Transcript Highlights:

• Representative Knight, Representative Knight's 3136, which is about creating state-based health benefit
• For my own benefit here, how many folks left? Go ahead.
• Well, we are going to limit testimony, so I will give you...
• We are limiting testimony to four minutes. Gentlemen, can I interrupt you for just a second?
• Gentlemen, please state your name, and remember that you are limited to two minutes.

Committee: House Corrections and Public Institutions

Summary: The committee first took up executive action on Senate Bill 890. Members explained that the House committee substitute combined provisions from related bills, changed the title to accommodate an amendment, and restored language that had been unintentionally repealed in section 217.550. The amendment was adopted, the substitute was adopted, and the House Committee Substitute for SB 890 was voted do pass by a roll call of 11 ayes and 1 no. The committee then heard Senate Bill 945 from Senator Carla May, which would raise the civil filing surcharge in the city of St. Louis from $15 to up to $20 to support the law library and related court services. Senator May and a representative of the Law Library Association of St. Louis testified that the surcharge had not been raised since 1996, that costs had increased, and that the increase would help maintain legal research resources and public access. Questions focused on whether the amount was sufficient and what other funding sources existed; there was no opposition testimony. Finally, the committee heard House Concurrent Resolution 29, which urges Congress to restore mandatory country-of-origin labeling for beef and pork. The sponsor and supporters argued that consumers should know where meat comes from, that independent cattle producers are harmed by consolidation in the packing industry, and that voluntary labeling is inadequate. Opponents from the Missouri Farm Bureau, Missouri Chamber of Commerce, and Missouri Pork Association argued that mandatory labeling adds regulatory burden, is not supported by consumer purchasing data, and should remain voluntary. The hearing included extensive testimony from cattle producers and consumers, but no vote on HCR 29 was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Even with significant investments, each campus faces practical limits based on the capacity of project
• Are— We provide a report each year to show our 12% cap limit, and our most recent report shows about
• Really what we should expect to happen in the next five years, especially given the limitations that
• Now, the resources are more limited.
• We're serving the same exact kid and having them go through a whole different process to get a benefit

Summary: The committee’s first major discussion focused on higher education facilities across UC, CSU, and the community colleges, with Chair Alvarez framing the issue as a final budget hearing before the May Revise. The LAO presented findings that campuses have grown substantially in buildings and square footage, while classroom and lab utilization remains below legislative standards and deferred maintenance backlogs continue to rise. The LAO also emphasized that the state and segments lack comprehensive data on capital renewal spending and recommended better reporting, clearer funding targets, and long-term planning for renewal and maintenance. UC, CSU, and community college representatives each described large five-year capital plans, aging facilities, seismic and deferred maintenance needs, and the role of student housing, while noting that construction costs are rising faster than inflation. Members questioned the segments about debt service, utilization rates, and how projects are prioritized. UC said its debt service tied to state support is about $665 million annually and described a $30 billion five-year capital financial plan, including housing, medical centers, and building renewal. CSU said it has about $31 billion in five-year needs and more than $8 billion in deferred maintenance, with funding coming from a mix of state-related and one-time sources since the state shifted capital responsibility to CSU. Community colleges said their unmet facilities needs total about $33.5 billion and explained their use of a scoring matrix and FUSION system to rank projects. The chair and members pressed all three systems to better distinguish between projects that are truly shovel-ready and those that are long-term needs, and discussed whether facilities condition data, total cost of ownership, and more standardized metrics should guide future bond proposals. The committee then turned to Proposition 2 and the Governor’s proposed community college capital outlay projects. The Department of Finance said Prop. 2 provides $1.5 billion for community colleges and that the Governor’s budget proposes 29 projects, with two continuing Prop. 51 projects also included. The LAO supported the overall use of the funds but raised concerns about the current 65/35 split between modernization and growth, the unusually large share of gymnasium projects, and some scoring metrics that favor larger campuses and certain regions. Community college officials said the scoring system was developed through participatory governance and would take one to two years to revise, but they supported the funding and agreed to follow up on questions about project categories and the rationale for the weighting. Members also suggested giving more weight to modernization, regional access, and intersegmental or collaborative projects. A final item addressed the CalKids program. The Department of Finance proposed $56,000 ongoing General Fund for three positions, while the LAO recommended approving two positions but rejecting a manager position until the current $7.5 million marketing campaign is evaluated. ScholarShare’s executive director said CalKids has enrolled more than 5 million children, with nearly 600,000 claims and over $45 million distributed, and argued that additional staff and outreach are needed to reach a goal of 1 million claimed scholarships by the end of 2025 and to implement AB 2808. Members asked about marketing effectiveness, data sharing, and eligibility rules, and the program said it is expanding partnerships with Cradle to Career and CSAC. No final vote was taken in the hearing, and the chair indicated the facilities item would be held open.

