Video & Transcript Research : 'Bell County'

Page 16 of 500
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, HB5655 proposes the creation of a water control and improvement district in Fort Bend County
  • As many of you may know, especially Senator Cook, being close to Fort Bend County, low-lying areas, we
  • The residents of Rusk County for years have celebrated the production of Ribbon Cane syrup.
  • With 30,000 annual visitors, it would designate Rusk County as the Syrup Capital of Texas.
  • validating certain acts and proceedings of the Hunter Ranch Improvement District No. 1. of Denton County
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • For years, some counties have begun imposing a cash bond requirement as a condition of approval for the
  • and precincts within a county.
  • pipelines, while still ensuring counties are able to regulate the process.
  • , but counties are not able to compel a cash bond, but may compel a performance bond.
  • We haven't seen reason to start laying big piles of cash in every county we go through. Thank you.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Tourism Committee Apr 16th, 2025

Tourism

Transcript Highlights:
  • It restricts paramutual wagering to one county.
  • The county in question is Loun County, and it aligns with sections 104, 105, and 65 of the Alabama Constitution
  • , making it a valid local bill for Loun County.
  • So, we have an amendment here because Loun County has a lot of...
  • Loun County has a lot of environmental justice issues.
Bills: SB268, SB262, HB237, SB90
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Children and Families Finance and Policy Committee 3/11/25

Children and Families Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • I know we've had a really comprehensive discussion about this and the many needs that our county workers
  • um<00:02:49.560> that<00:02:49.720> our<00:02:50.599> uh<00:02:50.920> County
  • <00:02:51.239> workers many needs um that our uh County workers many needs um that our uh
  • County workers and<00:02:52.760> um<00:02:52.879> the<00:02:53.000> department<00
  • RFO process, and then could you share any relevant information in terms of how social workers or county
Bills: HF1169, HF1916
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Tourism Committee Apr 2nd, 2025

Tourism

Transcript Highlights:
  • Is that also in Green County? Yes, the new palace.
  • Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe every other county, at least every other county, has the ability
  • And it would also prevent any further counties from having that.
  • and one in Shelby County.
  • 12 in Jefferson County. One from our group in Shelby... County.
Bills: SB90, SB255, SB268
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • This is an important bill for our counties.
  • Counties of over a million. What counties would those be? Well, let's start at the top.
  • Harris County. Dallas County. My county. Bexar County. Bexar. Let's see, I know I'm missing one.
  • Oh, Tarrant County is there.
  • as opposed to like a random sampling of all the counties?
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Revenue and Taxation Feb 23rd, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Revenue and Taxation

Transcript Highlights:
  • Some counties do it. Most counties do not. Thank you for the question.
  • , almost 30% go to Tulsa County.
  • Meanwhile, Garvin County has 0.07% of the credits, Beckham County has 2.9%. Kiowa County has 0.2%.
  • It could be a county.
  • If it's a county, so it's outside the city, then the county commissioners would be involved.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 17th, 2025 at 09:04 am

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • area of Montgomery County.
  • So like in my county, Fort Bend County, which you mentioned, we had an issue.
  • So like in my county, Fort Bend County, which you mentioned, we had an issue several years back called
  • -Mexico border in Nueces County.
  • -Mexico border in Nueces County. This bill, however, is specifically bracketed to Cameron County.
Summary: The committee heard testimony and took action on several land use, housing, municipal utility district, and cemetery-related bills. House Bill 447, dealing with transportation impact analysis requirements tied to MUD bond issuance, drew opposition from a witness who argued it would duplicate work, strain agency resources, and delay development; after the sponsor’s closing remarks, the committee substitute was withdrawn and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 1202, on third-party review of home backup power installations, was substituted and reported favorably to the full House by a unanimous roll call. House Bill 2494, on disannexation for failure to provide municipal services, and House Bill 1835, removing barriers to HUD-code manufactured homes, were also substituted and reported favorably; HB 1835 passed on a 5-1 vote. Senate Bill 15, limiting lot size and density requirements in certain large municipalities, was substituted and reported favorably unanimously. The committee also heard House Bill 897, which would authorize the sale or long-term lease of two state-owned Austin properties used by the Texas State Library and Archives Commission and HHSC. The sponsor said the properties are in poor condition and that proceeds would benefit the state; after questions, the committee substitute was withdrawn and the bill was left pending. Several template MUD bills were then laid out, including HB 5652, HB 5654, HB 5661, and HB 5656, each creating or authorizing municipal utility districts in Montgomery or Fort Bend counties for water, wastewater, drainage, road, and recreational improvements. These bills drew limited testimony in support and were left pending without objection. A major portion of the meeting focused on House Bill 2673, which would repeal last session’s change allowing new cemeteries within certain distances of municipalities and restore the prior rule limiting cemetery placement near growing urban areas. The sponsor and supporters argued the 2023 change created unintended consequences, removed valuable taxable land from future use, and complicated city planning; opponents, including a funeral service industry representative, argued the current law gives communities local control and helps address cemetery land shortages. After extensive testimony, the bill was left pending. The committee also heard HB 4753, a bill allowing a property owner to use a municipal record showing a certificate of occupancy was issued when the original document is lost; it was left pending. Finally, HB 3680, a Cameron County-specific bill modifying subdivision/model rule procedures to reduce replatting burdens while preserving colonia protections, and HB 4812, clarifying that condominiums follow Chapter 82 of the Property Code rather than full subdivision platting, both received supportive testimony and were left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 17th, 2025 at 09:04 am

