Senate Resolution 193 is a commemorative resolution honoring Benn's United Methodist Church in Smithfield, Virginia, on the occasion of its 100th anniversary. The resolution recounts the church’s long history, tracing its roots to Saint Luke’s Church in the 17th century and describing the development of the congregation from early worship gatherings in homes to successive church buildings on land deeded by George Benn in 1813. It also notes the completion of the current Gothic-style church building in 1924 and later expansions in the late 1960s and early 2000s to better serve the congregation and community.
The resolution further highlights the church’s role as a community institution, including its use for meetings by the Smithfield Ruritan Club and its celebration of the centennial in 2024 with the opening of a time capsule. The Senate formally commends the church for its century of service in its current building and directs the Clerk of the Senate to present a copy of the resolution as an expression of admiration for the church’s legacy and service to residents of the Smithfield area.
Impact
SR193 does not change state law, create new legal duties, or appropriate funds. Its effect is purely ceremonial: it places the Senate’s official recognition on the record and authorizes presentation of the resolution to Benn’s United Methodist Church. The only parties directly affected are the church and, symbolically, the Smithfield community it has served.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding the resolution is uniformly positive and celebratory. The Senate’s action reflects appreciation for the church’s longevity, historical significance, and community service, with no indication of opposition or controversy. Because the measure is a commendation resolution rather than substantive legislation, it appears to have been treated as a noncontroversial recognition item.
Contention
There is no notable policy contention in the text or available legislative history. The resolution is honorary in nature, and no committee debate or recorded votes are provided that would suggest disagreement. Any discussion would likely have centered on the church’s history and community contributions rather than on legislative issues.