Wisconsin Senate Bill SB1049

Wisconsin 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/24/26
• Refer: 2/24/26
• Failed: 3/23/26

Caption

An Act to create 101.122 and 101.19 (1g) (ar) of the statutes; Relating to: regulating trampoline parks, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Impact

The bill establishes clear guidelines for trampoline park operations, aiming to enhance safety for participants and encourage compliance within the industry. By requiring operators to maintain substantial liability insurance—specifically $1,000,000 in aggregate and $500,000 per incident—the bill seeks to provide financial accountability in cases of negligence. Furthermore, it mandates that trampoline parks have qualified personnel on-site to handle emergencies, promoting a safer environment for users of all ages, especially children, who are common patrons at these venues.

Overall

The provisions within SB1049 reflect a significant move towards formalizing safety regulations in the trampoline park industry, aiming to safeguard participants while balancing operational freedom for businesses. As trampoline parks proliferate, the legislation may serve as a model for managing liability and safety concerns in similar entertainment and recreational sectors.

Summary

Senate Bill 1049 introduces a regulatory framework for trampoline parks within the state. Under this legislation, trampoline parks are required to obtain an annual license from the Department of Safety and Professional Services (DSPS) before operating. The bill defines essential terms and mandates compliance with specific safety standards, ensuring that parks adhere to industry regulations regarding equipment maintenance, employee training, and operational practices designed to protect participants. Operators must also carry a minimum level of liability insurance to cover potential injuries stemming from the operation of the trampoline park.

Contention

A noteworthy aspect of SB1049 is the establishment of exemptions from the licensing requirements for certain entities, such as incidental playgrounds operated by governmental bodies and non-recreational facilities focused on training. This raises discussions about the coverage of trampoline safety regulations and whether these exemptions could lead to inconsistent standards across different facilities. Proponents of the bill argue that it streamlines regulation and enhances safety, while critics may view these exemptions as loopholes that can diminish the overall impact of safety mandates for recreational jumping facilities.