Transcript Highlights:

• In order to facilitate the goal of hearing as much from the public within the limits of our time, we
• Let us not be limited by a reliance on obsolete technology.
• We limited it in the committee that I took in my own committee. I don't know.
• I don't know how we did that, but we took amendments to our own bill, which limited it to, correct me
• We limited it in the committee that I took in my own committee. I don't know.

Summary: The committee first heard AB 470, which would change California’s carrier-of-last-resort rules and allow a phased transition away from copper landlines in areas deemed well served by alternative phone options. The author and AT&T argued the bill would protect consumers, preserve 911 access, require public notice and CPUC review, and direct investment toward modern fiber and emergency communications. Supporters included a wide range of business, civic, tribal, and community groups, while opponents from TURN, rural counties, labor, digital equity organizations, and local governments warned the bill could let AT&T shed service obligations too quickly, weaken protections for rural and underserved households, and harm workers. After extensive member discussion about CPUC authority, rural carveouts, labor impacts, and reinvestment, AB 470 was passed do pass as amended to Appropriations, with one no vote and one not voting, and the roll left open. The committee then took up AB 1532, a committee omnibus bill extending funding and surcharge authority for the Deaf and Disabled Telecommunications Program and the TNC Access for All program, while also adding CPUC accountability provisions. Chair Boerner Horvath explained the bill would not raise consumer costs and would require the CPUC to appear at hearings when requested and adopt rules for commissioner attendance. There was no opposition testimony, and the bill was moved do pass and re-refer to Utilities and Energy, though the roll was left open because it had not yet reached the threshold for immediate transmission. Finally, the committee heard AB 353, the Affordable Home Internet Act of 2025, which would establish an affordability floor for home broadband for low-income Californians after the expiration of the federal Affordable Connectivity Program. Supporters said broadband costs remain too high and that families, students, and vulnerable communities need a state solution now; opponents from the wireless industry and rural county representatives argued the bill would amount to an artificial price mandate and could complicate existing rural broadband buildouts. Members generally supported the goal but raised concerns about impacts on small ISPs and rural areas, and the bill was moved forward with a motion and second while discussion continued about possible exemptions and amendments.

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, I'm trying not to limit some of that.
• </c><00:04:13.640><c> trying</c><00:04:13.959><c> not</c><00:04:14.159><c> to</c><00:04:14.640><c> limit
• <00:04:15.200><c> some</c><00:04:15.400><c> of</c><00:04:15.640><c> that</c> I'm I'm trying not to limit
• > would</c><00:04:19.720><c> ask</c><00:04:19.880><c> members</c><00:04:20.160><c> to</c> look at limits
• it I would ask members to look at limits it I would ask members to vote vote vote no<00:04:22.800><c

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><01:15:08.920><c> and</c> and provide any benefits and and provide any benefits and reasonableness
• That's what a benefit is. If there are...
• you the square foot per benefiting home.
• </c><01:18:25.719><c> to</c> we're not getting enough benefits to we're not getting enough benefits to
• </c><01:53:17.239><c> is</c> Conway um and the intended benefit is Conway um and the intended benefit

