Transcript Highlights:

• Feel free to talk about it, mainly because I forgot to submit it, so don't read into that too much.
• submit it so mainly because I forgot to submit it so don't<00:01:32.720> don't<00:01:32.880> read
• <00:01:33.079> into<00:01:33.320> that<00:01:33.479> too don't don't read into
• that too don't don't read into that too much<00:01:35.720> uh<00:01:35.840> so<00:01:36.119
• <01:06:05.640> and<01:06:05.799> funding<01:06:06.240> stem how to read and

Bills: HF2436, HF470, HF2643, HF2456, HF102, HF1367

Keywords: child welfare, economic assistance, child care, grant program, video security cameras, early education, scholarships, funding, children, families, Minnesota education, child care licensing, family child care, child care center, Minnesota Department of Children, Youth, and Families, correction order, conditional license, fix-it ticket, documented technical assistance, license suspension

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm reading through all the other ones, and I see that as well.
• I'm reading through all the other ones, and I see that as well.
• We make sure that infants are screened for treatable conditions at birth, and our newborn screening program
• The advisory committee was established in 2007 when hearing screening was added to the newborn screening
• <01:29:36.119> right infectious disease are must-reads right infectious disease are must-reads

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Summary: The Senate Health and Human Services Committee met on January 28, 2025, to review Governor’s budget proposals for several health-related licensing boards. The chair said no formal action would be taken and noted that final budget language was not yet available. The committee began with an overview from Bridget Anderson of the health-related licensing boards, who explained that the boards are fee-funded, operate as independent executive agencies, and handle licensing, complaints, rulemaking, and disciplinary matters. She also noted that the Board of Dentistry’s budget includes the Administrative Services Unit and criminal background check program, which can make the budget graphs appear larger than the dentistry board’s own operations. The Board of Dentistry requested funding for a new administrative staff position, estimating about $100,000 in salary, insurance, and fringe costs, to replace support lost when an administrative position was reclassified. Anderson said the board handled more than 300 complaints last year, with cases becoming more complex, especially involving surgical and implant procedures and imaging. Members asked about dental Medicaid access, but Anderson said that issue would be better directed to DHS’s Medicaid oral health division. The Board of Behavioral Health and Therapy requested a full-time position due to rapid growth in the number of regulated professionals, from about 4,000 in 2014 to nearly 10,000 now, and also sought authority to set a fee for out-of-state applicants under the Counseling Compact, with a cap of up to $100 though the board expects to charge much less. The Board of Podiatric Medicine asked to raise its fee ceiling, saying fees had not been increased since 1999 and that the board now faces a structural deficit of about $40,000 per year and declining reserves. Several senators expressed concern about “not-to-exceed” fee authority, calling it too open-ended and suggesting the legislature should scrutinize specific fee needs rather than approve broad ceilings. Similar concerns were raised during the Board of Chiropractic Examiners presentation, where the board sought $100,000 in additional spending authority and a fee increase after 32 years without an adjustment; members questioned the proposed ceiling approach and asked for more historical information before deciding. The Board of Dietetics and Nutrition Practice also discussed fee-setting authority, with the executive director explaining that the board had previously lowered fees without clear authority and later faced audit questions; she requested funding for a vacant administrative position, saying applications and revenues have increased sharply and no fee increase would be needed. The final presentation began with the Board of Pharmacy, which said it serves more than 26,000 licensees and oversees the Prescription Monitoring Program and opioid product registration. The board requested an extension of previously appropriated general fund dollars through fiscal year 2027 to continue paying legal costs tied to the insulin safety net lawsuit, emphasizing that this was not a new funding request but an extension of existing authority. No votes or formal actions were taken during the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• We face a critical shortage of health care providers, so early screening and referral are essential.
• Early screening and proactive intervention saves lives, protects health, and conserves public resources
• It's a part of a sentence that reads the student from PEL grants and other scholarships.
• It's a part of a sentence that reads<01:31:54.480> the<01:31:54.719> student<01:31:55.199
• change, um how much would the um I read change, um how much would the um I read in<01:33:00.639>

