Wisconsin Senate Bill SB708

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/21/23
• Refer: 11/21/23
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Regulating trampoline parks, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Impact

The legislation will significantly alter existing state laws governing recreational activities in trampoline parks. By requiring licensing and insurance, it aims to standardize safety protocols across the state's trampoline parks, potentially reducing the number of injuries. This new legislative framework means that trampoline parks must adhere to strict guidelines concerning operational safety, ensuring that trained staff are present during hours of operation and that all necessary emergency response measures are in place. The state anticipates that such measures will lead to heightened accountability among trampoline park operators and create a safer environment for participants.

Summary

Senate Bill 708 establishes comprehensive regulations for trampoline parks in the state, aiming to enhance safety and operational standards. It mandates that no trampoline park operator can function without an annual license issued by the Department of Safety and Professional Services (DSPS). The bill highlights specific definitions of trampoline-related terms and outlines requirements for operators, including the necessity for a certificate of insurance with minimum liability coverage. The purpose of these stipulations is to mitigate injuries and ensure the safe operation of trampoline parks, which have seen increasing popularity and incidents of injury over the years. The bill underscores the importance of compliance with precise operational standards and insurance requirements.

Contention

There may be points of contention particularly regarding the liabilities placed on trampoline park operators and the legal implications for participants. The bill allows operators to use compliance with safety regulations as a defense in personal injury claims. This stipulation could raise concerns among consumer rights advocates who might argue that it unduly favors operators by making it difficult for injured participants to seek redress. Overall, the balance between operator duties and participant rights will likely be a focal point in discussions about the bill's implementation.