Summary: The committee first heard House Bill 561, sponsored by Representative Nancy Murphy, which would limit the state’s ability to discontinue, reclassify, or revert state-owned highway property to municipalities without local approval. Murphy and other supporters argued the bill would protect towns from unfunded mandates and prevent property tax increases caused by taking on costly road maintenance. Representative Wendy Thomas, Rosemarie Rung, Merrimack Town Council Chairman Finley Rothhouse, and Town Manager Paul McAuliffe all testified in support, describing the financial burden of the planned transfer of Continental Boulevard in Merrimack and warning it would set a harmful precedent for other communities. The Department of Transportation’s Steve Leon explained the department’s current authority and processes for discontinuance and reclassification, said active highways are not surplus property, and noted that the Supreme Court’s Town of Nelson decision held such reclassifications were not an unfunded mandate. The committee then closed the public hearing on HB 561. The committee next took up House Bill 578, presented by Representative Mooney on behalf of Representative Bill Boyd, to require sound barriers along the F. Everett Turnpike in Merrimack. Supporters said widening the turnpike would increase noise in nearby neighborhoods and that a 2019 NHDOT study identified 17 neighborhoods with noise levels above federal standards, though only four were included for mitigation under the current project. They argued the remaining neighborhoods should also receive relief and cited quality-of-life and property-value concerns. Senator Tim McGuire also testified in support, saying residents were experiencing unexpected and severe noise impacts and urging the committee to act outside the usual criteria to approve the barriers. The transcript provided does not show a final committee vote or action on HB 578.

Transcript Highlights:

• I think Senator Turner Ford's at her limit for the day, but I guess I could be persuaded. >> Senator
• </c><00:03:49.440><c> Ford's</c><00:03:49.760><c> at</c><00:03:49.920><c> her</c><00:03:50.159><c> limit
• </c><00:03:50.400><c> for</c> Senator Turner Ford's at her limit for Senator Turner Ford's at her limit
• </c><00:40:58.000><c> um</c> benefit our businesses would benefit um benefit our businesses would benefit
• </c><00:53:44.559><c> from</c> doing so, that would be a benefit from doing so, that would be a benefit

Committee: Joint Judiciary, Division A

Transcript Highlights:

• of the state of work for the benefit of the state of Wyoming.
• But how many of you do exceed that speed limit?
• And Mag, don't don't raise your limit?
• limit? limit?
• </c><02:18:11.679><c> because</c> what it does and the benefits because what it does and the benefits

Transcript Highlights:

• When remote participation is due to a personal matter, that participation is limited to two meetings
• Such participation is also limited to two meetings per calendar year, and those two meetings cannot be
• conspicuous and plain-language fashion, what that program is, how you can enroll in it, and what benefits
• These, you know, including, you know, different brain injury, and there's lots of people that could benefit
• Right now, DSPs are not offered any form of benefits, retirement plans, anything like that.

Summary: The Virginia Disability Commission held its first meeting of the year on June 18, established a quorum, and introduced members. Senator Barbara Favola was elected chair and Delegate Amy Laufer was elected vice chair, both unanimously. The commission also reviewed and unanimously approved its electronic/remote participation policy, which mirrors last year’s policy and allows limited remote participation under Virginia FOIA rules. Staff then reviewed a package of 14 disability-related bills that passed last session and were signed into law. Topics included disabled veterans’ vehicle registration fee exemptions, open captioning requirements for movie theaters, guardianship/conservatorship order forwarding, service dog team definitions, education and transition planning for students with disabilities, Blue Envelope and driver communication training for law enforcement and driver education, deferred disposition and jury service protections, voting rights in guardianship cases, expansion of the Virginia Human Rights Act, continuation of a DD waiver eligibility change, and DMAS training authority for autism competency checklists. Members discussed implementation concerns, especially making the Blue Envelope/driver communication program more visible and considering a follow-up letter and DMV presentation. The commission then adopted its interim work plan unanimously, with discussion of possible presentations on DMAS and Medicaid waivers, DBHDS telehealth training implementation, SCHEV and VDOE transition planning, transition from institutions to community settings, criminal justice reform, transportation and parking accessibility, adult-sized changing tables, and school accessibility. Members also suggested adding EVV concerns, seclusion and restraint, rare disease issues, and insurance coverage problems for needed medications. Public commenters urged the commission to address burdensome EVV requirements for family caregivers, improve accessibility for local government meetings and documents, and explore a standardized credential/career pathway for direct support professionals. The chair said follow-up work would be assigned on EVV and implementation issues, and the meeting location would move to the Senate side of the Capitol going forward.

