Video & Transcript Research : 'math screening'

Page 168 of 361
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

Senate Health and Human Services (04/23/2025)

Health and Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • Second, remote pre-screening for treatment.
  • Second, remote pre-screening patients. Second, remote pre-screening for<01:04:16.480> treatment.
  • <01:04:27.920> for<01:04:28.319> experimental remote pre-screening for experimental
  • We should do pre-screening appointments.
  • opportunities can happen pre-screening opportunities can happen in<01:05:23.960> person.
Keywords: 1191, senate, all
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Judiciary Committee Apr 21st, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Screening is an effective, well-tested solution.
  • than 20% of California providers recently contracted by California universities did not attest to screening
  • That's why AB 1864's gene synthesis screening requirements are so important.
  • AB 1864 codifies federal screening guidelines, developed with extensive input from industry and academia
  • a senior executive at California-based Twist Bioscience, urged Congress last December to mandate screening
Keywords: 988, house, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/17/26

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • Not surprisingly, our family has had a lot of these discussions over screen time, safeguards, and my
  • Parenting in the age of portable 24/7 screens, entertainment, and advertising. surprisingly, our family
  • <01:01:02.559> time, of these discussions over screen time, of these discussions over screen
  • screens, entertainment, and advertising. screens, entertainment, and advertising.
  • Teens are more engaged with their screens and phones than the people Teens are often looking at social
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Revenue Committee, February 12, 2026

Revenue

Transcript Highlights:
  • I will go ahead and promote him to a panelist, and he should be on the screen here in just a moment.
  • This is tools that these companies can use to help screen whether or not this is potential fraud.
  • This is tools that these companies can use to help screen whether or not this is potential fraud.
  • This is tools that these companies can use to help screen whether or not this is potential fraud.
  • Defoe's client in that there are certain<01:18:39.000> screens<01:18:39.240> that<01:18
NH
Transcript Highlights:
  • We are... and you have the screen. I hope it's turned on. Yeah. Sure. I have to go.
  • It doesn't want to let me screen share. Okay. Well, that's all right. We can go to the slide.
  • Um, it won't be as exciting, but yeah, it's just a screen share.
  • Well, and I'm sorry that the screen it.
  • > work, slide the sh screen share did not work, slide the sh screen share did not work, but<01
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The committee first took up a Senate message on HB 179, relative to hazardous waste accident fees. Members reviewed the Senate amendment, which would cap the daily non-payment penalty at no more than $1,000 per day and limit the cumulative penalty to 25% of the cost, with no additional daily penalty if the responsible party is following an agreed payment plan. Members discussed the change from the committee’s earlier version, which had allowed penalties up to 100% of the damages, and agreed the revised language was reasonable. The committee voted to concur with the Senate amendment and indicated the bill could be placed on consent. The committee then recessed SB 302, requiring background checks for solid waste facility owners, because a late request for an additional change had not yet been fully reviewed. It next voted on SB 229, relative to the sale of uninspected bison, red deer, and elk meat. Supporters said the bill would expand retail access to these meats, support New Hampshire farms, and improve food security. Members also noted the Department of Agriculture did not object, that the bill would remove a sunset and keep more workable inspection rules in place, and that the animals involved are largely from closed herds. The committee voted unanimously to pass SB 229 and agreed to place it on consent. Finally, the committee considered SB 50, establishing a committee to study the regulation of private animal boarding facilities. Members described disturbing testimony about missing, injured, or dead dogs and the lack of clear oversight, licensing, or even a reliable list of kennels in the state. They discussed possible study topics including licensing, inspection authority, standards, penalties, and protections for both pet owners and boarding operators, including disclosure of medical conditions. The committee voted unanimously to pass SB 50 and also agreed to place it on consent. After the executive sessions, the committee heard a presentation from the New Hampshire Food Alliance on the state’s first food and agriculture strategic plan, introduced by director Nicole Cardwell, with participation from advisory committee members including Rep. Bixby and Commissioner Sean Jasper.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Local and County Government Apr 21st, 2026 at 02:00 pm

Local and County Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • And so I got basically an applied math degree at Oklahoma State and decided to become a teacher for middle
Keywords: 914, all
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Transportation Committee Jun 23rd, 2026