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • area of Montgomery County.
  • It's to create MUD 263 in Montgomery County.
  • So you mentioned stuff in Fort Bend County.
  • So like in my county, Fort Bend County, which you mentioned, we had an issue several years back called
  • -Mexico border in Nueces County. This bill, however, is specifically bracketed to Cameron County.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on a series of land use, housing, and local government bills. House Bill 447, relating to TIA requirements for certain MUD bond issuances, drew opposition from a witness who argued it would duplicate work already done, strain agency resources, and delay development; after the author’s closing, the committee substitute was withdrawn and the bill was left pending. The committee then voted out Senate Bill 1202 (third-party review of home backup power installations), House Bill 2494 (disannexation for failure to provide services), House Bill 1835 (removing barriers to HUD co-manufactured homes), and Senate Bill 15 (lot size and density limits in certain municipalities), with House Bill 1835 receiving one no vote and the others passing unanimously. House Bill 897, authorizing sale or lease of two state-owned Austin properties, was laid out and left pending after brief questions and no public testimony. The committee also heard and left pending several MUD creation bills for Montgomery and Fort Bend counties, including House Bills 5652, 5654, 5661, and 5656, each presented as template district bills with local support and no opposition recorded at the table. A major portion of the meeting focused on House Bill 2673, which would restore prior restrictions on new cemeteries near growing urban areas by repealing changes made last session. Representative Lujan and supporters argued the current law created unintended consequences, including loss of developable land, tax-exempt property in urban cores, and conflicts with infrastructure planning; they said cities already have authority to establish their own cemeteries if needed. Opponents, including a funeral services industry representative, argued the 2023 change was intended to let communities decide and that the bill would take local decision-making backward. After extensive testimony from both sides, the bill was left pending. The committee also heard House Bill 3680, which would create a Cameron County-specific process allowing local discretion under the model subdivision rules. Supporters said the bill would preserve colonia protections while reducing costly platting and replatting burdens on families trying to sell or pass down land; county officials and realtors testified in favor. The bill was left pending after closing. House Bill 4812, a clarification to the Texas Uniform Condominium Act to prevent counties from imposing subdivision platting requirements on condominiums, received support from builders and a condominium attorney who said current county practices create duplicative hurdles and higher costs; it too was left pending. Finally, House Bill 5148, which would allow certain single-stair apartment buildings up to six stories, generated the most detailed policy debate. Supporters, including housing advocates and architects, said the bill would lower costs, improve unit design, and expand affordable, family-friendly housing while maintaining safety through sprinklers and other safeguards. Fire officials from Corpus Christi opposed the bill, warning that a single stairwell could hinder firefighting and occupant evacuation, especially if sprinklers fail or smoke spreads. The author said the bill was aimed at new construction only and was part of a broader effort to reduce outdated housing regulations; the committee substitute was withdrawn and the bill was left pending at adjournment.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 17th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • area of Montgomery County.
  • It's to create MUD 263 in Montgomery County.
  • So you mentioned stuff in Fort Bend County.
  • So, like in my county, Fort Bend County, which you mentioned, we had an issue several years back called
  • -Mexico border in Nueces County. This bill, however, is specifically bracketed to Cameron County.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 17th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • Recognized Bell to explain the bill.
  • The way Texas is growing from Harrison, Montgomery County over to Bexar County up I-34.
  • County.
  • County.
  • If it's just in the county, no. Okay. And again, some counties—I can't speak for the counties.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 3/23/26

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • With me today is the right guy from Wright County, our county administrator, Greg Kryser.
  • With me today is the right guy from Wright County, our county administrator, Greg Kryser.
  • Counties can choose to act. Counties that don't are under no obligation to adopt it.
  • that inconsistency by giving counties that inconsistency by giving counties the<00:31:23.760>
  • counties to adopt regulation ordinances. counties to adopt regulation ordinances.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Housing Finance and Policy Committee 2/18/26

Housing Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Louis County.
  • Louis County. And if you could from St. Louis County.
  • Louis County.
  • <00:15:26.959> Our the county can't do this alone. Our the county can't do this alone.
  • You know, counties will multiplies.
Bills: HF3403, HF3410, HF3424