Transcript Highlights:

• hires, we've also been able to hire a plethora of adjuncts who we've needed to assign to additional sections
• And so, I can't imagine what billing, I mean, you use an ICD-9 code for whatever you're billing for.
• The billing codes that go along with the specifics of it. Yeah, okay.
• that high, because we know we have folks who just don't Know about programs or don't have the transportation

Committee: House Legislative Health & Human Services Committee

Transcript Highlights:

• The Assembly Transportation Committee Good afternoon.
• County Transportation Commission, the Golden Gate Bridge Highway Transportation District, the Napa Valley
• Transportation Authority, all in support.
• I'm very sympathetic to transportation and know how public transportation is critical, especially in
• That section? That section? Why are they saying— we'll pause so we can make sure.

Summary: The Assembly Transportation Committee heard SB 63 by Senator Wiener, as amended and coauthored by Senator Arreguín, a Bay Area transit funding measure intended to avert major service cuts at BART, Muni, Caltrain, and AC Transit. The authors said the region faces a fiscal cliff and that without new revenue, BART could collapse and other systems could face severe reductions. They described the bill as the product of extensive negotiations among the five Bay Area counties and transit operators, with San Mateo and Santa Clara counties opting in during the process. Much of the discussion focused on accountability and governance. Supporters said the bill includes some of the strongest oversight provisions in recent memory, including a third-party efficiency review and ad hoc adjudication committees that can withhold a portion of funding if operators fail to correct problems. Assembly Member Papin and Assembly Member Lackey argued the measure amounts to a taxpayer bailout with insufficient representation and too much control left to MTC, while the authors responded that the bill gives affected counties direct complaint and enforcement authority and that MTC must follow the ad hoc committees’ recommendations. Several members asked about complaint procedures, withholding thresholds, opt-in/opt-out issues, and whether the funding would return to the source counties if withheld. Testimony in support came from SPUR, Caltrain, MTC, the Bay Area Council, BART, SamTrans, VTA, San Francisco MTA, transit coalitions, environmental groups, local governments, and labor. Supporters emphasized the risk of severe service cuts, the importance of preserving recent investments such as Caltrain electrification, and the need for regional self-help. There was no registered opposition witness, though some members spoke against the bill. The committee ultimately voted 11-5 to pass SB 63 as amended to the floor, with the committee amendments also removing urgency language.

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm the Code Advisor.
• I'm Allison, and I'm the Deputy Code Revisor. Senator Holy, a new member?
• Christopher Lewis, Assistant Code Revisor. Hi, Chris. And Jill. Assistant Code Revisor. Hi, Chris.
• The table that's sent out, I believe, has 153 sections on it.
• And just to repeat again, how many sections of this report?

Committee: Joint Statute Law Committee

Summary: The committee began with introductions of members and staff, then approved the minutes from the previous meeting and voted to approve a step increase for Code Advisor Kathy Buckley. Staff then reported on publications, noting 2024 sales and free distribution totals were down somewhat from prior years, but that online access is reducing demand for paper copies. They also discussed a table of 153 “multiple action” RCW sections from the 2025 session; most could be merged through editorial authority, while about 10 sections would likely need future legislative cleanup. The committee approved the multiple action table. Budget and staffing updates showed the office is expected to return a substantial amount to the state this year, though that figure may decrease slightly because of end-of-year purchases, including a shared printer with LSS. Kathy Buckley said next year’s reduced budget should not create problems, with hiring delayed for one proofreader and a retirement already being backfilled. The committee also reviewed the publications account (the “197 fund”), which continues to receive royalty revenue and serves as a cushion for emergencies and special sessions. Members heard updates on rulemaking: one expedited WAC update to fix URLs after the legislature’s website overhaul, and a separate public records rulemaking intended to align the office’s procedures with House and Senate practices. Staff said the public records process would likely take about six months and would include normal notice-and-comment procedures. The committee also discussed the office’s recent experience with a video auditor and security training, and received a construction update that the office expects to move back into the renovated Pritchard Building on September 14, 2026. At the end, members asked for session statistics. Staff reported 424 session law chapters and, using legislative website data, 1,305 House bills introduced, 1,082 Senate bills introduced, 238 House bills passed, and 193 Senate bills passed. The meeting concluded with thanks, a brief exchange about food, and adjournment.

