Transcript Highlights:

• This legislation will provide transformative changes to 775 thousand special education kids in Texas.
• It provides transparency to parents and agreed-upon services that can provide a student. individual educational
• We've got a one-time supplement of $125 million to provide additional support.
• The ability to confer will also provide a critical opportunity for the victim to express how a person
• to provide law enforcement services in certain counties to local governments.

Bills: SJR12 , SJR81 , SCR39 , SB22 , SB32 , SB241 , SB393 , SB414 , SB458 , SB464 , SB568 , SB583 , SB609 , SB660 , SB693 , SB731 , SB732 , SB746 , SB783 , SB785 , SB897 , SB993 , SB996 , SB1008 , SB1029 , SB1035 , SB1036 , SB1120 , SB1122 , SB1147 , SB1163 , SB1188 , SB1197 , SB1209 , SB1227 , SB1245 , SB1267 , SB1307 , SB1321 , SB1332 , SB1386 , SB1394 , SB1396 , SB1470 , SB1494 , SB1537 , SB1596 , SB1598 , SB1610 , SB1664 , SB1814 , SB1822 , SB1841 , SB1948 , SB2065 , SB2155 , SB2406 , SB2407 , SJR12 , SJR36 , SJR81 , SJR50 , SJR4 , SCR22 , SCR12 , SCR39 , SB765 , SB62 , SB666 , SB888 , SB687 , SB847 , SB1248 , SB504 , SB305 , SB296 , SB284 , SB241 , SB304 , SB1023 , SB204 , SB609 , SB670 , SB850 , SB854 , SB413 , SB1346 , SB1033 , SB1220 , SB1073 , SB810 , SB1539 , SB447 , SB1119 , SB1505 , SB1215 , SB1302 , SB583 , SB673 , SB681 , SB1172 , SB955 , SB957 , SB1120 , SB541 , SB266 , SB1415 , SB53 , SB1352 , SB785 , SB1450 , SB1502 , SB1566 , SB414 , SB1062 , SB711 , SB746 , SB1404 , SB1448 , SB507 , SB1026 , SB1349 , SB1355 , SB1433 , SB1434 , SB1596 , SB1403 , SB667 , SB1059 , SB1567 , SB310 , SB311 , SB505 , SB1209 , SB1210 , SB1470 , SB264 , SB1029 , SB1358 , SB1364 , SB1569 , SB1376 , SB1228 , SB519 , SB1350 , SB462 , SB827 , SB1585 , SB1396 , SB1484 , SB1273 , SB927 , SB1227 , SB1229 , SB1353 , SB1464 , SB1709 , SB1729 , SB1733 , SB1744 , SB1772 , SB1841 , SB1147 , SB1008 , SB2016 , SB1173 , SB1163 , SB996 , SB568 , SB1370 , SB1321 , SB1101 , SB860 , SB993 , SB693 , SB1610 , SB1537 , SB1332 , SB1307 , SB963 , SB493 , SB984 , SB619 , SB1122 , SB455 , SB522 , SB1057 , SB1239 , SB1254 , SB1255 , SB1259 , SB1341 , SB1664 , SB1877 , SB464 , SB1277 , SB32 , SB732 , SB660 , SB731 , SB921 , SB268 , SB1822 , SB1188 , SB1589 , SB397 , SB1058 , SB1036 , SB1267 , SB2112 , SB1930 , SB532 , SB1035 , SB2155 , SB508 , SB292 , SB291 , SB901 , SB1333 , SB1436 , SB1494 , SB964 , SB779 , SB1378 , SB2312 , SB1719 , SB1386 , SB287 , SB2143 , SB1245 , SB261 , SB1247 , SB1948 , SB2406 , SB2407 , SB1882 , SB1197 , SB1814 , SB618 , SB38 , SB393 , SB2065 , SB1371 , SB1394 , SB1365 , SB2243 , SB2226 , SB2039 , SB1919 , SB1895 , SB1598 , SB1493 , SB1810 , SB1791 , SB1706 , SB1644 , SB1238 , SB783 , SB458 , SB22 , SB651 , SB897 , SB1809 , SB1080 , SB745 , SB826 , SB989 , SB1320 , SB1437 , SB2320 , SB2289 , SB1171 , SB664 , SB1637 , SB2064 , SB868 , SJR40 , SJR27 , SCR38 , SCR37 , SB1079 , SB1243 , SB1504 , SB1851 , SB1879 , SB2237 , SB1257 , SB2034 , SB1522 , SB883 , SB249 , SB1318 , SB1151 , SB596 , SB1191 , SB226 , SB570 , SB870 , SB991 , SB60 , SB365 , SB1067 , SB1786 , SB326 , SB1401 , SB1592 , SB1728 , SB1265 , SB586 , SB529 , SB217 , SB209 , SB1923 , SB1559 , SB1839 , SB387 , SB1874 , SB1872 , SB1873 , SB1921 , SB1883 , SB1677 , SB95 , SB1620 , SB1838 , SB2024 , SB2429 , SB1999 , SB511 , SB2309 , SB2166 , SB871 , SB510 , SB33 , SB2420 , SB1860 , SB1541 , SB1316 , SB1314 , SB1313 , SB1426 , SB1398 , SB1869 , SB1750 , SB1871 , SB36 , SB855 , SB1233 , SB760 , SB2425 , SB2037 , SB1758 , SB1759 , SB2365 , SB1924 , SB762 , SB1271 , SB1818 , SB605 , SB1405 , SB1762 , SB1968 , SB1977 , SB2077 , SB2148 , SB2321 , SB1967 , SB1662 , SB1663 , SB2124 , SB2204

