Video & Transcript Research : 'eligibility process'

Page 29 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part III) Sep 2nd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's a narrow process for certain medications that have serious safety risks.
  • A bit of the process in the Senate and an even larger group in the House.
  • Yes, Jonathan Mitchell, a very sharp lawyer, is involved in this process all along.
  • Why would we trust this process if it took... if this much stuff came out of the bill?
  • Why is this process trustworthy?
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Some $17 million, the $17 million plus the next $30 million that we give them through this budget process
  • My question has to do with the children who are able to, or who would be eligible.
  • If I'm understanding this bill correctly, this is for any child eligible under the age of 18 right now
  • How can we trust that there's actually going to be money in those accounts when that child is eligible
  • Representative Kerbs, now is the final process of the bill with the debate.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • That was a process that began during Brit Henry's administration.
  • Representative, is there any way to get community members and churches involved with this process for
  • And I do believe this is a step to refine that process to help us with that information.
  • that is evaluated by the commission, because one thing that I do highly respect is the very thorough process
  • I mean they're already familiar with all of the Screeners, so it's not a process that should be long
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025 at 10:04 am

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 5134 remedies this by limiting eligibility to request a deposition before bringing action.
  • This bill gives them a standardized disclosure process that protects their integrity.
  • We are the first ones that initiate the paperwork to get to the court process.
  • We are the first ones that initiate the paperwork to get to the court process.
  • We are the first ones that initiate the paperwork to get to the court process.
Summary: The committee heard House Bill 4961, which would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages after a collision. The author said the bill is intended to create incentives to maintain insurance and to address what he described as an unfair system for insured drivers. Texans for Lawsuit Reform and Texas Eagle Forum testified in support, while the Texas Trial Lawyers Association opposed it, warning the bill could also affect pedestrians, passengers, children, and others who did not choose whether a vehicle was insured. The bill author clarified that passengers would be included in the bill’s coverage. No vote was taken and the bill was left pending. House Bill 5570 would extend a legislative attorney CLE exemption to attorneys appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate to boards or commissions. The author said the measure is meant to ease time burdens and encourage service, and a witness supported it as a modest incentive for public service. A committee member noted a discrepancy in the number of affected attorneys, and the author agreed to verify the correct figure. The bill was left pending. The committee also heard House Bill 2969, which would restrict the State Bar from adopting rules or penalties that unreasonably burden attorneys’ religious exercise or free speech based on sincerely held beliefs. The author and several witnesses from Texas Values, Alliance Defending Freedom, and Cecilia Wood argued the bill protects lawyers of faith from an ABA model rule they described as a speech code. No one testified against the bill, and it was left pending. House Bill 4260, which would prohibit county judges and county commissioners from practicing law in courts over which they have jurisdiction, drew opposition from the County Judges and Commissioners Association, which argued existing ethics rules already address conflicts and that the bill would burden rural officials. The author said the bill was prompted by concerns about judges using their office to pressure others. The bill was left pending. House Bill 5134 would limit Rule 202 pre-suit depositions to people who have suffered or reasonably expect actual damages and would allow attorney’s fees against abusive petitioners. The author said the bill is aimed at preventing harassment and fishing expeditions, especially in family-law disputes. Questions focused on how the standard would work and how it differs from current law; the author said the main change is fee-shifting and a clearer legislative directive. The bill was left pending. House Bill 3095, a committee substitute version of a similar uninsured-motorist bill, would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages and limit economic recovery, with several exceptions. Trial lawyers argued it was unconstitutional because it capped economic damages and could unfairly affect innocent drivers, pedestrians, and older people who no longer drive. The author acknowledged constitutional concerns and said the bill would need further work; the committee withdrew the substitute and left the bill pending. Finally, House Bill 4388 would require all judges, including county judges who perform administrative duties, to remain subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct. Supporters said some elected judges avoid accountability by relinquishing judicial functions, while opponents argued the bill is too rigid and unnecessary because existing remedies already exist. House Bill 3964 would limit public nuisance claims to their historical role and bar such claims against lawful conduct, conduct already covered by other remedies, and products. The author and supporters said the bill is meant to prevent courts from using public nuisance to make policy, while opponents argued it would eliminate useful remedies and could affect local actions against environmental or product-related harms. The author said the bill would not affect statutory nuisance claims, private nuisance claims, or other causes of action, and would be amended to clarify some provisions. The bill was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025 at 10:04 am