Transcript Highlights:

• Pending is the committee substitute for Senate Bill 84, which would create a new section of code in Article
• And it refers back to—I forget the code section—but 61 on our trespass code refers back to that for posting
• I know that there's precedent in other sections of code that has to do with communications where that's
• Okay, so what I'm looking at is: is there opportunity within the section of code before us to make sure
• Or what we're talking about here, I think, if we're getting specific about this code section, it's really

Committee: Senate Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:

• The Assembly Transportation Committee Good afternoon.
• The Assembly Transportation Committee is called to order. Welcome, everyone.
• Gate Bridge Highway Transportation District, and the Napa Valley Transportation Authority, all in support
• I'm very sympathetic to transportation and know how public transportation is critical, especially in
• That section? That section? Why are they saying... We'll pause so we can make sure.

Committee: House Transportation

Summary: The Assembly Transportation Committee heard SB 63 by Senator Wiener, as amended, a Bay Area transit funding measure intended to avert major service cuts at BART, Muni, Caltrain, and AC Transit. The authors said the region faces a fiscal cliff and that the bill would place a sales tax measure before voters to provide long-term operating support, paired with a third-party efficiency review and new accountability provisions. Supporters, including SPUR, Caltrain, BART, MTC, transit agencies, local governments, labor, and environmental groups, argued the measure is urgently needed to prevent collapse of transit service and broader economic harm. A major focus of the hearing was accountability and governance. The bill’s amended structure would create operator-specific ad hoc adjudication committees made up of commissioners from the counties that fund each operator, with the ability to withhold a portion of funding if problems are not corrected. Senator Wiener and Senator Arreguín said the amendments strengthened oversight and reflected extensive negotiations among the counties. Assemblymember Papan opposed the bill, arguing it still lacked fair representation and proactive oversight for San Mateo County and that the county was being asked to pay without sufficient control. Assemblymember Lackey also opposed the measure, calling it a bailout and criticizing the tax structure. Committee members questioned how complaints would be filed, how the adjudication process would work, whether MTC could override committee decisions, and how often counties could bring complaints. The authors explained that counties may file one complaint per operator per year, that MTC must follow the ad hoc committee’s recommendation, and that withheld funds would be returned if issues are resolved. After debate, Assemblymember Ahrens moved the bill and Assemblymember Harabedian seconded. The committee voted 11-5 to pass SB 63 as amended and send it to the floor.

Transcript Highlights:

• They're not taking away transportation.
• </c> with uh section. with uh section.
• Under section 4, it says repeal section two of this act, which is the Health and Human Services contracts
• </c> Um, it does say, if I might, uh, section Um, it does say, if I might, uh, section 4,<01:37:23.679
• And it doesn't have a repeal for section three, which talks about section two. Mr.

