Video & Transcript Research : 'Chapter 552'

Page 16 of 312
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • efficient use of resources provision that ensures that DIR coordinates the activities under this chapter
  • This is a follow-up to last session's Senate Bill. 895, which replaced Chapter 151 of the Texas Financial
  • Code with Chapter 152 as part of the motion.
  • If we exempt Chapter 1304 businesses and other unlicensed sales of service businesses this session, more
  • We know that a lot of the businesses currently covered by Chapter 601 are licensees, and as Stephanie
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence May 6th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chapter 54 of the government code outlines that 25 different counties have their own qualifications and
  • To ensure proper oversight and accountability, Senate Bill 664 also clarifies Chapter 54 magistrates'
  • the Texas Judicial Council, Senate Bill 664 adds similar language regarding license requirements to Chapter
  • However, there is language in the Government Code in Chapter 56.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 29th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chapter 103 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code, titled "Compensation to Persons Wrongfully Imprisoned
  • the trafficking section, and the public... ...decency section, and then there's an organized crime chapter—I
  • think that's Chapter 43.
  • Family under 2511, like most of the stuff in Chapter 6, is not a violent, assaultive offense.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • addition of Section 1683.007, which requires that any institution offering health benefits under this chapter
  • addition of Section 1683.007, which requires that any institution offering health benefits under this chapter
  • addition of Section 1683.007, which requires that any institution offering health benefits under this chapter
  • Versus chapter, if a person is convicted of a place on Deferred Adjudication Community Supervision for
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • mistreatment or constitutes a threat of violence to student or a minor that is not justified under Chapter
  • 1683 dot zero zero seven which requires that any institution offering health benefits under this chapter
  • Yes, you indicated that the eligibility is students eligible. versus chapter if Person is convicted of
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Mar 26th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 3004 would introduce new provisions under Chapter 752. With a health and safety code.
  • Chapter 752 of the Health and Safety Code was established more than 30 years ago, 36 years ago.
  • I appreciate that they are trying to fix some ambiguities in the bill, but Chapter 752 of the Health
  • As we sit here today, if someone violates Chapter Chapter 752 states that if someone gets within six
  • Notwithstanding what Chapter 752 has to say about notice.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session May 8th, 2025 at 10:05 am

