Requesting Google Maps, Apple Maps, And Similar Digital Mapping And Navigation Platforms To Remove, Modify, Or Restrict The Public Identification, Labeling, And Promotion Of Hazardous Coastal Features, Including Mermaid Caves.
HCR121 is a House Concurrent Resolution that asks Google Maps, Apple Maps, and similar digital mapping and navigation platforms to remove, modify, or restrict the public identification and promotion of hazardous coastal features in Hawaii, including the Mermaid Caves on the Nanakuli coastline. The measure is based on findings that these locations present extreme natural hazards such as sudden wave surge, unpredictable ocean conditions, limited visibility, and few or no safe exits, and that public labeling on navigation apps can encourage unsafe visitation.
The resolution also asks that any changes to map listings remove recreational or point-of-interest designations and directions that encourage access. It directs the Department of Land and Natural Resources to work with county agencies, emergency responders, and the platforms to provide documentation and safety data supporting removal or modification requests. The resolution expressly states that it is not intended to restrict lawful shoreline access, traditional and customary practices, news reporting, academic research, or historical reference.
Because this is a concurrent resolution rather than a bill, it does not amend the Hawaii Revised Statutes or create enforceable legal duties. Its practical effect is to formally express the Legislature’s position and request voluntary action by private mapping companies and coordination by state and county agencies. If acted on, it could change how hazardous coastal sites are labeled in digital maps and navigation tools, potentially reducing visitor traffic and emergency rescues at dangerous locations.
The overall sentiment of the measure is strongly protective of public safety and supportive of limiting digital promotion of dangerous sites. The resolution frames the issue as one of preventing avoidable injuries and deaths, reducing strain on first responders, and preserving sensitive coastal and cultural resources. No votes or committee transcripts were provided, so there is no recorded legislative debate or opposition in the supplied materials.
The main point of tension is the balance between public safety and public access. The resolution emphasizes that it should not interfere with lawful shoreline access, customary Native Hawaiian practices, or legitimate reporting and research, suggesting concern that removal of map labels could be seen as overbroad. Another possible area of contention is the reliance on private platforms to alter listings based on government requests, rather than using direct regulatory action. The bill text itself does not identify specific opponents, but the issue implicates residents, visitors, emergency responders, county governments, and the mapping companies named in the resolution.