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Just want to clarify that in the bill, Section 81.0292 does allow for a process for them...”
  • It broadens the eligibility criteria for sitting for the exam and represents a significant...
  • This bill gives them a standardized disclosure process that protects their integrity.
  • I believe that that is in the process of having statewide implementation as we speak.
  • We are the first ones that initiate the paperwork to get to the court process.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on several bills affecting civil practice, judicial conduct, and attorney regulation. HB 4961 and the similar HB 3095 would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages after a collision, with HB 3095 also addressing certain exceptions and limiting economic damages in some cases. Supporters said the measures would encourage insurance coverage and fairness for insured drivers, while opponents argued they would unfairly punish injured people who were not responsible for the lack of insurance, including pedestrians, passengers, children, and others. HB 3095 drew constitutional concerns from witnesses, and the committee later withdrew the committee substitute and left the bill pending; HB 4961 was also left pending after questions about its scope, including passengers. HB 5570 would expand a continuing legal education exemption to attorneys appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate who serve on boards or commissions. The author and witness said the bill would free up time for public service while still requiring ethics training. A committee member raised a discrepancy in the number of attorneys covered, and the bill was left pending. HB 2969 would prohibit the State Bar from adopting rules or penalties that unreasonably burden attorneys’ religious exercise or free speech, especially in relation to sincerely held religious beliefs. Supporters framed it as a protection for lawyers of faith against an ABA-style speech code, while no one testified in opposition; the bill was left pending. HB 4260 would prohibit county judges and county commissioners from practicing law in courts over which they have jurisdiction. The author described it as an ethics measure to avoid conflicts of interest, but county officials and the County Judges and Commissioners Association opposed it, saying existing ethics rules already address conflicts and that the bill would impose hardships, especially in rural counties. The bill was left pending. HB 4388 would require all judges, including those who serve only in administrative roles, to remain subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct; supporters said some judges avoid discipline by relinquishing judicial functions, while opponents said the bill was unnecessary and could burden county judges who serve as administrators. It was also left pending. The committee also heard HB 5134, which would limit Rule 202 pre-suit depositions to people who have suffered or reasonably expect to suffer actual damages and allow attorney’s fees against abusive petitioners. The author said the bill would curb harassment and fishing expeditions, but members questioned how the standard would work in practice; the bill was left pending. Finally, HB 3964 would narrow common-law public nuisance claims by barring suits over lawful conduct, conduct already addressed by other remedies, and products, while preserving other causes of action. Supporters said the bill would prevent regulation through litigation and protect legislative authority; opponents said it would eliminate important remedies and that no Texas abuse had been shown. The author indicated he would revise the bill, and it was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's almost a knee-jerk process for the defense these days.
  • It allows this process to result in the renewal of the judgment.
  • This will allow this process to result in the renewal of those judgments.
  • What this process does is it gives this process an... ability for a receiver and a debtor to work together
  • They are served by a process server saying you have been served.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Either way, it's the same process. The bill goes to the governor, and we can protect some kids.
  • How's the process work? How much longer do they typically have to pay to get out?
  • Speaker, SJR53 is approving a major rule by OMMA under our new reigns Act process.
  • Members, this has been a two-year process to get this graduation bill completed.
  • No, I think what it'll do is create a very even taxation process where the assessors can spend time on
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Mar 3rd, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Oklahoma Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • There is no appeal process for the teacher once the local school board has decided.
  • I would encourage the school board to deny the request and move forward in the hiring process Or hopefully
  • in this case, if it's a bad actor, not hiring process.
  • Senate Bill 1533 is simple cleanup language to define eligibility requirements for the dignity and burial
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government (Part I) Apr 28th, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chairman and members, Senate Bill 845 relates to the eligibility of social workers for the Homes for
  • Members licensed social workers are not eligible for the Homes for Texas Heroes program, excuse me, which
  • provides down payment assistance as a grant or as a forgivable second lien loan to eligible professionals
  • And Senator Zafarini mentioned that it is eligible to professionals and is available statewide to those
  • to a wide variety of policy and possible gaps in the vetting process.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Rules Apr 23rd, 2026 at 08:30 am

Rules

Transcript Highlights:
  • What is the current process or what is allowable for school districts to bond for?
  • So we're not changing the bond process at all. We're just including some additional communications.
  • the bond process.
  • And that process currently is under a supermajority status. Isn't that true?
  • That this almost a half of this fund will be put into another decision-making process.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Revenue and Taxation Feb 23rd, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Revenue and Taxation

Transcript Highlights:
  • back from students who either change from the private to the public school or students who were not eligible
  • extent anybody is already accessing expenses through the homeschool tax credit, that would be the same process
  • generated particular rules, but in the fourth year of the program, I would anticipate that they have a process
  • So This is just an effort for people to get their unclaimed property back and make it an easier process
  • Under the eligibility provisions, I see the foster care and the, you know, trying to make sure we're
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/11/2026 - Senate Health and Human Services

