Video & Transcript Research : 'fee structure'

Page 11 of 500
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Tax, Business and Transportation Feb 7th, 2026 at 06:52 pm

Senate Tax, Business & Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • NMBD's own agency analysis explicitly describes a per-ton CO2-equivalent fee structure, which would generate
  • 1.1 CO2-equivalent fee structure, which would generate $1.1 billion every year that the agency gets
  • climate change-fueled drought fueled a massive, unstoppable fire that burned almost a thousand structures
  • climate change-fueled drought, fueled a massive, unstoppable fire that burned almost a thousand structures
  • But if you're not going to do it, we need to have a regulatory structure to encourage you, to help you
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Health and Public Affairs Feb 4th, 2026 at 06:25 pm

Senate Health & Public Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • approaches that businesses already understand and are implementing nationwide, the bill adopts a structure
  • Having uniform fees, taxes, and zoning regulations across the board for child care homes and centers
  • Not allowing municipalities to levy new taxes And fees or residential zoning regulation make opening
  • Permitting and rezoning processes, special use requirements, local fees, And local zoning requirements
  • The training and the response to the response to Structure fires, wildland fires, hazardous materials
Bills: SB20, SB53, SB86, SB96, SB129
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Community Affairs Jan 27th, 2026

Community Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • spend time with, without the government micromanaging who they are, what the purpose is, what tax structure
  • But even you admitted that if I'm building the exact same structure today, I have to provide parking
  • Provided that the chickee is 10 feet from the property line and 10 feet from other structures.
  • of the cost of a new home is either through government, or because of government regulation and/or fees
  • Its attorney fee provisions will invite lawsuits against local governments.
Summary: The committee took up a series of land use, housing, local government, and public notice bills, along with a firefighter cancer bill and a bill on temporary door locking devices. SB 984 on firefighter cancer benefits and prevention was explained as clarifying access to death benefits and a one-time cancer payment for firefighters; it was reported favorably. SB 1612 required local governments to accept electronic payments online; it also passed favorably. SB 1180 created a recall framework for elected community development district board members and, through a strike-all amendment, also addressed synthetic turf enforcement and expanded compact urban mixed-use district definitions; the amendment was adopted and the bill was reported favorably. SB 936 allowed temporary door locking devices above the finished floor and directed the Building Commission to add standards to the Florida Building Code; it passed favorably. The committee also considered SB 380 on legal notices, which would let certain local government entities publish notices on their own websites or other designated sites instead of relying on newspapers in more cases. The Florida Press Association, Common Cause, and newspaper representatives opposed the bill, arguing it would fragment public notice access and make notices harder to find and verify, while supporters said it would modernize and reduce costs. The bill’s amendment clarified which agencies were covered, and the committee reported the bill favorably. SB 962 on affordable housing narrowed prior zoning preemption language so working farms and farm operations would not be unintentionally captured by Live Local-style rules; it passed favorably. SB 1444 on state preemption and religious expression, private clubs, and minor home construction drew support from religious freedom advocates and opposition from cities and counties, which warned of vague terms and overbroad preemption; it was reported favorably. The committee then approved SB 218, which would limit the reach of last session’s hurricane recovery land-use preemption to counties actually damaged by hurricanes and restore normal local land-use authority in unaffected counties. SB 1434 on infill redevelopment would streamline zoning and subdivision approvals for environmentally impacted parcels in certain urban counties to encourage housing on contaminated or underused land; counties and local-government groups opposed it as an overbroad preemption and raised concerns about the environmental threshold and density provisions, but the bill was reported favorably. SB 1020 on chickees prohibited local ordinances from blocking chickee construction if setback requirements are met and made unauthorized attempts to circumvent the building code a misdemeanor; it passed favorably. Finally, SB 948 on local government land development regulations and orders, as amended, proposed a statewide starter-home framework with lot-split and zoning changes to increase housing supply; local-government and planning groups warned it would function as a rigid statewide zoning code and could drive overdevelopment, while housing advocates supported it as necessary state action. The committee reported the bill favorably after extensive debate.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Natural Resources May 14th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • The pumpage fees are capped.
  • , the initialization of well fees.
  • As of right now, they're funded solely on connection fees.
  • Uh, were to give them production fee authority.
  • Finally, it got a funding structure that's a one-time well construction fee of $1000 and a one-time water
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources May 14th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • and the initialization of well fees.
  • As of right now, they're funded solely on connection fees.
  • Zwiener, were to give them production fees.
  • Finally, it got a funding structure.
  • That's a one-time well construction fee of $1,000 and a one-time water service connection fee of $1,000
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Committee on Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs May 5th, 2025

Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • While the districts in the region have, in some cases, used arbitrary fee schedules. and overly strict
  • construction requirements to extract fees from developers far beyond their means and actual costs.
  • It prohibits water districts from imposing unreasonable fees.
  • However, the fee limitations will apply.
  • I will say this: the export fee we got in before, and the export fee is...
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 3/3/25

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • He asked about the language on fees or assessments, wondering whether it refers to the overall rate or
  • but<01:41:43.679> the<01:41:43.960> language<01:41:44.960> uh<01:41:45.560> fee
  • <01:41:46.000> or<01:41:46.360> assessments but the language uh fee or assessments
  • but the language uh fee or assessments I'm<01:41:47.119> wondering<01:41:47.599> does<01
  • something or do something what<01:42:28.760> would<01:42:28.920> the<01:42:29.040> fee
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Business and Insurance 2ND REVISED Apr 16th, 2026 at 09:30 am

Business and Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • This is the medical fee schedule. With that, I yield for questions. Do pass from the chair.
  • HB 3041 caps surcharge fees at 4%. With that, I yield for questions.
  • And so, it's talking about processing credit card transactions, talking about the potential fees.
  • If these fees aren't capped, if credit card fees aren't capped at a reasonable rate, everybody else that's
  • The fee schedules are different. The continuing educational requirements are different.
OK
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Alcohol, Tobacco and Controlled Substances REVISED: SB1501 - Added Apr 8th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Alcohol, Tobacco and Controlled Substances

Transcript Highlights:
  • tried for years to get a bond bill passed and so we sent over to the senate a bill that's a $2,000 fee
  • This helps our local distilleries with some of their issues and reduces their licensure fee from $3,125
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • And the fee on this would be $10 for the whole tanker.
  • So the 2%, all that fee there is to cover the inspection fee that goes on that right now ODAF is having
  • to take fees from money from other parts to make up the inspection fees on this and the management on
  • So I mean granted I'm not for fee increases and all that, but I think this makes sense that basically
  • So if someone produces $86 their fee for the year would be $100.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Energy Finance and Policy Committee 3/26/26

Energy Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • And I want to be clear, Xcel Energy does not support any changes that would impact cask fees associated
  • Today the cask fees that we collect from our customers at the two facilities exceed $40 million a year
  • And the proposed change by eliminating the cask fees that were imposed in 2007 would result in about
  • that were imposed in 2007 the cask fees that were imposed in 2007 would<00:13:24.560> result<
  • on casks to be lower or the fees on casks to be lower or eliminated. eliminated. eliminated.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/17/2026 - House Commerce

Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • And the county that imposed the fee would not explain how they had to be.
  • Impact fees, for example, are exempt under the bill because impact fees go through a rough proportionality
  • Those fees are tacked onto the mortgage and continue to make housing unaffordable.
  • We are not talking about structural components of the bill.
  • We are not talking about structural components of the bill.
Summary: The committee heard Senate Bill 1566, which would prohibit municipalities and counties from maliciously delaying licensing, permits, or approvals, authorize the Attorney General to enforce the prohibition, and provide expedited judicial review. The sponsor said the bill is intended to address affordability by preventing intentional government delays in housing and business approvals. County representatives supported the goal but opposed the bill as drafted, arguing the county language differed from the city/town language and could sweep in ordinary processing delays or incomplete applications; the sponsor said a floor amendment would fix the county language. Testimony from supporters described long permit and parcel-number delays and argued the bill would give applicants a remedy against intentional obstruction. The committee recommended the bill do pass by a 7-3 vote, with one present and one absent. The committee then heard Senate Bill 1787, which would require written notice for exactions imposed on development projects, allow individualized determinations, and create an appeal path including judicial review. The sponsor framed it as a takings and affordability measure to stop unrelated or excessive exactions from being imposed on housing projects. Cities and counties opposed the bill, saying existing law already requires nexus and proportionality, already provides an appeal process, and that the bill would create a duplicative Attorney General review and confusion, especially for mixed-use projects. Supporters, including Pacific Legal Foundation, the Home Builders Association, and a homeowner who described a costly infrastructure demand on her property, argued the bill would curb extortionate demands and make the process fairer. The committee passed the bill 7-2 with one present and one absent. Senate Bill 1478, a liquor-regulation cleanup bill, was also heard and received broad support. The measure makes technical changes to liquor statutes, including clarifying interim permits, repealing a federal food-safety preemption provision, and updating definitions such as cider and production terminology. Industry stakeholders said the bill was the product of months of consensus work and mostly technical corrections. It passed unanimously, 10-0. Finally, the committee heard Senate Bill 1431, which would limit municipal control over home design features and prohibit certain required shared amenities that would necessitate HOA maintenance. The sponsor and supporters argued the bill would reduce housing costs by preventing subjective aesthetic mandates and unnecessary HOA-driven requirements, while opponents from cities and neighborhood groups warned it would undermine local control, crime-prevention design standards, neighborhood character, and quality. Home builders and property-rights advocates said the bill would expand consumer choice and reduce costs, while critics argued it could lead to lower-quality housing and remove local recourse. The bill was not reported out in the portion provided, and testimony continued with no final vote shown.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

AEN-WLA, AEN Public Hearings 02-11-2026

Agriculture and Environment

Transcript Highlights:
  • Establishes a land conversion fee fund to, among other things, support the healthy soils program.
  • <00:19:12.240> by payment of an a land conversion fee by payment of an a land conversion fee
  • Establishes the a land conversion fee Establishes the a land conversion fee fund<00:19:22.160>
  • <00:21:45.919> as<00:21:46.159> a<00:21:46.559> disincentive conversion fees
  • as a disincentive conversion fees as a disincentive ideally<00:21:48.320> could<00:21:48.480>
Summary: The committee heard several measures related to agriculture, invasive species control, trees, reef protection, and land use. SP 2489 would require Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity leases to include access, invasive-species control, and termination provisions; DAB and DLNR supported it, as did several outside groups, while the Hawaii Farm Bureau and Hawaii Cattlemen’s Council raised concerns about notice, cooperation with lessees, and placing penalties on leaseholders for preexisting infestations. The chair noted six testifiers in support, one opposed, and three with comments. SP 2310 would appropriate funds to remove overgrown vegetation from the Kohola stream. DAB supported the bill but explained that the work already completed by its contractor stopped at a DOT boundary, and that the affected parcel appears to be a DOT highway segment on ceded lands; the committee discussed whether the appropriation should instead go to DOT. SP 2372, on exceptional and significant trees, received support from DNR and Outdoor Circle, with testimony describing trees as critical infrastructure and suggesting technical amendments to committee membership and the process for recommending trees to county councils. SP 2426, which would authorize DNR to contract with private parties to maintain sunscreen dispensers at state beaches and promote mineral-based sunscreen as reef-protective, drew support from DNR and reef advocates, while another witness questioned the science behind claims about mineral versus chemical sunscreens and urged broader environmental solutions. SP 2334 would impose a land conversion fee on agricultural land converted to other uses, create a fee fund for programs including healthy soils, and require state agricultural lands to use a conservation metric. DAB offered comments, and testimony from climate and farm groups generally supported the conservation goals but questioned references to programs not yet in place and objected to language excluding solar and wind uses, with one witness urging that agri-voltaics remain allowed. SP 2925, concerning coconut trees, would recognize them as food, water, and cultural resources, require signage for landscape palms, set labeling standards, and create a tax credit for naturally managed consumable coconut trees. DAB shifted from opposition to comments, DNR supported, and testimony from cultural and subsistence advocates strongly backed the bill as a response to coconut rhinoceros beetle impacts; committee questions focused on enforcement of signage, inspection resources, and the proposed tax credit.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

