake the dead, or in some cases, startle into an early grave, Mr. Nardo.
• They receive protection under federal law, and this is simply, again, bringing Virginia law in line.
• They receive protection under federal law, and this is simply, again, bringing Virginia law in alignment

Transcript Highlights:

• Privacy protections, civil rights, and community consent.
• These amendments do make an important balance to guardrails protecting workers while protecting the California
• These amendments do make an important balance to guardrails protecting workers while protecting the California
• Don't tell me this is about protecting a vulnerable community.
• I want to make sure that we continue to protect that.

Summary: The committee began as a subcommittee due to the lack of a quorum and heard several privacy- and technology-related measures. The first item was H.R. 117, a resolution urging Congress to reform Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The author and supporters argued the law is outdated and shields platforms from accountability for harms such as harassment, exploitation, scams, and other online abuse. Witnesses, including a survivor parent and a gender justice advocate, described harms to children, women, and LGBTQ people and urged a two-year sunset to force federal reform. Some members supported the resolution as a call for federal action, while one member said he could not support it because the resolution was too general and lacked specificity about the reforms being sought. No vote was taken because the committee lacked a quorum. The committee then heard SB 898, which would require manufacturers of connected consumer products to disclose how long they will support the software and to notify consumers when products approach end of life. The author said consumers deserve transparency about security updates and continued functionality, and supporters from Consumer Reports and PIRG emphasized cybersecurity risks, consumer confusion, and electronic waste from unsupported devices. Opponents, including business and industry groups, raised concerns about enforcement through the unfair competition law, notice burdens, labeling issues, and compliance challenges, especially for products with long support windows or third-party dependencies. One member expressed support, noting the cybersecurity risks of end-of-life devices, but again no vote was taken because there was no quorum. The committee also heard SB 435, which would narrow the CCPA definition of publicly available information to limit how businesses classify data as public. The author and supporters said the bill would close a loophole that allows data brokers and others to monetize personal information without meaningful consent and could help prevent surveillance and misuse of data, including by government agencies. Opponents argued the bill would upset the balance between privacy and the free flow of information, create compliance uncertainty, and retroactively reclassify information that businesses reasonably believed was public. Some members said they supported the goal of stronger privacy protections, while others said the bill was too broad. The committee again could not vote due to the lack of a quorum. Later, the committee heard SB 923, which would expand Californians’ right to delete personal information to cover data obtained from third parties and require online businesses to offer a web form or similar method for deletion requests. Supporters, including the California Privacy Protection Agency and consumer advocates, said the bill would make deletion rights meaningful and better address data broker practices. Opponents sought an opt-out-of-processing alternative and raised operational and legal concerns, but supporters said deletion is not the same as retention or processing limits. Members largely spoke in favor of the bill’s privacy goals, but no action was taken. The committee also heard SB 947, the “No Robo Bosses Act,” which would require human review for certain automated employment decisions and limit predictive analysis in workplace discipline and termination. Labor groups supported the bill as a safeguard against biased or erroneous AI-driven decisions, while business, public employer, and local government groups opposed it as overbroad and burdensome. Members voiced support for human oversight in employment decisions, but the item was not voted on because the committee still lacked a quorum. Finally, the committee began hearing SB 1114, the SOGI Data Privacy Act, which would restrict disclosure of sexual orientation, gender identity, and intersex data to federal agencies absent a court order or legal requirement; the author and witness framed it as a response to federal efforts to obtain sensitive LGBTQ-related data.

Transcript Highlights:

• This bill does not create a new protected class.
• AGSC seeks targeted amendments that preserve safety protections while protecting consumer choice and
• I believe all sides have expressed the desire for consumer protection.
• And I... ...enforcement is there to protect everyone.
• So it is imperative that these extended protections be implemented to protect vulnerable communities

Committee: House Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:

• Do they not also deserve protection?
• protect our communities.
• We should balance the ideals of protecting children and the public while also protecting safe access
• We should balance the ideals of protecting children and the public while also protecting safe access
• , really increase their protections for children.

