Video & Transcript : 'noise complaint' :

Page 4 of 337
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/24/2026 - House Commerce

Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • ADG, including reporting requirements relating to audits conducted by third-party auditors and complaints
  • It requires the ADG to submit an annual report that includes aggregate data of complaints received by
  • ADG, including reporting requirements relating to audits conducted by third-party auditors and complaints
  • Requires the ADG to submit an annual report that includes aggregate data of complaints that are received
  • by the department to to submit an annual report that includes aggregate data of complaints that are
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Early Learning & K-12 Education Feb 4th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Early Learning & K-12 Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • maintain an online record of all final decisions issued in response to special education community complaints
  • The fiscal note reflects a one-time cost of $16,000 for the 0.1 FTE needed to add prior complaint decisions
  • be available in an online format and accessible to the public at no charge for 20 years after the complaint
  • if, when the requirement becomes effective, OSPI does not have a historical record of community complaint
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Human Services Apr 29th, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, it's messing up everybody in the process, and you'll hear this. ...a complaint from other health
  • to file a clean claim, yet they have a two-year window or more to claw back, and the appeal and complaint
  • The complaint process we experienced after several months simply pointed us right back to the MCO we
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Labor & Commerce Jan 23rd, 2026 at 08:00 am

Labor & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • The bill authorizes L&I to decide whether to investigate an employee wage complaint rather than requiring
  • The bill authorizes L&I to decide whether to investigate an employee wage complaint rather than requiring
  • When L&I accepts a wage complaint, the bill requires L&I to issue either a citation or determination
  • The bill pauses the statute of limitations for related civil actions once a wage complaint is filed with
  • L&I, with this pause ending if L&I notifies the worker that the complaint will not be accepted or upon
TX
Summary: The Committee on Local Government heard and discussed a series of House bills dealing with municipal structure, tax payment timing, local provider participation funds, firefighter cancer screenings, sunset review of the Trinity River Authority, replacement certificates of occupancy, and open meetings enforcement. HB 303 would remove the 501-resident floor so very small type A and B municipalities can convert to type C cities; HB 2742 would give property owners a later first split-payment deadline when tax bills are mailed after November 30; HB 3305 and HB 3348 were local provider participation fund measures with committee substitutes; HB 198 would require political subdivisions to offer occupational cancer screenings for firefighters; HB 1535 was a sunset bill for the Trinity River Authority; HB 4753 would allow a municipality-issued proof of a certificate of occupancy to substitute for a lost original; and HB 3711 would treat certain Open Meetings Act violations as offenses against public administration and require public explanation when prosecutors decline to act. Testimony was generally supportive or limited, with several witnesses and senators emphasizing practical fixes, firefighter health and cost savings, local government transparency, and administrative cleanup. For HB 198, firefighter representatives gave emotional testimony about cancer deaths and the value of early screening. On HB 3711, a witness supported the bill but urged stronger enforcement and broader application. Several senators raised policy concerns on HB 2715 about routing removal proceedings through a regional presiding judge rather than the local county, arguing it could politicize the process. The committee took no public testimony on most bills and repeatedly left them pending subject to call of the chair before later voting them out. HB 21, HB 30, HB 1535, HB 1520, HB 198, HB 303, HB 2742, and HB 4753 were reported to the full Senate, generally by unanimous or near-unanimous votes, and several were also recommended for the local and uncontested calendar. HB 30 passed on a 5-1 vote, while the other reported bills were approved unanimously or with no recorded opposition. The committee then recessed subject to the call of the chair.
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

HHS Public Hearing 03-28-2025

Health and Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><00:12:52.720><c> in</c> private venues generating noise in private venues generating noise in primarily
  • </c> awakened by different kinds of noise. awakened by different kinds of noise.
  • </c> also get we've been getting complaints also get we've been getting complaints from<00:15:12.480>
  • </c> because of noise. because of noise.
  • You only going to have crickets because too loud, going to have noise.
Summary: The committee first heard SR 12/SCR 16, which asks the Department of Health to convene a task force to identify minimum professional standards for community health worker training programs. The Department of Health supported the measure and said it could take on the work with current resources. Testimony from Papa Ola Lokahi, the Hawaii Public Health Institute, the Hawaii Community Health Worker Association, and community health workers strongly supported the resolution but urged broader task force representation, including community health workers themselves, Papa Ola Lokahi, the Hawaii Primary Care Association, the Native Hawaiian Pacific Islander Community Health Worker Alliance, and community-based rural nonprofit organizations. Several testifiers also asked that community health workers make up at least half of the task force. The department indicated it had no objection to adding the requested groups, and members discussed those proposed amendments. The committee then took up SR 141/SCR 172, which requests a Department of Health working group on demolition waste reduction. Energy Justice Network and other supporters urged amendments, including use of the internationally recognized zero-waste definition and hierarchy. The committee also heard SR 165/SCR 205, which would direct the Department of Health to adopt rules setting maximum decibel levels for concerts or events at private venues in primarily residential areas. The department said it was already working on noise issues and wanted a community noise working group to address nuisances beyond current statutory categories, but members questioned the lack of specific standards, the absence of a defined working group membership, and whether the proposal would lead to broader restrictions on events. Testimony and discussion focused on concerns about noise impacts, enforcement, and the balance between community complaints and long-standing local events. No votes or final committee actions were taken in the portion provided. The hearing then moved on to SR 174/SCR 194, which would ask the Department of Health to reduce the use of disposable surgical equipment and adopt sustainable practices, but discussion of that measure was not included in the transcript excerpt.
ID