Keywords: parental rights, education, constitutional amendment, school choice, child education, tax exemption, ad valorem, tangible personal property, income production, border security, southern border, federal immigration policy, illegal immigration, cartels, transnational cartels, fentanyl, drug trafficking, human trafficking, Operation Lone Star, Texas border

Summary: The meeting primarily focused on educational reforms, particularly in special education funding. Notably, Senator Bettencourt laid out the transformative impacts of Senate Bill 568, which aims to lift a historical cap on special education funding that affected approximately 775,000 students. The discussions included plans for an intensity-based funding model that could ensure fair distribution of resources depending on individual needs, thereby enhancing educational support for diverse learning requirements. Senators acknowledged past failures in the special education framework, emphasizing the necessity of moving towards a system that is transparent and focused on delivering adequate services.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:24:22.760><c> a</c> would hope that it kind of provides a would hope that it kind of provides
• We're the client, and you're supposed to be providing the service for us.
• shift, and they can email or provide input to that talk story session.
• </c> build up their vacation leave providing build up their vacation leave providing we<00:51:41.680>
• Could you provide those stats to the committee? Sure.

Transcript Highlights:

• Perkins, and the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act provide about 10% of the K-12 education and
• in November, you can even get past that so long as you're partnering with folks like Voc Rehab to provide
• We're going to have to cull that eligible training provider list to make sure that we're not training
• The feds won't let you hold your grantees accountable as far as sanctions for it, but let's be honest
• So it's a good time to—you know, if you're then I don't know who your case management provider is, and

Committee: All ALC-HOSPITAL, MEDICAID, & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES STUDY SUBCOMMITTEE

Summary: The committee heard testimony from Nick Moore, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Office of Career and Technical Education, on efforts to better align workforce, education, and human services programs. Moore argued that WIOA, Perkins, and ESSA were designed to function as an integrated talent system, but that federal and state bureaucracy has kept them siloed. He said the Department of Labor and OCTAE are working on more integrated state plan guidance, including a 2026 plan modification timeline, combined Perkins/WIOA plans, and greater use of labor market information to align training with in-demand jobs and Workforce Pell. Moore emphasized reducing overhead, cross-training staff, using common intake and integrated case management, and focusing on the “shadow labor force” of people facing benefit cliffs, child care barriers, or other obstacles to work. He repeatedly urged states to use waivers and flexibility where possible, to consolidate or streamline local workforce structures, and to hold programs accountable through measures such as labor force participation, training-related employment, retention, and cost per successful outcome. Members asked about the balance between flexibility and accountability, the role of employers versus postsecondary institutions, rural “training deserts,” state waivers, and data systems such as Mississippi Spark and Arkansas Launch. Moore said states should use technology and integrated intake to co-enroll eligible participants in multiple programs and better match people to jobs. In response to questions, Moore said some federal rules cannot be waived, but many reporting and administrative requirements can be streamlined, and he encouraged Arkansas to propose ideas for waivers or state-level integration. He also discussed the need for enhanced wage records and state longitudinal data systems to improve workforce planning and economic development. After Moore’s presentation, DHS Secretary Janet Mann and Director Jay Hill gave a brief update on reimbursement rates, saying the department had compiled more than 100 public comments, recommended holding the current rate, and was awaiting executive review; they estimated the process could take 30 to 60 days. The committee then adjourned, noting a later audit presentation scheduled for the afternoon.