Bills: HB1183, HB1656, HB1658, HB1661, HB1663, HB1664, HB1859, HB2116, HB2271, HB2276, HB2335, HB2360, HB2387, HB2472, HB1805, HB2469, HB1815, HB1860, HB2117, HB2118, HB2437, HB2438, HB2604, HB1590, HB2156, HB2268

Keywords: retirement, pension, law enforcement, public safety, Hawaii Revised Statutes, indebtedness, salary recovery, employee compensation, deductions, financial management, collective bargaining, employee relations, impasse procedures, arbitration, public employment, HB1661, cafeteria plan, Section 125, Internal Revenue Code, flexible spending account

Transcript Highlights:

• It wasn't on our radar screen in the original format in this new replace-all.
• It wasn't on our radar screen in the original format in this new replace-all.
• It wasn't on our radar screen in the original format in this new replace-all.
• For lot lines would be the new reading. Mr.
• for lock lines would be the new reading for lock lines would be the new reading um<01:47:27.400>

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This is the one that's, I believe, commonly known as Reading Corps, and it's moving that program back
• On line 546 is a proposal to repeal the sunset for the newborn hearing screening advisory committee.
• This is the one that's, I believe, commonly known as Reading Corps, and it's moving that program back
• On line 546 is a proposal to repeal the sunset for the newborn hearing screening advisory committee.
• Then at the top of page 15 is Senator Miller's bill for the newborn screening of MLDD.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And if the desk would read it so everyone would know what it said. She's emailed a copy out.
• If the desk would read it so everyone<00:38:26.320> would everyone would everyone would know<
• ,<00:44:03.480> and<00:44:03.560> train who actually recruit, screen, and train who
• actually recruit, screen, and train citizen<00:44:04.640> volunteers<00:44:05.200> who
• Please take time to read it.

Bills: SB118, SB203, HB420, HB414, HB363, HB405, HB261, HB263, HB327, HB348, HB228, HB282, SB273, HB7, SB296, SB199, SB47, SB204, HB80, HB11, HB192

Keywords: bail, offenses, constitutional amendment, criminal justice, law enforcement, public safety, dental insurance, medical loss ratio, premium regulation, insurance commissioner, rebate, consumer protection, Baldwin County, local bill, education funding, school tax, privilege license tax, county tax revenue, municipal school board, Baldwin County Board of Education

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, we have a number of bills on the agenda, but first I'm going to read this handy-dandy script, uh,
• So, for your testimony under HRS 312-2 and HRS 91-3, I went and read the administrative rules that you
• <00:52:28.599> um<00:52:28.880> and as well as all the kiosk screens um and as well
• as all the kiosk screens um and if<00:52:29.440> an<00:52:29.640> individual<00:52:30.119
• <00:59:23.520> my opposed to this bill if you read my opposed to this bill if you read my