Transcript Highlights:

• When remote participation is due to a personal matter, that participation is limited to two meetings
• They are also limited to two meetings per calendar year, and those two meetings cannot be held consecutively
• conspicuous and plain-language fashion, what that program is, how you can enroll in it, and what benefits
• These, you know, including different brain injury, and there's lots of people that could benefit from
• Right now, DSPs are not offered any form of benefits, retirement plans, anything like that.

Transcript Highlights:

• He currently serves on the Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee, the Committee on Limited Jurisdiction
• Courts, and as co-chair of the Limited Jurisdiction New Judge Orientation Program.
• I will not benefit from this at all because I will never again hold this job after this year.
• And of course, The economy in that region, and of course the state benefit, the benefit that went into
• Pensioners may have many goals when they want their shares to be voted by proxy, but Senate Bill 1503 would limit

Transcript Highlights:

• I mean, it just, again, this is like a credit card that has no max, no limit on it.
• Senate Bill 5420 will ensure that veterans have equal access to benefits regardless of when they served
• The amendment from the other chamber expands who is eligible for those benefits.
• The underlying bill stops intercepting benefits from young adults in extended foster care.
• it to either 20 parts per million or to the lowest lead limit that is feasible.

Transcript Highlights:

• committee was very clear that we were wanting to move in some direction on the voter buy-in for these, limited
• They should actually bear, remove the benefit of that TIF from that million dollars.
• how they abate it, if you do a TIF, you're still getting the $100, but you're foregoing the added benefit
• if you do a You do a TIF, you're still getting the hundred bucks, but you're foregoing the added benefit
• enough new construction and property values have grown by enough that we were always at the Hancock limit

Committee: House Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

Summary: The Special Committee on Property Tax Reform met for an open discussion, with no public testimony, to reset its work after the prior combined bill was separated back into two standalone measures. The chair outlined the current direction: House Bill 2780 would include Murphy’s Hancock fix, levy-by-subclass, commercial protection language, the 275-to-150 levy adjustment, and abatement provisions; House Bill 2668 would carry clear ballot language, no-tax-increase ballot measures, clarification of SB 190, and the SB 3 fix. Members also discussed whether additional ideas, such as taxpayer appeal protections and electronic filing, might be added later if they can be worked out. A major portion of the meeting focused on the Hancock-related “275 fix,” with members clarifying that the proposal would not move all districts to 275, but would prevent two known districts below that level from being forced down and losing significant revenue. Several members raised concerns about confusion in the field and the need to communicate clearly to school districts and superintendents what the proposal would and would not do. There was also discussion of new construction under Hancock, including whether certain redevelopment or replacement projects should count as new construction and how that affects school and other local taxing entities. The committee spent substantial time debating tax abatements, especially TIFs and similar economic incentives. Supporters of the language said the intent is to prevent taxing jurisdictions from treating abated revenue as if it were still available and then shifting the cost to other taxpayers; opponents questioned whether the language would improperly reduce revenue that communities had already decided to collect. Members also discussed whether the language should apply only to the entity adopting the abatement, and whether some abatements are better handled through separate legislation. Several members urged that any new ideas be referred through committee so they can receive proper vetting and fiscal analysis, and there was broad agreement to keep the main bills relatively streamlined while continuing to work on additional concepts separately.