Idaho 2026 Regular Session

Feb 9th, 2026

Business

Transcript Highlights:
  • Likewise, if we're talking about noise ordinance or noise issues, as many of you folks know, I go to
  • Noise is noise. And this bill allows local government to address that issue...” Mr.
  • Noise is noise. And this bill allows local government to address that issue.
  • We talked about noise, you know, and concern about noise.
  • We talked about noise, you know, and concern about noise.
Committee: House Business
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Mar 26th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Would a nuisance be like a noise complaint?
  • Would a nuisance be like a noise complaint?
  • Would a nuisance be like a noise complaint?
  • Would a nuisance be like a noise complaint?
  • Would a nuisance be like a noise complaint?
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/11/2026 - Senate Regulatory Affairs and Government Efficiency

Regulatory Affairs and Government Efficiency

Transcript Highlights:
  • The bill also requires the department to create and implement a complaint submission process and tracking
  • the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House, and the Governor, including the number of complaints
  • Other things that come out with the audit are, again, complaint process with respect to serving the public
  • Statistics: the Arizona Attorney General's Office received 300 real estate fraud complaints over a two-year
  • you for your first name and your phone number, and they do not confirm... 300 real estate fraud complaints
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

Senate Commerce (04/29/2025)

Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • And you did say the noise, but I've heard a lot of people complain about the noise.
  • </c><01:59:30.080><c> and</c> related to that complaint and related to that complaint and essentially
  • noise? noise?
  • </c> to sell their homes to escape the noise. to sell their homes to escape the noise.
  • Local infrastructure incessant noise.
Committee: Senate Commerce
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Agriculture & Livestock Apr 1st, 2025

Agriculture & Livestock

Transcript Highlights:
  • Two, noise.
  • The noise-making devices, the clappers, the laser lights...
  • I know that's what initiated the complaint.
  • Complaints and claims lag behind problematic activities.
  • This bill would only increase... ...complaints.
Bills: HB43 , HB3364 , HB3469 , HB3479 , HB43
Summary: The second bill, House Bill 3469, was introduced to address pest control regulations concerning nuisance birds. Representative Campos explained how the bill proposes non-lethal methods to deter these birds, such as the use of laser lights and sounds, which avoids conflict with both state and federal regulations. The committee heard impassioned testimonies from members of the public who shared firsthand experiences regarding the adverse effects of these birds on property and public health. The meeting concluded with both bills being left pending, reflecting a desire for further deliberation among the committee members.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> mean okay I looked up the noise mean okay I looked up the noise ordinances<03:51:46.319><c> in</
  • For instance, I'm focusing on the noise. Okay, just then just look at the noise.
  • I think we're talking about noise.
  • noise noise has been regulations around noise noise has been is<04:27:19.159><c> complicated</c><04:
  • </c><04:27:45.880><c> that</c><04:27:46.040><c> clicky</c> noise clicky noise okay and that clicky noise
Summary: The discussion focused on a cannabis legalization/regulation bill and whether it should be retained for further study or moved forward. Members debated the fiscal impact, with one side emphasizing that the bill would cost about $7.1 million in the first two years before generating revenue, while supporters argued the House should make a statement in favor of legalization despite likely opposition from the Senate and governor. There was also disagreement over strategy: some said retaining the bill until closer to the next election would give the issue more visibility, while others said delaying would only avoid sending a bill the Senate was unlikely to take up anyway. A major point of contention was whether cannabis should be regulated by a new cannabis commission or placed under the Liquor Commission. Supporters of the Liquor Commission argued it already has enforcement infrastructure, especially for age restrictions, and could handle cannabis more efficiently without creating a new bureaucracy. Opponents said cannabis is a different industry that would require specialized expertise, and they objected to expanding the Liquor Commission, which they described as unpopular and costly. The committee also discussed past versions of the bill, including concerns about limited licenses and the perception that the earlier approach favored large businesses. Members reviewed specific provisions such as licensing fees, THC limits, and cultivation categories. One member noted a $10,000 fee for retail cannabis stores and cannabis product manufacturers authorized to perform extractions, while a smaller tier-one cultivator fee was described as a lower-cost option for small growers. There was also discussion of whether the bill would allow sales through general retail outlets or only dedicated cannabis stores, and whether plants and seeds were covered. No final vote or action was clearly recorded in the excerpt, but the main procedural question was whether to retain the bill for more work or advance it as written.