Summary: The committee of conference first discussed House Bill 557, which concerns information on the school budget ballot. The main issue was how to define and calculate the “average cost per pupil.” House members favored a simple calculation dividing the operating budget by enrollment, arguing that it is clearer to the public and matches how taxpayers think about school costs. Senate members preferred the existing RSA-based definition for consistency across statutes and noted that the current definition was about to take effect. Members also debated whether the ballot language should specify the figure as being for the “preceding year,” and some House members ultimately agreed to that clarification while one member did not. After discussion, the Senate declined to move off its position on the calculation method, but agreed to a compromise amendment adding “for the preceding year” to the Senate language so it would align with the rest of the ballot information. The committee then agreed to draft the report with that amendment. The committee then turned to House Bill 71, dealing with restrictions on using public school and higher education facilities to shelter certain migrants, along with a Senate-added provision requiring DHHS contracts to comply with the patient bill of rights. Members generally said they supported the base policy of the bill, but Representative Noble raised a drafting concern about a repeal section that appeared to undo the new contract requirement; the group discussed removing that repeal language and adjusting effective dates. The committee also reviewed Senate-added language creating a donation fund for a proposed accessible pier at Hampton Beach. Supporters said the project would be privately funded through donations, with the state park division managing the fund and any remaining balance eventually transferring to an existing state park donations account if the pier is not built. Members questioned maintenance costs, fundraising responsibility, and whether the account was necessary, but the Senate explained the fund was intended to provide a mechanism for private fundraising and future maintenance support.

Transcript Highlights:

• This is, again, for this section of the budget hearing on the Prop. 98 section: $3 billion in flexible
• This is the public comment section for this hearing.
• And unless we're provided one-time funding for those unfunded FTES, we are going to have to cut sections
• Finally, $15.6 million and 45 positions in savings related to the Control Section 4.05 reductions to
• Finally, $15.6 million and 45 positions in savings related to the Control Section 4.05 reductions to

Summary: The committee heard the May Revision presentation for the Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Education Finance, with public comment focused heavily on K-12 priorities such as universal school meals, kitchen infrastructure, food service and custodial support, youth leadership grants, Special Olympics funding, English learner support, universal pre-K, literacy investments, and concerns about community college funding shifts. Speakers also urged support for expanded learning, teacher recruitment and training, and maintaining or increasing funding for community colleges and student support programs. Finance and the LAO then reviewed the Proposition 98 outlook. Finance said the May Revision lowers the 2025-26 Prop. 98 guarantee to $114.6 billion, about $4.3 billion below January, due mainly to lower revenue estimates, with smaller effects from attendance and property tax changes. The administration also described rebenching for universal transitional kindergarten and a one-time rebench tied to Los Angeles fire-related property tax losses, along with changes to the Public School System Stabilization Account, deferrals, and updated COLA assumptions. The LAO said the budget relies too much on deferrals and one-time funds, creates a structural shortfall, and should instead align ongoing spending with the guarantee and preserve a reserve buffer. Members questioned the TK rebench and the shift of funding from community colleges to K-12, asking why it was being applied retroactively and how colleges would be held harmless. Finance said the changes align funding with where TK costs are being incurred and that reappropriation funding and other adjustments would offset impacts on community colleges. The LAO argued the historical split formula is outdated and should be abandoned in favor of budgeting around current priorities rather than fixed percentages. Members also raised concerns about draining the rainy day reserve and using deferrals, while the LAO said preserving reserves would better protect against future volatility. The committee then moved to specific K-12 and education proposals. Finance outlined May Revision changes including state operations adjustments for the Department of Education, technical trailer bill changes, a $100 million student teacher stipend program administered by Kern County, and updates to the charter school facility grant program. The LAO recommended rejecting the proposed increases for expanded learning, literacy coaches, and the student teacher stipend as currently structured, while supporting the minimum grant increase for expanded learning. Members expressed support for teacher recruitment efforts but questioned whether one-time funding can sustain ongoing programs and whether the student teacher stipend should be targeted to shortage areas or low-income communities.

Transcript Highlights:

• the next of kin, and then it replaces the word beneficiary with the word heir throughout the final section
• I move that the bill, as amended, receive a due pass recommendation and be sent to the Transportation
• This one’s going to the Transportation Committee as well. Is there a fiscal note on this?
• The bill has received a due pass recommendation and is sent to the Transportation Committee, subject
• I move that the bill receive a due pass recommendation and be sent to the Transportation Committee.

