Transcript Highlights:

• In another area of the structure is where you can go and get your alcoholic beverage, your beer.
• <00:16:07.319> area<00:16:07.680> of<00:16:07.880> the<00:16:08.279> structure
• then um in another area of the structure then um in another area of the structure um<00:16:09.519
• <00:49:19.400> of before proceeding with this kind of before proceeding with this kind of structure
• thank you Mr chair Senator structure thank you Mr chair Senator Duckworth<00:49:23.440> uh<00

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• HEO achieves that goal of having return to investment-grade credit, then my question is, is it structurally
• um my question is is is it structurally um my question is is is it structurally possible<00:24:35.159
• So that underlying compensation framework and that underlying structure that's part of the grid service
• <01:25:22.280> that's<01:25:22.520> part that un underlying structure that's part that
• un underlying structure that's part of<01:25:22.800> the<01:25:22.920> grid<01:25:23.159

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee on Energy and Environmental Protection heard testimony on Senate Bill 897, which would create a Wildlife Liability Trust Fund within DCCA for administrative purposes. The chair opened by noting the hearing had to end by noon because of floor session, and that written testimony would be considered if not all witnesses could speak. Testimony included support from DCCA, the Attorney General’s office, the Public Utilities Commission, Charter Communications, Ulupono Initiative, AES Hawaii, Hawaiian Electric, Clearway Energy Group, Kauai Island Utility Cooperative, Hawaiian Telcom, and IBW Local 1260, with opposition or concerns from the Hawaii Association for Justice and some others. Hawaiian Electric strongly supported the bill and asked for amendments, saying the fund would help address wildfire liability, protect customers and the economy, and support restoration of investment-grade credit; it also proposed a larger shareholder contribution and said the bill was part of a broader effort to raise settlement funds and improve grid safety and resiliency. Committee members focused heavily on whether the bill would actually lower costs for ratepayers and improve credit ratings. DCCA said there was a nexus between limiting liability, creating a sufficiently large wildfire fund, and transparent mitigation requirements, but acknowledged there was no guarantee of a credit-rating improvement or precise estimate of rate impacts. Members questioned Hawaiian Electric about the assumptions in its cost comparisons, the 30-year securitization structure, and whether funding could be shifted later to shareholders after credit was restored. Hawaiian Electric responded that the bill assumes the fund is paid through securitization, that removing that presumption could undermine the credit-rating benefit, and that its models suggest credit-spread savings could offset the customer charge over time; it also said it would follow up with additional analysis. The company and Ulupono both described the measure as a difficult but potentially necessary way to socialize wildfire risk and avoid a larger crisis later. The Hawaii Association for Justice opposed the bill’s liability caps and raised concerns about consumer rights, oversight discretion, statute-of-limitations changes, and evidence rules. Hawaiian Telcom suggested amendments to clarify compliance with FCC pole-attachment agreements. No vote or final action was taken during the portion of the hearing provided, and members indicated they wanted more analysis before being comfortable with the bill’s long-term ratepayer impacts.

Transcript Highlights:

• We want to repair, replace, and replace structures and equipment.
• We want to repair, replace, and replace structures and equipment.
• We want to repair, replace, and replace structures and equipment.
• We want to repair, replace, and replace structures and equipment.
• We want to repair, replace, and replace structures and equipment.

Bills: HF220, HF230, HF240, HF241, HF295, HF429, HF490, HF505, HF574, HF576, HF581, HF865, HF918, HF1085, HF1449, HF1452, HF1454, HF602

Keywords: HF220, Minnesota transportation, highway user tax distribution fund, trunk highway fund, Minnesota Department of Transportation, MnDOT, transportation finance, dedicated funds, funding restrictions, arts in transportation, cultural strategies, transportation project planning, project design, project construction, placemaking, public art, infrastructure spending, state statutes 161.045, HF230, Wyoming

Transcript Highlights:

• <02:01:37.159> into<02:01:37.599> the and puts some more structure into the and puts
• some more structure into the insolvency<02:01:38.520> and<02:01:38.760> financial<02:01
• , that would give an avenue for the municipality, the political subdivision, to work within that structure
• You'll notice that the bill is structured so that the funding would come from the existing highway fund
• so that the funding would structured so that the funding would come<02:40:04.720> from<02:40:

