Video & Transcript Research : 'mandatory fees'

Page 22 of 478
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Because single-user restrooms are not mandatory, this bill would ban gender-diverse folks from these
  • The increase in fees is anti-small business.
  • Don't provide free daycare, free school lunches, or mandatory paid parental leave.
  • It's going to SecureShare, which is an electronic sharing of information, and it is mandatory.
  • It is mandatory that the prospective agency review and TCOL... has oversight and visibility into whether
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session Mar 10th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight Mar 5th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, 3430 aims to make the collection process more efficient for the court costs and fines and fees
  • Court costs, fines, and fees collection is actually down a few percent.
  • judgment on fines and costs, what is the percentage that that individual or group would collect as their fee
  • So, if the victim is this mandatory on the victim that they give their information to whoever's monitoring
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Public Safety Feb 17th, 2026 at 08:30 am

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • Raises the DUI assessment fee from $160 to $200.
  • So currently, with the fee structure the way it is, do these fees ever go unpaid, and if they do, what
  • No, those fees would be paid prior to taking the assessment.
  • to $55 fee.
  • Would they pay the fee?
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Tax, Business and Transportation Jan 29th, 2026 at 02:36 pm

Senate Tax, Business & Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • So what this bill did in 2020 is create a $100 fee on large pet food manufacturers.
  • This whole question about whether this is a tax or a fee is something that's been in federal court.
  • So that's how it works; it's just a hundred dollar fee. Again, in fairness, Mr.
  • How do the fee structures work to ensure that it's really fair? Just introduce yourself.
  • What is the typical fee for a neuter?
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/27/2026 - House Commerce

Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • We pay a very substantial franchise fee to the National Park Service.
  • So that can be considered an added fee. That can be considered an upcharge.
  • If we're talking about the fees, we can... That's understandable.
  • If we're talking about the fees, we can talk about fees, but if we're talking about redoing the entire
  • If we're looking just at fees, I looked at my APS bill and I had fees of $24 every month.
Summary: The committee heard and acted on several bills. HB 2192, a child influencer bill, would require compensation for minors featured in monetized content to be placed in trust, allow takedown requests for content as minors become adults, and create remedies for sexualized depictions of minors. The sponsor and Google described it as a modern Coogan-trust style protection; some members raised concerns about the age-13 and age-18 provisions, but the bill received a do pass recommendation on a 9-0 vote with two present. HB 2501, an agency bill, conformed Arizona’s definition of appraisal management company to federal law and passed unanimously. HB 2693, which revises bona fide association rules to allow statewide chambers or business leagues to operate self-funded multiple employer welfare arrangements, drew support from the Chamber and small-business advocates but opposition from a coalition citing possible federal preemption; it passed as amended on an 8-1 vote. HB 2010, the digital goods disclosure bill, required clearer notice that online “purchases” may be licenses, prorated refunds if access changes, and removed some penalty language in amendment; supporters said it would reduce consumer confusion, while retailers argued federal law already covers the issue. It passed as amended 11-0. The committee also approved HB 2279, which limits liability for Grand Canyon river outfitters for inherent risks of rafting while preserving claims for gross negligence or intentional acts, despite constitutional objections from opponents; it passed 7-4. HB 2690, which tightens unemployment insurance eligibility by adding work-search and fraud cross-check requirements, was opposed by advocates who said it would add red tape and burden eligible claimants, but it passed 7-4. HB 2310, clarifying that qualified marketplace contractor agreements may be terminated unilaterally by the contractor, passed 10-0. HB 2555, requiring retail businesses to accept cash for purchases of $100 or less and banning cash fees, passed as amended 9-1 after debate over consumer access and business flexibility. Finally, HB 2199, which expands required education for RV park managers and shifts some enforcement duties to the Department of Housing, passed as amended 7-0 with three present. The committee then considered HB 2459, which would let mobile home park landlords recover actual utility charges and add an administrative fee for submetering; supporters said it would address overcharges and improve transparency, while opponents warned it could increase costs and confusion. The transcript cuts off before the final action on HB 2459.
TX
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Human Services Apr 1st, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, the committee substitute provides clarifying language that excludes monthly fee-based discount
  • One solution to high prescription costs are monthly fee-based membership discount programs.
  • It requires consumers to pay both annual subscriptions and monthly fees, which creates a member-only
  • these issues by ensuring Medicaid reimbursement reimbursement rates reflect the usual and customary fees
  • So House Bill 2402... would clarify that monthly fee-based subscription programs are exempt from the
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • But they may charge fees or cover...
  • But they may charge fees or entry fees and stuff like that to cover the cost.
  • For instance, they shall not require a fee or other payment from statewide professional...
  • Wouldn't it make more sense then to just tell the districts they have to have the same access fees for
  • I think it's probably a good idea that schools don't get in the business of charging fees to vendors
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Committee Meeting - 2026-03-26

