Video & Transcript Research : 'testing and labeling'

Page 121 of 500
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations - Human Resources Division Apr 10th, 2025 at 02:00 pm

Appropriations - Human Resources Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • is that we adopt Section 7 and 8 and do not...
  • And I take the input from the committee and work on it.
  • I like the 2 and 2. The two and two. I like the two and two.
  • And Keith and Steph agree with each other.
  • So we're going to go to two and a half? Two and one and a half.
Bills: SB2015
Summary: The committee first discussed a wastewater infrastructure bill, centered on whether state support should be provided as a grant or through the existing Clean Water State Revolving Fund as a low-interest loan program. Department of Environmental Quality official David Brushwine explained that the SRF already finances wastewater projects, can leverage federal funds with state bond proceeds, and could accommodate the Washburn, Lincoln, and Peasant projects if they are ready to proceed. Members noted that losing federal grant support would make projects harder for local residents to afford because costs would be recovered through utility rates or special assessments, but the projects would still be eligible for loans. Senator Magrum indicated he would likely concur with the budget after this discussion, and the bill was set aside for later consideration. The committee then turned to a proposed amendment for a four-plex housing project for people with disabilities or other special needs. Senator Mathern described Sections 7 and 8 as creating a design consultation appropriation and a revolving loan fund modeled on existing hospital and nursing home loan programs, while Section 9 would transfer $3.3 million from the state infrastructure fund. Members debated ownership, rent subsidies, repayment terms, and whether the state should finance the project directly or leave it to a private developer with Department of Human Services oversight. Concerns were raised that the state should not own the housing and that the proposal needed more work to be workable, but the committee ultimately reached consensus to adopt Sections 7 and 8 and leave out Section 9 for further conference committee discussion. The committee also reviewed provider inflation and long-term care rate issues, with members discussing whether to support a 2% and 1.5% inflation adjustment and how to handle the $5-per-day basic care rate. Staff explained that the $5 payment was already in the base budget, but members debated whether it should remain ongoing or be treated as one-time funding and paired with a study of rate rebasing. The committee agreed to have draft language prepared to remove the $5 from the base budget and add study language, then moved the bill forward for drafting.
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations - Human Resources Division Apr 10th, 2025 at 09:30 am

Appropriations - Human Resources Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • Is that the one-and-two-and-two thing? The two-and-two, yeah. Yeah.
  • Is that the one, one, and two and two thing? The two and two, yeah.
  • That's not a change from the two and two or one and a half and one and a half.
  • That's not a change from the two and two or one and a half and one and a half.
  • One and a half and one and a half was $43 million, two and two was $58 million.
Bills: SB2015
Summary: The committee met to review revised long sheets and section-by-section language for a human services/health budget bill, with much of the discussion focused on how to present block grant funding and full-time equivalent (FTE) positions for behavioral health clinics and CCBHCs. Members debated whether to keep FTE counts in the budget at all, ultimately leaning toward removing or zeroing out the FTE references while keeping the dollar authority, and reducing the salaries-and-wages block grant by about $4.75 million. They also discussed public health federal authority, agreeing to remove about $60 million in unused federal spending authority tied to COVID-era funds, and clarified that if federal money later becomes available it could be requested through the Emergency Commission. A major topic was the provider inflation increase. The House version had 2% and 2%, while members debated alternatives and appeared to settle, at least for further work, on 2% in the first year and 1.5% in the second year, with staff asked to recalculate the fiscal impact. The committee also reviewed FMAP changes, noting a revised 2027 FMAP estimate and its effect on general fund and other funds, and discussed whether to adjust public health and other line items accordingly. Several members emphasized that many of these numbers are still tentative and will be refined before final action. The committee also touched on several policy items and capital-related provisions, including behavioral health services, Medicaid expansion, the moratorium on new ICF beds, and a proposed amendment for a medical homes/fourplex-related item that would show a $400,000 legislative investment with repayment from a developer. There was extended discussion of the All True hospital/facility proposal, with some members favoring leaving it in with a smaller initial commitment and others preferring to remove it and revisit later in conference committee. The meeting ended with staff asked to continue updating the bill language and members instructed to review remaining sections before the next meeting; no final votes were taken in the portion provided.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 4/10/25

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • And the minutes are adopted.
  • and we have the A2 for recommendation. and we have the A2 for recommendation.
  • And we invite you all to watch as the bills move forward through Ways and Means and on the floor.
  • bills move forward through ways and the bills move forward through ways and means<00:15:37.199> and
  • chairs and to all of our members and chairs and to all of our members and staff<00:15:44.160>
Bills: HF2783
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 4/8/25

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • And filing fraud and deceptive mailings.
  • and agriculture, and families.
  • <00:24:23.760> and<00:24:24.000> MFU fair and competitive markets, and MFU fair and
  • Please head to the test fires table, introduce yourself for the record, and proceed. Good morning.
  • and the commensurate challenges and and the commensurate challenges and choices<00:32:12.320>
Bills: HF2783
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations - Human Resources Division Apr 7th, 2025 at 09:30 am