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • For five decades, TAMACC has added new chapters to the rich history of Latino entrepreneurship in Texas
  • The chair lays out Senate Bill 552 as a matter of postponed business.
  • The amendment says, notwithstanding subsection A, nothing in this chapter relieves a...
  • The chair lays out Senate Bill 552 as a matter of postponed business on second reading.
  • I move to postpone further consideration of Senate Bill 552 until 9:52 a.m. Friday.
Summary: The House convened with a quorum, received the invocation and pledges, and heard several announcements and recognitions before moving into floor action. Members honored the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley chess team for winning a share of the 2025 President’s Cup, recognized educator Jessica Lopez, and paid memorial tribute to Jennifer Maddenly, along with recognitions for Jeanette Valdez Duran’s food pantry work, TAMACC’s 50th anniversary, and Bernardine Steptoe’s retirement from WFAA. The House also granted permission for committees to meet while the House was in session, set a local consent calendar, and suspended posting rules for a Public Health Committee hearing on SB 2721. The chamber then considered a long series of Senate and House bills, with many passing on record votes. Measures addressed local law enforcement authority (SB 906), veterans highway designation (SB 1229), foster care medical billing (SB 855), massage therapy trafficking safeguards (SB 703), tax ballot language (SB 1025), occupational licensing for people with convictions (SB 1080), lien deadlines (SB 929), liquor sales complaints (SB 1355), higher education application fee waivers (SB 2231), utility data access (SB 1877), pediatric preceptorships (SB 1998), and several House bills on bond forfeiture notice, health workforce coordination, indigent civil commitment representation, consumer transaction cancellations, bird dispersal rules, theft venue for digital property, military grant applications, AI cancer-detection grants, cybersecurity contract language, in-state tuition for military-related programs, utility capital recovery, energy waste advisory oversight, gas utility rate recovery, psychedelic therapy study, teacher retirement funding transparency, pension changes, tax payment plans, and voter registration security. Some measures drew notable debate or amendments, including HB 5247, where a ratepayer-credit amendment failed, and HB 2298, HB 4014, HB 510, HB 561, HB 1128, HB 1904, HB 30, HB 200, HB 3045, and HB 5111, which all passed after recorded votes with varying margins. A major point of contention was SB 2420, the app store age-verification bill, which prompted extended debate over whether the bill should also require app developers to verify users’ ages. Representative Bryant offered an amendment to preserve developer verification obligations, arguing the bill would otherwise shift responsibility away from app makers; the author opposed it, saying the bill’s approach was more workable and raised concerns about First Amendment issues. Multiple points of order were raised and withdrawn during the debate, and the amendment discussion remained unresolved in the excerpt. The House also postponed further consideration of SB 17, SB 552, and SB 2420 at different points, and recessed for lunch after completing a large block of third-reading votes.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session May 5th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • The chair lays out Senate Bill 552 as a matter of postponed business.
  • SB 552 by Huffman, ruling to changing the eligibility for certain persons. receive community supervision
  • Members I move to postpone further consideration of Senate Bill 552 until 8 59 a.m. Tuesday, May 6.
  • Actually, but we do have chapter 42. Okay, so my.
  • so they would have had to have that as well, and then they would also have to be in violation of Chapter
Bills: HJR34, HB 113, HB184, HB198, HB247, HB367, HB449, HB1778, HB514, HB576, HB632, HB1395, HB2225, HB2582, HB2494, HB766, HB2715, HB2712, HB3069, HB3505, HB 1269, HB4224, HB3609, HB5032, HB2240, HB5180, HB3348, HB4668, HB4909, HB4665, HB4895, HB3395, HB3157, HB4762, HB4395, HB4325, HB4952, HB4386, HB4273, HB2760, HB2697, HB2820, HB1828, HB1768, HB1579, HB1773, HB1871, HB2035, HB2448, HB2492, HB1411, HB4753, HB4666, HB4529, HB1499, HB1610, HB2028, HB1506, HB886, HB3546, HB796, HB223, HB1475, HB3556, HB4638, HCR126, HB38, HB 104, SB1008, SB1106, SB1172, SB2629, SB2964, SB616, HB2214, SB552, HB3181, HB3628, HB589, HB3529, HB3354, HB333, HB2914, HB4130, HB4131, HB24, HB 1160, HB3962, HB4115, HB2295, HB5398, HB1407, HB3800, HB2613, HJR138, HB42, HJR34, HB 129, HB677, HB426, HB668, HB1699, HB2017, HB2128, HB2038, HB3783, HB3717, HB2316, HB3686, HB2563, HB3883, HB4021, HB2788, HB2663, HB3305, HB3173, HB3474, HB 1105, HB3531, HB3490, HB3597, HB 1295, HB3512, HB3010, HB3112, HB4215, HB3223, HB3464, HB3120, HB4214, HB4511, HB3704, HB4081, HB4783, HB4063, HB2783, HB4937, HB5085, HB2510, HB3426, HB4361, HB 1169, HB2516, HB2347, HB4034, HB4700, HB3560, HB5150, HB3860, HB3146, HB3924, HB 113, HB184, HB198, HB247, HB367, HB449, HB1778, HB514, HB576, HB632, HB1395, HB2225, HB2582, HB2494, HB766, HB2715, HB2712, HB3069, HB3505, HB 1269, HB4224, HB3609, HB5032, HB2240, HB5180, HB3348, HB4668, HB4909, HB4665, HB4895, HB3395, HB3157, HB4762, HB4395, HB4325, HB4952, HB4386, HB4273, HB2760, HB2697, HB2820, HB1828, HB1768, HB1579, HB1773, HB1871, HB2035, HB2448, HB2492, HB1411, HB4753, HB4666, HB4529, HB1499, HB1610, HB2028, HB1506, HB886, HB3546, HB796, HB223, HB1475, HB3556, HB4638, HCR98, HCR92, HCR126
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session Jun 1st, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

TX

Texas 89th 1st C.S.