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• There are other regulatory structures in place to minimize the exposure risk from keys and automotive
• key fobs, and Minnesota's law is not consistent with those other regulatory structures, as mentioned
• There are other regulatory structures in place to minimize the exposure risk from keys and automotive
• key fobs, and Minnesota's law is not consistent with those other regulatory structures, as mentioned
• Representative Inan, yeah, that is how the bill is currently structured: if you are a consumer, you cannot

Bills: HF737, HF247, HF325, HF1330

Keywords: lead, cadmium, consumer products, safety regulation, retail restrictions, motor sports, nonoxygenated gasoline, fuel regulations, storage requirements, racing events, HF325, flavored nitrous oxide, nitrous oxide, whippets, laughing gas, retail sales, consumer protection, misdemeanor, commerce, Minnesota Statutes chapter 325F

Transcript Highlights:

• I really appreciate the structure of this, Mr. Chair.
• Postsecondary schools apply, and I just sort of appreciate that structure.
• But the structure of it, I appreciate.
• that structure I guess um<00:20:30.880> and<00:20:30.960> it's<00:20:31.080> not
• But the structure of it, I appreciate. So thank you. Thank you.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• “I think that we could try to fashion this program within the drug court because we have the structure
• It would be a women’s court structure, but there are problems because of the way of our structure.
• ><01:05:13.520> the the drug court because we have the the drug court because we have the structure
• it would be a women's uh court structure it would be a women's uh court but<01:05:18.160> there
• if I could just way of our structure if I could just elaborate<01:05:22.720> um<01:05:23.079>

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The Judiciary Committee heard several bills on January 30. SB 286 and SB 287 both concerned supplemental funding for the Honolulu Department of the Prosecuting Attorney: SB 286 for the career criminal prosecution unit and SB 287 for the victim witness assistance program. Testimony from the department explained that these bills are filed each year because the Attorney General’s core budget allocation may not be sufficient, though the department said the core had recently been increased and the supplemental request might no longer be necessary. For SB 287, the department also warned of a possible federal Victims of Crime Act funding freeze that could cut about $1.88 million and severely harm victim services. Both bills drew support from county and community witnesses, and members asked about prior-year funding and why the requests were limited to fiscal 2025-26; no votes were taken in the excerpt. SB 289, from the State Ethics Commission, would create a more uniform administrative fine process under the ethics code and lobbyist law. The commission said the measure would not change substantive enforcement but would let it issue a notice and order of fine first, with the respondent able to request a hearing within 20 days, which would speed up cases that are not factually disputed. Members questioned whether the bill would deny due process or function like an automatic parking ticket, and the commission responded that respondents could still challenge the fine and that the process would apply to violations with fines under $1,000. The committee also heard SB 304, which would add 11 positions for the First Circuit Adult Client Services Branch; Judiciary testimony said probation caseloads are high, with an average of 116 cases per officer, and the added staff would help meet national supervision standards and better serve higher-risk clients. Members asked whether the positions were already in the budget and about current staffing ratios; the witness said the positions were not already funded and that the Judiciary supported the bill with amendments. The committee then heard SB 311, a proposed constitutional amendment to exclude spending money to influence elections from protected free speech. Testimony was strongly divided: supporters argued that Citizens United has distorted elections and empowered special interests, while opponents warned the language was too broad and could affect nonprofit advocacy and grassroots groups. Finally, SB 313 would impose a 1% wealth asset tax on individuals with $20 million or more in assets. The Department of Taxation said it had concerns about the bill’s ambiguity and administration and noted it would require annual valuation and likely additional resources; opponents, including family business representatives and the Tax Foundation of Hawaii, argued the tax would be difficult and costly to administer, would require sensitive business disclosures, and could force family businesses to pay from company cash. Supporters said wealthy residents should pay a fair share. The committee heard testimony and questions on these bills, but the excerpt does not show final committee votes or actions.