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • and the attorney fees. and the attorney fees.
  • The second section that's applicable here is the legal fees.
  • The legal fees section speaks to charging attorney fees for homeowners.
  • Um which was a major uh takeaway fees.
  • <00:25:47.120> and And if we can't collect our fees and And if we can't collect our fees and
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Aug 15th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Because single-user restrooms are not mandatory, this bill would ban gender-diverse folks from these
  • Because single-user restrooms are not mandatory, this bill would ban gender-diverse folks from these
  • The increase in fees is anti-small business, for example.
  • Y'all defund education, don't provide free daycare, free school lunches, mandatory...
  • Y'all defund education, don't provide free daycare, free school lunches, mandatory paid parental leave
Bills: SB6, SB7, SB8, SB11, SB12, SB13, SB15, SB17
Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 8, the Texas Women's Privacy Act, and heard extensive public testimony both for and against the measure. Supporters, including representatives of Texas Values and Texas Values Action, argued the bill was needed to protect women’s privacy and safety in restrooms, locker rooms, showers, prisons, domestic violence shelters, and other government-controlled spaces, and said it would provide clear, sex-based rules. Opponents, including many transgender Texans, civil rights advocates, clergy, business and public safety voices, and others, argued the bill would invite harassment, gender policing, lawsuits, and invasive inspections, while harming trans, intersex, and gender-nonconforming people as well as cisgender women who do not fit stereotypes. Several witnesses said the bill would conflict with federal law or prison standards, worsen safety in shelters and prisons, and hurt Texas’s reputation and economy. The chair repeatedly noted the compressed special-session schedule and said flood relief remained the session’s top priority. Public testimony on SB 8 was eventually closed, and the bill was left pending. The committee then moved to Senate Bill 6, dealing with consumable hemp product restrictions. Testimony on SB 6 focused on whether the bill went too far in restricting hemp-derived THC products. Opponents argued hemp and THC have medical and economic value, that the bill would criminalize conduct and burden courts, and that regulation—not prohibition—was the better approach. Some witnesses supported tighter rules such as testing, child-resistant packaging, and limits on marketing to children, but still opposed the bill’s broad THC ban, higher fees, and age restrictions. Several speakers emphasized benefits for veterans, chronic pain patients, and small businesses, and warned that prohibition would push consumers toward the illicit market. The committee heard the testimony and then continued with additional witnesses, with no final vote or disposition reported in the excerpt.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Transportation Finance and Policy Committee 4/13/26

Transportation Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • There is no fund that this excess fees are going to be going to.
  • There is no fund that this excess fees are going to be going to.
  • There is no fund that this excess fees are going to be going to.
  • There is no fund that this excess fees are going to be going to.
  • There is no fund that this excess fees are going to be going to.
Summary: The committee approved the April 8, 2026 minutes and then heard House File 3373, which was laid over. The bill sought trunk highway bond funding for preliminary and final design work at the 70th Street interchange in St. Paul Park. Representative Hansen, Mayor Keith Frankie, and Washington County Commissioner Karla Bigham described the interchange as undersized and increasingly unsafe because of refinery truck traffic, aggregate hauling, nearby growth, and changing traffic patterns. Members asked about prior study, cost, and greenhouse gas requirements, and the bill author said the request was about $500,000. Chair Cosgrove noted the bill would be laid over and suggested the issue could involve future statutory exemptions. The committee then took up House File 4449, also laid over, after adopting the A4 author’s amendment. Representative Jones presented the bill as a transit planning and accountability measure for the Twin Cities metro. It would set numeric transit goals, require better coordination between road projects and future transit projects, and give the Met Council more tools to support transit-oriented development, including property acquisition and development around transit corridors. Jones argued the bill would help avoid rebuilding roads twice and improve transit ridership, frequency, speed, and reliability. Representative Olson offered an amendment to exempt highway projects primarily addressing documented safety issues, arguing that safety projects should not be burdened by added transit requirements or costs. Jones said she supported the safety concern but opposed the amendment as written because the bill was aimed at major construction projects. After a roll call, the amendment failed on an 8-8 tie. The bill itself remained laid over for further work, with the chair noting there was still time to refine the proposal.