Committee: Senate Law & Justice

Transcript Highlights:

• Does this eliminate them in state code for assistance? Recognition? Mr.
• of code.
• And that five-year window aligns with other sections of current Idaho Code. So, Mr.
• Chairman and Senator Ricks, basically what we're adding into the current section of code is that it would
• Chairman and Senator Ricks, so basically what we're adding into the current section of code is that it

Committee: Senate Judiciary and Rules

Transcript Highlights:

• The Appropriations Committee on Transportation, Tourism, and Economic Development will now come to order
• And then finally, the transportation and economic development space is the third largest funded in the
• And then finally, transportation and economic development represents $601 million in GR spending.
• Transportation barriers, child care barriers.
• Transportation barriers, child care barriers.

Bills: S0048

Committee: Senate Appropriations Committee on Transportation, Tourism, and Economic Development

Summary: The Appropriations Committee on Transportation, Tourism, and Economic Development heard the Governor’s proposed FY 2026-27 budget for the TED silo and presentations from Commerce, Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, Military Affairs, the State Guard, State, Transportation, and Emergency Management. The Governor’s office outlined a $117.4 billion overall budget, including $18.3 billion for TED agencies, with major allocations for FDOT, Commerce, emergency management, tourism, military affairs, and state operations. Agency heads emphasized priorities such as housing and disaster recovery, workforce and rural infrastructure, law enforcement recruitment, defense support, tourism marketing, aerospace and spaceport investment, election audits, historic preservation, road and bridge maintenance, aviation safety, and emergency preparedness systems. Members asked several questions about the use and effectiveness of funding. Visit Florida officials said the public-private match is essential and that they exceeded the required match last year. Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles discussed trooper pay, vehicle replacement, aviation support, and transparency tools such as vehicle camera systems, with senators praising the department’s recruitment efforts. Military Affairs and the State Guard described readiness, recruiting, facility construction, and support for domestic missions, including hurricane response and perimeter security at the Everglades detention site; questions focused on deployment tempo, staffing, and costs. The Department of State explained funding for automated election audits, a conservation lab, and historic preservation, and said its arts grant changes were intended to standardize scoring rather than cut programs. Transportation highlighted a $15.4 billion total budget, major work program funding, safety initiatives, seaport and aviation investments, and the elimination of Florida Rail Enterprise funding due to reduced documentary stamp revenues. The committee also heard and passed CS/SB 48 by Senator Gates, which requires local governments to allow accessory dwelling units on a voluntary basis, while preserving local authority over setbacks, construction, and permitting. An amendment removed reusable tenant screening reports and clarified that conforming ADUs are allowed by right without separate hearings. The Florida Restaurant and Lodging Association and several industry and business groups supported the bill, citing the need for long-term rental housing for workers. After debate, the committee adopted the amendment and reported the bill favorably by roll call vote.

Transcript Highlights:

• Marilyn, would you </font> <font color="aaaaaa">Transportation will now come </font> <font color="aaaaaa
• </font> <font color="aaaaaa">transportation industry.
• For the state </font> <font color="aaaaaa">and public transportation.
• We </font> <font color="aaaaaa">transportation.
• For the state </font> <font color="aaaaaa">and public transportation.

Transcript Highlights:

• Second, AB 117 is a budget trailer bill that provides for the California State Transportation Agency
• Again, as was mentioned by the chair and for a little bit of background, Control Section 91 of the 2025
• I use public transportation in the Bay Area. I use the BART system.
• I use public transportation in the Bay Area.
• This loan is critical for Bay Area transportation agencies and their operations.