Transcript Highlights:

• Tax expenditures are structured differently from expenditures of finance or appropriation committees.
• <00:10:07.560> differently<00:10:07.880> from are structured differently from are structured
• Williams, Chair Davids, and Representative Harder, our bracket structure and other provisions in our
• Likewise, our bracket structure—the married joint brackets—are not double what they are for single filers
• You know, the biggest marriage penalty in our tax code was from the bracket structure, so that credit

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: The House Tax Committee met for an organizational and orientation session. Members and staff introduced themselves, with several lawmakers noting their districts, business backgrounds, and interest in tax policy. Chair Greg Davids then opened the committee’s first substantive item: a presentation from House Research and House Fiscal staff on how the committee works and on basic tax concepts. House Research staff Sean Williams and Chris Clayman explained their roles in drafting bills and amendments, writing bill summaries, answering legal and policy questions, and modeling tax proposals. They also described the committee’s key documents, including partisan and nonpartisan bill summaries, revenue estimates, fiscal notes, and supporting materials. Their presentation covered core tax concepts such as tax bases, rates, deductions, exemptions, credits, tax revenues, and tax expenditures, emphasizing that tax expenditures function like spending through the tax code and are reviewed by a legislative commission. The staff then reviewed Minnesota’s major taxes, focusing on the individual income tax and business taxation. They explained that Minnesota’s individual income tax starts with federal adjusted gross income, then applies state additions, deductions, subtractions, and credits, and that the state’s income tax brackets and rates are set separately from federal law. They also outlined the difference between corporate franchise taxes for C corporations and individual income tax treatment for pass-through entities, and discussed how the federal SALT cap led Minnesota and other states to adopt pass-through entity taxes so businesses could preserve federal deductibility of state taxes. Members asked questions about a duplicate “marriage penalty” entry on a slide, the purpose of Minnesota’s marriage penalty credit, comparisons with other states, and the timing and effect of the pass-through entity tax; staff answered that the duplicate was a mistake, the credit offsets bracket-related marriage penalties, and the pass-through entity tax was adopted in response to the federal SALT cap.

Transcript Highlights:

• That is the nature of how those credits are structured.
• And generally speaking, homestead and ag property are beneficiaries of the structure of the income tax
• And generally speaking, homestead and ag property are beneficiaries of the structure of the income tax
• the tax space as we tax structure the tax space as we understand<00:59:57.000> it<00:59:57.200
• The Minnesota historic structure rehabilitation credit was amended to match the federal credit payout

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So, just for clarity then, does the statute itself outline the penalty and fee structure, or just give
• Could you just describe what all is involved with the fee structure and maybe what that goes to?
• The fee structure remained largely the same. It's the same similar fees.
• Perfection, I don't think we ever get in this body or in this structure, but we have a governor that
• There's always, you know, whenever something is new, and has gone a year without a whole lot of structure

Keywords: 1204, all

Transcript Highlights:

• to look at the system's problems, and they've made recommendations on an entire redesign of the structure
• They are two of the most influential structural factors in early childhood because they directly shape
• whoever introduces it then, we've thought the detail through, because this is a really complicated structure
• Approval consistency has improved, which indicates, again, a stabilization within the payment structure
• to a broader developmental disability stakeholder group, and expanding the focus beyond payment structure

Keywords: 908, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It brings these arrangements into a structure that the department can effectively monitor without overcomplicating
• With regard to governance, oversight, and market discipline, the formation and operation are structured
• <00:07:35.320> are uh the formation and operation are uh the formation and operation are structured
• <00:07:37.520> These structured and deliberate. These structured and deliberate.
• That gives the department early warning indicators and a structured set of interventions if financial

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I think what we're trying to figure out is looking at the budget structurally, looking at the baseline
• Chair, because structurally the fund is not sound.
• also have funding that comes directly from our public universities to support the overall staffing structure
• But I think doing that, even if it's not technically repealing the language that allows for the structure
• think putting doing that even if it's not technically repealing the language that allows for the structure