State Affairs (Part I) Aug 4th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • The committee developed this model policy by starting with Chapter 143 civil service.
  • 552, the other state law governing FOIA requests.
  • So either you fall under 143, state law, or 552, the other state law governing FOIA requests.
  • Again, the adoption of Chapter 143 civil service is extremely cumbersome.
  • We're moving in the wrong direction. 552 covers up way too much.
Bills: SB7, SB14
Summary: The Committee on State Affairs heard testimony on Senate Bill 7, the Texas Women’s Privacy Act, with the author and committee substitute explaining that the bill would require public facilities to designate multi-use private spaces by biological sex, restrict access to women’s restrooms, locker rooms, showers, sleeping quarters, shelters, and correctional facilities, and create civil penalties and enforcement mechanisms. Members asked about how the bill would apply to family violence shelters, children in mixed-family settings, venue layout, and venue for lawsuits; the author said the bill was similar to prior legislation but with stronger penalties and the 15th Court of Appeals as the exclusive intermediate appellate court for challenges, while clarifying that trial venue should generally be local except for state agencies. The committee also heard that the bill would be amended to better address local venue concerns and shelter-related issues. Invited testimony was largely in support of the bill from witnesses who described personal experiences in women’s sports, prisons, shelters, and public facilities, arguing that single-sex spaces are necessary for privacy and safety. Supporters included parents, former incarcerated women, a Republican county chair, a legal advocate, and a prison educator, who cited incidents involving transgender-identifying individuals in locker rooms, shelters, prisons, and restrooms, and said the bill would restore sex-based boundaries and protect vulnerable women and girls. One witness from Texas Values said the bill was needed despite the recently enacted Women’s Bill of Rights, and another ADF witness said the measure would protect privacy in schools and shelters. Opponents testified that the bill would harm transgender and intersex Texans, create harassment and “gender policing,” and expose cisgender women and children to invasive enforcement. Several witnesses argued there is no evidence that transgender women pose a restroom safety threat, while others said the bill would worsen mental health, employment, and school conditions for trans people and could conflict with prison standards and federal law. Family violence advocates urged changes to protect shelter operations and clarify that children can stay with parents, while other witnesses said the bill would create barriers for victims seeking help. The hearing featured extensive public testimony on both sides, but no final vote or committee action was taken in the portion provided.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session Mar 31st, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • her husband, Cy Simonson, who's the Texas Council President, and Rich Crossley, who is now my local chapter
  • H.R. 552 by Lopez Cameron, Deputy Ruben Garcia. H.R. 553 by Martinez. Ruben Reina, Sr.
Keywords: 1184, house, all
FL
Transcript Highlights:
  • FINALLY WE WILL CONSIDER A NUMBER OF AMENDMENTS CHAPTER 120 PREPARED BY STAFF AND SENATOR GRALL THAT
  • WE THOUGHT IT WAS IMPORTANT AND PROPER THE COMMITTEE WOULD REVIEW THE LANGUAGE THAT WILL IMPROVE CHAPTER
  • WE ARE DISCUSSING TODAY EITHER DO OR DO NOT COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 120 AND FINALLY THIS OBJECTION YOU ARE
  • SAYING THIS RULE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 120, YOU ARE NOT IN ANY WAY COMMENTING ON WHAT IS INSIDE
  • YOU'RE ONLY COMMENTING ON IF IT COMPLIES WITH CHAPTER 120 AND OUR STAFF DIRECTOR AND TEAM SURROUNDING
Keywords: 999, senate, all