SNAP/FOOD STAMPS: Modifies the use of SNAP benefits to include food delivery costs
Summary
House Concurrent Resolution 98 urges and requests the Louisiana Department of Health to study whether Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits should be allowed to cover grocery delivery fees and related service costs. The resolution is framed as a response to barriers faced by SNAP recipients who cannot easily shop in person, especially elderly residents, people with disabilities, and individuals with limited transportation or who live in rural or underserved areas.
The study would examine the number and characteristics of Louisiana SNAP recipients who might benefit, the typical cost of delivery services, the potential effects on food access, food security, and health outcomes, and the administrative and technological steps that would be needed to implement such a policy. It also asks LDH to consider whether expanded delivery access could produce savings or efficiencies, including possible reductions in healthcare costs tied to poor nutrition, and to report findings and recommendations to legislative health committees by February 1, 2027.
Impact
HCR 98 does not itself change Louisiana law or SNAP eligibility rules; instead, it directs LDH to study and report on a potential policy change that would require coordination with federal law and private delivery platforms. Its practical impact is to place the issue of SNAP-covered delivery fees before state policymakers and to gather data on fiscal, administrative, and public health implications for future legislative or advocacy action. The resolution specifically focuses on affected groups such as elderly individuals, people with mobility limitations, and low-income households that rely on SNAP.
Sentiment
The overall sentiment reflected in the bill text and vote history appears supportive of exploring expanded food access options, but not unanimous. The resolution passed final consideration in the House by a relatively close 43-37 vote, suggesting meaningful support alongside substantial skepticism. The bill’s findings emphasize food insecurity, transportation barriers, and access to healthy food, indicating a generally sympathetic policy rationale for vulnerable populations.
Contention
The main point of contention is whether SNAP benefits should be expanded to cover non-food delivery costs, which some may view as beyond the traditional scope of food assistance or potentially costly to administer. Concerns likely center on fiscal impact, federal compliance, implementation complexity, and whether the policy would create new obligations for the state or retailers. Supporters emphasize improved access for elderly, disabled, and rural recipients, while opponents appear to have questioned the necessity or practicality of using public benefits for delivery fees rather than food purchases alone.
Memorializes Congress and the United States Department of Agriculture to reinstate and fund the Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program
Requests the state Department of Education to study the feasibility of and potential costs associated with prohibiting certain foods and beverages in public schools
Transfers certain family and support programs from the Department of Children and Family Services to the Louisiana Workforce Commission and renames Louisiana Workforce Commission to Louisiana Works (EN INCREASE GF EX See Note)
Authorizes and directs the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, through its office of transformation, to evaluate district alignments, maintenance facilities, and laboratory operations, including the establishment of a district construction engineer role, while ensuring continued project delivery during the transition