Transcript Highlights:

• Administrative code provides rules and restrictions on distributors.
• It also provides rules and restrictions on manufacturers.
• But DOCR does provide training.
• They provide the required space for the testing site for the program.
• So not all provided the information. So the estimate... So not all provided the information.

Committees: Joint Judiciary , Joint Judiciary Committee

Transcript Highlights:

• in November, you can even get past that so long as you're partnering with folks like Voc Rehab to provide
• times we find that our CTE programs that we're offering or the programs on our eligible training provider
• We're going to have to cull that eligible training provider list to make sure that we're not training
• The feds won't let you hold your grantees accountable as far as sanctions for it, but let's be honest
• It's a good time to—you know, if you're then I don't know who your case management provider is, and so

Committee: All ALC-HOSPITAL, MEDICAID, & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES STUDY SUBCOMMITTEE

Summary: The committee heard a lengthy presentation from Nick Moore, acting assistant secretary of the Office of Career and Technical Education, focused on integrating workforce, education, training, and human services systems. Moore argued that federal programs under WIOA, Perkins, and ESSA should be aligned more closely, with fewer administrative layers, more state flexibility, and stronger use of labor market information to steer training toward in-demand jobs. He emphasized combined state plans, streamlined reporting, cross-training staff, integrated intake and case management, and better use of tools such as apprenticeships, talent marketplaces, and co-enrollment with SNAP, TANF, and Medicaid to help people overcome benefit cliffs and move into work. Moore also criticized current workforce outcomes, saying too much money is spent on overhead and too few participants end up employed in jobs related to their training. He urged states to reduce duplicative one-stop centers, improve transparency in budgeting, modernize data systems, and use performance measures tied to labor force participation, training-related employment, and retention. Members asked about balancing flexibility and accountability, the role of employers versus postsecondary institutions, rural “training deserts,” statewide waivers, and data-sharing systems such as Mississippi’s workforce technology efforts. Moore said the department wants to help states get to “yes” on innovative ideas, but that some changes would require congressional action. After Moore’s presentation, DHS Secretary Janet Mann and Director Jay Hill gave a brief update on reimbursement rates. They said the agency had compiled and posted responses to more than 100 public comments, had recommended that the governor keep current rates in place, and expected the executive review process to take about 30 to 60 days. A senator asked for clarification on the legislation requiring monthly verbal and written reports. The meeting then adjourned, with members noting a later presentation on an audit of state programs.

Transcript Highlights:

• families, teach our children about consent and conflict resolution, and reduce gender-based violence and provide
• believe survivors, that is not interested in protecting survivors, and is no longer a partner in providing
• We are a domestic violence, sexual assault, and sex trafficking organization, and we have been providing
• have been a part of the Underground Railroad, which is not a mainstream way of getting services provided
• Thurston County is no longer able to provide any victim advocacy services to domestic violence victims

Summary: Washington State Sen. Manka Dhingra opened a press conference focused on survivor-centered policies and funding for victim services, saying the state should continue supporting survivors despite a difficult budget climate and reduced federal support. She highlighted prior state actions such as extending the statute of limitations for sexual assault, restricting firearms for abusers, protecting survivors from discrimination, easing access to protection orders, and addressing female genital mutilation, while emphasizing the need to fund services that are trauma-informed and victim-centered. Much of the event focused on the request to restore about $21.38 million in victim services funding. Colleen McIngles of the King County Children’s Justice Center warned that without the funding, programs statewide would close, eliminating forensic interviewers, advocates, and coordinated response teams. Kate Garvey of the King County Sexual Assault Resource Center said agencies have already laid off staff and are triaging clients, and that the money would only maintain existing services. Several speakers tied the need for funding to broader public safety and survivor support, including references to federal VOCA cuts and the national reckoning over the Epstein case. Legislators also discussed several bills. Sen. T’wina Nobles described SB 5169, which would reduce the need for child victims and witnesses to repeatedly relive trauma in court. Rep. Jamila Taylor and Rep. Roger Goodman discussed HB 1591, which would provide mitigating treatment, resentencing options, and possible vacatur for survivors whose criminal conduct was connected to coercion or abuse. Rep. Chris Stearns and Sen. Tina Orwall discussed court-process reforms in SB 6017 and related efforts to prevent retraumatization of sexual assault survivors, along with recognition of female genital mutilation as sexual assault. Rep. Lauren Davis shared her personal experience with domestic violence and argued that cuts to system-based victim advocacy have left many survivors without support. The press conference also celebrated unanimous Senate passage of the Ebony Alert bill, which advocates said is needed to improve responses to missing Black women and girls; speakers urged the House to pass it next.