Summary: The Senate Judiciary and Elections Committee approved the minutes from its March 18, 2026 meeting and then took up a long agenda of bills and a clemency nomination. HB 2825, as amended, was heard first. The bill would replace criminal enforcement tools for nonpayment of fines, fees, restitution, and surcharges with a civil collection process, including a required summons and civil default procedures. Supporters said it would streamline restitution collection and reduce costs, while opponents argued it would weaken victims’ rights and remove effective enforcement leverage. The committee adopted the Rogers amendment and passed the bill 5-2. The committee also confirmed Neil McDowell to the Arizona Board of Executive Clemency by a 6-0 vote after hearing his background in corrections and his plans to help the board function efficiently. The committee then passed HB 4070, as amended, 5-2. That bill bars incorporation of corporations whose officers, directors, or trustees have been convicted of sex trafficking or human trafficking, and expands civil liability to those who facilitate trafficking. Supporters framed it as a corporate accountability tool to deter trafficking, while the ACLU opposed it as overbroad and potentially sweeping in people not intended to be covered. HB 2720, which increases penalties for paying or agreeing to pay for sexual conduct and adds a fee to support anti-trafficking services, also passed, 4-3. Supporters, including survivors and law enforcement, said it targets demand and helps victims; opponents warned it could criminalize victims and lacked sufficient safeguards. The committee heard several additional bills. HB 2047 would raise trespass penalties after eviction-related writs of restitution from third-degree to first-degree trespass; the sponsor and constables said it would improve scene safety and encourage law enforcement response. HB 2136 would create new crimes for “civil terrorism” and “subversion” and increase penalties for certain highway obstruction; the ACLU argued it would punish protest and speech critical of government. HB 2406 would make images and recordings of abused children and deceased minors confidential, limit dissemination, and impose civil and criminal penalties for misuse; supporters said it would prevent re-victimization and reduce trauma, while defense and media concerns were raised about access. HB 2415, dealing with kratom and 7-OH products, drew sharply divided testimony over whether the bill is a needed safety regulation or an overbroad ban that could push users to illicit drugs; the transcript ends before a final vote on that bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• AND THE WHOLE CONCEPT OF A HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION WAS TO PROTECT THE FAMILY UNIT, THERE ARE A VARIETY OF
• STATUTES IN PLACE TO PROTECT FOLKS FROM PREDATORS AS RELATES TO THEIR HOMESTEADING AND MAINTAINING THEIR
• IF WE CARE ABOUT PROTECTING FAMILIES IN PREVENTING UNNECESSARY TRAGEDY, THIS IS WHERE WE START. >> Sen
• WE NEED TO PROTECT OUR KIDS, NOT ARM THEIR KILLERS. THANK YOU. >> Sen.
• DRIVING AROUND NORTHWEST JACKSONVILLE WE WILL SEE CEMETERIES WHERE YOU WILL FIND THE GRAVES OF TONGUE

Transcript Highlights:

• To protect the institution and not our children.
• It protects itself, and how are we letting these children go?
• It protected the school. not the student.
• their own image rather than protect children.
• As you've heard from the situation going on at Sunrise, we're gravely concerned.

Bills: SB604 , SB843 , SB1636 , SB2395 , SB571 , SB1224 , SB1832 , SB2392 , SB747 , SB2623 , SB2624 , SB2185

Committees: Senate Education , Senate Education K-16

Transcript Highlights:

• It's protected in the bill. The— what?
• But decades in public education is protect their children, and most do.
• And to protect kids. Not to protect kids.
• We can act in the public safety to protect children, and we should do that.
• to protect kids in these situations.

Summary: The House began with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, and approval of the prior day’s journal by a 123-1 roll call vote. Members then spent time introducing guests, including physicians, sheriffs, students, interns, and school groups from several districts. The chamber also heard a personal privilege statement recognizing a member’s son’s birthday. On third reading, House Bill 1758, dealing with permanent daylight saving time in Missouri, drew debate over whether ending clock changes would improve convenience or create safety and health problems by leaving more commutes in darkness. Supporters argued it would align with public preference and reduce disruption, while opponents warned of circadian and safety concerns. The bill passed 107-31 with two present. The House then moved to perfection of House Bill 3329, which repeals expired or unused tax credits, and House Bill 3405, which reclassifies SALT/pass-through entity items as deductions rather than tax credits for reporting purposes; both were described as cleanup and efficiency measures and were perfected without opposition. The chamber then took up House Bill 2426, a broad parental rights bill covering medical, educational, privacy, and related decision-making for children, and a major amendment focused on individualized education plans (IEPs). Supporters said the bill and amendment strengthen parental involvement and require stricter judicial review, while opponents raised concerns about overbreadth, school district administration burdens, transparency requirements, and possible conflicts with existing law on truancy, medical care, and records. House Amendment 1 was adopted 98-25 with six present, and debate continued on the underlying bill with no final vote shown in the transcript excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, the Graves County Judicial Center. Uh, that is a 30,000-square-foot facility.
• </c> the<00:48:18.240><c> Graves</c><00:48:18.640><c> County</c><00:48:18.880><c> Judicial</c><00:48:
• </c><00:48:19.760><c> Uh</c> the Graves County Judicial Center.
• Uh the Graves County Judicial Center.
• So part of that is the emergency protective order, the EPO, comes through that system into our clerk's