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several bills related to consumer protection, liquor regulation, construction procurement, and state contracting. On House Bill 565, DCCA and the Office of Consumer Protection stood on written testimony, and a committee member raised a question about whether creators of remains would have to hold them indefinitely if family members did not respond; the member indicated language would be fixed to address that issue. No vote was taken. House Bill 208, dealing with liquor law changes, drew strong support from Scarlet Honolulu and Maui Brewing Company, who said the measure would modernize liquor rules and add guardrails, while the Wine Institute and Anheuser-Busch opposed it as a special tax break or unnecessary expansion of liquor-related authority. Members questioned whether anonymous complaints should be allowed and whether the bill could lead to retaliation; the supporter said complaints should not be anonymous and suggested the Liquor Commission had been accused of writing complaints to target licenses. No action was taken. House Bill 939, concerning taxation of low-ABV spirits-based beverages, received support from Maui Brewing Company and Johnson Brothers, who said it would align tax treatment with existing categories and reduce confusion, while the Wine Institute and Anheuser-Busch opposed it as a narrow tax break that could reduce revenue and should instead be considered in a broader alcohol tax review. House Bill 808, on construction defect insurance or related protections for state projects, drew comments from DAGS, the State Procurement Office, and the Subcontractors Association, with the latter warning it would make state contracting harder and shrink the contractor base; the chair questioned what recourse the state has when defects appear after a project is completed. House Bill 809, addressing procurement and subcontractor-listing corrections, drew opposition from SPO, DAGS, and the Subcontractors Association, while the General Contractors Association supported it; members debated whether a 24-hour correction window would create abuse or simply allow minor ministerial fixes, and the bill’s sponsor said the goal was to reduce bid protests and procurement discretion. No votes or final committee actions were recorded in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• It's very good information, but the students said, oh, I wasn't going to read any of that, but if you
• <00:20:15.559> any students said oh I w't going to read any students said oh I w't going to
• read any of<00:20:15.880> that<00:20:16.159> but<00:20:16.280> if<00:20:16.360>
• mind onto the screen in front of<00:25:05.559> them<00:25:06.480> greatly<00:25:06.960
• The question is: applying for colleges, maybe Provost—how's the university screening that?

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So, in case anyone is interested in reading more about some of the stuff that I talked about today, I
• The one up here on the screen, Ute Lake Ranch, we're currently on the fifth phase of that one.
• So I'm not going to read all of these numbers, but you have the copy of this report in your materials
• I'm not going to read the numbers, but they're incredibly impressive The most important thing to note
• To amplify my concerns, I would like to read A quote.

Transcript Highlights:

• It's up to you if you'd like to put it on the screen. That's fine.
• Um, I think on page four, that paragraph H at the bottom, um, as I read it, that could potentially have
• Um, I think on page four, that paragraph H at the bottom, um, as I read it, that could potentially have
• paragraph H at the bottom, um, as I read paragraph H at the bottom, um, as I read it,<00:40:16.320
• additional technology to help screen additional technology to help screen business<01:04:47.359>

Bills: HF3217, HF2252

Keywords: bioindustrial facilities, economic development, renewable energy, advanced biofuels, state funding, HF2252, Minnesota bonding, volume cap, private activity bonds, tax-exempt bonds, public facility bonds, public facilities pool, unified pool, bond allocation, municipal finance, bond cap, housing bonds, residential rental projects, manufacturing bonds, enterprise zone bonds

Summary: The committee first approved the prior day’s minutes as amended, correcting the meeting number from the 46th to the 45th meeting. It then took up House File 3217, which would restore funding for the Minnesota Bioincentive Program. Representative Kisha argued the state should honor commitments made to companies that met program requirements and had not received full reimbursement. Testifiers from the Great Plains Institute and Minnesota Biofuels Association said the program has supported bioeconomy investment, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, and generated strong economic returns, but has been underfunded, leaving unpaid claims. Members raised questions about whether the bill was retrospective and whether it should be reviewed by another committee; the bill was laid over for further consideration without a vote. The committee then heard House File 2252, a proposal to modernize Minnesota’s private activity bond volume cap by shifting unused allocation from the small issuer/manufacturing bucket to the public facilities bucket while leaving the overall cap unchanged. The bill’s public finance testifier said the current allocation formula is outdated, housing would remain the top priority, and the change would be budget neutral. Testifiers from the Minnesota Milk Producers Association and Minnesota Biofuels Association supported the bill, saying it would better align financing with rural infrastructure, clean water, manure management, renewable natural gas, dairy processing, and low-carbon fuel projects, and could lower borrowing costs for those sectors. Members questioned whether the bill fit the committee’s jurisdiction and noted it might be more appropriate for another committee; the bill was also laid over for further consideration.