Summary: The joint appropriations committee met on April 28 to review the FY 2027 budget package, including the general appropriations feed bills (HB 4138 and SB 1831) and related budget reconciliation measures. Staff described the budget as including about $17.96 billion in general fund appropriations, a one-time transfer of state monies to increase revenues, a 5% lump-sum reduction to most agencies’ discretionary general fund budgets, and several one-time restorations or continuations for items such as school facilities, child care, child safety, corrections stipends, and public safety operating costs. Members spent much of the meeting debating how the across-the-board cuts would be implemented, which programs might be affected, and how fund sweeps from prior-year appropriations and special funds would work, including questions about universities, public safety, rural hospitals, transportation grants, the Corporation Commission, and health insurance costs for state employees and troopers. A major point of discussion was the impact on universities and higher education. Arizona Board of Regents representatives said the proposed reductions and fund sweeps would affect already obligated dollars, research, staffing, and student aid programs, and could force difficult decisions about programs such as the Promise Program, Teachers Academy, and other pass-through funds. Committee members also raised concerns about whether the cuts could lead to tuition increases or reductions in services, while majority members emphasized that agencies and the executive branch should decide how to absorb the reductions. Another major topic was health care and the state employee health plan: staff explained that the budget includes a $228 million general fund infusion to stabilize the plan, while a separate reconciliation bill would raise employee premiums over three years. Members also discussed whether the budget’s changes to AHCCCS/Access and hospital eligibility rules could increase costs for hospitals and reduce coverage. Public testimony largely opposed the budget. Speakers from Opportunity Arizona, the Arizona Board of Regents, and local governments argued that the proposal would shift costs onto working families, reduce support for education, housing, SNAP, health care, and rural infrastructure, and protect tax benefits for data centers and higher-income taxpayers. A mayor from Globe asked for state help after severe flooding damaged roads, water lines, and homes, while a motorcycle safety advocate asked the committee to review a DPS motorcycle safety fund appropriation. Committee members and staff repeatedly clarified that some items discussed were one-time appropriations not continued into FY 2027, that some fund sweeps were from unspent or unencumbered balances, and that the committee planned to take a mass roll-call vote on the budget bills at the end of the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• So there is a final market structure bill that's in committee.
• The substantial gap is based solely on ownership structure, not on differences in quality of care, services
• way this bill is written and the way it would work is that the firemen, the city, however their structure
• The structure is different in different ways percentage-wise, so it'd be about a 75/25 split.
• right the structure different ways percentage wise so it'd be about a 75 25 25 split so that way to

Bills: HB165, HB175, HB198, HB272, HB457, HB488, HB566, HB603, HB763, HB902, HB909, HB971, HB981, HB1066, HB1125, HB1154, HB1231

Keywords: HB165, lottery proceeds, Lottery Proceeds Fund, Veterans Service Grant Fund, constitutional amendment, veterans, military veterans, veterans' benefits, veterans services, family support, state lottery, education funding, Minimum Foundation Program, problem gambling, compulsive gaming, state treasurer, ballot proposition, constitutional referendum, lottery revenue, Louisiana resident veterans

Transcript Highlights:

• So you have the servers literally exposed to open air and steel structures that are making a lot of noise
• This industry is not monolithic by any means, a variety of different companies, structures and operations
• That's what a lot of other states have done in this area is they'll create new rate structures that are
• Bringing more structure and discipline to large load interconnection is a necessary step given the scale
• That structure was something that was done post Winter Storm Uri in that legislative session in terms

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• connection between clinical experience and public policy while providing a stable and accountable structure
• while providing a stable<00:09:05.600> and<00:09:05.839> accountable<00:09:06.320> structure
• <00:09:06.640> to stable and accountable structure to stable and accountable structure to
• And what would be sort of the beginning structural things that you would put in place with such an office
• And what would be sort of the beginning structural things that you would put in place with such an office