Transcript Highlights:

• the state government's abilities to meet their needs, and amicus briefs supporting nonprofits that provide
• Our attorneys have also made it a priority to meet with advocates and service providers throughout the
• Our concern is that it's going to impact our residents and how we provide benefits, how we issue birth
• I mean, partly the courts do have the power to issue sanctions, which is something that I think Judge
• He'll be providing a Medicaid overview at 7:30.

Committee: House Federal Funding Stabilization Subcommittee

Transcript Highlights:

• I’m happy to provide you with this. In fact, we’ll follow up.
• through with so many medical providers in order to make this decision.
• We have endeavored to provide that.
• They want us to sanction this decision. They want you, the state, to sanction this decision.
• testimony in writing or to provide it verbally.

Committee: Joint Joint Committee on Public Health

Summary: The Joint Committee on Public Health opened its first hearing of the session and heard testimony on bills in three areas: emergency medical services/AED access, athletic training and student safety, and end-of-life options. Committee chairs outlined testimony rules and noted that written testimony would also be accepted. Some bills had no live witnesses, while others drew extensive testimony from advocates, professionals, and legislators. On AED-related bills, the American Heart Association supported requiring automated external defibrillators at sporting events and athletic fields, citing sudden cardiac arrest survival rates and urging cardiac emergency response plans as an added safeguard. A parks and recreation professional supported AED access but raised concerns about the cost, staffing, maintenance, and feasibility for municipalities with limited resources. Athletic trainers supported expanding their scope of practice and removing workplace restrictions, arguing it would improve injury prevention, reduce costs, and help retain professionals in Massachusetts. The committee also took extensive testimony on end-of-life options legislation. Supporters included legislators, physicians, hospice volunteers, clergy, patients’ family members, and advocacy groups, who described the bills as allowing terminally ill, mentally capable adults to choose a peaceful death with strict safeguards and self-administration requirements. They emphasized personal stories of suffering, public support, and the claim that other states have not seen abuse. Opponents, including faith-based, disability-rights, and family policy representatives, argued the bills amount to physician-assisted suicide, could pressure vulnerable people, and may be influenced by prognosis errors, coercion, or financial incentives. No votes or final committee actions were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• person In crisis, providing eligibility requirements for pre-prosecution diversion programs, providing
• . the department, providing for revocation or suspension of licenses, sanctions, and penalties for facilities
• Providing duties and limitations.
• or internet service provider, upon the request of a law enforcement agency, to provide location information
• repair provider duties.

Transcript Highlights:

• The sanctions on the chapters, I'd like to know which chapters are sanctioned.
• provide the space and the building.
• It is essential to provide or address housing for staff to have the necessary funding to provide basic
• We provide services to all who come in.
• It doesn't matter; it's providing the services.

Committee: House House Government, Elections & Indian Affairs

Transcript Highlights:

• The department is also required to immediately provide the results to the court.
• I don't know that a fiscal note was provided to you.
• So what that looks like is we would take the... ...provided to you.
• So we do have a provider portal. Some of our providers, they do have access.
• So right now our providers just have partial access.

Committee: Senate Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:

• Or, number three, this bill does not provide for incurable prejudice to the defense.
• The Michael Morton Act, speaking of which, the idea that there's no. sanctions on it.
• Even inadvertent failures to disclose evidence result in these sanctions.
• And Keith to choose correct sanctions.
• HB 3166 would provide the opportunity for prosecutors and courts to provide solutions in cases such as

Bills: HB867 , HB1347 , HB1801 , HB1820 , HB2197 , HB2617 , HB3110 , HB3166 , HB3330 , HB4237 , HB4342 , HB4629 , HB4933 , HJR148

Committee: House Criminal Jurisprudence

Keywords: criminal case dismissal, attorney discretion, law enforcement misconduct, judicial approval, evidence, judicial consent, transparency, healthcare, Medicare, insurance, elderly, retired, benefits, access, cost, criminal justice, case dismissal, prosecutorial discretion, law enforcement oversight, criminal procedure

Transcript Highlights:

• The department is also required to immediately provide the results to the court.
• I don't know that the fiscal note was provided to you.
• So we do have a provider portal. We are—some of our providers, ...sure.
• So we do have a provider portal. Some of our providers do have access.
• So right now our providers just have partial access.