Transcript Highlights:

• In front of you on the screen is a price list from a body shop here in Minnesota.
• In front of you on the screen is a price list from a body shop here in Minnesota.
• <00:17:33.600> that<00:17:33.760> for extra well, you can read that for extra well,
• Where can I get a list so I can read through some of those complaints to see what they are?
• Um, so I country. from what I have read.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• , as we're watching the prosecutors walking through in many cases without any screening at all while
• we're standing there with the jury pool in our cases waiting to be screened.
• <00:48:38.200> it in our cases waiting to be screened it in our cases waiting to be screened
• a case a public defender has this screen a case a public defender has roughly<01:03:19.799> four<
• <01:04:03.880> those<01:04:04.000> are and if you look at that screen those are and

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Secretary, read the caption.
• Secretary, read the caption.
• Secretary, read the caption.
• Chair lays out on second reading Senate Bill 456, the secretary read the caption.
• On third reading, final passes. Senate Bill 66. The secretary will read the caption.

Bills: SB66, SB317, SB393, SB397, SB456, SB614, SB628, SB629, SB636, SB715, SB731, SB801, SB872, SB905, SB986, SB1012, SB1013, SB1015, SB1032, SB1113, SB1181, SB1212, SB1241, SB1250, SB1278, SB1285, SB1376, SB1444, SB1449, SB1524, SB1525, SB1528, SB1556, SB1588, SB1660, SB1704, SB1708, SB1802, SB1833, SB1844, SB1854, SB1863, SB1957, SB1959, SB1965, SB1999, SB2035, SB2056, SB2082, SB2119, SB2138, SB2165, SB2199, SB2201, SB2203, SB2245, SB2284, SB2419, SB2422, SB2452, SB2487, SB2523, SB2529, SB2533, SB2541, SB2586, SB2595, SB2605, SB2615, SB2675, SB2690, SB2717, SB2753, SB2778, SB2835, SB2841, SB2891, SB2929, SB2933, SB3016, SB3039, SB3044, HB912, HB2525, SJR3, SB5, SB29, SB326, SB494, SB530, SB769, SB783, SB963, SB1238, SB1271, SB1786, SB1967, SB2312, SB72, SB616, SB1143, SB1172, SB1267, SB1273, SB1506, SB1759, SB2361, SB1, SB260, SB1637, SJR36, SJR50, SJR63, SJR59, SCR12, SCR39, SCR48, SCR19, SB2023, SB1524, SB2422, SB2119, SB2753, SB1863, SB62, SB666, SB847, SB284, SB854, SB1073, SB810, SB1505, SB583, SB507, SB1434, SB1376, SB1772, SB2016, SB1163, SB1122, SB731, SB397, SB508, SB1436, SB287, SB261, SB1882, SB393, SB1791, SB209, SB2429, SB1999, SB511, SB2309, SB510, SB1085, SB1975, SB2717, SB1262, SB636, SB2056, SB884, SB517, SB1200, SB1845, SB2681, SB2199, SB2458, SB801, SB2533, SB3014, SB3013, SB758, SB1013, SB2797, SB2076, SB2876, SB2284, SB2929, SB2595, SB715, SB1640, SB1241, SB2538, SB1449, SB2529, SB986, SB1181, SB1359, SB2245, SB410, SB1234, SB456, SB1012, SB2926, SB2138, SB2615, SB2972, SB2841, SB3016, SB1856, SB2035, SB1528, SB1373, SB672, SB2891, SB1854, SB317, SB2539, SB2532, SB1250, SB2082, SB2203, SB1285, SB1959, SB1454, SB2520, SB2541, SB1708, SB1237, SB1844, SB1586, SB3039, SB2819, SB66, SB629, SB1015, SB2342, SB2903, SB2933, SB1965, SB2477, SB3029, SB2605, SB2419, SB1957, SB375, SB250, SB777, SB628, SB2523, SB2367, SB2703, SB2608, SB2778, SB3044, SB2965, SB2521, SB865, SB1032, SB2165, SB2501, SB2675, SB2452, SB2835, SB872, SB1212, SB1278, SB1588, SB1602, SB1704, SB1723, SB1833, SB1858, SB1946, SB2009, SB2177, SB2460, SB2785, SB2373, SB1660, SB614, SB867, SB1608, SB1525, SB905, SB640, SB2487, SB1698, SB383, SB705, SB748, SB1113, SB1117, SB1802, SB2340, SB2586, SB2680, SB2690, SB2994, SB2747, SB1950, SB913, SB1071, SB1086, SB1087, SB1483, SB1444, SB1553, SB1556, SB1703, SB2133, SB2297, SB2298, SB2622, SB2955, SB3059, SB2782, SB2781, SB2637, SB2633, SB2337, SB2334, SB1861, SB2043, SB1367, SB946, SB945, SB2857, SB128, SB571, SB1263, SB3058, SB612, SB2221, SB2587, SB2044, SB2363, SB2713, HB1109, HB1392, HB22, HB2525, HB3093, HB517, HB912, HB1130, HB142, HB1689, HB2018, SB2311, SB1986, SB2565, SB2943, SB1888, SB2417, SB3048, SB3052, SB3053, SB3036, SB3057, SB3056, SB3043, SB3037, SB3050, SB3063, SB3047, SB3035, HJR98, HJR99, HB136, HB2884, HB1393, HB2730, HB1399, HB1244, HB467, HB331, HB2559

