Video & Transcript Research : 'Sheriff'

Page 4 of 135
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part II) Mar 17th, 2025

State Affairs

Summary: The Senate Committee on State Affairs resumed consideration of several pending bills, first taking up Senate Bills 667, 1349, 1585, and 2312. After inviting testimony had already been heard, no members of the public came forward to testify on any of those measures, and the committee closed public testimony and left all four bills pending. The committee then heard Senate Bill 1355, which Senator Parker explained as a committee substitute aimed at helping Texas distillers recover unpaid invoices from wholesalers. The substitute would require distillers to invoice at the time of purchase, send a demand letter if payment terms are violated, and allow complaints to be filed with the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission, which could determine an appropriate penalty based on the facts. Natasha Dehart of Bent Distilling Company testified in support, describing serious cash-flow problems and unpaid invoices from a Texas wholesaler that had forced layoffs, late vendor payments, and operational strain. No one testified against the bill, and it was left pending. The committee also heard Senate Bill 1378, a narrowly tailored local bill for a Carrollton facility recently acquired by Sazerac that employs more than 1,000 Texans. Senator Parker said the bill would create a limited exemption to avoid forcing the company to shut down or move because of current permit restrictions, while preserving the three-tier system and preventing the company from selling wine to itself. A Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission resource witness said the bill was drafted so it would not open the door to broader industry changes. Mason Moreland testified against the bill as filed, arguing it gave special treatment to one company and failed to address broader problems in the wine industry, including direct-to-consumer sales and permit issues. After questions from senators, public testimony closed and SB 1378 was left pending. The committee then recessed subject to the call of the chair.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Schofield: ...reduce the sheriff or constable's budget for the year by the amount of the contract.
  • protection for the budget of the office that does the contract, whether it's the constable or the sheriff
  • Oliverson: And you want to make sure to preserve that, that it stays with the constables or sheriffs,
Bills: HB25, HB48, HB149, HB254, HB26, HB192
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Finance Aug 27th, 2025

Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • bill codifies an existing law enforcement program in Harris County, specifically, HB 26 allows a sheriff
  • The bill also prohibits the commissioner's court from prohibiting or otherwise restricting a sheriff
  • The sheriff also was involved in this. and the constables of both parties approached the house and got
  • enforcement agencies and probits the county from transferring money appropriated to the Office of Sheriff
  • Constable to the county's general revenue fund or other county account, prohibiting the Office of Sheriff
Bills: HB8, HB26, HB192
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Public Safety Committee Meeting - 2026-03-25

Public Safety Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • This will allow police chiefs and sheriffs to do the same if they so choose, and I believe there is an
  • 00:04:25.600> police<00:04:25.920> chiefs<00:04:26.320> and<00:04:26.520> sheriffs
  • will allow uh police chiefs and sheriffs will allow uh police chiefs and sheriffs to<00:04:26.960
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/24/26

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • redemption, remain with the sheriff. redemption, remain with the sheriff.
  • existing framework by equipping sheriffs existing framework by equipping sheriffs with<01:03:47.560
  • Is it coming from the sheriffs? Is it coming from the counties?
  • <01:06:31.560> Is Are Is it coming from the sheriffs?
  • Is Are Is it coming from the sheriffs?
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Specifically, HB 26 allows a... a sheriff, a county sheriff or constable, to enter into a contract with
  • The bill also prohibits the Commissioner's Court from prohibiting or otherwise restricting a sheriff
  • The sheriff was also involved in this, and the constables of both counties.
  • Constable to the county's general revenue fund or other county account, prohibiting the Office of Sheriff
  • spending money appropriated to the office for any unlawful purpose or prohibiting or restricting the sheriff
Bills: HB8, HB26, HB192
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/27/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh, it clarifies foreclosure surplus dealings that the sheriff has to deal with, as well as informing
  • Whereas sheriffs have accidentally sent it to the wrong place because it was unclear and been sued and
  • 52.479> Uh,<00:01:52.799> it Uh, it clarifies foreclosure surplus dealings that the sheriff
  • Whereas sheriffs have accidentally sent it to the wrong place because it was unclear and been sued and
  • . whereas sheriffs have relevant parties. whereas sheriffs have accidentally<00:02:15.120> sent
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Administration of Criminal Justice May 12th, 2026

Administration of Criminal Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • And actually, to Sheriff Cobb's point, my sheriff is who I talk to to get firsthand information on this
  • Thank you, Sheriff Cobb. Thank you, Madam Chair.
  • Senator, Sheriff Cobb, you were the executive director now, but you were a sheriff for many years, and
  • Could I ask the other 63 sheriffs, or 64 sheriffs, would it likely be the same answer?
  • I've talked to my sheriff multiple times about this.
Summary: The Criminal Justice Committee heard and advanced a series of bills, mostly on juvenile justice, gaming background checks, corrections, and criminal procedure. Early in the meeting, the committee reported favorably SB 258 on juvenile traffic violations, SB 321 on electronic bonds, SB 134 on child sexual abuse material/sexting-related offenses involving juveniles, and HB 75 on promotional play for racetracks after adopting an amendment narrowing the bill’s application. The committee also reported favorably SB 422 on unsupervised probation for certain fourth-offense OWI cases, SB 440 on the Renaissance District board membership, SB 393 on explosives regulation after correcting a bill-number mix-up, SB 339 on gaming-industry background checks, SB 325 on excluding certain persons from sports wagering, and SB 288 on criminal history background checks. Most of these measures were described as technical cleanups or modernization efforts and drew support from law enforcement, district attorneys, or industry groups, with little or no opposition. The most substantial debate centered on SB 201, which would change how Louisiana handles juvenile homicide sentencing, including first- and second-degree murder cases and review of old death sentences converted to life terms. Supporters from the Attorney General’s office said the bill would align sentencing procedures with existing Supreme Court law and give courts a more neutral framework. Opponents from the SPLC and the Louisiana Center for Children’s Rights argued it would weaken the safeguard that life without parole for children should be reserved for the rarest cases, expand exposure to juvenile life-without-parole sentences, and raise constitutional concerns. After an amendment was adopted, the committee voted 7-3 to report SB 201 favorably as amended. The committee also heard SB 523 on clemency and sentencing considerations for defendants who are victims of domestic abuse, human trafficking, or sexual assault. Supporters said it would create a path to pardon or commutation and allow victimization to be considered at sentencing, while several survivor-advocacy groups opposed the bill’s pre-sentence investigation requirement, warning it could introduce biased or harmful information and that the bill did not go far enough to fix sentencing problems. After testimony from the Board of Pardons and Parole and the Sheriff’s Association, the committee reported SB 523 favorably as amended. It also reported SB 320 on DNA detection and rape-kit data reporting, SB 470 on pregnant women in custody and shackling during delivery, and SB 345 requiring annual OJJ reporting, with members noting confidentiality concerns that may need amendment later. The final bill taken up in the excerpt was SB 313, which would bar clerks and vendors from charging additional electronic filing fees in criminal and traffic cases, but the transcript cuts off before action on that measure.