CPC Public Hearing - Tue Feb 10, 2026 @ 2:00 PM HST

Consumer Protection & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • And the reason for that is because I don't know necessarily what the structural scheme of the HDIA program
  • And the reason for that is because I don't know necessarily what the structural scheme of the HDIA program
  • And the reason for that is because I don't know necessarily what the structural scheme of the HDIA program
  • Um, let's move on then. >> For that is because I don't know necessarily what the structural scheme of
  • against a landlord that refuses to accept a reusable tenant screening report, plus their attorney's fees
Summary: The committee on Consumer Protection and Commerce met on February 10, 2026, and heard testimony on several bills. HB 1849 relating to licensing drew comments from DCCA’s Professional and Vocational Licensing Division and the Hawaii Real Estate Commission, both of which stood on written testimony. The Hawaii Coalition for Immigrant Rights testified in strong support, emphasizing that some immigrants, including DACA recipients, are already contributing in Hawaii and that the state should help create pathways for them to remain and advance professionally. No vote or final action was taken on HB 1849 during the portion shown. The committee then heard HB 2000, the wheelchair right-to-repair bill. Encart opposed the measure, arguing that repair delays are largely driven by insurance prior authorization and that wheelchair repairs involve FDA-regulated medical devices where improper repairs could create health risks. Peter Fritz testified in support, saying the bill was modeled on similar laws in other states and that he had personal experience through his sister’s use of a wheelchair. Members questioned whether repairs done outside insurer networks might not be reimbursed, and Fritz said that was a concern but that the need for timely repair outweighed it. The committee also discussed HB 1753 on social media, where DCCA’s Office of Consumer Protection supported the bill but suggested an amendment to the definition of personal information. On HB 1511 relating to consumer protection, DCCA’s Insurance Division supported the bill, while the Alliance for Automotive Innovation and the Hawaii Automobile Dealers Association offered comments seeking to preserve legitimate manufacturer and dealer communications about vehicles, warranties, recalls, and related services. The committee also took up HB 276 HD1 and HB 1513 on condominiums. The Hawaii Real Estate Commission offered comments on HB 276 HD1. For HB 1513, the Hawaii Green Infrastructure Authority supported the bill, but DCCA’s Insurance Division opposed it, warning that diverting HHRF funds could weaken reinsurance arrangements and raise premiums for consumers who rely on the fund. Members questioned whether the proposed condo loan program would need HHRF money and whether the amounts in the bill were necessary, and the division said it opposed using HHRF for that purpose. The committee also heard HB 2188 on housing, where OCP supported the measure and the Hawaii Association of Realtors raised concerns about conflicts with the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the use of tenant screening reports, noting that a working group is already addressing landlord-tenant issues. Members asked OCP to research how other states handle similar laws and whether additional language is needed to avoid federal conflict. Finally, on HB 1876 relating to mental health, the Department of Health’s Adult Mental Health Division supported the bill but said it remains opposed to harmful, non-evidence-based treatment modalities; Pride at Work Hawaii also testified in strong support. No final votes or committee decisions were reported in the excerpt.