Joint Transportation Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • modeling them sort of on the ground in eight case study jurisdictions, and those are shown there on the screen
  • when we selected these cases, In eight case study jurisdictions, and those are shown there on the screen
  • consider fairness to be more about in eight case study jurisdictions, and those are shown there on the screen
  • We're developing the program manual, the governance structure, the evaluation tools, the screening processes
  • the Thor/Freya area, going from about 5th Street to 29th, and that's on the bottom right of your screen
Summary: The committee began with member introductions, then heard a presentation on a draft final report studying alternative funding mechanisms for sidewalks and related pedestrian infrastructure. Consultants said current local funding sources are insufficient, with most jurisdictions unable to complete planned sidewalk networks within 50 years. They evaluated four options: a sidewalk utility fee, a modified transportation benefit district sales tax, a new real estate excise tax option, and expanded stormwater fee use for ADA sidewalk ramps. The consultants recommended authorizing the modified TBD sales tax and new REET option, considering a sidewalk utility despite legal uncertainty, broadening any authorization to all pedestrian improvements, and not pursuing the stormwater fee option. Members asked about legal authority, fairness, revenue adequacy, and whether jurisdictions had been consulted; the presenters said state enabling legislation would likely be needed for a sidewalk utility and that fairness could be defined either by direct benefit or by need. The committee then received an update on the 2025 assessment of city transportation funding needs. The consultants reported that city transportation revenues have grown in some local and federal categories since 2019, but state revenues have remained relatively flat and smaller cities are especially affected by declining fuel tax revenues and limited tax bases. They estimated annual city transportation needs at $4.25 billion, average annual spending at $1.89 billion, and a funding gap of $2.37 billion, larger than in the prior study because of updated data, inclusion of system improvements, and higher preservation costs. Draft recommendations focused on reducing costs and improving efficiency, preserving and increasing state support, and expanding local funding options, including preservation-first spending, a permanent federal fund exchange program, streamlined review processes, better coordination with WSDOT, possible property tax flexibility, and exploration of new local tools. Members raised questions about design standards, the role of density and transit, federal compliance, and whether the report would identify specific consolidation or process changes. The committee also heard a project update on evaluating zero-emission vehicle and electrification programs funded by the Climate Commitment Act. Consultants said they had reviewed roughly 23 programs and projects across seven agencies and were now evaluating options to improve delivery, including process improvements, reorganizing programs, or consolidating governance and administrative functions. Early findings highlighted staffing shortages, duplication and variation across agencies, differing levels of risk, and the challenge of coordinating climate priorities across agencies with other core missions. Members asked about program outcomes, administrative costs, whether some programs should have exit strategies, and how to strengthen the EV Coordinating Council. Finally, WSDOT provided an implementation update on its new public-private partnership authority under SB 5801, saying work is underway to prepare governance, legal, policy, and organizational structures ahead of the January 1, 2027 effective date.
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Tribal and State Relations Committee Apr 13th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • Other reports have also shown that facilities in other jurisdictions also fail to, sometimes fail to screen
  • importantly, there are also documented issues in other jurisdictions with facilities not actively screening
  • for... ...issues in other jurisdictions with facilities not actively screening for need, meaning that
  • video interactions are as effective as in-person services, and of course it improves the ability of screening
  • video interactions are as effective as in-person services, and of course it improves the ability to screen
Summary: The meeting focused heavily on behavioral health and substance use treatment, especially the IMD exclusion and whether North Dakota should pursue a Section 1115 waiver to allow Medicaid reimbursement for services in institutions for mental diseases for adults ages 21 to 64. Turtle Mountain representatives described major local needs, including limited access to care, high syphilis rates, and the importance of timely public health data. They also discussed the tribe’s recovery center, which opened the prior year, now operating five levels of care with 16 beds, and the desire to expand capacity, possibly through an IMD waiver or related policy changes. Committee members also raised related issues such as rural health transformation funding, telehealth, workforce retention, and the need for better coordination between tribal and state public health systems. A central issue was Turtle Mountain Public Health’s long-running effort to secure a data use agreement with the state so it can receive surveillance data and respond directly to infectious disease cases among tribal members. Speakers said the tribe had a successful COVID-era agreement that allowed faster contact tracing and case management, but that agreement ended with the pandemic. They argued that current delays in sharing data, especially for sexually transmitted infections, leave the tribe unable to respond quickly, while the state and county epidemiology workload is too distant and stretched to be effective. Committee members expressed support and said they would look into the issue, noting that other tribes have secured similar agreements. The committee also heard a detailed presentation from the National Health Law Program on the IMD exclusion. The presenter explained that federal Medicaid law generally bars payment for care in facilities with more than 16 beds, but that states can use other tools such as state plan amendments, managed care arrangements, telehealth, and community-based services. He said IMD waivers are administratively complex, time-limited, and have shown mixed results in other states, with some gains in residential treatment access but limited evidence of improved overdose outcomes or stronger community-based care. He urged the committee to consider broader continuum-of-care solutions and cautioned that waivers alone are not a cure-all. No final vote was taken on the bill draft during the portion shown, but the committee discussed the proposal to appropriate $49,000 and one FTE to HHS to pursue an IMD waiver and report back in the next interim. Members also debated the policy rationale for the 16-bed limit, the role of the state versus tribal sovereignty, and whether the bill should move through the Health Care or Human Services committee in the future.
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Children and Family Law (10/21/2025)

