Video & Transcript Research : 'judicial warrant'

Page 16 of 283
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 4/16/26

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • Our solution is a $45 million judicial Our solution is a $45 million judicial center<00:24:34.800
  • And we just a jail, judicial center.
  • <00:39:44.120> District, including the 8th Judicial District, including the 8th Judicial District
  • <00:42:33.680> center, new judicial center, new judicial center, and<00:42:35.480> and<
  • the proposal is for a new judicial the proposal is for a new judicial center. center. center.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/25/2026 - Senate Health and Human Services

Health and Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • The bill allows a patient or a person acting on the patient's behalf to request judicial review of the
  • Finally, the bill requires the court to review a request within five judicial days, allows the court
  • The statute is intended to give the patients an additional right to request judicial review, what they
  • call judicial review.
  • The patient's an additional right to request judicial review, what they call judicial review.
NV

Nevada 2025 Regular Session

Assembly Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections May 29th, 2025 at 01:00 pm

Legislative Operations and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • common law principles of parliamentary law: common law is defined as the body of law developed by judicial
  • decisions, and it is the judicial decisions that affect meetings or assemblies.
  • But there's a great body that's not codified, but it's law that must be followed through judicial decisions
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • I will pass the gavel to Chairman Creighton, and we'll move forward on the omnibus judicial bill.
  • Senate Bill 2078 is what we often refer to as the judicial court's omnibus bill. uh, because of population
  • Just making sure that the judicial infrastructure is in place.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Warrant needed for federal immigration officers 3/10/26

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • First, it requires a judicial warrant to enter private property, a domestic violence shelter, school
  • It also codifies the findings of Esparza, a case that found that a judicial warrant is required in order
  • It also codifies the findings of Esparza, a case that found that a judicial warrant is required in order
  • Um, that case found that in Minnesota a judicial warrant is required in order for ICE detainers to be
  • Fourth Amendment, were understood to mean judicial warrants.
Keywords: 1183, house
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 9th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • compensation as well as judicial transparency, accountability, judicial compensation as well as judicial
  • As an organization, 100% fully behind increase in judicial pay.
  • I can be consistent as a judicial officer.
  • The last thing is someone didn't mention warrants.
  • I do misdemeanor warrants all the time.
Bills: HB40
Summary: The Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence met to hear House Bill 1761, a broad judicial package focused on increasing judicial compensation and adding accountability and efficiency measures. The chair explained that HB 1707 and HB 2100 were withdrawn from the agenda, and that HB 1761 would be taken up first because many judges and stakeholders were present. The committee substitute for HB 1761 proposed a 30% increase in base judicial pay to $182,000, changes to judicial retirement linkage, stronger judicial conduct provisions, and efficiency measures such as targeted reporting for judges not meeting benchmarks, appellate in-person meeting encouragement, and time limits on certain motions. The chair and several supporters said judicial pay had reached “emergency status,” citing Texas’s low national ranking and difficulty recruiting and retaining qualified judges. Witnesses in support included presiding and district judges, the State Bar’s judicial section, business and trial lawyer groups, and prosecutors. They emphasized that many judges work long hours off the bench, handle warrants at night and on weekends, manage heavy dockets, and face recruitment problems in both urban and rural counties. Supporters also said higher pay would help attract experienced lawyers, retain judges, and improve court efficiency. Several witnesses and members discussed judicial accountability, including public reporting of court performance and the role of the Texas Supreme Court and presiding judges in setting benchmarks. Some members raised concerns that raw statistics can be misleading because judges also do substantial off-the-bench work and often help cover other courts’ dockets. There was also testimony and discussion about the bill’s conduct and discipline provisions. A representative of the Texas Civil Rights Project opposed parts of the bill that would tie pay raises to changes affecting judicial independence, warning about subjective bail-related discipline standards and possible chilling effects. The executive director of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct cautioned against civil penalties for complainants, saying it could discourage good-faith complaints and create litigation risks. Other witnesses supported accountability reforms but urged caution about unintended consequences, especially for family and emergency cases and for judges handling warrants and other time-sensitive matters. After testimony, the committee withdrew the committee substitute and left HB 1761 pending, then recessed the committee.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session Aug 15th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • from the 89th Legislature regular session relating to the... ...operation and administration of the judicial
  • relating to the operation and administration of practices and procedures related to proceedings in the judicial
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

House of Representatives May 31st, 2026

Louisiana House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • judicial districts.
  • Speaking to that, and Orleans did have 83 warrants, St. Tammany had 30 warrants.
  • So just to clarify, Orleans Parish is the only judicial district that is losing warrants for the ADAs
  • No other judicial district in this state is losing warrants.
  • Do you think removing warrants, or reducing warrants rather, or ADAs, makes a place generally more safe
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Legislative Commission on Data Practices 1/22/26