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: The committee heard House File 3668, authored by Chair Beerman, which would create a state Office of Gun Violence Prevention. Beerman and several supporters framed gun violence as a public health crisis, arguing the office would improve research, coordination, data collection, and evidence-based prevention. Supporters cited firearm deaths among children and adults, the trauma experienced by survivors and families, and Minnesota’s need for a centralized structure to guide policy and prevention efforts. Testifying in support were representatives of the Minnesota Medical Association, Protect Minnesota, a parent affected by the Annunciation school shooting, family physicians, an OB-GYN, and a pediatric emergency physician. They described gun violence as a daily clinical and community reality, pointed to rising firearm deaths and injuries, and said Minnesota should apply the same public health approach used for motor vehicle safety, tobacco, and other crises. Several witnesses emphasized the impact on children, suicide prevention, maternal health, and the need for Minnesota-specific research and coordinated responses. Opposition came from the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus, which argued the bill would create a taxpayer-funded bureaucracy that could be used to advance gun control policy and treat lawful firearm ownership as a public health problem. The group said the state should focus instead on enforcement, prosecution, and victim services. Vice Chair Nidau offered an A2 amendment to move the office from the Department of Health to the Department of Public Safety, citing data-sharing and accountability, but withdrew it after discussion with Chair Beerman. The hearing ended with additional member discussion, including concerns about existing violence-prevention spending and whether school safety investments would be a better use of funds; no final vote was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, I'm CEO of Cowry, which is an advisory practice that works on compliant domestic structuring options
• /c> practice that works on compliant practice that works on compliant domestic<00:02:49.920> structuring
• <00:02:50.319> options<00:02:50.640> for<00:02:50.959> US domestic structuring
• options for US domestic structuring options for US companies<00:02:52.560> and<00:02:52.800><
• entity like an LLC owned in whole or in part by a trust is a long-established and common ownership structure

Bills: HB0086

Keywords: county officials, election code, misconduct, removal, government accountability, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Less than 15 or 20, and have done approximately 700 cases a year each year, started a structural heart
• critical access hospital, which is the only hospital in the entire nation that we are able to do structural
• This bill adds structure and transparency to the licensing complaint process while preserving ADHS's
• have one that had differential rates that was either greater or less, depending on how they were structured
• The structure of the care services is dependent on the facility.

Bills: HB2176, HB2333, HB2435, HB2447, HB2617, HB2683, HB2686, HB2725, HB2726, HB2906, HB2953, HB2958

Keywords: health care, licensure, complaints, investigation, safety, patient care, regulatory compliance, prosthetics, orthotics, health insurance, Medicare, medical necessity, disability rights, coverage, reimbursement, internationally trained physicians, medical board, clinical training, provisional license, healthcare workforce

Transcript Highlights:

• Make sure that I understand the structure that you put in place here under this bill: if a magistrate
• Structuring a sentence to hopefully make it a little clearer.
• But we have a due process structure that would apply to those populations, and your amendment would simply
• Justice system in these serious cases, I think we should absolutely be utilizing the other structure
• It strengthens our structural integrity and reliability of our grid. I do have an amendment.

Bills: SB664, SB40, SB9, SJR1, SJR5, SB27, SB207, SB2938, SB1901, SB1227, SB1248, SB912, SB1321, SB2143, SB2145, SB1497, SB1239, SB2180, SB1388, SB1762, SB1662, SB1951, SB1537, SB493, SB378, SB1020, SB1018, SB992, SB958, SB920, SB1350, SCR25, SB687, SB1332, SB2185, SB552, SB664, SB40, SB9, SJR1, SJR5, SB458, SB482, SB927, SB984, SB651, SB1620, SB2124, SB2448, SB841, SB843, SB402, SB2662, SB2053, SB2332, SB2112, SB745, SB1247, SB1789, SB27, SB207, SB2938, SB1901, SB1227, SB1248, SB912, SB1321, SB2143, SB2145, SB1497, SB1239, SB2180, SB1388, SB1762, SB1662, SB1951, SB1537, SB493, SB378, SB1020, SB1018, SB992, SB958, SB920, SB1350, HCR76, HCR127, HCR9, HCR40, HCR118, HR559, HCR59, HCR135, HCR141, HCR46, HCR109, HCR10, SCR25, HB2525, HB142, HB140, HB29, HB451, HB3809, HB3307, HB 1130, HJR1, HB9, SB17, SB260, SB509, SB1506, SB1637, SB2308

Keywords: Texas courts, judicial officers, associate judge, magistrate, master, referee, hearing officer, court administration, Government Code Chapter 54, Government Code Chapter 54A, bail training, Article 17.024, Article 15.17, local administrative judge, State Commission on Judicial Conduct, Office of Court Administration, county courts, criminal justice, criminal jurisprudence, judicial qualifications

Transcript Highlights:

• HB 3556 by Vasut relates to certain structures located near National Wildlife Refuges. Mr. Basu.
• HB 3556 by Vasut, relating to certain structures located near a National Wildlife Refuge. Mr.
• HB3469 by Compost, relating to the exemption from certain activities from regulation as a structural
• Members, yes, this just changes the interest structure on unpaid child support to 3%.
• Capriglione provides a practical structured solution for our state agencies to offer telework arrangements

Bills: HB200, HB541, HB1803, HB30, HB175, HB249, HB721, HB851, HB897, HB 1128, HB1904, HB1916, HB5560, HB3071, HB5627, HB5435, HB3913, HB2921, HB2695, HB2688, HB3045, HB3483, HB3673, HB4213, HB4226, HB783, HB4373, HB4735, HB5155, HB5057, HB4984, HB4944, HB4813, HB5339, HB5196, HB5033, HB4853, HB3486, HB4211, HB74, HB4670, HB4730, HB4743, HB4603, HB4463, HB3892, HB4139, HB4752, HB4520, HB4517, HB4486, HB4437, HB4426, HB4396, HB4263, HB3487, HB3418, HB2284, HB2266, HB2229, HB4912, HB2189, HB4506, HB5269, HB5224, HB5195, HB3317, HB4166, HB3947, HB3358, HB3370, HB4438, HB3745, HB3602, HB3697, HB2001, HB1968, HB3371, HB3909, HCR7, SB1744, SB1364, SB1316, HB2026, HB3302, HB3368, HB1639, HB5652, HB4655, HB5654, HB5658, HB5656, HB4894, HB4996, HB5088, HB5650, HB4464, HB3751, HB5665, HB5661, HB 1237, HB2802, HB5437, HB2703, HB5666, HB5667, HCR113, HCR86, SB2196, SB463, SB856, SB1245, SB1169, SB509, SB985, SB305, SB552, HB1535, HB 123, HB1804, HB426, HB1773, HB1871, HB2035, HB2492, HB1411, HB4753, HB4666, HB4529, HB1499, HB1610, HB2028, HB1506, HB886, HB3546, HB796, HB223, HB3556, HB2448, HB4638, HB 111, HB180, HB 1027, HB 1178, HB610, HB 1277, HB1615, HB1620, HB5342, HB4885, HB4751, HB4530, HB4488, HB2149, HB2071, HB2282, HB2248, HB2243, HB2522, HB2310, HB2513, HB2300, HB1902, HB1813, HB3719, HB4284, HB3743, HB3778, HB5153, HB5147, HB4877, HB4850, HB3261, HB3005, HB3033, HB2849, HB2967, HB3531, HB1768, HB333, HB2914, HB2613, HB3717, HB3704, HB2697, HB3801, HB3099, HB3488, HB3477, HB3466, HB3396, HB3469, HB2594, HB2776, HB2564, HB2298, HB5331, HB5646, HB5247, HB5323, HB4384, HB3896, HB4014, HB3627, HB3594, HB2524, HB510, HB561, HB5111, HB5446, HB 1181, HB3963, HB2785, HB1661, HB2460, HB200, HB541, HB1803, HB30, HB175, HB249, HB721, HB851, HB897, HB 1128, HB1904, HB1916, HB5560, HB3071, HB5627, HB5435, HB3913, HB2921, HB2695, HB2688, HB3045, HB3483, HB3673, HB4213, HB4226, HB783, HB4373, HB4735, HB5155, HB5057, HB4984, HB4944, HB4813, HB5339, HB5196, HB5033, HB4853, HB3486, HB4211, HB74, HB4670, HB4730, HB4743, HB4603, HB4463, HB3892, HB4139, HB4752, HB4520, HB4517, HB4486, HB4437, HB4426, HB4396, HB4263, HB3487, HB3418, HB2284, HB2266, HB2229, HB4912, HB2189, HB4506, HB5269, HB5224, HB5195, HB3317, HB4166, HB3947, HB3358, HB3370, HB4438, HB3745, HB3602, HB3697, HB2001, HB1968, HB3371, HB3909, HCR98, HCR92, HCR126, HCR7

Keywords: juvenile offenders, parole eligibility, youth justice, criminal justice reform, inmate rehabilitation, direct patient care, healthcare, physicians, medical services, insurance regulation, dentist, dental hygienist, interstate practice, licensure, compact privilege, public health, military members, disaster relief, tax rates, local government