Summary: The committee considered and advanced several bills. House Bill 4995, concerning video cameras in special education classrooms, was explained as requiring parents to be notified of recording interruptions, providing written notice of the law to parents and school employees, shortening the required random review of recordings from every 90 days to every 30 days, and clarifying that school boards must still conduct independent investigations even if DHS or prosecutors do not act. The committee adopted the motion to report the bill to the full Senate. House Bill 5214, dealing with drug testing in child abuse and neglect cases, would allow courts to order testing of parents in certain cases, require laboratory confirmation of positives, and require DHS to notify the court and other parties; the committee adopted the strike-and-insert amendment, then reported the bill as amended and adopted a title amendment. The committee also advanced House Bill 4025 and House Bill 5441, both restructuring state personnel systems. HB 4025 would exempt employees of the Department of Health, health facilities, and human services from classified civil service and grievance procedures beginning July 1, 2026, while preserving status for some current employees and allowing exemptions to comply with federal requirements; the committee adopted a piecemeal amendment and reported it as amended. HB 5441 would eliminate separate civil service systems for Transportation, Revenue, and the Bureau for Social Services and move classifications and compensation structures to the Division of Personnel, with testimony from the governor’s counsel emphasizing faster hiring and more flexibility; the committee adopted the strike-and-insert amendment and reported the bill as amended. House Bill 4602, a child welfare pilot program creating a private community-based system for post-removal services, drew testimony from DHS about concerns over costs, continuity, oversight, and child well-being outcomes, while supporters argued it could reduce caseloads and improve flexibility. The chair amended the bill to remove one of the two pilot regions, leaving only the Berkeley/Jefferson County pilot, and the committee then reported the bill as amended despite opposition from the senator from Marion. House Bill 4106, removing the provisional concealed handgun license requirement for ages 18 to 21, heard testimony from a pediatrician opposing the change and from a gun rights advocate supporting it; an amendment requiring firearms training for under-21 carriers failed by a 1-14 roll call, and the committee then reported the bill as amended. Finally, House Bill 4198, after a subcommittee rewrite, was advanced with a strike-and-insert amendment that refined E-Verify requirements for public and private employers, added exemptions for certain small or new employers and sole proprietors, clarified recordkeeping and notice requirements, and adjusted penalties and enforcement procedures. After a motion for the previous question, the committee adopted the amendment and reported HB 4198 as amended. House Bill 5319 was removed from the agenda, and the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• to pass it, and that's what I believe the chair was concerned about: could there be an effective sanction
• ordered to pay child support and they always find some way not to do it, you know, the ultimate sanction
• Sean was the main provider for our children, me, and our household.
• I am certain this law would be a profound blessing to any family facing the sudden loss of a provider
• This law would be a profound blessing to any family facing the sudden loss of a provider due to a drunk

Committee: House Children and Families

Transcript Highlights:

• Representatives, House Bill 639 by the Health and Welfare Committee, an act relating to midwifery, to provide
• House Bill 532 by the Transportation and Defense Committee, an act relating to motor vehicles, to provide
• , relating to reports of medical authorities establishing blindness, declaring an emergency, and providing
• department to use the same expedited process already available for relatives while continuing to provide
• part and parcel to that, then they could lose their ability to sell licenses, or they could be sanctioned

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:18:53.280><c> to</c> examinations or giving State sanction to examinations or giving State sanction
• She benefited from the physical and mental health benefits sports provides.
• <01:23:40.320><c> bullying</c><01:23:41.320><c> and</c> sanctioned bullying and sanctioned bullying and
• It provided a new opportunity.
• It provided a new opportunity.

Transcript Highlights:

• based on RCW 42.52.50. appropriate penalty and/or sanctions based on R.C.W. 42.480.
• Simmons to provide oral argument first.
• I provided you advice.
• Have 20 minutes to proceed, if you would like, to provide a response. Go ahead.
• Has ever been held accountable for providing funding for merely providing funding for her employer.