Transcript Highlights:
  • We do not have a uniform screening for domestic violence or child welfare concerns before the mediation
  • Um we do not have a uniform screening<00:11:09.920> um<00:11:10.000> for<00:11:10.320><
  • c> domestic<00:11:10.800> violence<00:11:11.440> or<00:11:12.160> um screening
  • um for domestic violence or um screening um for domestic violence or um child<00:11:12.640> welfare
  • We require a mandatory domestic violence screening tool so that we can ensure that cases that are experiencing
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The subcommittee met without a quorum and discussed how to proceed with its family court review work. The chair said preliminary, unofficial reports could be circulated and voted on by email, and noted that next year the work might continue as a full committee rather than a subcommittee. Members also discussed carrying unresolved issues into next year, including the long-standing “one judge, one case” concept. Later, the committee received additional materials from a member who could not attend, including a packet on state-funded transcript requests and background information on how different states structure family court systems. A major presentation focused on improving New Hampshire family court pre-trial and mediation practices. The presenters said current rules give judges broad discretion, which can lead to inconsistent discovery, evidence, and timelines, especially for self-represented parties. They raised concerns about uneven mediator training and oversight, lack of uniform domestic violence screening, and unclear information for families about their rights and how to exit mediation. They recommended standardized pre-trial case management orders, clearer plain-language deadlines, mandatory domestic violence screening, stronger mediator certification and continuing education, a mentorship program, an independent oversight board, and a pilot program in a few counties before any statewide rollout. Members and presenters also discussed existing court forms and practices, including mediation agreements, mediator preparation forms, first appearances, and the use of Zoom for mediation. One participant argued that mediation can work better when parties are better prepared and when cases are not sent too early, and suggested that neutral case evaluation is another useful alternative dispute resolution tool. The discussion also touched on the need for better educational materials for pro se litigants, with one member describing efforts to create a more accessible guide for people going to court. No votes were taken, and the session ended with plans to continue reviewing materials and refine recommendations.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • reason to drive for competitive grants because actually direct corporations have tons and tons of screening
  • So maybe a question for staff or for the chairs: Will this appropriation receive the same sort of screening
  • reason to drive for competitive grants because actually direct appropriations have tons and tons of screening
  • So maybe a question for staff or for the chairs: Will this appropriation receive the same sort of screening
  • Representative Pinto: Will this appropriation receive the same sort of screening that an appropriation
Bills: HF2446, HF2563, HF2444
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Insurance Apr 2nd, 2025

Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • short-term and long-term effects, to cover reversals of any procedures, and to cover any testing or screening
  • simply says that a company and has to continue providing coverage for procedures and treatment, screening
  • Or for bone density scans, cancer screenings, or estrogen and other hormonal treatments to address the
  • Line 12-2 says any testing. a screening necessary to monitor the mental and physical health of the enrollee
  • had complications, had medical issues, and the coverage, but it also talks about All the necessary screening
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Floor Session 3/26/26