Keywords: disability, supported decision-making, legal assistance, confidentiality, access to justice, autonomy, civil rights, advocacy, monuments, memorials, public property, historical significance, civil penalties, local governance, SB 393, Sparks, Middleton, local government, political subdivision, public securities

Transcript Highlights:

• I will note that there is a drafting error that on line 11 the prospective repeal should read 2029.
• I will note that there is a drafting error that on line 11 the prospective repeal should read 2029.
• You notice we're seeing an AI-generated commissioner on that screen.
• commissioner on that screen. commissioner on that screen. >> Yeah. >> Yeah.
• this<01:08:23.040> it<01:08:23.359> looks as I read this it looks as I read this it

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Also want to say that October is National Depression and Mental Health Screening Month, and tomorrow
• Depression and Mental Health Screening Depression and Mental Health Screening Month<00:02:06.560
• This is what it says, but don't rely on what you're reading online. Talk to your own physician.
• don't rely on what you're reading don't rely on what you're reading online.<00:35:12.000> Talk
• She encouraged everyone to read Senate Bill 7.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee met with a quorum, approved the prior meeting minutes, and then heard testimony on the use of artificial intelligence in therapy and mental health settings. Representative Lisa Willner and Brenda Rosen of NASW Kentucky argued for “guard rails” on AI chatbots so they cannot present themselves as licensed therapists or replace school counselors, psychologists, or social workers. They said AI can support licensed professionals, but warned that chatbots cannot reliably recognize nonverbal cues, escalate crises, or provide accountable care, and they cited examples of harmful chatbot interactions, including a suicide case and a chatbot telling a user to “Please die.” The witnesses also raised concerns about data privacy, commercialization of sensitive mental health conversations, and the use of personal clinical content to train AI models. They said minors should require parental consent and suggested transparency about how a chatbot is trained and who created it. They distinguished between unvetted consumer chatbots and AI tools that have been scientifically validated or approved as digital therapeutics, noting that some evidence-based tools may be useful for specific conditions such as depression, anxiety, or eating disorders. Committee members asked whether regulation should be handled by the legislature or by professional boards, and whether a multi-state model would be preferable to 50 different state approaches. The witnesses generally favored expert-led standards and said a board or panel of experts could review and approve mental health chatbots, but members cautioned that boards can become too restrictive and that legislation should preserve flexibility and avoid discouraging children from seeking help. The discussion ended with a request for the witnesses to restate their proposed policy ideas, including privacy protections, bans on commercialization, limits on training AI with clinical content, transparency requirements, and informed consent.