Committee: Senate Budget and Fiscal Review

Summary: The Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee heard two measures: AB 107, a budget bill junior making largely technical changes to the 2023, 2024, and 2025 budget acts, and AB 117, a trailer bill authorizing a $590 million loan structure to support four Bay Area transit agencies through the Metropolitan Transportation Commission using unallocated Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program funds. Finance explained AB 107 included technical fixes such as extending encumbrance periods, updating federal authority, correcting fiscal language, moving $20 million for California travel promotion from Visit California to GoBiz, and adding an APA exemption for implementation of already-approved climate bond programs. AB 117 was described as a cost-neutral regional solution with a 12-year loan term, two years interest-only, and repayment secured through existing state transit funding streams, with oversight by CalSTA, CTC, and MTC to limit impacts on other projects. Members raised concerns about transparency, competitive bidding, and whether APA exemptions and no-bid or emergency processes could reduce oversight, while supporters argued the exemptions were needed to get voter-approved climate and wildfire-related funds out the door. On AB 117, senators questioned whether the loan could become a de facto bailout if a Bay Area sales tax measure fails, whether post-pandemic ridership declines and safety/fare-evasion issues are temporary or structural, and whether the loan could jeopardize TIRCP-funded capital projects such as BART Phase 2. Transit agencies and local representatives testified in support, saying ridership is recovering, the loan is critical to avoid service cuts, and the Bay Area economy depends on transit stability. The committee first passed AB 107 on a 9-4 vote and AB 117 on a 9-4 vote, then held both bills on call. After recess, absent members returned and both measures were lifted from call and passed with 11 votes each. The committee then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• Second, AB 117 is a budget trailer bill that provides for the California State Transportation Agency
• Again, as was mentioned by the chair and for a little bit of background, Control Section 91 of the 2025
• I use public transportation in the Bay Area.
• So that will then depend on the needs of the different transportation agencies?
• This loan is critical for Bay Area transportation agencies and their operations.

Summary: The Senate Budget Committee heard two bills: AB 107, a budget bill junior making largely technical changes to the 2023, 2024, and 2025 Budget Acts, and AB 117, a trailer bill authorizing a regional transit loan package for Bay Area agencies. Department of Finance staff said AB 107 contains no new state money or new policy items, but makes adjustments such as extending encumbrance periods, updating federal authority, moving $20 million in tourism promotion funding from Visit California to GoBiz, and adding an APA exemption for certain climate bond program guidelines. AB 117 would allow CalSTA to loan up to $590 million from unallocated Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program funds to MTC, which would then lend to BART, Muni, Caltrain, and AC Transit; the loans would run 12 years with two years interest-only, and the state said the structure is intended to be cost-neutral and protected by repayment safeguards. Committee discussion focused heavily on transparency, oversight, and whether the transit loan could jeopardize future projects or become a de facto bailout if a Bay Area sales tax measure fails. Several senators questioned the need for the APA exemption in AB 107, arguing that emergency or existing public processes might provide better oversight, while supporters said the exemption was needed to get voter-approved climate bond funds out the door and that the language had already been agreed to in the budget process. On AB 117, senators raised concerns about declining ridership, fare evasion, safety, post-pandemic travel patterns, repayment sources, and the impact on other TIRCP projects such as BART Phase 2. Finance staff and transit representatives responded that ridership changes were driven by COVID-era shifts, labor and safety issues, and changing commute patterns, and that the loan would be secured against existing state transit assistance streams rather than general fund dollars. Public comment was largely supportive of both bills. Water, natural resources, and environmental groups backed the APA exemption in AB 107, saying it would speed implementation of Proposition 4 funding for water recycling, wildfire, coastal resilience, and related projects. Transit agencies and labor groups supported AB 117, saying the loan is needed to stabilize operations and preserve service while local revenue measures and efficiency efforts are pursued; San Francisco, Caltrain, BART, and AC Transit all testified in favor, though San Jose asked for stronger protections for previously approved TIRCP-funded projects. The committee first passed AB 107 and AB 117 on 8-4 and 9-4 votes, placed them on call, then later lifted the calls and both bills ultimately passed with 11 votes each and were sent out of committee.

Transcript Highlights:

• Second, AB 117 is a budget trailer bill that provides for the California State Transportation Agency
• I just would point out that the control section language is very specific to a particular region.
• I use public transportation in the Bay Area. I use the BART system.
• I use public transportation in the Bay Area.
• This loan is critical for Bay Area transportation agencies and their operations.