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • students are still not attending school for fear of what awaits them as they try to focus on reading and math
  • students are still not attending school for fear of what awaits them as they try to focus on reading and math
  • We all want them to focus on math and reading and spelling tests.
  • Teachers are just teaching reading and math. They're trying to comfort children who are scared.
  • I know because I was behind one teachers are just teaching reading and math.
Keywords: 1183, house
NH
Transcript Highlights:
  • cuts for at least two years so that we can stabilize our workforce and revisit the calculations and math
  • cuts for at least two years so that we can stabilize our workforce and revisit the calculations and math
  • :14:49.760> the<00:14:50.000> calculations<00:14:50.880> and<00:14:51.120> math
  • <00:14:51.600> that revisit the calculations and math that revisit the calculations and math
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The committee to study long-term managed care met to approve the prior meeting minutes, with a clarification that “OB3” referred to the “one big beautiful bill.” The minutes were then approved. Chair Jim Kofalt outlined the day’s agenda, which included testimony from the Granite State Home Health and Hospice Association, the New Hampshire Association of Counties, and later DHHS. He also noted that future meetings were expected soon and that the meetings were being livestreamed on YouTube. Granite State Home Health and Hospice Association, represented by Kellyanne Totten and Amy Moore, urged inclusive planning and a cautious, phased approach if managed care is considered. They emphasized that home care providers are not uniform, with different licensing and service models, and said any pilot should include varied provider types, rural and southern regions, and agencies of different sizes. They warned that workforce shortages, inflation, and a possible 9% CMS cut to Medicare home health payments could force agencies to reduce service areas or service types. They also said the 2023 Medicaid CFI rate increase has begun to lose its effect. In response to questions, they said the rural health transformation fund may help with planning and telehealth but likely cannot be used directly for rates or recruitment/retention. They also described the New England Home Care Nurse Residency Program, a Department of Labor grant, as a way to bring new registered nurses into home care with added training and school partnerships. The New Hampshire Association of Counties, through county nursing home administrators Craig Labore and David Ross, revisited the earlier Step Two managed care discussions from 2016-2018. They said prior consultants found the long-term services and supports system was underfunded and needed investment to stabilize providers and expand community-based care. They argued the same concerns remain today and said a managed model would jeopardize the Medicaid quality incentive payment program and, for county nursing homes, the proportionate share payment program. Their testimony was generally opposed to moving forward with managed long-term services and supports without significant additional funding and safeguards.
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

Senate Finance (05/21/2025)

Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • So it just clarifies that the math formula this is the way we intended it.
  • So it just clarifies that that the<00:43:20.079> math<00:43:20.319> formula<00:43:20.720
  • 43:20.800> is<00:43:21.119> the<00:43:21.280> way<00:43:21.440> we the math
  • formula this is the way we the math formula this is the way we intended<00:43:22.079> it.
  • So, we will do all that math behind the scenes.
Keywords: 1191, senate, all
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • Since I'm an automotive engineer, let's do some math.
  • So this basic math doesn't support increasing our current $75 annual fee at all.
  • <00:31:21.679> So<00:31:21.919> this<00:31:22.159> basic<00:31:22.480> math
  • So this basic math owner's fair share.
  • So this basic math doesn't<00:31:23.600> support<00:31:24.080> increasing<00:31:24.480>
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Press Conference: Senator Sarah Eckhardt Mar 26th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Bills: SJR57, SCR8, SB8, SB14, SB24, SB108, SB112, SB125, SB213, SB251, SB315, SB318, SB371, SB378, SB379, SB472, SB487, SB502, SB513, SB565, SB621, SB650, SB689, SB707, SB710, SB761, SB763, SB815, SB854, SB875, SB896, SB916, SB925, SB958, SB961, SB965, SB973, SB987, SB990, SB995, SB1006, SB1018, SB1019, SB1024, SB1026, SB1146, SB1194, SB1198, SB1253, SB1330, SB1343, SB1362, SB1379, SB1497, SB1498, SB1527, SB1532, SB1547, SB1596, SJR36, SJR12, SJR57, SCR22, SCR12, SCR8, SB565, SB765, SB62, SB666, SB707, SB888, SB687, SB847, SB1248, SB14, SB1006, SB504, SB925, SB995, SB857, SB305, SB296, SB284, SB815, SB1379, SB1497, SB1499, SB1498, SB241, SB304, SB621, SB1023, SB1024, SB686, SB112, SB371, SB204, SB609, SB670, SB502, SB850, SB854, SB413, SB1362, SB1346, SB1033, SB1220, SB1073, SB810, SB987, SB1539, SB447, SB875, SB406, SB985, SB965, SB1119, SB1505, SB24, SB1194, SB1253, SB1215, SB1532, SB1302, SB856, SB650, SB583, SB673, SB213, SB681, SB1172, SB1252, SB378, SB1343, SB608, SB487, SB955, SB957, SB988, SB990, SB1019, SB1021, SB1120, SB251, SB958, SB761, SB541, SB315, SB379, SB1018, SB1737, SB266, SB1415, SB1527, SB125, SB599, SB1330, SB53, SB916, SB896, SB1352, SB973, SB785, SB710, SB472, SB1450, SB1502, SB1566, SB414, SB1062, SB1547, SB961, SB1038, SB513, SB578, SB711, SB746, SB942, SB1404, SB1448, SB1738, SB108, SB8, SB318, SB507, SB533, SB689, SB1026, SB1349, SB1355, SB1433, SB1434, SB1596, SB1403, SB1198, SB1146, SB763, SB667, SB1059, SB617, SB1567, SB503, SJR37, SB16, SB310, SB311, SB396, SB505, SB1209, SB1210, SB1470, SB264, SB924, SB1029, SB1185, SB1202, SB1358, SB1364, SB1569, SB1697, SB1376, SB1228, SB519, SB878, SB1350, SB462, SB1535, SB827, SB1585, SB207, SB1207, SB1619, SB1396, SB920, SB1484, SB1273, SB1741
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part II) Mar 26th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Bills: SJR57, SCR8, SB8, SB14, SB24, SB108, SB112, SB125, SB213, SB251, SB315, SB318, SB371, SB378, SB379, SB472, SB487, SB502, SB513, SB565, SB621, SB650, SB689, SB707, SB710, SB761, SB763, SB815, SB854, SB875, SB896, SB916, SB925, SB958, SB961, SB965, SB973, SB987, SB990, SB995, SB1006, SB1018, SB1019, SB1024, SB1026, SB1146, SB1194, SB1198, SB1253, SB1330, SB1343, SB1362, SB1379, SB1497, SB1498, SB1527, SB1532, SB1547, SB1596, SJR36, SJR12, SJR57, SCR22, SCR12, SCR8, SB565, SB765, SB62, SB666, SB707, SB888, SB687, SB847, SB1248, SB14, SB1006, SB504, SB925, SB995, SB857, SB305, SB296, SB284, SB815, SB1379, SB1497, SB1499, SB1498, SB241, SB304, SB621, SB1023, SB1024, SB686, SB112, SB371, SB204, SB609, SB670, SB502, SB850, SB854, SB413, SB1362, SB1346, SB1033, SB1220, SB1073, SB810, SB987, SB1539, SB447, SB875, SB406, SB985, SB965, SB1119, SB1505, SB24, SB1194, SB1253, SB1215, SB1532, SB1302, SB856, SB650, SB583, SB673, SB213, SB681, SB1172, SB1252, SB378, SB1343, SB608, SB487, SB955, SB957, SB988, SB990, SB1019, SB1021, SB1120, SB251, SB958, SB761, SB541, SB315, SB379, SB1018, SB1737, SB266, SB1415, SB1527, SB125, SB599, SB1330, SB53, SB916, SB896, SB1352, SB973, SB785, SB710, SB472, SB1450, SB1502, SB1566, SB414, SB1062, SB1547, SB961, SB1038, SB513, SB578, SB711, SB746, SB942, SB1404, SB1448, SB1738, SB108, SB8, SB318, SB507, SB533, SB689, SB1026, SB1349, SB1355, SB1433, SB1434, SB1596, SB1403, SB1198, SB1146, SB763, SB667, SB1059, SB617, SB1567, SB503, SJR37, SB16, SB310, SB311, SB396, SB505, SB1209, SB1210, SB1470, SB264, SB924, SB1029, SB1185, SB1202, SB1358, SB1364, SB1569, SB1697, SB1376, SB1228, SB519, SB878, SB1350, SB462, SB1535, SB827, SB1585, SB207, SB1207, SB1619, SB1396, SB920, SB1484, SB1273, SB1741
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Public Safety Committee Apr 21st, 2026