Transcript Highlights:

• So, we do not limit it only to the judges who are brand new who have just been elected.
• Because there is a lot of potential financial benefit if we can come together cooperatively.
• We are a part of that program and we will receive that data as well so that we can benefit from it.
• Because the other thing that we've done in Oklahoma is we've limited ourselves to one or two models of
• I have prioritized three of those issues that we would limit to the supplemental.

Committee: House A&B Judiciary Subcommittee

Transcript Highlights:

• But more persuasive than that are the voices of Nevadans who have benefited from SB 234.
• SB 323's sponsors and co-sponsors, would like to ask the committee to not let a program that has benefited
• And I know that, especially in this session, there are constraints on the state's limited budget.
• And I know that, especially in this session, there are constraints on the state's limited budget.
• So everybody can benefit from it. There will be more than what is necessary or needed.

Bills: SB60 , SB85 , SB323

Committee: Assembly Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:

• We ask for your wisdom to guide our decisions, so that we may overcome our own limitations and weaknesses
• The bill will... ...remove the cap and limits that restrict the board to expanding no more than seven
• Committee Substitute Senate Bill 547, relating to notice from a health benefit plan issuer regarding
• Committee Substitute Senate Bill 547, relating to notice from a health benefit plan issuer regarding
• I highlight that these rural delegation agreements are limited to primary care and mental health services

