Video & Transcript Research : 'budget amendment'

Page 32 of 500
NV

Nevada 2025 Regular Session

Assembly Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections May 29th, 2025 at 01:00 pm

Legislative Operations and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • a friendly amendment.
  • That was amended over in our house.
  • Frankly, if it was my amendment, I'd amend it that way.
  • The proposed amendment and then the most recent amendment that was adopted, where Section 1.5 was deleted
  • Is there any way we could amend this amendment to eliminate that? Thank you, Assembly Member.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Ways and Means Committee 3/17/25

Ways and Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • ahead with the A6 amendment.
  • of the overall state general fund budget of the overall state general fund budget and<00:02:33.959
  • <00:03:23.599> is is funded in this in this budget is is funded in this in this budget is
  • He also said they have the A6 amendment and that they should go to the A6 amendment.
  • Again, a reminder that this budget, this bill, is about one quarter of 1% of the overall state budget
Bills: HF1704, HF1722
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The following amendment. The clerk will read the amendment. Amendment by Buckley.
  • In the perfecting amendment, the amendment...
  • The following amendment to the amendment, the clerk will read the amendment. To the amendment. Mr.
  • The following amendment: the clerk will read the amendment. Amendment by Bernal.
  • Amendment by Hinojosa to explain the amendment.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Mar 18th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Constitutional amendment and bill.
  • , the amendment...
  • Several amendments to that original provision.
  • The 10th Amendment is clear.
  • The ability to have that amended.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part III) Aug 26th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • I do have a floor amendment.
  • I will withdraw those two amendments and support your amendment to that.
  • The following amendment, Secretary will read the amendment.
  • I move adoption. the adoption of the amendment? Hearing none, the amendment is adopted.
  • There is an amendment. The following amendment. Secretary, read the amendment.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session Aug 19th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • And the federal budget has cut many of these programs.
  • serve their communities. ...that our independent school districts would not go upside down from a budget
  • What it will do is take much more of our local budgeting process to the ballot box.
  • a ...property tax decrease, but it will be a lot more voter involvement at the ballot box in the budgeting
  • I'm sick to my stomach to know that that the author refused amendments from violence shelters.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government (Part I) Apr 28th, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Criminal immunity through a charter amendment.
  • And the result was the charter amendment passed by how much? 4555, 45.
  • So I think that But they, we have budgets, we have constraints, right?
  • This amendment doesn't provide damages.
  • Our city has a budget of $5 billion.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Ways and Means Committee 4/23/25

Ways and Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • And we have an amendment to the amendment to the DE4 amendment.
  • The A2 is amended to the DE4. Now on to the DE4 as amended.
  • Now on to the DE4 as amended. Uh DE4. Now on to the DE4 as amended.
  • So support the amendment. Thank staff. So support the amendment.
  • Um, this bill, House File 2783, as amended, is the 2025 state government finance budget bill, and the
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Natural Resources May 27th, 2026