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • It helps ensure individuals who should not be providing care are appropriately screened out, while also
  • We are often the first point of contact screening people into buildings and the first line of defense
  • Cameras, computer screens, fences, and lighting will replace human security officers, with the result
  • We've all seen the pictures on our social media feeds or on our TV screens. Thank you.
  • We have screening abilities in the police departments. They can do background checks.
Summary: The committee met without a quorum and operated as a subcommittee while hearing several bills, with members repeatedly noting that votes would be taken later once a quorum was established. Early in the meeting, the committee heard SB 1446 on parole en banc review and SB 1278 on elderly parole eligibility for certain sex offenses. SB 1446’s author said the bill would give commissioners more discretion in en banc review, make votes public, and allow referral for sexually violent predator evaluation in certain cases; supporters included the California District Attorneys Association, while opponents from Uncommon Law, the Ella Baker Center, and public defender groups argued it would add confusion, create constitutional and litigation concerns, and duplicate existing safeguards. SB 1278 would exclude certain rape, child sexual abuse, and habitual/serial sex offense convictions from elderly parole eligibility; district attorneys and police chiefs supported it as a victim-safety measure, while civil rights and defense organizations opposed it as unnecessary, costly, and inconsistent with evidence on aging and recidivism. Both bills were discussed but not voted on due to the lack of quorum. The committee then heard SB 1354, which would bar out-of-state military or law enforcement personnel from entering California to perform such functions without the Governor’s permission. The author and supporters framed it as protecting state sovereignty and limiting unauthorized armed incursions; the committee accepted an amendment removing a criminal penalty and leaving enforcement to the Attorney General. No opposition testimony was offered, and members expressed support, but no vote was taken because quorum was still lacking. The committee also heard SB 926, a bill to fund implementation of Proposition 36. Supporters, including sheriffs, district attorneys, probation officials, and the League of California Cities, said local agencies need funding for treatment, supervision, and administration; opponents argued the proposal was fiscally reckless, lacked accountability, and overemphasized incarceration. Amendments removed a specific appropriation and shifted funding decisions to the budget process, but the bill was also held pending quorum. Later, the committee heard SB 874, which would require background checks for unlicensed providers of Medi-Cal behavioral health treatment services, create a stakeholder workgroup, and direct DHCS to issue guidance and report on program integrity. Support came from local health plans and behavior analysis providers, who said the bill would improve safety and consistency; there was no opposition testimony. The committee then heard SB 1210, which would extend CalGang oversight and due process protections to local gang databases as well as shared ones. Supporters described privacy abuses, racial disparities, and personal harm from inaccurate gang labels; law enforcement opposition argued the bill would impose CalGang standards on informal investigative files and would significantly change the gang definition. The author said the bill closes a loophole and preserves prior reforms, but no vote was taken. The committee also began hearing SB 1019 on creating a California Cargo Thief Task Force, with strong support from BNSF, trucking, shipping, port, and supply-chain representatives who described organized, multi-jurisdictional cargo theft and rail sabotage; no opposition was heard, and members indicated support, but action was deferred pending quorum. The meeting then moved to SB 1217 on a non-consensual intimate image clearinghouse, with the chair and author describing privacy-related amendments and the bill’s focus on helping survivors remove exploitative images; the transcript cuts off as that presentation began.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Health and Human Services - 04/15/26

Health and Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • Line 528 is a proposal to bring the fee exemption requirements for newborn screening into statute.
  • fee exemption requirements<00:19:51.440> for<00:19:51.560> newborn<00:19:52.000> screening
  • <00:19:52.480> into requirements for newborn screening into requirements for newborn screening
  • Section 3 provides criteria in which a newborn screening fee exemption may apply and provides what is
  • ,<01:11:53.120> you've you've seen the green screens, you've you've seen the green screens
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Children and Families Finance and Policy Committee 2/26/25

Children and Families Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • "The first items on our agenda when we met was something showing on this screen, clarifying, uh, you
  • Additionally, SSI staff reviewed each and every one of these screens field by field and documented and
  • <00:33:53.559> for walkthroughs of the required screens for walkthroughs of the required screens
  • <00:34:03.120> field<00:34:03.519> by every one of these screens field by every one
  • of these screens field by field<00:34:04.440> and<00:34:04.960> documented<00:34:05.960
Bills: HF1346, HF1169, HF1276