Bills: HB135 , HCR64 , SCR3 , SCR30 , SB500 , SB739 , SB816 , SB898 , SB1283 , SB1351 , SB1423 , SB1531 , SB1540 , SB1666 , SB1721 , SB1886 , SB1931 , SB2001 , SB2075 , SB2154 , SB2173 , SB2217 , SB2284 , SB2375 , SB2383 , SB2386 , SB2398 , SB2448 , SB2476 , SB2540 , SB2580 , SB2589 , SB2693 , SB2707 , SB2776 , SB2786 , SB2801 , SB2864 , SB2927 , SJR84 , SCR30 , SB243 , SB324 , SB393 , SB457 , SB511 , SB529 , SB547 , SB636 , SB646 , SB659 , SB715 , SB731 , SB735 , SB800 , SB801 , SB904 , SB1065 , SB1141 , SB1181 , SB1224 , SB1241 , SB1242 , SB1250 , SB1266 , SB1285 , SB1359 , SB1434 , SB1442 , SB1467 , SB1502 , SB1524 , SB1528 , SB1551 , SB1585 , SB1640 , SB1754 , SB1757 , SB1777 , SB1844 , SB1863 , SB1972 , SB2007 , SB2035 , SB2046 , SB2055 , SB2069 , SB2082 , SB2119 , SB2139 , SB2154 , SB2200 , SB2201 , SB2269 , SB2310 , SB2330 , SB2357 , SB2366 , SB2401 , SB2422 , SB2514 , SB2530 , SB2533 , SB2543 , SB2544 , SB2550 , SB2568 , SB2589 , SB2660 , SB2693 , SB2695 , SB2707 , SB2717 , SB2721 , SB2742 , SB2753 , SB2807 , SB2846 , SB2891 , SB2925 , SB2938 , SJR3 , SJR18 , SB5 , SB326 , SB767 , SB769 , SB783 , SB914 , SB963 , SB1035 , SB1197 , SB1271 , SB1415 , SB1437 , SB1619 , SB1637 , SB1786 , SB1806 , SB494 , SB530 , SB2312 , SB1 , SB260 , HB135 , HB 1109 , HB1392 , HB22 , HCR64 , SJR36 , SJR50 , SJR63 , SJR84 , SJR59 , SCR12 , SCR39 , SCR48 , SCR19 , SCR30 , SCR3 , SB2023 , SB62 , SB666 , SB847 , SB284 , SB854 , SB1073 , SB810 , SB1505 , SB583 , SB1502 , SB507 , SB1434 , SB1376 , SB1585 , SB1772 , SB2016 , SB1163 , SB1122 , SB731 , SB397 , SB508 , SB1436 , SB287 , SB261 , SB1882 , SB393 , SB1791 , SB209 , SB2429 , SB1999 , SB511 , SB2309 , SB510 , SB1085 , SB1975 , SB2717 , SB1262 , SB1524 , SB636 , SB2056 , SB884 , SB517 , SB1200 , SB1845 , SB1863 , SB2681 , SB2200 , SB2199 , SB1757 , SB2458 , SB2201 , SB801 , SB2533 , SB3014 , SB3013 , SB758 , SB1721 , SB1013 , SB2797 , SB2383 , SB2119 , SB2448 , SB1777 , SB1283 , SB2076 , SB2786 , SB2876 , SB2284 , SB1540 , SB2929 , SB2540 , SB2595 , SB2217 , SB715 , SB500 , SB1640 , SB2001 , SB2514 , SB2753 , SB2398 , SB1241 , SB2927 , SB2173 , SB2538 , SB898 , SB1449 , SB2529 , SB2846 , SB2476 , SB986 , SB1181 , SB2075 , SB2154 , SB2864 , SB1359 , SB2386 , SB2550 , SB1351 , SB1423 , SB1931 , SB2245 , SB2589 , SB2707 , SB410 , SB2776 , SB2580 , SB1886 , SB1234 , SB739 , SB456 , SB1666 , SB2801 , SB2055 , SB1012 , SB2926 , SB2138 , SB1242 , SB2615 , SB2310 , SB1224 , SB2972 , SB2841 , SB3016 , SB2139 , SB1856 , SB2035 , SB1528 , SB1141 , SB2401 , SB2530 , SB2375 , SB547 , SB1266 , SB1373 , SB1467 , SB2069 , SB2269 , SB2480 , SB672 , SB904 , SB2695 , SB2891 , SB2422 , SB2543 , SB1854 , SB317 , SB2539 , SB2532 , SB2925 , SB1250 , SB2082 , SB2203 , SB457 , SB2357 , SB2721 , SB243 , SB1285 , SB2568 , SB1959 , SB1442 , SB1454 , SB2520 , SB2541 , SB1708 , SB1237 , SB1844 , SB1586 , SB1551 , SB3039 , SB2819 , SB66 , SB629 , SB1015 , SB2342 , SB2903 , SB2933 , SB1965 , SB2477 , SB3029 , SB2605 , SB2419 , SB1957 , SB375 , SB250 , SB777 , SB628 , SB2523 , SB2367 , SB2703 , SB2608 , SB2778 , SB3044 , SB2965 , SB2521 , SB865 , HB2525 , HB3093 , SB1032 , SB2165 , SB2501 , SB2675 , SB2452 , SB2835

Transcript Highlights:

• By enacting this legislation, New Mexico will be just the 6th state to ensure that federal benefits for
• While the Children, Youth and Families Department already has policies in place that limit the use of
• A joint memorial requesting the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology to study the benefits and
• President, Senator, is that limited to just independent practitioners? Mr.
• It's relating to public safety, removing the limitations of prosecution on trafficking.

Transcript Highlights:

• Hunt for legislation to provide accidental death benefits for the surviving spouse of Matthew Troy, a
• Committee on Ways and Means: The Committee on Ways and Means, to whom was referred the bill relative to benefits
• Third reading of the bill: An act relative to benefits for teachers, House No. 4361.
• Through you to the members, I rise today to speak on H-4361, an act relative to benefits for teachers
• he did related to this in the prior session where we did successfully retroactively allow a more limited