Transcript Highlights:

• of adverse childhood experiences are outlined on the front of the information sheet, which you can read
• recognition that trauma and adverse childhood experiences are part and parcel of what we need to screen
• I don't want to beat that horse to death; you all can read that for yourselves.
• So, I'm not going to read this off, but you can see the breakdown along the last three years or so in
• Go do your reading; come on, we all know how to read.

Transcript Highlights:

• I am going to read for you the top of page 20, the second line, where it starts to say, mention that
• we're going to be the ones to cure the problems, but it just needs to be very visible on our radar screen
• We will also provide a definitions page on how to read the document and understand each one of the criteria

Transcript Highlights:

• Thank you for that because after you and I talked yesterday, Representative, I read that and I just wanted
• a little clarification. read that and I just wanted a little clearer understanding.
• I commit to you that I'm going to do a better job of screening some of these bills before they get to

Bills: HB332, HB166, SB336, HB447, HB244

Keywords: computer science, K-12 education, public schools, graduation requirement, digital literacy, coding, programming, STEM, artificial intelligence, AI, computational thinking, technology education, computer literacy, high school credit, middle school, elementary school, teacher training, professional development, distance learning, virtual school

Transcript Highlights:

• The first one you see up on your screen, this is a three-way comparison at a summary level.
• To read through this document, at the statewide total line you would see for the...
• We just wanted to make sure that you know how to read the document.

Summary: The conference committee met on Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5167, the state operating budget, and received a detailed staff briefing on the proposed conference report. Staff explained how to read the comparison documents, the four-year balanced-budget outlook, and the main resource assumptions, including use of the March 2025 revenue forecast, exclusion of the statutory 4.5% growth assumption, revenue legislation totaling about $8.7 billion, numerous fund transfers, and reversion assumptions. They also noted the proposal does not include a temporary salary reduction or furloughs. The briefing highlighted major policy areas and their net five-year impacts, including increases for state and higher education employee compensation, K-12 education, long-term care and developmental disabilities, corrections, information technology, and other policy items. It also described net reductions in behavioral health, children/youth/families, higher education, natural resources, other human services, and health care/public health, with many of the changes tied to delayed programs, rate adjustments, fund shifts, and savings options from Governor Ferguson. The committee then heard member comments, with supporters emphasizing K-12 funding and fiscal responsibility, and Senator Gildon opposing the process and the closed-door nature of the budget development. A motion was made and seconded to recommend adoption of the conference report and pass the bill. The roll call showed one member voting do not recommend, one member excused, and the remaining members recommending adoption. By vote of the committee, the conference report was adopted, and the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• Representative Frentz has a bill, 3769, which is a DOC policy bill related to substance use and TV screening
• Representative Frentz has a bill, 3769, which is a DOC policy bill related to substance use and TV screening
• Representative Frentz has a bill, 3769, which is a DOC policy bill related to substance use and TV screening

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee took up House File 3990, Chair Novotny’s bill, as the vehicle for a public safety policy package. Members were told the DE1 amendment had been posted for public review, so no formal action would be taken at this meeting; the committee planned to act on the bill at the next hearing on March 25. Chair Novotny said questions from Judiciary on the original bill had been addressed or were still being worked on, and he expressed hope the bill would pass out the next day. Non-partisan staff walked through the DE1 amendment, explaining that it combines multiple bills into one package. The included provisions covered BCA fraud investigations and administrative subpoenas, disaster assistance reporting dates, DOC policy on substance use and TV screening, raising the kratom possession/sale age to 21, DOC facility licensing, restitution considerations for early release, BCA data collection and local law enforcement reimbursements, public employer review of applicants with criminal convictions, victim notification and minor-victim privacy protections, second-degree murder language involving out-of-state protection orders, increased penalties for certain coercion offenses tied to non-consensual image dissemination, and reporting when law enforcement deploys chemical irritants. No one signed up to testify, and there were no votes or formal amendments acted on during the meeting. The chair noted that additional amendments were expected at the next hearing, and the meeting adjourned without further action.