Committee: Senate Budget and Fiscal Review

Transcript Highlights:

• automatically just grant that power because the way the military works is much different under the Uniform Code
• Code, 636(c)(1) says, yes, on a civil case that can be done, but only at the consent of both parties,
• This whole extradition thing is based in the United States Constitution, Article 4, Section 2.
• We have specifically added, on page 2, line 11, Section N: Nothing in this section shall be construed
• I am the transportation administrator for the Bureau of Right of Way.

Committee: House Criminal Justice and Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:

• or the Code of Criminal Procedure.
• 23 of the House Amendments, amending Section 14.103 Government Code, and substitutes therefore Section
• Section 23.
• Section 14.103 of the Government Code is amended by adding subsections D and E to read as follows: D.
• of the Government Code.

Bills: SJR27 , SB7 , SB27 , SB57 , SB66 , SB140 , SB293 , SB413 , SB437 , SB467 , SB506 , SB510 , SB512 , SB571 , SB710 , SB785 , SB800 , SB850 , SB863 , SB865 , SB904 , SB905 , SB973 , SB974 , SB1191 , SB1281 , SB1300 , SB1362 , SB1494 , SB1504 , SB1522 , SB1567 , SB1579 , SB1580 , SB1723 , SB1760 , SB1838 , SB1923 , SB1946 , SB1957 , SB1964 , SB2121 , SB2167 , SB2221 , SB2321 , SB2368 , SB2373 , SB2407 , SB2431 , SB2477 , SB2587 , SB2615 , SB2807 , SB2965 , SB2986 , SB3039 , SB3047 , SB3070 , SB1 , SB8 , SB12 , SB13 , SB15 , SB17 , SB21 , SB30 , SB37 , SB260 , SB268 , SB331 , SB379 , SB441 , SB447 , SB457 , SB509 , SB568 , SB650 , SB763 , SB1198 , SB1405 , SB1506 , SB1540 , SB1566 , SB1610 , SB1637 , SB1660 , SB1833 , SB2018 , SB2024 , SB2155 , SB2217 , SB2308 , SB2337 , SB2601 , SB2753 , SB2778 , SB2878 , SB2900 , SB2972 , SB3059 , HB4 , HB145 , HB300 , HB493 , HB2011 , HB2067 , HB2516 , HB2525 , HB2885 , HB2974 , HB3071 , HB3372 , HB3556 , HB3595 , HB5138 , HB5246 , HB40 , HB46 , HB 119 , HB705 , HB1545 , HB2017 , HB2963 , HB3642 , HB3909 , SJR36 , SJR50 , SJR63 , SCR12 , SCR39 , SB2023 , SB62 , SB666 , SB847 , SB284 , SB854 , SB810 , SB1505 , SB583 , SB507 , SB1434 , SB1772 , SB2016 , SB1122 , SB731 , SB397 , SB508 , SB1436 , SB287 , SB1882 , SB393 , SB1791 , SB209 , SB2429 , SB1085 , SB1975 , SB2717 , SB1262 , SB636 , SB2056 , SB884 , SB1200 , SB1845 , SB2458 , SB801 , SB3014 , SB3013 , SB758 , SB2797 , SB2076 , SB2876 , SB1640 , SB1449 , SB1181 , SB1234 , SB2926 , SB2841 , SB1528 , SB1854 , SB317 , SB1250 , SB2082 , SB1237 , SB2819 , SB629 , SB2608 , SB1602 , SB2009 , SB867 , SB640 , SB1698 , SB2680 , SB913 , SB1071 , SB1086 , SB1087 , SB1483 , SB1444 , SB1553 , SB1556 , SB1703 , SB2133 , SB2297 , SB2298 , SB2622 , SB2955 , SB2334 , SB1367 , SB2044 , SB2363 , SB2565 , SB1888 , SB3036 , SB3057 , SB3043 , SB3063 , SB3035 , SB203 , SB2688 , SB2522 , SB2459 , SB2655 , SB2251 , SB1884 , SB2928 , SB2566 , SB2549 , SB2553 , SB2919 , SB1944 , SB1232 , SB1798 , SB2603 , SB2607 , SB2683 , SB1319 , SB3045 , SB3071 , HB796 , HB1523 , HB5294 , HB748 , HB3395 , HB180 , HB3171 , HB146 , HB5596 , HB5694 , HB 1135 , HB3225 , HB186 , HB1449 , HB3793 , HB 112 , HB 104 , HB3336 , HB3520 , HB3320 , HB5663 , HB2399 , HB 111 , HB3483 , HB4580 , HB3748 , HB632 , HB4730 , HB5690 , HB5689 , HB3385 , HB4359 , HB5381 , HB 123 , HB5606 , HB 1057 , HB3664 , HCR141 , HCR40 , HCR59 , SR695 , SCR54 , HCR153 , HCR166 , HCR168 , SJR27 , SB7 , SB57 , SB66 , SB140 , SB293 , SB413 , SB437 , SB467 , SB506 , SB510 , SB512 , SB571 , SB710 , SB785 , SB800 , SB850 , SB863 , SB865 , SB904 , SB905 , SB973 , SB974 , SB1191 , SB1281 , SB1300 , SB1362 , SB1504 , SB1522 , SB1567 , SB1579 , SB1580 , SB1723 , SB1760 , SB1838 , SB1923 , SB1946 , SB1957 , SB1964 , SB2167 , SB2221 , SB2321 , SB2368 , SB2407 , SB2477 , SB2587 , SB2615 , SB2807 , SB2965 , SB2986 , SB3039 , SB3047 , SB3070 , HB40 , HB 119 , HB705 , HB1545 , HB2017 , HB2963 , HB3642 , HB3909 , SB17 , SB21 , SB509 , SB1198 , SB1506 , SB1833 , SB2155 , SB2601 , SB2778 , HB300 , HB2011

