County authorized to approve up to 24 chickens on any lot by ordinance.
Summary
HF4295 amends Minnesota county zoning law governing feedlot ordinances to expressly allow a county, by local ordinance, to approve up to 24 chickens on any lot. The bill adds this authority as an exception to existing setback requirements for animal feedlots under state rules, meaning counties could permit small backyard or urban-style chicken keeping even where feedlot setback rules might otherwise limit it.
The bill also retains and restates several existing procedural requirements for county feedlot ordinances. Counties proposing to adopt or amend a feedlot ordinance must notify the Pollution Control Agency and the commissioner of agriculture early in the process, may seek agency review and recommendations before final approval, and may be required to prepare an economic-effects report if requested by the county board. The bill also preserves a reciprocal setback rule requiring new residences to observe the same setback distances from existing feedlots as feedlots must observe from residences, unless the residence is replacing an existing one.
Impact
The bill would amend Minnesota Statutes, section 394.25, subdivision 3c, by adding explicit county authority to allow up to 24 chickens on any lot through local ordinance, notwithstanding state feedlot setback rules. In practice, this gives counties flexibility to legalize small-scale chicken ownership in residential or mixed-use areas without needing to treat those chickens as prohibited by feedlot zoning standards. It affects county governments, property owners, and residents interested in keeping backyard chickens, while leaving the broader feedlot ordinance framework and agency review process in place.
Sentiment
No committee transcript or vote record was provided, so there is no direct evidence of debate, amendments, or recorded support/opposition. Based on the bill caption and text, the measure appears to be a targeted local-control bill with a practical, permissive purpose rather than a major regulatory overhaul. The overall sentiment cannot be determined from the available history, but the bill’s structure suggests an effort to accommodate small-scale chicken keeping while preserving existing county zoning procedures.
Contention
The main point of potential contention is the balance between local flexibility and existing animal-agriculture or nuisance controls. Supporters would likely favor the bill as a way to let counties authorize backyard chickens and respond to local demand, while opponents could raise concerns about odor, noise, sanitation, neighborhood impacts, or the erosion of uniform feedlot standards. Another possible issue is whether allowing up to 24 chickens on any lot could create conflicts with existing setback and zoning expectations, though the bill limits the change to county ordinances and does not mandate approval statewide.
Requires State Planning Commission to adopt model ordinance for siting certain warehouses and permits conforming updates to municipal master plans and zoning ordinances and establishes fund in DCA; appropriates $5 million.