Summary: The Interim Joint Budget Review Subcommittee on Justice and Judiciary met without a quorum and heard an update from the Administrative Office of the Courts on the judicial branch budget. AOC Director Zach Ramsey and budget director Carol Henderson outlined the branch’s current funding structure, noting that fiscal year 2026 general fund support is about 2.77% of the state general fund, below the National Center for State Courts’ typical 2% to 4% range. They emphasized Kentucky’s unusual responsibility for courthouse facilities, with the judicial branch directly involved in construction, maintenance, and operations across 229 facilities in all 120 counties. AOC said nearly 91% of its general fund is spent on personnel and other non-discretionary costs, and that the branch has long relied on agency revenue, restricted fund carryforwards, and vacancy credits to balance court operations. Members were told that Senate Bill 25 required a $34.5 million transfer into a reserve account, part of which was used to purchase the Chamberlain Avenue building in Frankfort. AOC reported that only $11.9 million remains in restricted funds, while it projects needing about $13.5 million to cover fiscal year 2026 obligations, not including roughly $9 million in flood-related remediation costs for Hardin and Franklin counties, much of which it expects to recover through insurance and FEMA. Looking ahead to the next biennium, AOC said it will seek full funding of court operations at $341 million annually, a $13.5 million increase to bring current services into the base appropriation rather than relying on reserves. It also previewed additional requests, including a 15% across-the-board pay parity plan for Kentucky Court of Justice personnel, replacement of declining master commissioner fee revenue tied to 141 deputy circuit court clerk positions, funding for technology subscription and case management system costs, JAV audiovisual system upgrades, AEDs and medical kits for courthouses, and other staffing and operational needs. Senator Funky Frommeyer asked whether the 15% salary proposal was included in the $13.5 million increase; AOC said it was not, and that it would be an additional request. No votes or formal actions were taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• So this will protect the homeowner.
• </c> will protect them? Is that what this is? will protect them? Is that what this is?
• <00:38:59.000><c> losing</c> bill protects residents from losing bill protects residents from losing
• </c> So this will protect the homeowner. So this will protect the homeowner.
• House Bill 753, Tax Sales, Homeowner Protections, Revisions.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> that provides highlighted protections that provides highlighted protections for<01:25:41.880><c>
• We are trying to protect communities that we believe need to be protected.
• We are here protecting what we believe needs protection.
• We are trying to protect communities that we believe need to be protected.
• We are here protecting what we believe needs protection.

Bills: HF1837 , HF361 , HF2725 , HF2566 , HF2744 , HF1685 , HF501 , HF1889 , HF1389

Committee: House State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:

• And so we want to ensure that those families are protected and also offer a safe place for our children
• However, I firmly believe that the plans that DHS have put in place already provide those protections

Bills: HB1979 , HB1225 , HB3931 , HB4454 , HB3849 , HB1746 , HB3720 , HB4275 , HB4300 , HB3586 , HB2268 , HB3755 , HB4117 , HB4294 , HB3650 , HB4298

Committee: Senate Health and Human Services

Keywords: early childhood education, task force, governance structure, healthcare access, stakeholder engagement, quality services, vital records, birth certificate, birth registration, biological sex, sex designation, male, female, nonbinary, gender identity, X marker, transgender, vital statistics, State Department of Health, State Commissioner of Health

Transcript Highlights:

• little bit of a story here, but sometimes we overlook and forget about the actual heroes that are protecting
• trooper, moved toward the truck and began attempting to break its windows to extract the family to protect
• Instead, they held their ground, using their own bodies as shields to protect the innocent while returning
• They take time away from their families and do what needs to be done to protect us and our way of life