Summary: The Washington State Office of Administrative Hearings held oral argument before the Legislative Ethics Board in the matter of Representative Tara Simmons, docketed as Legislative Ethics Board case 2025-5. The hearing concerned Simmons’ motion for summary judgment in an ethics complaint alleging violations of RCW 42.52.020 (conflicts of interest) and RCW 42.52.070 (special privileges), based on her work involving an EEC proviso, her employment relationship with EEC, a campaign surplus donation connected to AEJG and Jerry Stone, her involvement in an AEJG-EEC subcontract dispute, and related text messages with Anthony Powers. No evidence was taken; the session focused on legal argument over whether the alleged facts, if accepted as true, were sufficient to establish violations as a matter of law. Simmons’ counsel argued the complaint was legally insufficient because the alleged actions benefited her employer or others, not Simmons herself, and that existing board opinions allow legislators to support employers absent a direct personal benefit. He also argued the board was effectively trying to adopt a new bright-line rule prohibiting legislators from funding employers, which he said would be an improper retroactive change. Board staff, through Assistant Attorney General Julia Eisentrout, opposed summary judgment and argued the facts were enough to show Simmons had an indirect financial or other interest in EEC’s funding, that her job duties and legislative actions created conflicts, and that her actions around the donation, subcontract dispute, and text messages could be viewed as using her position to secure special privileges. A board member asked whether the allegations themselves were sufficient and whether the standard required assuming the facts as alleged; staff responded that the motion failed because the record contained sufficient facts to proceed, and that any factual disputes should be resolved at hearing. After rebuttal, the ALJ closed the oral argument and turned the matter over to the Legislative Ethics Board for deliberation. No ruling was issued during the hearing, and the board was to decide whether to grant the summary judgment motion or set the case for an evidentiary hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• So this just allows them to have access to take an AP test through an online provider that the public
• the sunset language for a now successful alternative certification program offered to qualified providers
• we're asking to do with Centville 710, if funds are available, which they are, is to fund additional providers
• certified teachers, just give them some additional training and additional supports, and hopefully provide

Bills: SB1734 , SB1630 , SB1894 , SB1975 , SB1432 , SB1437 , SB1812 , SB346 , SB1250 , SB710 , SB1489 , SB2045 , SB1614

Committee: House Common Education

Keywords: artificial intelligence, AI, schools, public school districts, education technology, edtech, student privacy, FERPA, data privacy, data security, emerging technologies, machine learning, generative AI, classroom technology, instructional technology, teacher oversight, human-in-the-loop, student data, parental consent, opt-out

Transcript Highlights:

• This is what we have: three provider taxes. This is the first provider tax that we have.
• The reason we're having these three provider taxes is to comply with federal law.
• SB 144 is the provider assessment. SB 144 is the provider assessment. I'd make it favorable, Mr.
• Can you explain why we have this provider sub and not on the other two?
• Can you explain why we have this provider sub and not on the other two?

Bills: SB143 , SB144 , SB145 , SB152 , SB153 , SB154 , SB162 , SB226 , SB146 , SB143 , SB144 , SB145 , SB152 , SB153 , SB154 , SB162 , SB226 , SB146

Committee: Senate Finance and Taxation General Fund

Keywords: SB143, solid waste, garbage collection, trash fees, refuse collection, municipal fees, county fees, fee exemption, veterans benefits, veteran household, disabled veteran, VA benefits, Social Security exemption, low-income households, poverty level, county commission, municipal governing body, Alabama solid waste law, certificate of exception, public health

Transcript Highlights:

• , so it would be the private permitting provider that would be liable in that situation.
• Yeah, Madam Chair, Senator Payne, with the amendment that provides that immunity. Thank you.
• I can get you that answer and provide it to every member of the committee. I'd love to hear it.
• I’ll be providing that as quickly as possible to you. That’s fine. Thank you.
• Fourth, we provide affordability through a reasonable scale.

Bills: SB1108 , SB1205 , SB1241 , SB1286 , SB1366 , SB1431 , SB1473 , SB1477 , SB1478 , SB1479 , SB1492 , SB1517 , SB1563 , SB1586 , SB1665 , SB1671

Committee: Senate Regulatory Affairs and Government Efficiency

Keywords: cash transactions, mandatory rounding, swedish rounding, public notice, Arizona Revised Statutes, motor vehicle booting, private property, fees, dispute process, regulations, SB1241, private permitting provider, private permit, private certificate of completion, building permit, building plan review, inspection, single-trade residential construction, residential construction, municipal permitting