Summary: The House began with ceremonial and procedural business, including adoption of resolutions recognizing the National Asian Pacific American Caucus and several orders extending reporting deadlines for committees, all of which were adopted by suspension of the rules. The House also concurred with a Senate petition concerning accidental death benefits for the surviving spouse of a former Boston firefighter, referring it to the Committee on Public Service. The chamber then took up several Ways and Means bills and local matters, including human trafficking recognition training for certain hospitality workers, teacher benefits under the Retirement Plus program, and land/easement measures for Westford, Wellesley, and Bourne. Most of these items were advanced to third reading after amendments were adopted. The House also moved through a series of local bills on the calendar, ordering multiple measures to third reading, including bills related to Watertown digital legal notices, Newton alarm divisions, Springfield property tax assessment, Natick’s charter, Beckett conservation commission membership, and Leicester stabilization funds. Later, the House considered and passed two major bills to be engrossed by roll call vote. H. 4361, relative to benefits for teachers, was supported by members who described it as a long-sought fix to Retirement Plus enrollment problems caused by unclear implementation and communication years ago; it passed 158-0. H. 4360, requiring human trafficking recognition training for certain hospitality workers, also drew strong support from members and advocates emphasizing victim identification, hotel and motel staff training, and anti-trafficking enforcement; an amendment updating the training language was adopted, and the bill likewise passed 158-0. The House then recessed until the next day.

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm an employee benefits broker.
• I work with companies and nonprofits around the state, helping to set up employee benefit plans.
• my employer, my clients, but more importantly, I'm also a member of the National Association of Benefits
• We represent all the benefit brokers in Massachusetts and, by extension, all the employers in this state
• I will point out that while the ACA does limit the use of rating factors to influence upfront premiums

Committee: Joint Joint Committee on Financial Services

Summary: The Joint Committee on Financial Services held a hearing with Chair Jamie Murphy and Senate co-chair Senator Feeney presiding. Members asked witnesses to keep testimony to three minutes and noted that written testimony could still be submitted. The committee heard testimony on several health insurance and pharmacy-related bills, including a proposal to allow controlled prescriptions to be transferred between pharmacies within the same chain, legislation affecting health savings account (HSA)-compatible plans and future insurance mandates, a bill on small business health insurance incentives, and H. 1212 on emergency insulin access. Several parents and patients testified in support of emergency insulin access, describing severe diabetes emergencies, diabetic ketoacidosis, prescription delays, and the need for pharmacists to dispense insulin in urgent situations when doctors or insurers are unavailable. A parent also described the burden of repeatedly obtaining new prescriptions for ADHD medication when pharmacies are out of stock. Witnesses supporting the HSA bill argued that state coverage mandates can unintentionally disqualify HSA-qualified plans and that the bill would preserve tax advantages for enrollees while avoiding repeated legislative fixes. A representative of the Retailers Association supported the small business health insurance incentives bill, saying it could help retain small employers in the merged market by allowing carriers to offer financial incentives tied to cooperative purchasing and utilization efforts. One witness, Kathleen Demarest, testified against a co-pay assistance restriction, saying a state rule had unexpectedly cut off her drug assistance before a generic was actually available, leaving her with very high out-of-pocket costs. Committee members asked a few clarifying questions about HSAs, insulin dispensing, and school support for diabetes care. After all scheduled witnesses had testified and no additional testimony was offered, the committee voted to close the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• This would require bargaining over contributions for supplemental retirement benefits for Department
• under a private defined benefit pension plan, as well as Taft-Hartley.
• Indian tribe, or a nonprofit nature conservancy organization acquiring real property for a public benefit
• Indian tribe, or a nonprofit nature conservancy organization acquiring real property for a public benefit
• It directs the Office of the Attorney General to designate investigators as limited authority Washington

Committee: Senate Rules

Transcript Highlights:

• their commitment to continue working on making this even more transparent, making it a responsible limit
• And it's largely driven by salaries and benefits. Ask for an I vote.
• And it's largely driven by salaries and benefits. Ask for an I vote.
• And it's largely driven by salaries and benefits. Ask for an I vote.
• from more infrastructure would benefit from more infrastructure like<00:46:09.200><c> this.