Bills: HB4139 , HB4143 , HB4144 , HB3974 , HB3303 , HB3790 , HB3697 , HB3262 , HB4226 , HB2936 , HB3322 , HB4296 , HB3278 , HB4202 , HB3648 , HB3500 , HB3037 , HB3428 , HB3257 , HB3432 , HB3043 , HB3044 , HB3078 , HB3940

Keywords: home warranty, service contracts, transparency, insurance regulation, consumer protection, motor vehicles, traffic collisions, car accident, auto accident, crash report, collision report, property damage threshold, Department of Public Safety, DPS, law enforcement reports, insurance claims, financial responsibility, uninsured motorist, private property accidents, public roadway

Transcript Highlights:

• He has a keen understanding of consumer protection, antitrust, and administrative law.
• Consumer protection and science and technology policy several bills on the agenda are ones the committee
• The committee also should focus on protecting consumers from scams and the FTC consumers report shows
• This legislation would protect our seniors from fraud and strike at the heart of one of the most lucrative
• on the vulnerabilities these devices may introduce, empowering us to take more decisive action to protect

Bills: SB244 , SB28 , SB289 , SB323 , SB389 , SB414 , SB428 , SB433 , SB582 , SB613 , SB759 , SB792 , SB841 , SB843 , SB97

Committee: Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee

Keywords: national security, cybersecurity, consumer technology, routers, modems, study, communication, consumer protection, smart devices, transparency, internet-connected devices, FTC enforcement, sodium nitrite, poisoning prevention, youth safety, consumer product safety, banned hazardous product, Consumer Product Safety Act, CPSA, hazardous household products

Summary: The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation held an important meeting where they discussed various bills aimed at addressing pressing issues like consumer protection, technology, and environmental management. Chairman Cruz opened the meeting by emphasizing the role of subpoenas in ensuring accountability and oversight, highlighting a recent compliance from several parties following such threats. The meeting progressed to consider several bills, including the Romance Scam Prevention Act championed by Senator Blackburn, which seeks to protect vulnerable populations from online dating scams that have resulted in enormous financial losses, particularly among seniors. The committee also nominated Michael Kratios for the Office of Science and Technology Policy and Mark Medder for the Federal Trade Commission, underscoring the significance of leadership in fostering innovation and consumer protection in technology sectors.

Transcript Highlights:

• To protect our teachers but not overly punish students.
• doing justice to the other students that are in there trying to learn and also putting our teachers in grave

Bills: HB2987 , HB3026 , HB3076 , HB3288 , HB3315 , HB3467 , HB3711 , HB3885 , HB4427 , HB4359 , HB4363

Committee: House Education Oversight

Keywords: education, academic standards, subject matter standards, State Board of Education, legislative review, joint resolution, curriculum, school standards, Oklahoma Administrative Code, education oversight, common education, curriculum standards, state education policy, rulemaking, legislative veto, kindergarten, military families, education policy, school districts, international military dependents

Transcript Highlights:

• Minnesotans want these protections, and they want to know how their legislators are voting on this.
• Minnesotans want these protections, and they want to know how their legislators are voting on this.
• She said they deserve every protection, and that is what the bill does.
• He said they deserve every protection, and that's what this bill does.
• </c><01:38:00.320><c> for</c><01:38:00.520><c> that</c> funeral grave for that funeral grave for that

Committee: House Health Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:

• It's cloaked in language to protect doctors. HB 99 is a flawed bill.
• Nor the harm or hide behind corporate protections. Thank you so much. Thank you, Rachel.
• That is not due to a lack of commitment to patient protection or accountability.
• It protects patients' rights, which is what we really want.
• and our clinics, and instead we're providing protection—well, we're providing them some protection,

Bills: HB99 , HJR5 , HM39 , HB206 , HB213 , SB41 , SB153 , SB165 , SB261 , SB264

Committee: House House Judiciary

Keywords: medical malpractice, malpractice reform, patient's compensation fund, PCF, health care liability, tort reform, damage caps, punitive damages, hospital liability, physician liability, nurse practitioner, certified nurse-midwife, outpatient facility, ambulatory surgical center, urgent care, free-standing emergency room, insurance surcharge, superintendent of insurance, New Mexico hospitals, medical review process