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • : reverse location warrants, which are otherwise known as geofence warrants, and reverse keyword warrants
  • That is the reverse warrant.
  • That is the reverse warrant. permission. That is the reverse warrant.
  • . warrants. warrants.
  • That violates judicial discretion. That violates judicial discretion.
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The committee continued its hearing on enforcement and compliance with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, first taking additional public testimony from Melissa Zimmerman and Matt Senot of the East Side Corridor residents in Owatonna. They described submitting roughly two dozen data requests across several government entities related to a proposed highway project, saying some agencies responded but others did not, and that even after they substantially prevailed in a data practices complaint and the court imposed a maximum civil penalty, they still did not receive meaningful access to the records. Zimmerman said the lack of access harmed their ability to comment on the project’s environmental review, and both witnesses argued that the law needs stronger enforcement, realistic timelines, better communication, and more accessible remedies for requesters who cannot afford repeated litigation. They also raised practical barriers such as inaccessible file formats, missing software on a county-provided laptop, and the need for electronic delivery options. The committee then heard from Eric Johnson of Anoka County, who testified about Chapter 13 issues involving third-party polygraph data used in probation monitoring. He argued that when the state relies on third-party-generated summaries, the responsible authority’s obligations for access, retention, and correction are unclear, and there is no effective remedy when the third party does not respond. Johnson said the county directed him to seek raw data from the third party, which had not responded, and he warned that short retention periods can make data subject rights unenforceable if the records are destroyed before a request is resolved. Members asked about statutory citations and retention schedules, and several commented that the issue may warrant review of data-retention rules. During member discussion, legislators broadly agreed that the Data Practices Act’s enforcement mechanisms are not working well enough and that many requesters cannot afford to pursue administrative or court remedies. Co-Chair Scott suggested staff compile the testimony into a report to identify possible legislative fixes, while Senator Lucero said there may be some “low-hanging fruit” that could be addressed quickly in the short session. The chair also floated the idea of involving the Office of Collaboration and Dispute Resolution in a mediation role to improve communication and reduce gridlock, though members noted that any process would still need to produce results consistent with the law. The committee then moved on to its next agenda item, a discussion of the BCA Fusion Center and its annual reporting requirements.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Limiting access to child care center facilities discussed 3/4/26

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:02:47.120> officer warrant signed by a judicial officer warrant signed by a judicial officer
  • difference between judicial warrants and admin<00:04:20.880> warrants.
  • judicial warrant from doing their job. judicial warrant from doing their job.
  • Thank you. law that a valid judicial warrant is law that a valid judicial warrant is required<00:35:04.640
  • <00:53:12.720> warrant without even showing a judicial warrant without even showing a judicial
Keywords: 1183, house
Summary: The committee took up House File 3415, a bill aimed at limiting immigration enforcement activity at child care centers. House Research explained the DE1 amendment, which defined key terms and barred child care employees from consenting to civil immigration enforcement entry without a judicial warrant, while requiring officials to identify themselves and state their purpose; the amendment also clarified that it would not block officials administering child care programs. After brief debate, members adopted the DE1 amendment. The bill author, Representative Sensor Mura, said the measure was intended to address fear and disruption in child care settings caused by recent immigration enforcement activity and to keep those spaces safe for children and families. Supporters, including a pastor, a Children’s Defense Fund representative, parents, child care workers, and an ACLU policy counsel, testified that immigration enforcement near daycares has caused fear, staff absences, lockdowns, and emotional harm to children. They argued the bill would not stop lawful enforcement but would require warrants and basic identification before entry, protecting children from witnessing raids or arrests and giving providers clear rules. Several witnesses described specific incidents involving ICE activity near Spanish immersion daycares in Minneapolis and St. Paul, including staff members being detained, parents organizing safety watches, and children showing distress. Testimony emphasized that many affected children are U.S. citizens in immigrant families and that visible enforcement can create toxic stress and separation anxiety. No final action on the bill was taken in the portion of the meeting provided beyond adoption of the DE1 amendment and continuation of testimony.
AL

Alabama 2026 Regular Session

Alabama House Ways and Means General Fund Committee Feb 11th, 2026

Ways and Means General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:05:57.840> or agency that issues an arrest warrant or agency that issues an arrest warrant
  • a warrant or indictment within 30 days. a warrant or indictment within 30 days.
  • been released where there was warrants been released where there was warrants outstanding<00:06:
  • release that warrant release that warrant >> and<00:07:33.919> certainly<00:07:34.240
  • >> Talking about the funding for the judicial side.
Bills: HB304, HB285, HB312, HB311, SB60
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Higher Education Finance and Policy Committee 3/12/26

Higher Education Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • agents are able to do currently, to only a judicial warrant.
  • Is that to only a judicial warrant.
  • > halls, a judicial warrant are residence halls, a judicial warrant are residence halls, offices
  • DHS the importance of judicial enforcement of those warrants.
  • They can't use an judicial warrant. They can't use an administrative<01:47:56.159> warrant.
Bills: HF3432, HF3411