Health and Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • So what would happen is that AHCCCS, this is a long process.
  • So once this bill is signed, AHCCCS would then start the process.
  • So what would happen is that access, this is a long process.
  • In general, yes, providers have due process.
  • How long is that process, do you think?
Summary: The committee first approved the February 4 minutes and then heard Senate Bill 1086, which would require AHCCCS contractors to reimburse non-contracting providers for certain laboratory services when a member was referred by a contracting provider, and would bar prior authorization for diagnostic services and retaliation tied to such referrals. AHCCCS testified neutral but warned the prior-authorization ban could increase utilization and create fiscal and federal compliance concerns. The committee adopted the Warner amendment limiting non-contracting reimbursement to no more than contracting-provider rates, then passed SB 1086 as amended on a 4-2 vote. The committee next took up Senate Bill 1611, an emergency measure to require AHCCCS to contract with an administrative services organization for program integrity and case management functions for the American Indian Health Plan, while keeping AHCCCS ultimately responsible. The chair’s amendment expanded the ASO’s duties to include provider support, quality improvement, and data analytics, removed AHCCCS claims payment authority, added more tribal observers, and exempted IHS and tribal facilities. Testimony strongly supported reforming the system after fraud and overcorrection harmed Native members and providers, but AHCCCS raised concerns about the fast timeline, possible duplication of fraud-fighting functions, and the need for 45 days of tribal consultation. The committee adopted the amendment and passed SB 1611 as amended on a 5-2 vote. Senate Bill 1630 would create a Medicaid-funded home and community-based services program for adults with serious mental illness, capped initially at 250 members under the Angius amendment, with semiannual reporting and a process for future expansion only if costs are reduced or neutral. Supporters said the bill would help the sickest SMI patients avoid repeated hospitalizations, jail, and homelessness, and could save the state general fund by shifting costs to federal Medicaid funding; AHCCCS was neutral and said it was finalizing the fiscal estimate. The committee adopted the amendment and passed SB 1630 unanimously. The committee also passed SB 1193, protecting emergency medical care technician personal information from disclosure; SB 1318, repealing an outdated state dense-breast notification requirement to align with FDA language; and SB 1345, restricting anonymous complaints against health care institutions, though AHCCCS warned that federal law may still require investigation of complaints from any source and that the bill could reduce reporting and invite litigation.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WAL Public Hearing - Thu Feb 5, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST

Water & Land

Transcript Highlights:
  • Yeah, we're in the process of executing a memorandum of agreement with DHHL for the 60C review process
  • :55.679> we<01:15:55.920> actually recruitment process that we actually recruitment process
  • The last thing that process started.
  • <01:31:31.040> So um is a very complicated process. So um is a very complicated process.
  • We have um we have yet to processes.
Summary: The committee first heard HB 1527 relating to gambling. The chair outlined hearing rules, including a two-minute limit and a warning that bills not heard would die. Testimony was overwhelmingly in support from a prosecutor, Honolulu Police Department, and Stop Predatory Gambling, all arguing that casinos and sports betting increase crime, sex trafficking, harassment of athletes, and broader social harm. No opposition testimony was presented, and the committee moved on without questions or action taken on the bill. The committee then heard HB 1823 relating to coastal zone management and HB 2490 relating to coastal resilience. For HB 1823, DLNR, the Office of Planning, and Maui County testified, with Maui County supporting the measure and its proposed amendments. For HB 2490, DLNR expressed concern about exempting a proposed Mokuji Bay pilot project from permits and regulation before a long-term plan is finalized, while the County of Maui, the Mokuji Soto Zen Mission, and the Office of Planning supported the bill as a coastal resilience pilot. The mission described severe erosion, sea-level rise impacts, and years of unsuccessful efforts to stabilize the shoreline; its consultant said the study is leaning toward nature-based and hybrid solutions. In questioning, members and DLNR discussed whether the bill should say the project “shall” or “may” be exempt, and the chair indicated the language would be adjusted to preserve DLNR discretion and to change the lead agency reference to OPSD. No vote was taken in the transcript. Finally, the committee took up HB 2223 relating to historic preservation reviews. SHPD said it stood on its written comments, while OPSD and DHHL supported the bill. DHHL argued the measure would streamline reviews, improve transparency, and help address long wait times for its projects, saying it could alleviate burden on SHPD and better serve beneficiaries. Representative Shimizu questioned whether the bill would create redundancy and expand government rather than strengthen SHPD, noting a separate staffing bill already exists. SHPD responded that DHHL is uniquely subject to 6E review and that the bill would not waive federal or state historic review requirements; the discussion also touched on possible federal-style grant support and the existing memorandum of agreement between SHPD and DHHL. The transcript ends during questioning, with no final committee action shown.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Implementing a standardized screening process is imperative.
  • before the arbitration process actually happens.
  • user of the arbitration process in Texas.
  • And so, prior to 2019, when we just had the mediation process, 95% was solved through the informal process
  • It is, does somebody have an unfair advantage in this process?
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Insurance Apr 30th, 2025

Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's because they're not affordable due to the way the PBMs are processing them.
  • Without insurance, it would have cost her $22 when we process the claim through...
  • That's a $119 difference just because of the way the claim was processed.
  • We thank TDI for the rulemaking process. We've submitted comments.
  • During the insertion process, this medication can be a godsend for survivors.