Appropriations - Human Resources Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • And, yeah, my name is Matt Schwarz, and I have testified.
  • overhead rails and oxygen pipes throughout and so on.
  • And thank you very much. And Bruce Murray, I am approvals. And thank you very much.
  • the Senate, and it's like two and a half pages.
  • and DOCR.
Bills: SB2015
Summary: The Senate Appropriations Human Resources division met with a quorum and spent much of the meeting on a proposed “medical home” concept for people with significant disabilities and medical needs. Matt Schwartz described the need for small, community-based homes so adults like his daughter could live in a least-restrictive setting without losing housing if service providers change. Architect Jeff Eubel presented a conceptual budget for one roughly 5,000-square-foot facility for four residents, explaining that the design would likely include four large sleeping units, common space, support areas, and medical infrastructure such as emergency power, oxygen, sprinklers, and accessibility features. Committee members and George Sink, joining by phone, raised questions about layout, zoning, ownership, staffing, and whether families would actually move loved ones into such facilities if they were far from home. The department said the concept was not in the governor’s budget and identified staff who could continue discussions; the committee did not take final action and instead discussed refining the language with interested members. The committee then turned to amendments related to long-term care and behavioral health funding. One amendment would reduce a planned $4 million general fund incentive payment and instead create a withhold-based quality program for nursing facilities, to be developed collaboratively by the department and providers and reported to Legislative Management by September 2026. The department said it could live with the language but preferred the governor’s timing; several senators questioned whether the committee should be directing an operational policy change and whether the study would simply delay implementation. No vote was taken, and the amendment was set aside for later consideration. A second amendment would clarify use of an existing $2 million general fund item for behavioral health services in nursing homes and basic care facilities, directing it toward training, technical assistance, consultation, and direct patient care for residents with medically based behavioral health disorders. Members noted the funding was already in the bill and discussed it in the context of other budget items, but again deferred action. The committee also clarified that a separate $750,000 juvenile justice diversion appropriation in House Bill 1425 was distinct from a similar amount in the budget and should likely remain in that separate bill. The chair indicated a goal of having amendments ready by the end of the week, and the committee recessed without final votes on the discussed items.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Higher Education Finance and Policy Committee 3/18/25

Higher Education Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • yourself for the record and proceed with your<00:47:26.599> test<00:47:26.880> Tony<00:
  • 00:47:28.559> thank your test Tony thank you chair and thank your test Tony thank you chair and
  • Cloud, and I only had to drive 15 minutes to get a year's worth of chemo, radiation, test visits—you
  • c> and should honor and and give gratitude and should honor and and give gratitude and opportunities
  • c><01:20:13.639> time Amendment uh labeled A1 and at this time Amendment uh labeled A1 and at
Bills: HF2090, HF982, HF2229
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • say we'd like some additional time and here's why we're testing this new technology.
  • There's a lot of cheating on that test, and it needs the Railroad Commission being understood.
  • And it's in my red test. Yeah, exactly.
  • They serve as the location for the development, manufacturing, and testing of certain technologies prioritized
  • Sports like Starbase in Cameron County and a rocket engine testing facility in McGregor, Texas are high
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • funding. or adopt the well and the associated liability and plug it themselves before producing nearby
  • This program will expedite the plugging of certain orphaned wells and help increase oil and gas production
  • And certainly I think I appreciate what will be in the substitute and we look forward. to working with
  • that we all recognize that y'all are working to solve and so appreciate your consideration of it and
  • Go ahead and move that. And then next week, hopefully, have the committee subs put them back out.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 3/4/25

Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • They receive sample testing and preparatory materials to get ready to go into that trade, and then any
  • represent Greenman and Schultz and I are represent Greenman and Schultz and I are all<00:15:10.519
  • <00:15:26.959> again comment and thank you chair and again comment and thank you chair and
  • competitive and and are giving people competitive and and are giving people that<00:32:00.279>
  • and Mr ble and grants I represent bakg and Mr ble and others<00:37:07.119> to<00:37:07.440>
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • development of therapies and pharmaceuticals, facilities and equipment, and prevention programs.
  • 60 and 70.
  • Hi, I'm Carrie Shaw, and I'm here to represent and talk about Parkinson's disease and ...
  • And from one. ...dose, and Moderna's is double that.
  • In particular, we develop and test innovative models of health care delivery using randomized clinical
Bills: SB5, SJR3, SB 5, SJR 3
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • testing procedures distribution sale and testing procedures distribution sale and consumer<00:02
  • is the testing piece, because if you buy a bottle of bourbon, it has been tested, and then you are allowed
  • is the testing piece, because if you buy a bottle of bourbon, it has been tested, and then you are allowed
  • can, and that's definitely something we want to talk more about as a testing issue.
  • <00:26:22.159> the to the testing of the Beverages and the to the testing of the Beverages
Keywords: 958, all
Summary: The committee met with a quorum and took up Senate Bill 202, adopting a committee substitute before hearing testimony. Senator Julie Rocky Adams explained that the substitute would require the Cabinet for Health and Family Services to promulgate regulations by January 1, 2026 for intoxicating hemp-derived beverages, direct the University of Kentucky to study manufacturing, testing, distribution, sales, and consumer effects of those beverages, and impose a moratorium on their sale until July 1, 2026. Supporters, including Rep. Matt Cook, said the measure was intended as a consumer-protection step rather than a ban, citing concerns about youth access, inconsistent labeling, and the need for a clearer regulatory framework. Members asked about the legal status of the products, whether the bill could unintentionally sweep in non-intoxicating hemp beverages, and whether there was evidence of harm. Senators were told the products are legal under the federal farm bill loophole, but that testing has shown THC levels on sampled cans did not match labels and that current regulations do not specifically address intoxicating hemp-derived beverages. Senator Higdon said CHFS had already been authorized to regulate hemp products and was moving forward with regulations and enforcement, while Senator Meredith questioned whether a moratorium would unfairly punish businesses that had already invested in the market and suggested setting a THC standard instead. Public testimony then shifted to industry opposition. Jim Higdon of Cornbread Hemp said his company had invested heavily in a beverage line and argued the moratorium would function like a ban and harm small businesses. Dee Taylor of 502 Hemp and the Kentucky Hemp Association also opposed the moratorium, saying existing rules already require age limits, behind-the-counter sales, and licensed retailers, and arguing that a cap on milligrams would be preferable to a shutdown. He said retailers were seeing approved and unapproved products in the market and urged work with the Cabinet and ABC rather than a moratorium.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • ...agents to understand chemistry, potency thresholds, lab testing, and labeling compliance, and they
  • these products and they were tested.
  • And you can easily confirm that and see the regulations, including labeling, testing, and licensing,
  • Rules around age limits, safety testing, and labeling make sense.
  • I've seen the tests, and they make my point for me, and actually, those are illegal. How so?
Bills: SB5, SB11, SB12, SB 5, SB 11, SB 12
TX

Texas 89th 1st C.S.

State Affairs Jul 22nd, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • to understand chemistry, potency thresholds, lab testing, and labeling compliance, and they will never
  • these products and they were tested.
  • And you can easily confirm that and see the regulations, including labeling, testing, and licensing with
  • Reasonable rules around age limits, safety testing, and labeling make sense.
  • and labeling standards.
Bills: SB 5, SB 11, SB 12
Summary: The Senate Committee on State Affairs took up Senate Bill 5, which Senator Perry described as a ban on intoxicating THC consumer products while preserving legal CBD, CBG, hemp seed, hemp seed protein powder, and hemp seed oil products. Perry argued that most retail THC products are already illegal under federal law, that the industry has used loopholes and misleading labeling to sell high-potency products, and that regulation would be ineffective because chemists can quickly alter formulations. He also said the bill would steer people with medical needs toward the Texas Compassionate Use Program (T-Cup), which he and other supporters described as the proper physician-guided alternative. Committee members and witnesses repeatedly discussed the distinction between legal hemp-derived products and intoxicating THC products, and Perry said the bill would not touch non-consumable hemp uses such as fiber and clothing. Invited testimony came from law enforcement and medical witnesses who supported the bill. Texas Police Chiefs Association representative Steve Dye, Kaufman County District Attorney Early Wiley, and Chambers County Sheriff Brian Hawthorne all said regulation would be too costly, too complex, and ultimately unenforceable, while a ban would be clearer and easier to enforce. They cited overloaded DPS labs, the need for expensive private testing, limited police and prosecutor resources, and the difficulty of keeping up with constantly changing cannabinoids and out-of-state products. Hawthorne and Wiley described raids and investigations involving warehouses, retail stores, cash seizures, and products they said were marketed to young people and often mislabeled or imported from other states. They also said the bill would help law enforcement by creating a clearer legal line and protecting legitimate CBD/CBG businesses. Dr. Lindy McGee, speaking for the Texas Medical Association and Texas Pediatric Society, testified that retail THC products pose serious risks to children and adolescents, including addiction, impaired brain development, psychosis, suicide attempts, self-harm, accidental toddler ingestions, and possible long-term cognitive effects. She said there is no effective medication treatment for THC addiction comparable to nicotine cessation tools, and she supported restrictions such as child-resistant packaging, no marketing to minors, and age limits, while opposing criminal penalties for possession by minors. Senators asked follow-up questions about brain development, memory, dementia risk, pregnancy, and cardiovascular effects. No vote was taken during the portion provided, and the committee continued with invited testimony and questions.