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chairman and members, yes, it's just a technical amendment.
  • Yeah, it's just a technical amendment.
  • I make the motion to amend to approve Amendment 4490. Is there any objection?
  • McLeod, Amendment 4424?
  • And that's what the amendment does. Do I have any objections for me amending with 4424?
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/25/2026 - House Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • The amendment outlines penalties to a university's operating budget if the prohibited activity occurs
  • The amendment outlines penalties to a university's operating budget if the prohibited activity occurs
  • Then we have to move the amendment, and then we’ll move the oral amendment on top of the existing amendment
  • Then we have to move the amendment, and then we’ll move the oral amendment on top of the existing amendment
  • We throw them amendments after amendments, corrections to amendments.
Summary: The committee first heard a lengthy presentation and discussion focused on Arizona State University’s foreign research ties, especially collaborations and funding connected to China and Chinese military-affiliated institutions. The presenter argued that ASU and the Arizona Board of Regents had not been transparent about foreign gifts, contracts, and research partnerships, citing federal reporting forms, the Wolf Amendment, export-control concerns, and alleged links to dual-use technologies such as quantum systems, AI, robotics, microelectronics, and biosecurity. A witness from American Global Strategies testified in support, saying the bill would help protect U.S. research security and national security by imposing state-level guardrails on sensitive collaborations. After questions, the committee considered a strike-everything amendment to SB 1060 that would bar public universities from entering into or continuing certain loans, gifts, contracts, research partnerships, or sponsored projects involving the PRC, the CCP, and listed Chinese military-linked universities, require ABOR review and approval, and impose reporting and budget penalties. The amendment was withdrawn, and the committee instead took up SB 1327, which directs ABOR to require university research security policies and to report annually on those policies and on foreign contributions over $250,000; SB 1327 received a 4-2 do-pass recommendation, with Del Santos, Hernandez, and Márquez voting no and Kolodin, Powell, Keshel, and Gillette voting yes. The committee then heard SB 1803, a veterans bill regulating unrecognized persons who assist with VA disability claims. The sponsor and industry witnesses said the bill would protect veterans from bad actors by requiring disclosures, capping fees, banning certain practices, and filing service agreements with the Attorney General, while opponents argued it could restrict consumer choice, resemble a price ceiling, and still allow non-attorneys to engage in the unauthorized practice of law. After extensive debate over contingent fees, legal ethics, and whether the bill was too favorable to one company, the committee continued the hearing with additional testimony and questions.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House Commerce and Small Business Committee Feb 18th, 2026

Commerce and Small Business

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, this is an amendment that was just submitted to me, but it's a friendly amendment. >> I'm giving
  • The bill applies only to new or amended requirements, not to existing ones.
  • The bill applies only to new or amended requirements, not to existing ones.
  • So, that's the amendment that you have before you. >> Chairman, the amendment replaces lines 82 and 83
  • All in favor of this amendment say I. >> All post amendment is adopted. >> All post amendment is adopted
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • And so I think we just have to be very careful and sensitive with the amendments that we make to our
  • And so I think we just have to be very careful and sensitive with the amendments that we make to our
Summary: The Committee on Natural Resources heard House Bill 2109, which would remove certain long-proposed reservoir projects from the state water plan after 50 years without progress. Chairman Van Deaver and many landowners, local officials, timber interests, and conservation advocates testified in support, arguing that the Marvin Nichols Reservoir has burdened Northeast Texas landowners for decades with the threat of eminent domain, depressed property values, and uncertainty over homes, farms, ranches, schools, churches, and cemeteries. Supporters also said the project would flood tens of thousands of acres, require extensive mitigation, harm timber and agriculture, and that Texas now has better alternatives such as conservation, reuse, aquifer storage and recovery, and desalination. Several members expressed sympathy for the affected families and questioned whether a project could remain in the plan indefinitely without progress. Opposition came from North Texas water interests, including the North Texas Commission, Tarrant Regional Water District, and the Texas Water Association, who argued that the bill would interfere with the state’s long-term water planning process and remove needed future supply options for a fast-growing region. They said Region C faces major projected shortages by 2070, that conservation and reuse have already delayed the need for new supplies, and that reservoirs remain one tool in the state’s water-planning toolbox. TWDB staff explained the existing inter-regional conflict process and noted that the substitute would affect several unique reservoir sites, not just Marvin Nichols. After testimony, Chairman Van Deaver closed by urging passage of the bill, but the committee withdrew the substitute and left HB 2109 pending. The committee then took up House Bill 5188, a brackish groundwater bill. The author said the bill would reduce permitting burdens for wells in designated brackish groundwater production zones, and the committee substitute added requirements on monitoring, groundwater-rights ownership, and allocation of pumpage limits while removing some exclusions and export-fee provisions. Texas Wildlife Association testified against the bill, warning that the exemptions could weaken groundwater conservation districts’ ability to protect freshwater resources and surface-owner rights. San Antonio Water System testified in favor, saying brackish groundwater is a key future supply and that the substitute would help speed development of desalination and brackish projects. The Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts testified neutrally but raised concerns about reduced district oversight, especially around injection-well exclusions and the loss of export fees, and said discussions on the bill were ongoing.