Transcript Highlights:

• consolidated into Section 110.
• frequency of medical reviews moved into Section 305.
• “This is under Section 9, Criminal History and Background Checks. Section 1, I believe.
• of code.
• I think we have...” “...corresponding section of code.

Committee: House Health and Welfare

Transcript Highlights:

• If I know that section three and four of the amendment cover all of the rural health and also federal
• If I know that section<02:42:46.960><c> three</c><02:42:47.359><c> and</c><02:42:47.760><c> four</c><
• </c> estimated gational age under its section estimated gational age under its section entitled<02:52
• The amendment removes the code-required egress allowance present in the original bill.
• So again, DEES has no ability to enforce building codes.

Transcript Highlights:

• In the next section, in Section C, that just highlights there again that it's going through 12th grade
• 28.480><c> teachers</c><01:05:28.880><c> lost</c> was that section where teachers lost was that section
• </c><01:39:51.600><c> two,</c> look on page three, section two, look on page three, section two, this
• Chairman Brown, Transportation. Mr.
• Chairman Brown, Transportation. Transportation. Transportation.

Transcript Highlights:

• The bill prohibits certain uses of digital firearm manufacturing code.
• Possession of such code creates a rebuttable presumption of an intent to unlawfully distribute the code
• It then is converted and sliced into a G-code file.
• Sections 6, 7, and 8 attempt to provide exemptions.
• ..." "...on this exact issue of 3D printing and firearm codes, those codes are already available online

Bills: HB2255 , HB2320 , HB2548

Committee: House Civil Rights & Judiciary

Keywords: litigation finance, legal funding, lawsuit, financial services, access to justice, firearm regulation, manufacturing, safety standards, background checks, license requirements, health care market standards, hospital consolidation, merger review, health care transaction notice, attorney general review, antitrust, provider organizations, hospital systems, contracting affiliation, material change