Phasing out parental choice programs and the Special Needs Scholarship Program, repealing the achievement gap reduction program and the student achievement guarantee program, creating a new student achievement guarantee program, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation. (FE)
Impact
The bill's primary impact is the elimination of three established programs that have provided funding and opportunities for students attending private schools through state-supported scholarships. Starting in the 2024-25 school year, private schools can only continue to participate in these programs if they were already involved in the 2023-24 year, effectively freezing enrollment and participation. Furthermore, the new SAGE program introduces requirements for class size reduction and mandates collaboration with community organizations, which aims to enhance educational achievements for low-income students but places heavier requirements on participating schools.
Summary
Assembly Bill 518 proposes significant changes to existing educational programs in Wisconsin. Specifically, it aims to phase out the parental choice programs and the Special Needs Scholarship Program (SNSP), along with repealing the Achievement Gap Reduction (AGR) program and the old Student Achievement Guarantee in Education (SAGE) program. In place of these programs, the bill establishes a new Student Achievement Guarantee in Education program that is designed to support low-income students focused on improving academic outcomes through increased resources and support.
Conclusion
Ultimately, AB518 represents a significant shift in educational policy in Wisconsin, favoring a centralized approach to educational aid that prioritizes low-income families' needs over broader school choice options. The changes outlined could potentially reshape the landscape of education funding and accessibility in the state, stirring ongoing discussions about educational equity and choice among legislators and constituents.
Contention
Notable points of contention surrounding AB518 include debates over the effectiveness of the previous voucher and scholarship programs versus the necessity of reforming state educational funding. Advocates argue that the shift in focus to a needs-based support system will better serve economically disadvantaged students. Critics, however, raise concerns about the loss of choice for parents regarding educational institutions, suggesting that the bill might limit options for families that have benefitted from the existing programs. The implication is that it could further restrict avenues for students requiring special accommodations or seeking alternatives outside traditional public schooling.
Pupil discrimination and private schools participating in a parental choice program or the Special Needs Scholarship Program, discrimination based on gender identity or gender expression, and providing a penalty.
Pupil discrimination and private schools participating in a parental choice program or the Special Needs Scholarship Program, discrimination based on gender identity or gender expression, and providing a penalty.